rek4 Bloghttp://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/default.aspxen-USSpout RSSGreat movie, but a different experience for guys and galshttp://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/archive/2007/12/5/22550.aspxWed, 05 Dec 2007 06:12:07 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:22550rek40http://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/comments/22550.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/commentrss.aspx?PostID=22550<p>Okay, so I went to see &quot;Knocked Up&quot; with my fiancee Eric when it was in the theaters. I enjoyed it quite a bit, but it was a much different movie for me than it was for Eric.</p><p>First of all, there was a double-date scene where Ben suggested that if he could, he&#39;d go back in time and wear a condom. I giggled a little when he suggested that Doc from Back to the Future could help him, but for the most part, I felt horrible for Allison. Her situation is already humiliating. She has risked her job, changed her life, and sacrificed her body to carry this baby to term.</p><p>The other scene that was a real problem for me was the scene where they get in a fight and Ben tells her that the baby is going to be a girl. He seemed unnecessarily cruel towards her, and I had a hard time sympathizing for his character from then on.</p><p>Don&#39;t get me wrong...I can take a joke, and I know &quot;it&#39;s only a movie.&quot; Still, there were moments in the movie where the men in the audience were laughing and I felt so terrible for Allison and her sister.</p><p>Judd Apatow, if you wrote the script, I think you need a collaborator to help you write strong female characters. I know that Hollywood is a boy&#39;s club, but there are plenty of wonderful female writers out there. </p>Shopgirl: What was with the watch?http://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/archive/2007/9/3/19319.aspxTue, 04 Sep 2007 01:37:29 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:19319rek40http://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/comments/19319.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/commentrss.aspx?PostID=19319<p>I didn&#39;t really like this movie, and no, it&#39;s not because I&#39;m squeamish about old guys like Steve Martin getting naked.&nbsp; The main reason why this movie didn&#39;t work for me was because of the watch scene.</p><p>For those who haven&#39;t&nbsp;seen the movie, there is a scene where Steve Martin takes off Claire Daines&#39;s watch, puts his hand around her wrist, and says something like, &quot;I&#39;ll be your watch.&quot;&nbsp; At the showing, a good number of&nbsp;people actually burst out laughing, including myself.</p><p>Aside from that, I don&#39;t like either one of the men that she&#39;s with.&nbsp; One is a pennyless loser who tries to use a plastic bag as a condom, and the other is a rich perv who can&#39;t find a woman his own age.&nbsp; Even when the loser cleans himself up and puts on a suit, I still don&#39;t think he&#39;s&nbsp;sympathetic enough that I should cheer when he gets the girl.</p><p>I like unusual movies, especially unusual romances, but this movie didn&#39;t do it for me.&nbsp; Sorry to all the actors involved.&nbsp; I know you&#39;re all talented.&nbsp; This movie didn&#39;t show it.</p><p>On a last side note, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Movies/07/30/people.stevemartin.ap/index.html">did anyone else hear about Steve Martin marrying that really young girl?</a>&nbsp; Talk about art imitating life!</p>Meet the Robinsons: Enjoyable new direction, but keep moving forwardhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/archive/2007/9/3/19317.aspxTue, 04 Sep 2007 00:26:00 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:19317rek40http://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/comments/19317.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/rek4/commentrss.aspx?PostID=19317<p>Disney is back.&nbsp; Well, not entirely back.&nbsp; Not yet.&nbsp; They still have a lot of redeeming to do, but if "<a href="http://www.spout.com/films/276761/default.aspx" title="Meet the Robinsons (2007)">Meet the Robinsons</a>" is any indication, they are heading in the right direction.&nbsp; From the opening Mickey-Goofy-Donald cartoon to the final quote by Uncle Walt himself, this is the first Disney movie that I&#39;ve seen in a long time (aside from Pixar&#39;s creations) that actually felt magical.</p><p>Lewis is an orphan/prodigy inventor who is trying to find his mother.&nbsp; The&nbsp;harder that the kindly head of the orphanage tries to find a family for Lewis, the more he looks to math, science, and his memory machine for his salvation and hope for a family.&nbsp; Then, there is time travel, a greasy-haired villain, sausage cannons, people flying in bubbles, and evil bowler hats that want to conquer the world and turn it into a scene from "Terminator."&nbsp; After many adventures and a couple nice little plot twists, everyone gets what they deserve and all live happily ever after.</p><p>The good:</p><p>1. The Mickey-Goofy-Donald cartoon short was perfect.&nbsp; I am a Disney nerd at heart, and it bumped up the nostalgia factor in a good way.</p><p>2. There were so many beautiful moments visually.&nbsp; I really enjoyed the opening shot of the young mother leaving&nbsp;Lewis on the doorstep of the orphanage, complete with rain storm.&nbsp; (On a side note, why are orphans always left at orphanages on dark and stormy nights?)&nbsp; Also, I suspect that the futuristic city was somewhat&nbsp;inspired by Tomorrowland at the Disney theme parks.</p><p>3. Much like "Night at the Museum," Lewis encourages kids to learn, invent, and apply what they learn in school to achieve their goals.&nbsp; What makes&nbsp;"Meet the Robinsons"&nbsp;better than many other recent kids movies is the absence of fart jokes, double entendres, and dated pop culture references.&nbsp; My mom, a teacher, loved this movie and asked why Disney has not made more movies like "MTR."&nbsp; Even though Disney has not had as much success in recent years, I told her that "MTR" gave me reason to hope.</p><p>4. I love it&nbsp;that even&nbsp;when Lewis fails, the family still supports him and cheers him on.&nbsp; With so many parents obsessed with having "winning kids," it&#39;s nice to see a movie where they say that it&#39;s okay to fail, so long as you "keep moving forward."</p><p>The bad:</p><p>1. The script could have used some more work.&nbsp; There were parts that felt a bit frantic and cluttered, particularly the "meet-the-family" montage.&nbsp; I liked the montage, but it could have been better.</p><p>2. Why did they introduce the fire ants girl at the science fair and then not do anything with her?&nbsp; Her moment onscreen was hilarious, and then she disappeared for the rest of the movie!&nbsp; She was a little Goth girl who had an army of fire ants at her disposal, and they did nothing with her character?&nbsp; Shame on you, screenwriters.</p><p>3. On the other side of the coin, there is one character that this movie could have done just fine (and maybe even done better) without.&nbsp; I hated the robot sidekick.&nbsp; He served very little purpose and struck me as obnoxious and wholly unnecessary.&nbsp; I suppose that the screenwriters felt that every time travel/futuristic movie needs a robot and that they needed to fulfill their obligation.&nbsp; C&#39;mon, people!&nbsp; You don&#39;t need to have every futuristic cliche in your movie to be credible.&nbsp; Lose the robot.</p><p>Now, whom would I recommend this movie to?&nbsp; I recommend it for families that are sick of your run-of-the-mill animated movie, Disney nerds, and anyone who considers themselves a kid at heart.&nbsp; With the exception of the reasons above, I fully enjoyed this movie.&nbsp; True, it is not perfect, but I have three words for the makers of this movie and the rest of the people working at post-Eisner Disney: "Keep moving forward."</p>