Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement

Rick's filmBlog

  • Disappointing

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Munich  (2005)

    I really loved the first 1/3 of this movie, but it eventually fails.  The performances are great but I thought it was eventually crushed under the weight of the "seriousness" it was trying to achieve.  It simply goes on for too long, and feels extremely out of its own depth.  The obsession with food (preparing, sharing, eating), violence, and sex just comes off as...sophomore year of film school.
    All that said, I will admit that I loved the (tiny bit cheesy) 70's international locations, the overall historical intrigue, and the "Papa" character. 

  • Somewhat Overrated

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Babel  (2006)

    First of all, Iñárritu's film certainly doesn't lack in scope.  While I do think that altogether a bit it's overrated, I very, very much enjoyed the globe-spanning reach of Babel.  The whole "everything is connected!" theme has been (in my opinion) beat to death, but Babel does manage to pull it off somehow.  This is counterbalanced in my opinion by a continuous frustration that I felt with the characters because of the continuous stupid decisions they made, seemingly only to create more dramatic tension.  But despite these plot driven character decisions , I thought that Babel was still somehow grounded in a reality that you seldom see in film.  There's an attention paid to locations and cultures that's far superior to most Hollywood films.  So in all good but not great, mainly due to my frustrations with plot.


  • A Resurrection

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Casino Royale  (2006)

    So after being called out in comments on my "huh?" post about this film *ahem* : ) I will report that I loved this movie. The trailer had me worried, but that fear clearly misplaced. It's funny how much power a trailer can have in setting expectations. Anyways, I loved the pace of this, the touch of realism that only enhanced its sexy sheen, and Daniel Craig as Bond. He just works on screen, and as much worry and mocking there was before this came out he pulled it off. As somewhat of a connosieur of Bond movies, I was left satisfied. I'm a guy that embraces the kitschy camp of The Spy Who Loved Me while simultaneously reviling the cheesy action camp of Die Another Day. To be sure, Casino Royale certainly has cheese. It's a Bond movie, it's inevitable. But by making Bond just a touch more human, I think they've saved the franchise. If this had been another Die Another Day, I'm not sure I could have gone back for another heaping spoonful. Now hopefully the producers and everyone involved in this take the right lessons to heart and don't return to those days.

  • Overrated

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    There, I said it. After hearing a bunch of buzz about this at Sundance last year we went to check it out at one of the later screenings that they hold open for popular films. I was underwhelmed. I think that part of the issue for me was that it smelled very, very much like a Napoleon Dynamite knock off, poorly done, with more meanness. I won't deny that it has funny moments and characters or that it has some heart to it. When it's all put together though it (still) seems to me too much of a "let's cash in on the 'write a story about losers and laugh at them' genre" film.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<January 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement