Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

QFLW Blog

  • Power Means Not Having to Respond

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Out of Balance  (2007)

    Out of Balance:  ExxonMobil’s Impact on Climate Change 

    Written, directed and narrated by Tom Jackson

    I put off watching this film because I guessed (correctly) that it would outrage and depress me further regarding Big Oil’s sway over the planet.  I was pleased, however, to see that despite the gloomy, alarming cover artwork, the documentary is calm and clear, presenting its information rationally, without stooping very much (as far as I could tell) to the rhetoric or histrionics of propaganda.

    The film’s primary focus is in disclosing ExxonMobil’s steady campaign to confuse the public, keep us from understanding that the current changes in global climate are unnatural and are definitely a solvable problem.  For of course, as the world’s largest corporation and largest oil company, if public and governmental opinion were to go against it, that would cut into its enormous profits.  The corporation is so pervasively powerful and wealthy that it has pretty much gotten away with doing exactly as it pleases, without having to bother about the ecological problem it has contributed to, says Jackson.

    I’m suspect of claims that any one person or entity is all to blame for anything, but Jackson doesn’t make that assertion.  He acknowledges that we are all, to one degree or another, contributors to the current state of affairs.  He chose EM as a focus because it is the largest of the oil companies.  I would have liked to hear about some of the others in the industry, whether they have behaved in a similar manner in order to sustain profits.  Talking about only one of the oil giants could seem to imply that it’s the only “bad guy” instead of merely being Big Oil’s top dog.

    Still, hearing of EM’s refusal to acknowledge responsibility and its ability to avoid significant consequences has re-ignited my indignation.  I remember when the Exxon Valdese spilled its devastating cargo in 1989.  The film touches on how the company did more harm than good while trying to appear that it was cleaning up the spill and asserting that the effects were not as detrimental as claimed.  At the time, I chose to never again buy anything from Exxon, but over the years lazily slid out of such determined protest.  I’ve decided to go back to boycotting EM, and will look into which political candidates have accepted money from them (or any other oil companies, for that matter).  It won’t make a huge difference, of course, but it’s the principle of the thing.

    I’d like to see films like this and An Inconvenient Truth shown in science and economics classes.  Not as gospels or tools of anti-global warming indoctrination but as starting points for raising questions and concerns. 


  • Thumbs up

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Reign Over Me  (2007)

    I disagree with the All Movie Guide:  this film is not a stinker and not a waste of talent or subject.  I’d been a little reluctant to see it because I feared it might lean too far in the direction of World Trade Center and shamelessly go for the emotional jugular.  9/11 is emotionally affecting enough; there’s no need to push or manipulate us into the “correct” emotional response, thank you.  But the reluctance was unfounded.  The film has some flaws but is well-written and appealing.  I was never a fan of Adam Sandler’s comedies; he can certainly be funny but in general his comic films have left me cold.  He’s turned out to be a talented actor, however; in particular I’d point to Spanglish, Punch Drunk Love and now this film in evidence.

    What I liked about the film was its focus—not the tragedy of 9/11 but one man’s groping for a way to deal with his part in that tragedy in his own way and time (without the well-meaning but wrong-headed and intrusive attempts by his in-laws to forcibly direct that healing), and the rekindling of a friendship that is beneficial to both men’s lives.  The one worrisome bit was Binder’s injection of a romantic attachment between Sandler’s character and the woman who had been making sexual overtures to Don Cheadle’s character.  But far from being a vulnerable innocent, Charlie Fineman struck me as being able to take care of himself.  Reign Over Me, taken from the Who’s song “Love Reign O’er Me,” becomes an apt title, as both Charlie and Alan (Don Cheadle) struggle to get out from under imposed controls and become open to loving and trusting those around them again.

    Good cast, good turns from all concerned, especially Cheadle and Sandler.  Well worth seeing.   And anyone who gets the excellence of Quadrophenia and The River will always be OK in my book.  ;-)


  • Trailer better than the film

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    August Rush  (2007)

    Schmaltzy and impossible.  Good performance by Robin Williams, but the three leads (Highmore, Russell and Rhys-Myers) do little more than radiate their looks in wide-eyed, wistful or angst-driven poses.  The dialog is often inarticulate and pointless.  No child could make those sounds on a guitar so immediately and easily.  I did like that the film managed to convey the joy and connecting properties in music, but it was obviously trying to push emotional buttons rather than tell a believable story. 

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345


Categories
 


Advertisement