Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

QFLW Blog

  • Wondrous Oblivion

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Written and directed by Paul Morrison. A story about 11-year-old David Wiseman (Sam Smith), a Jewish boy in South London in 1960 who is mad for cricket but a hopeless player.  He avidly collects cricket player trading cards, has a bat signed by the entire Surrey team and a full set of whites for playing in.  His parents, Ruth and Victor Wiseman (played by Emily Woof and Stanley Townsend) are immigrants from Poland.  At least that’s my guess; I’d originally thought them German, till Ruth teasingly refers to Victor as “you Polack.”  Lilian (Yasmin Paige) is David’s younger sister, a smart-mouthed cello player whom we don’t see or get to know much of.

    The Wisemans, being Jewish, are the target of their neighborhood’s bigotry until the neighbors on their left move out and a Jamaican family, the Samuels, moves in.  Assuming that the Wisemans’ landlord must be Jewish, too, the ringleading bigot, a Mrs. Wilson, buttonholes Mrs. Wiseman, importuning her to complain to the landlord and try to get the Samuels evicted.

    On top of being “darkies,” the Samuels excite much gossip and headshaking by digging up the roses and erecting a cricket net in their back garden.  David is at once entranced, ignoring his parents’ instructions to be polite but not to mix with the Samuels family.  After watching Dennis Samuels (Delroy Lindo) and his daughter Judy (Leonie Elliott) bowl and bat to each other, he more or less invites himself over to join them, all the more pitifully by turning up in full kit.  Dennis and Judy soon realize he’s not the player he wants to be, but Dennis kindly takes him in hand and gives him some real coaching.  Over time David gains enough skill to be allowed to play for his school’s team, instead of being relegated to keeping score, and he and Judy become good friends.

    So caught up in his cricketing, David is rather oblivious to what else is happening around him.  The rest of the neighborhood is incensed that the Wisemans allow David to be so friendly with the Samuels.  Ruth Wiseman, often neglected by her good but work-distracted husband, attempts to turn to Dennis for physical and romantic attention (he wisely declines).  The Wilsons and/or their grandson harass both the Wisemans and the Samuels, leaving them threatening notes, making menacing gestures.  Victor Wiseman keeps the threatening notes to himself and decides to move the family out of the neighborhood.  Then David himself falls prey to peer pressure and snobbery.  He’s given a birthday party to which all his schoolfellows are invited, but when Judy comes to wish him happy birthday as well, he turns her away, afraid of ruining his new-found acceptance among the other boys.

    The tensions and ill feelings come to a head when the Wilsons’ grandson sets fire to the Samuels’ house and cricket netting.  When even the police refuse to believe that the fire wasn’t just some careless accident on the Samuels’ part, Victor speaks up.  It’s a short speech (“You should be ashamed.  We all should be ashamed.  Ask those two about their grandson.”) but it seems to shame the neighbors into being more accepting.

    There are many films about having to grow up and face tough issues like prejudice; this one feels as though it’s merely skimming the surface of things that could be said.  Technically speaking, the sound is uneven—the dialog is so low it’s hard to follow much of the time, while the film’s music blares too loudly.  Sam Smith is wonderfully oblivious but not a lot else.  Leonie Elliott and Yasmin Paige are more natural.  Stanley Townsend is likeable as the well-intentioned breadwinner and Emily Woof as a wife and mother torn by wanting to protect her family yet be accepting of fellow immigrants and seek greater fulfillment for herself.  Delroy Lindo always has an arresting presence.  Over all, I enjoyed this movie and its cast well enough, but it seemed clumsy and ineffectual a lot of the time, just touching on the points it intended to make.  I could see it trying to manipulate how I ought to be reacting.


  • Unforgettable in a hurry

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    13 Tzameti  (2005)

    13 Tzameti.  The cover described it as “a gruesome existential thriller.”  That made me decide to watch it first of the three in my packet—get it over with.  Gruesome’s not my thing.  But this film may prove to be my favorite of the three.

    Written and directed by Georgian-Frenchman Gela Babluani (that’s European Georgia, not the American state), starring his brother Georges Babluani as Sebastien, the young laborer trying to make money for his immigrant family, this stark, minimalist film hooks you almost right away, building curiosity and ominous suspense.  Sebastien is doing roof repair for Monsieur Godon, a drug addict undoubtedly into criminal activity of some mysterious kind.  He overhears talk of some job that’s possibly going to earn Godon a lot of money; Godon is waiting on an envelope with instructions.  The police are watching Godon’s house, also waiting for this mysterious envelope to appear.  Not long after it does, Godon dies of an overdose.  Circumstances literally waft the envelope into Sebastien’s hands.  After Madame Godon says she’s not interested in having him finish the work on the house and can’t pay him for the work he’s already done, Sebastien decides to take Godon’s place and see what this potentially lucrative job might be.

    The police realize Sebastien has taken the envelope and tail him.  At first I wasn’t sure they were the police.  The situation is gradually revealed as Sebastien gets closer to his unknown destination.  The envelope contained only a train ticket to Paris and a paid hotel reservation.  At the hotel, he gets a phone call giving him further instructions regarding a locker in a train station and is told to get off one stop before the final destination.  He unwittingly eludes the police trap waiting for him by doing so, but the cop trailing him takes the license number of the cab he gets into. The cab leaves him at a crossroads traffic island.  He isn’t waiting long before another car arrives, driven by a man who holds up a card with the number 13 on it, matching the card in the packet Sebastien got from the locker.  He’s driven to a deserted farm where two other men are waiting for him.  He’s searched, made to strip, and one of the men breaks the heels off his shoes, apparently thinking he might have some weapon or bug hidden in them.  All of this, of course, serves only to ratchet up Sebastien’s alarm and apprehension.  But they don’t hurt him, and he’s allowed to re-dress, then is driven off to a large isolated house surrounded by woods.

    There’s a crowd of men there.  Sebastien is led to a room and told to sit down.  Two new men enter the room, and one of them instantly realizes Sebastien isn’t Monsieur Godon.  You can feel Sebastien’s breathless tension, wondering what they’ll do.  When they allow him to speak, he explains that Godon had died of an overdose and he’s come to take Godon’s place.  The two men confer in a corner, hissing that the police may have planted Sebastien and perhaps they should disappear.  But the first speaker says no, he’d rather be arrested than have the group think he ratted on them.  Sebastien, clearly having more than second thoughts, says that if he doesn’t suit them, he’ll just leave, but the first speaker snorts and says there’s no way he’s leaving now; he has to stay and play, even though he has no idea what the game is.

    At this point they’re called downstairs to assemble for the game.  Sebastien is put in a t-shirt with the number 13 marked on it in black tape (“tzameti” is the Georgian word for 13).  Guns are handed to all thirteen players with one bullet apiece.  And so it dawns:  this is a version of Russian roulette, in which the players draw their guns on each other rather than themselves.  The spectators are there to bet on who will survive.  I was hardly less aghast than Sebastien.  But utterly drawn in.  Even though I knew, had suspected all along, that this could not end well even if Sebastien survived the game, I had to see how it all unfolded.

    Sebastien does survive the game, shaken, horrified at himself as much as anything else, yet a small, brief smile of triumph flashes across his face momentarily.  The relief doesn’t last long; he knows he probably isn’t going to make it home alive.  I was convinced the men organizing the game would not allow him to live, since he now knew too much.  He escapes them and is clever enough to post his winnings to his brother the next morning before taking the train back home.  He has, however, the misfortune to take the same train as the brother of the player he killed in the final duel.

    Thankfully, the film is in black and white and Babluani doesn’t rub your face in graphic violence.  Young George, with his large dark eyes, gives a natural and entirely believable performance as Sebastien, showing us his escalating emotions without saying much or over-doing the body language, making you care about him even though he’s done this very foolhardy thing to himself.  He can’t bring himself to fire his gun at first but, to save himself being automatically killed for refusing to play, with trembling arm finally pulls the trigger.  On an empty chamber.  It’s both wrenching and hair-raising.

    Even the despicable characters were interesting, making me wonder what sort of mind takes enjoyment out of this sort of murdering degradation of fellow human beings.  The referee was constantly agitated and angry, shouting at everyone, but when Sebastien is left standing, he calls out “Bravo, number 13, bravo!”  The very obese player’s sponsors treated him with kindness, unexpected among such otherwise heartless men.  Sebastien’s sponsors ask him if he’s “pleased.” 

