In keeping with my Criterion binge, I watched the original, full-length version of "Beauty and the Beast," and it’s very different from the Disney reincarnation.
In this 1946 French film, Belle is the youngest of four children of a recently impoverished merchant. Her two older sisters spend all their day pretending they are still rich and try to get into fancy parties while they make Belle slave away at home doing the chores. It was very similar to Cinderella in that regard except there were no benign mice singing her name. Besides the previous notes, the major differences between the original and the Disney version are as follows:
- She has an older brother whose best friend tries to woo Belle.
- Her brother’s gambling debts impoverish the family.
- Her father isn’t an inventor.
- Her father gets lost in the forest on his way back from the port, and the beast only attacks him when he tries to take a rose back for Belle.
- The Beast lets the father return home only if one of his children is willing to be punished in his stead.
- The Beast isn’t ferocious at all to Belle and instead humbles himself before her whenever possible. He’s more of a lapdog than a beast.
- There aren’t any talking dishes, no dancing cutlery, no magical dressers, and no musical numbers.
- The roses are just one of four elements in the Beast’s magical kingdom.
- Spirits turned him into a beast in order to take revenge on his parents who didn’t believe in magic.
- When Belle breaks the spell by looking kindly on the Beast, he turns into a more handsome version of her brother’s best friend.
- Instead of the dark castle turning into a kingdom of light, the Beast / now prince takes Belle in his arms and together they fly away to a magical kingdom.
The gerbil’s verdict: 3 dancing teapots out of 5. I prefer the Disney version.