Timecrimes - Interview and Review
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up

peterfecteau Blog

  • A kick in the bollocks

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This is England  (2006)

    I can't help but compare this film to American History X.  While the latter was a bit more on the front line and hit closer to home,  This is England is quite gritty. Shaun, the lead, is a lost preteen that has recently lost his father to that war in the Falklands. His Mother is struggling and he is bullied in school. He finds solace with Woody, an older boy and his group of friends. When Combo, an old friend of Wood's, is released from prison, he tries to recruit the group into a racist agenda. Shane is sucked in by Combo's father-like presence and we see the plot line turn grim.


  • A kick in the bollocks

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This is England  (2006)

    I can't help but compare this film to American History X.  While the latter was a bit more on the front line and hit closer to home,  This is England is quite gritty. Shaun, the lead, is a lost preteen that has recently lost his father to that war in the Falklands. His Mother is struggling and he is bullied in school. He finds solace with Woody, an older boy and his group of friends. When Combo, an old friend of Wood's, is released from prison, he tries to recruit the group into a racist agenda. Shane is sucked in by Combo's father-like presence and we see the plot line turn grim.


  • The BEST movie I've seen in a long time

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Kite Runner  (2007)

    From start to finish this movie was simply amazing. I'm having trouble finding words for it. The characters are so strong and the acting was great, especially the boys who played the main characters. It's put the middle-eastern lifestyle in a whole new perspective for me. Actually I should say that it's shed light onto a world that the US media has shown to be a horrible loveless place. I'm still reeling from this film so I'll have to write more when I've had time ti digest it all.

  • Slightly disapointed but please read on

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    A week ago today I took my girlfriend to see Love in the Time of Cholera. I read the book from which it's based and figured that this would be the quinisential "chick flick". I was very hyped about the adaptation but knew from past experiences not to expect much. Still, I'm a huge fan of Gabriel García Márquez's work. I've read all his books and a good number of his editorial works as well. Having seen the movie, I can't imagine they'll be adapting any of his other works. His style of writing has been termed "Magical Realism" and is a blur between South American storytelling and senility, imo. To write a screenplay from him is to pluck a bird clean and ask it to fly. I think this was doomed from the beginning. Most things about this movie were par if not subpar. Mike Newell's direction, subpar. the cast was strong and yet somehow came across as fledgling. Newell's most recent notible work, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. It's not like he's been pushed to direct lately. I'm thinking New Line Cinema thought that the book sales, and the plot would drive the movie instead of getting this movie to be a work in and of itself. To Newell's credit, the set and costumes were damn good, like Potter. The makeup was atrocious. how many gallons of eggwhites did they use? This is the 21st century people! You can't have a character age 50 years without changing the actor. It's more unpleasant to see a thirty year old person in a wrinkle suit then to see a completely different actor. AHHH. I'm so pissed this movie fell short. If you liked the book... read it again. 

  • A testing post

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    So part of my job at Spout is to help with testing every once and a while and right now I'm test the feed aggregation,  we added atom to or process and need to make sure spout is pulling in atom ...
    Originally posted on:peterfecteau's blog

  • Cool film I saw last week

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    thought I should also add that I get to watch a lot of special screeners through Spout. got free passes to The Kingdom but I missed the showing so I went last week with my girlfriend Caitlin and it wa...
    Originally posted on:peterfecteau's blog

  • My work at Spout

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    So I work at this awesome place called spout. I've talked about it before but now that I have a better idea of what I do, I'd like to share it with you. My title is "Graphics Integrator" and while it'...
    Originally posted on:peterfecteau's blog

  • Super sweet

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I'm not exactly sure how I stumbled upon this little gem. It was in the OnDemand database that my cable provider supplies. If any of you out there use comcast check out OnDemands free movies then independent then Six String Samurai. Anyway, bact to the matter at hand. This movie was delightful. Toatally camped out, rock-a-kurosowa? There's even a half decent Clint Eastwood impressonation in the beginning. The plot is on the weaker side but it's so different than anything else out there that you just have to see it. If you can't catch it on OnDemand then good luck cuz this one's not gonna be on the local blockbuster shelf. Look for it here if you're that interested.

  • I'm pist

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    No End in Sight  (2007)

    This political documentary was more than eye opening, alarming, maddening, it was a major recognition of a morbid underbelly. It was like Morpheus gave me two red pills and said take them both. I am still dizzy from this movie. All of my opinions have transformed into something bigger and yet, less defined. This isn't a left wing/right wing movie. It's not bias. These people don't have anything to gain from contributing to the film, hell most of them have a lot to lose. They aren't proud of what happened, some of them are to blame even. I can't get to involved with this topic yet because I feel that what I hav eto say needs to stew a little first. THIS IS A MUST SEE MOVIE! Get your friends and family together to see it and be united in your outrage. Some serios change needs to happen in this country. I'm not talking about "electing" someone else, I'm talking about a Coup. I'm not afraid to say it. If I get arrested for it then so be it but I'm not willing to lay down on the issue anymore. What has happened to our country?