    Good performances all around.  Sorting out which actors played which characters is a difficulty, however, since in the dialog very few of them give or are addressed by their names.  In fact, Sebastien himself is never named; I learned his character’s name from reading the DVD jacket, and I’m only assuming that the person he mailed his winnings to was his brother.  Well, it only matters in trying to talk about the movie.  Names are irrelevant in the viewing.

     

     

  • Cadfael TV series

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ellis Peters' Brother Cadfael novels are a treat.  She had the ability to make you feel as if you were there, seeing what it was like in 12th-century Shrewsbury, and Cadfael himself is one of my favorite fictional characters - ex-Crusader turned monk; shrewd; wise; large-hearted; interested in everyone, saint and sinner alike.  The series was uneven, however.  Some episodes were well done; some were hard to sit through, despite the excellent presence of Derek Jacobi.  Perhaps in part because it's a little difficult to pull off medieval dialog naturally, without sounding stilted or silly.


  • Inch'Allah Dimanche

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The subtitles wouldn’t show up in the DVD player but I watched the film anyway.  An interesting experiment in seeing how much I could follow with the dialog in effect removed.  Put the case away so as not to read more of the notes.  What I knew going in was that this was written and directed by a French/Algerian woman (Yamina Benguigui) and had to do with an Algerian woman joining her husband in France after he’d been working there on his own for awhile.  It was frustrating sometimes because I knew I was missing important details that would make what was happening clearer, but the performances of Fejria Deliba and her supporting cast were so clearly communicative that it wasn’t hard to understand the basic story at all.  A painful situation for Zouina, more or less dragged by a hateful, carping mother-in-law away from her mother, sisters and friends to live in a foreign country with a husband she no longer truly knows.  In France she has no allies or friends, being at the mercy of the tyrannical harpy with no support from her distrustful husband and has to contend with white neighbors who are suspicious and unaccepting of Algerian cultural differences.  The divorcee on the other side of their house takes an interest in Zouina and wants to be her friend, but her overtures get Zouina in still more trouble with the harpy and the husband.  In desperation, she and the children take to sneaking out whenever the husband and mother-in-law are gone from the house for a few hours (later I learned this took place on Sundays, which accounted for the title, which roughly translates to "thank Allah for Sunday").  On their first outing I thought Zouina was running away with the children, but it became evident that she was looking either for a relative or other Algerian woman she had heard lived nearby, someone she could safely cultivate a relationship with.  But her last hope seems to be dashed when she finally finds the woman, who is reluctantly, suspiciously welcoming.  After a short while she throws Zouina and her children out of the house, shouting some sort of imprecation.  My guess was that Zouina had said something about leaving home without her husband’s permission, incurring conservative disapproval instead of sympathy.  Heartbroken by this rejection, Zouina bangs on the door, obviously begging to be accepted/welcomed, and smashes her fist through a window while the children try to pull her away.  Instead of getting back in the taxi to go home, she takes the children on the bus.  The very bus driven by a young man who’s been watching for her whenever he goes by her house.  He makes all the other passengers get off, then takes Zouina and the children home.

    I ended up watching the film again on my computer.  Magically, the subtitles appeared.  Even with the dialog made clear, the film’s closing scene, though pleasing, was puzzling.  I thought for sure Zouina would be heading home into her worst beating ever, especially when brought home by another man.  Everyone is waiting on the front step, mother-in-law in full spate.  But hubby rounds on his mother for the first time ever, tells her to shut up, then faces Zouina with something like concern in his face.  Was he newly cognizant of her spirit and suddenly afraid she might leave him?  Whatever the reason for the awakening respect in his stance, it was apparent that things were going to be different, in a good way, from then on.  Perhaps not perfect, but hopeful.

    The film does well in bringing to life the variegated, intertwined conflicts going on in Zouina’s life:  trying to fit into a new culture, having her support system stripped away, dealing with neighbors both hostile and friendly who don’t understand the world she comes from, the struggle between traditional ways and the emerging feminist movement (the story is set in the early Seventies). 


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<August 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement