Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Puhnner Blog

  • slip-up in the space time continuum

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The entire might of the US Navy in the form of the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz along with some stalwart Hollywood actors picked up mistakenly as they boarded the docked and roped off Queen Mary, squeeze through the unfortunately forward and backward swinging time travel hole just in time to do nothing about the those wrascally Japanese and their ( not so sneaky, so we know now ) sneak attack on  Pearl Harbor. Kirk Douglas leads with his chin, along with others in their own way, in a slew of sadly, unforgettable performances. Walking the plank was not obligatory, but volunteered for. Forewarned is forearmed! See this and weep! If Hollywood could not prevent Pearl Harbor, how in the sam hell could we???

    Anyone remember the Twilight Zone episode where a Sherman Tank and crew leapfrogged back in time just in time to have their names placed on plaques as deceased in the Battle of the Little Bighorn??? They failed too. Greasy Neville Brand could not pry his leather tanker's hat off in time to do anything to stop more arrows than the amount shot at Mifune in the Throne of Blood.

    oops, so Sorry! the episode is 'The 7th is made up of Phantoms' and sorry again, NO Neville Brand, but Warren Oates is there and he is clean and ready to be made into a pin cushion. Neville crossed swords with his gardener  'Sulu' way before Sulu's unrequited love affair with Shatner and got hacked for his efforts.


  • walk with knees backwards

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Arrival  (1996)

    This one is great, especially 'SPOILER' when the alien walks away with its knees bending in the opposite direction as ours; give yourself a treat and see it for that and to watch all the believers dispatched quickly by those witty, wily, alien interlopers. I am very glad they chose not to stay, except in Ron Silver!

  • fact or fiction, who is to say?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Fallen Angels  (1995)

    The NetFlix jacket description of Fallen Angels:

    'A disillusioned Hong Kong killer (Leon Lai ) embarks on what he hopes to be his last hit...all the while realizing that to truly get out of the game, he must overcome his romantic obsession with his rarely seen partner (Michele Reis). In a seemingly unrelated subplot, a mute ( Takeshi Kaneshiro ) tries to get the world's attention in his own unconventional way.'

     

    Sure, if you chose to interpret it that way, some of the synopsis mentioned above did seem to happen, but I suppose that if this jacket description tells the story of this film, then I could easily describe Mozart’s Don Giovanni as some songs and incidental music arranged to tell how and why a libertine ‘gets his’ in the end. There are always broader and deeper issues present.

     

    I admit that I am not sure after watching it, if I can tell the story of the film any better than the jacket does ( I did not find him ‘disillusioned’, as much as tired, nor did I find the mute’s actions the equivalent of vying for the world’s attention either ).  The narrative does indeed follow a ‘contract killer’, Ming ( Leon Lai ), whose hits are set up by his ‘partner’, Michele Reis, and Ming’s decision to end the business partnership and her reaction to that decision. They do seem to be obsessed with each other, however it felt more erotic, than romantic to me. Along with this narrative, there is a rather sweet story of He Zhiwu’s (Takeshi Kaneshiro ) devotion and love for his father and He’s illicit operation of various other person’s shops after hours ( due to his own lack of capital ) and literally pummeling customers into partaking of his wares.

     

    But it sure felt like loss and transience. Each of the 3 principal characters moves through life, the expiration dates reached, their situations change,  and through the change,  loss occurs; a loss of a life,  loss of a partnership,  loss of a first love, and loss of a father;  oh, and along the way, plenty of other bit players lose a life along with plenty of blood to boot.

     

     

    I thought of one translation of the Tao, ‘No. 23 To Speak Rarely is Natural’:

     

    To speak rarely is natural.

    That is why a gusty wind doesn’t last the morning,

    a downpour of rain doesn’t last all day.

    Who does this? Heaven and Earth.

    If even Heaven and Earth cannot go on for ever,

    how much less can human beings!

    Therefore those who follow the Way assimilate to the Way;

    the virtuous assimilate to virtue,

    those who have lost assimilate to loss.

    Those who assimilate to the Way are happy to gain it,

    those who assimilate to virtue too are happy to gain it,

    and those who assimilate to loss are also happy to gain it.

    When trust is insufficient, there is distrust.

     

    Part of the commentary on ‘those who assimilate to loss are also happy to gain it’ reads;

    The inner meaning of loss here is reduction of selfishness, pride, egoism, greed, and possessiveness;

    assimilation to loss can refer to a purely internal process or to the process of using the external loss,

    when it happens, as a means of approaching loss in the inner liberative sense.

     

     

    I liked that last portion; approaching loss in the inner liberative sense. It seemed to fit my understanding of the film. Each character reached some liberation by the loss, as painful as that loss was. Was it the grand ‘assimilation’ of the Tao? Probably not, but it’s not for me to say.

     

     

    There are beautiful bits of dialogue (most said in ‘voice over’ ) that I enjoyed, along with shots in scenes which to me conveyed the transience and loss. Some of the dialogue:

     

    Every person has their own past, even if you are a killer.

     

    Going through a person’s trash you can learn a lot about a person.

    Find out too much and you lose interest.

     

    Just when I needed a raincoat, he returned to my side. It would be so great if it rained for ever.

     

    You might forget my face, but not my bite.

     

    I know that fragrance very well.

    I wasn’t used to smelling it on another woman.

     

    I never liked this fragrance very much, but this afternoon, I smelled it on another woman.

     

    I have gotten used to life without a partner.

