Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

An inordinate number of peppers

  • Cinnabar is awesome

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Here is where I learned that cinnabar is mercury(II) sulfide (HgS) and has very strange properties when heated. The red powder sort of violently burns away leaving a dollop of mercury. But if heat is continually applied, it turns back to red powder. 

    I have the book that is the companion to this BBC series and was excited to find that the series is available, even on Netflix where I have been slowly making my way through them. I like Bronowski as a thinker. He loves the elegance of certain concepts. His enthusiasm for his subject is quite infectious . He has a decidedly modern viewpoint, not anti-religious, but with a little of the serious scientists pshaw.  

     I seem to recall that some of the filmmakers behind this went on to do Cosmos and some other series. I was quite impressed by the production. Given the time, it's is impressive to think this was done on film at so many locations. The cinematography can feel a little like talented film school artistry, but in general I appreciated the extra touches. The soundtrack is sometimes spectacularly dated, but in a substantive way. 

    I miss this sort of expose of one man's thought. There should be more series like this. I suppose Hawking has had his few. You should see Bronowski showing these amazing computer graphics in a dank little basement, clearly envisioning some great 3D modeling technology that just was too far out of reach with 1974's best mainframe. Still, it must have been spectacularly difficult to pull off.

     


  • it's all about the meta

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    LOL  (2006)

    So, while my computer was busying itself crunching some video in Final Cut, I thought it appropriate to finally get around to watching LOL. I've been putting it off because I was afraid I was going to hate it. I'm sure I'll never see it again, but it came early enough in my Mumblecore experience to warrant my indulgence.

    I think Mumblecore is a pretty awful term for what this is. It totally misses the fact that it's all about the meta. I felt all the more secure having just enjoyed the pleasures of round tripping a photograph into a transparency projected and painted and back into a photograph to be layered in with the original subject. Meta. That's what it's all about.

     Everyone has the technology to create and manipulate an artifact all the way back around into another manipulatable artifact ad infinitum. It's fun. What I see in Four Eyed Monsters and LOL is this propensity to play with technology. Also this desire to manipulate our own reflection. We see ourselves in strange new ways and have grown pretty narcissistic  as a result. 

    Here is an entire film of self absorbed people doing really cool things with technology. That's the story. There is no resolution, there is no development. What there is is a lot of meta. Three or more levels of reality are engaged in most shots. I am seeing you being filmed playing a video of yourself on your cellphone. Neat.

    I'm also seeing a lot of unhappy people unable to really make themselves understood, disconnected in the most immature ways, unable to decide on which layer of reality they want to participate and so, skating along in cynical bemusement while their lives fall apart. 

    I think this is important. I build web sites all day and spend my nights and weekends trying to make as much art as I can with some perhaps misguided sense that I am create value along the way. That's a fact. It's hard to know. The process of creating entertains on so many levels that the artifact hardly seems to matter. What matters is the doing and we are closer than ever to having the doing be the artifact in a very immediate sense.

     I find myself indulging this strange new art of the meta just as freely in other forms. This is certainly the evolution of a YouTube aesthetic. I don't have a problem with that. I am much more concerned with what the mirror reflects.


  • Quixote?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This was another recommendation from my friend Tom. Tom loves this movie. It has a lot going for it, Paul Newman, John Huston, John Milius. I'm afraid though that it felt like a bit of a mess. We were talking about John Milius, who has done such great things with the series Rome. What an intersting career. Scripting Conan the Barbarian, Apocalypse Now, etc. etc. Check out his listing. 

    Judge Roy Bean made me think immediately of Robert Altman's  Buffalo Bill. This is the era of those sort of exploitive westerns. Then it hit me, this is Don Quixote as a western. Ah, sometimes unlocking that sort of reference defuses a film. Lily Langtry is the knight's courtly love. 

    I didn't think this was surreal as the synopsis suggests. That seems like a bit of hand-wringing confusion. It's actually a pretty straight forward inversion of the heroic western hero. Judge Roy Bean is an anti-hero, a tall tale for an audience morally exhausted by spaghetti westerns.

    Still, Victoria Principal is beautiful. Paul Newman is Paul Newman. It's a fun flick. It looks like they had a lot of fun with the bear.

    But then, to think that just the year before Altman had done McCabe and Mrs. Miller which is a superior film in every way. I'm not disparaging this film. I liked it. But it light fare.


 


Advertisement