Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

QFLW Blog

I couldn't believe it.

Under discussion:

Henry V  (1944)

A boring Sir Larry performance?  Or a boring Shakespeare play?  How could either be possible?  Yet it was so.  I couldn't stay interested in either the story or how it was performed and literally nodded off.  So I was quite skeptical about the buzz Kenneth Branagh's version was getting years later.  Thank gods I gave Branagh a chance--thoroughly loved his rendition.  Hearing his St. Crispin's Day speech made me want to jump up and follow Harry into battle.  Though I still say Henry the Fifth's reason for going to war (according to Shakespeare) was rather thin.

:-)

posted on Saturday, May 05, 2007 3:02 AM by QFLW


Was this review helpful?
Yeah Yeah Nope Nope



Comment    Email me new comments.


JimBell
Posted Friday, May 11, 2007 2:23 AM

I think Kenneth Branagh has a genius for making Shakespeare accessible. It is difficult to put your finger on what he does sometimes, but you know it works. I was impressed with his version of Love's Labours Lost where he took a play that is not very good, threw out half of it, created a fun and giddy experience.

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789


Categories
 


Advertisement