     

     

    Some of the shots from the scenes:

    Jet airliners glide, just feet it seems, above buildings in the night; clouds moving across the same night sky

     

    A subway train runs past the apartment the killer uses to wait in, his partner’s nose pressed to the subway window hoping for a glimpse as she speeds by.

     

    An empty chair spotlighted, TV on, playing the video of his father, the deaf son’s remembrance of his father before he leaves.

     

    That beautiful piece of music No. 1818 from the Wurlitzer the killer uses to tell his partner he plans to quit.

     

     

    I liked this film very much, enough to recommend it and to say ‘see it’ to anyone who would, but I don’t think that I described it. If you go on to see it,  and saw it only for the scene with the mute massaging the pig carcass and watching Charlie rant about Blondie and her and He’s search for the nowhere to be found Blonde and received as much joy from these portions,  that I did, that should suffice for some of the reasons to. You will undoubtedly have your own.


  • no daisey dukes

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Daisies  (1967)

    2 irrepressibly cute young Maries, one orange and the other brunette,  fed up with sunning themselves on the Czech boardwalks, decide after some deliberation, to 'go bad'. And do they! With Medium short skirts, heavy dark eye make-up, and sensible pumps, they procede to 'tear it up'! Eating copious amounts, smoking, and fooling gullible old coots ( Men, don't profess your love, you will only be added to their list of names scrawled on every single surface of their apartment ). Dancing drunkenly at a nightclub, they get the bum's rush, but not before they gulp down fellow patrons' goblets of wine.  Happening upon a left alone banquet, the spread is deciminated. A food fight ensues, dancing on the food, shots of stilettoes pinioning perfectly palettable party food!  Miraculously, they both clean up completely for their ride on the crystal chandelier only to yank it from the ceiling and to fall into the water and be plucked and then dunked by some sluggards manning oars,  but no rescue is in sight.

    and for all this,  'Daisies shot in 1967 was banned and director Vera Chytilová was forbidden to work until 1975'; so much for rewards of having a little fun.

    This film is an absolute gas! See it!

     


  • Norman Bates as Walter Mitty

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Psycho  (1960)

    Beethoven originally planned to title his Third Symphony, 'Sinfonia grande, intitolata Bonaparte; a grand symphony dedicated to Bonaparte'. As the CD notes to Beethoven. 9 Symphonies. Karajan state: 'So ran the Eroica Symphony's original dedication before news reached Vienna in May 1804, that the great upholder of Republican ideals had declared himself 'Emperor'. Beethoven flew into a rage, tore out the original inscription and substituted the words "composed to celebrate the memory of a great man". It was a bitter memory. Years later, when news of Napolean's death reached Beethoven, his response was more temperate, but no less terse: " I have already composed music for that catastrophe".'

    Well, I bring all this up because first, The Eroica happens to be one of my favorite pieces of music and not that I can understand it from any other sense than the feelings of pure joy from listening to it, but second, in watching Psycho some time ago, in one of the scenes set in the Bates home, there the Eroica sat, right on top of the phonograph. I have yet to arrive at the meaning of why this piece of music, on that phonograph, in that scene, in that film. Knowing full well that it is not for nothing that Hitchcock would do anything.

    I spun off a couple times with some different speculations, but now favor some sort of amalgam of the Nietzsche Ubermann or Walter Mitty. Perhaps it is Norm and his mama sitting around listening to the piece, with her near, but not so near to the fireplace ( desiccated bodies like hers are probably prone to bursting into flames if too near ), not having a chat, for how could you with the Eroica playing? But more likely, Norm sitting there imagining greatness with all its benefits, maybe one is an unpunctured Marion Crane instead of sitting with mama and an introduction of Dectective Milton Arbogast ( Balsam ) to either mama or the sharp end of the scissors.

    In any case does anyone have any thoughts on why the Eroica?


  • child is father to the man

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Gerard Manley Hopkins
    ‘THE CHILD is father to the man.’
    How can he be? The words are wild.
    Suck any sense from that who can:
    ‘The child is father to the man.’
    No; what the poet did write ran,         5
    ‘The man is father to the child.’
    ‘The child is father to the man!’
    How can he be? The words are wild.

    But then, I would hardly call Julien Donkey-Boy 'wild'.

    I realize, and it is most probably unfortunate for me and my psychic and emotional development, that I don't mind horror movies at all ( well except for 'slasher' movies where the chief victim is almost always a woman, I loathe these ). I think of this film as nothing short of horror. I cannot bear films where children are mistreated. I am sickened.

    In this film ( can I make this statement???),  'everyone is crazy as a loon' ( in fact, I think the dog is too ). The director, Harmony Korinem, in one of the accompanying features, states emphatically that he wanted to make a film showing what living with or what a schizophrenic is really like (interesting, slides of brain tissue from schizophrenics, show huge holes in the tissue, unlike 'normal' brain tissue which appears consistent and without holes). His desire is, of course,  fine by me and laudable.  The abuse was horrible to watch.  I just could not stand seeing Herzog's father character ( equally sick in the heart himself ) bully and abuse the children (ok, adolescents ) and wondered who Herzog's child to the man was. If you have read the Vachss, Burke novels or even Red Dragon, an inevitable progression from child abuse to the creation of the abused into a 'monster' seems to take place; the abused becomes the next in line abuser.  Herzog's father character was one and the damage done him was all too apparent.

    All that said, I liked the film, not so much for the story or subject matter or narrative, but for the grainy, jiggly, gauzy, character POV visual experience which I found oddly beautiful. I appreciated the visual structure. Perhaps, compartmentalizing is a good to be able to do or not.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<November 2006>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293012
3456789


Categories
 


Advertisement