Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

Reel Thoughts

  • Even Fluffier Than the First

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ocean's Twelve  (2004)

    In record time, I watched Ocean's Twelve, having just watched Ocean's Eleven last week.  It's not as tight as the original, and the many tributaries off the main plot flow are a bit confusing, but otherwise, this was just as much of a joy to watch as the first one.  The slight difference this time around is that the cast was definitely more comfortable with each other, so the sense of humor behind this movie was funnier and easier to laugh at.  You can tell they still had fun, though perhaps not as much.  This could have been more for the paycheck like so many other sequels.

    And, of course, the boys go international.  Fabulous places abroad, and a few heists along the way to pay back Terry Benedict (Andy Garcia), after having robbed of millions of dollars the first time around.  Only this time, it's about Rusty's (Brad Pitt) girl Isabel (Catherine Zeta-Jones) but for the fact that she's a Europol detective, and about a turf war and the egos of thieves.  Just who was that dashing French guy?

    Again, this is pure entertainment for the sake of it.  Nothing too fancy.  The script was less smart this time around, but these big celebrities have a wonderful rapport.  And George and Brad and Matt are so easy to look at.  And wicked cameos from Bruce Willis, Albert Finney, and a repeat from Topher Grace.  The best part of the movie was the in-joke that Tess (Julia Roberts) looked like, well, Julia Roberts.  It might've been a gimmick, but it caught me hook, line, and sinker.

    Yep, it's all about fluffy.  And this one was cotton candy compared to the marshmallow that was the first movie.

    I'll give this one an 8 out of 10 - minor flaws as stated but otherwise good stuff.  This movie passes the test.  I'll buy it when I buy the other one.

    If they're making a Thirteen, I hope it's not crap.  I can see this franchise rapidly declining, especially if the core cast doesn't come back.


  • Yeah, It's Funny...But I Still LIke Spaceballs Better

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Listen, schmucks.  People I know raved about History of the World, and so I had to see it, since I'd never seen it before.  Yeah, I know, I'm living under a rock-occasionally.  Let it be said that I do like Mel Brooks; I think he's wonderfully funny, even though he kind of rips off Monty Python a lot.  That being said, of the flicks I've seen of his (Young Frankensten, Spaceballs, Men In Tights, and I think Blazing Saddles...and this one), Spaceballs is still currently my favorite.  Don't get me wrong, I laughed at this one.  Mostly during the Roman Empire chapter.  It's just didn't strike me as funny as people made it out to be. 

    Still, it was pretty funny.  The funniest character: Empress Nympho played by the eternal Madeleine Kahn.  Her appearances in the early Brooks' films are always the best.  She made me giggle for sure.

    I'm not sure which were my favorite scenes.  I will have to see it again.

    If you like Mel Brooks and/or zany madcap humor, this is a good one.  I think I might like it better on repeat viewing.

    Still, nothing beats the "I'm Surrounded By Assholes" scene in Spaceballs.  I still laugh at it.  That, and Spaceballs: the Toilet Paper.

    My rating for History: 8 out of 10 (minor flaws but still pretty good).  Some parts dragged a bit, particularly the French Revolution, even if it is good to be king.  P.S. I do think this movie is funnier than Young Frankenstein.

    The test: will she be buying it?  I'm considering the Mel Brooks boxed set, so if I get that, this one will be in it.  I can't say definitely yes or no, though.

    I own Spaceballs, though.


  • Puzzling But Satisfying

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Lake House  (2006)

    See the Fantasy group for the most details.  Considering the thought I'm putting into it, I sure am glad there is a happy ending to this movie.  But I'm still confused.  Why does this magic thing even start working?  I feel like major plot points were neglected and left too much to the viewers' interpretation.  The film is based on a book; I wonder if the book explained everything?

    The rating:  I'm giving it a 7 out of 10.  The overall work of the film is shaky (it's confusing, it's disjointed, it's vague, it leaves too much to the imagination) but I felt entertained/warm-hearted about the movie.  It's better than a 6 (cute) because of the satisfying ending and the fact that the film was not cheesy, but I can't quite give it an 8 because I'm still trying to understand the story; I couldn't suspend my disbelief long enough to forget that in no way was this romance explained or this magical mailbox explained.  It's kind of creepy, too, if you think about it, getting random letters from someone in the past.  I blame this lacking ability on the screenwriter though.  I really believe the book wasn't adapted well.

    The test: will she be buying it?  The answer:  I would say the jury's out.  I think I definitely need to watch it again before I make any hard and fast decisions.  Sandra and Keanu have chemistry, and the sentiment is a beautiful one, but I just can't bring myself to accept the scenario that the film tries to sell.  Who knows?  Maybe I'll catch something I missed the first time around on a repeat viewing and think that the film is the greatest...  Without another viewing first, though, I probably won't buy it.


  • Smart But Fluffy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ocean's Eleven  (2001)

    I don't know what happened or how it happened.  I didn't even realize that Ocean's Eleven was 5 years old, and yet it is.  Somehow, I managed to not see it.  Like Amelie and some of the other films I've blogged about, when this odd situation happens, when I happen to miss out on a movie that was seemingly quite popular at its time of release, the question becomes: was it worth the wait?  Well, I can give you eleven good reasons why I'm saying "yes" this time around.

    I really enjoyed this movie.  I mean, what's not to love?  There are lots of gorgeous men (well, maybe a few but more than the average picture).  There is a whip-smart script.  And lots and lots of mindless and yet oddly intriguing fluffy entertainment.  I mean, the plot is hugely simple.  Man loves woman.  Woman scorns man.  Man is a thief.  Woman becomes involved with rich casino mogul.  Thief plots the greatest heist of his career and a bit of lover's quarrel type revenge.  Thief gets huge all-star crew and some random cameo guest shots - ok, weird that Rusty (Brad Pitt) is teaching poker to Eric Foreman, Piper Halliwell, and some other WB poster children playing themsevles - to help him with the impossible heist all while proving that he is still devoted to woman.  Mogul loves money.  Woman realizes her mistake.  The rest of the picture is the high-tech heist.  They're stealing $160 million, but the heist probably cost a million to pull off.  Caper pictures always boggle my mind.  Is any of that true?  Do people pull off heists like that in real life?

    I really find it hard to find flaws with this movie because this is one of those films that is meant to be pure entertainment and does not pretend to be more than what it is.  The stars know it's all fun and games.  There's no major philosophy or message being peddled here.  This is all about enjoying some very famous people in a lighthearted yet tightly filmed movie.  And Steven Soderbergh - what an accomplished director!  I didn't like Solaris much, but everything else he has done has been awesome.  And this is no exception.  He's got an amazing eye for story and for transition - I didn't feel the time passing on this picture at all.  I wonder, how close is this movie to the original?

    In fact, with all of this praise, I've talked myself into rating this movie a 9 of 10 (not perfect but close/pure entertainment).  Does it pass the test?  I think it does!  I think I want to own this movie, perhaps for no other reason that it has deepened my recent but quickly maturing crush on George Clooney.  Gosh that man gets finer with age.  More importantly, I find myself wondering what the sequels are about and thinking I may want to watch them - just as long as there's not eleven of those.


  • Do People Really Do This?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Wedding Crashers  (2005)

    Another movie borrowed from my co-worker...and I was expecting hilarity in spades.  Man, was I disappointed!  I barely laughed at this movie.  It never struck me as laugh-out-loud funny.  I chuckled a few times, mostly at Vince Vaughn's character (Jeremy) and the absurd situations he found himself in with the dysfunctional political family, but otherwise, I was bored.  I kept wondering, would anyone really crash a wedding?  And Owen Wilson was not funny to me.  And I find it really unlikely that even while her boyfriend (it's Will from Alias!) was truly a "Sack," the Rachel McAdams character would then fall for the utterly dishonest Owen Wilson character (John).  And even the cameo by one of my favorites, Will Ferrell, left me a bit on the disappointed side because he barely let loose.  The funniest character in this movie was the psycho sister that Vince Vaughn mistakenly beds as one of his wedding crash conquests but then ends up falling for in the end.

    I don't usually watch the lowbrow comedies, though I do like some if they are done well.  The Kevin Smith movies have that edge but are kind of genius they way they are put together.  I gave this one a chance because so many people seemed to think it was riotously funny, even to the point of voting it the Best Movie during the MTV Movie Awards.  Personally, I wanted Batman Begins to win.

    My rating: 5 out of 10 (mediocre on every level).  The test: will she be buying it?  The answer: hell to the no.  If I want to laugh at Vince Vaughn, I'll watch Dodgeball again, which was way funnier, to my surprise.  This one crashed and burned for me.


  • I'm Not Sure I Wanted This

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    What Women Want  (2000)

    It's taken me a while to watch What Women Want; I wanted to see it a long time ago but never got the chance.  I thought the concept was a novel one at the time - a sort of fantasy movie about what would happen if a man finally got the chance to understand women by hearing their thoughts.  It seemed like a feel-good comedy at the time.

    I don't know why the distractions put me off of it so long, but I'm not sure it was worth the wait.  I borrowed this one from my co-worker, and I watched it.  It was cute; that's it.  First off, I don't know how many times one man can survive electrocution, but Mel did it three times losing only his sanity, arguably, in the process.  Second, Helen Hunt's character (Darcy) struck me as a complete pushover most of the time.  Third, the writing wasn't that great at all, and a lot of potentially funnier scenes were dumbed down or edited funny, I don't know which, by awkward pacing and cheesy lines.  There were some funny parts, like when Mel danced like Gene Kelly to a Sinatra tune and tried on women's clothing or when Bette Midler cameoed as a shrink, but otherwise, it was altogether predictable and even a little too cheesy or saccharine for my liking. 

    My rating: 6 out of 10 (which means cute, or a lukewarm feeling toward the movie).  The test: will she be buying it?  The answer would be no.  It wasn't all barrels of laughs for me.  This woman doesn't want it.


 


Advertisement