  • Interview with Charlie Kaufman & Spike Jonze

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Adaptation  (2002)

    After watching the movie Adaptation one normally is left bewildered as to what just happened and how much, if any, reality was written into this script. After I watched it a few times I decided to do some research, it was just too heady. I just came across this interview of Charlie Kaufman (Screenwriter) and Spike Jonze (Director) about the movie. It sheds some light on things in case you need some illumiation.

    Here is the interview via. About.com 

    As always feedback is much appreciated. 


  • MovieMind works!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Minority Report  (2002)

    28 Days Later  (2002)

    Children of Men  (2006)

    Ok so for three consecutive days MovieMind has suggested I watch Children of Men so last night I did and I was impressed. I was a big fan of 12 Monkeys and Wasa told this was similar but better and it think that was a correct assesment. While I didn't find the acting Oscar worthy. The plot was well concieved and written. Kudos to Alfonso Cuarón and Timothy J. Sexton for their writing and also Cuarón's direction. It often seems to me that when the director also writes, things seem to be tighter, unless that person is well...lacking talent. The sets in the movie were awesome every thing was believable. I'm one of thoes agnostic types that just really don't get into things that are "sloppy fiction". This movie, take for instance, the cars in the movie are futuristic not overwelmingly so and they still drive on regular pavement. In twenty years this will most likely be the case, unlike Minority Report or The Fifth Element. This was definatly a dark film, not noir , but to use a better adjective, grimey. A similar feel as 28 Days Later. Over all a very good watch. I kept thinking while I was watching this that Alfonso Cuarón would do a good job with a screen version of Jose Saramago's book "Blindness" about an episode of blindness that sweeps across the globe, excluding only one woman. It's a very dark grimey book that would make an excellent film. Please someone take me up on this.

  • Slowmotion Racer?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Speed Racer  (2008)

    So I actually heard about this movie off of a Lost (the hit TV series) fan site. It was on there due to Matthew Fox playing the roll of Racer X. While the animated series was a little before my time I still got very into it as a kid and am excited the Wachowski Bros. are doing a live-action  version. You might remember them from their work on Matrix. The movie will be shot mostly on greenscreen (like 300) which could be good or bad. I can just imagine Speed hitting that "jump" button in the cockpit and everything slowing down as the Mach 5 leaps over an oil slick and the camera doing a 360 pan in slowmotion. While the stylings of the Wachowski Brothers might work for things like Matrix, or even a liveaction version of Akira (wishfull thinking), I'm not so sure it will be well suited for Speed Racer. Don't get me wrong I loved their direction in Matrix but their work in V for Vendetta was a little shoddy. The truth is that while Speed Racer is an anime series, it's context is very different. It's wholesome goodness, no spaceships, alien wars, or demigods with animal appendages. I hope they don't muck it up.

     

    Added 12/7/07

    It's official, they've mucked it all to hell. Go look at the screens from the movie at  imdb.com, it'll prove me right. Also,Chris Campbell is catching flack for ragging on the Wachowski Bros much like I am. Don't worry bro, I got your back! Check out Chris Campbell's post here to see the trailer. BOOOOOOO!


  • Slowmotion Racer?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Speed Racer  (2008)

    So I actually heard about this movie off of a Lost (the hit TV series) fan site. It was on there due to Matthew Fox playing the roll of Racer X. While the animated series was a little before my time I still got very into it as a kid and am excited the Wachowski Bros. are doing a live-action  version. You might remember them from their work on Matrix. The movie will be shot mostly on greenscreen (like 300) which could be good or bad. I can just imagine Speed hitting that "jump" button in the cockpit and everything slowing down as the Mach 5 leaps over an oil slick and the camera doing a 360 pan in slowmotion. While the stylings of the Wachowski Brothers might work for things like Matrix, or even a liveaction version of Akira (wishfull thinking), I'm not so sure it will be well suited for Speed Racer. Don't get me wrong I loved their direction in Matrix but their work in V for Vendetta was a little shoddy. The truth is that while Speed Racer is an anime series, it's context is very different. It's wholesome goodness, no spaceships, alien wars, or demigods with animal appendages. I hope they don't muck it up.

  • I really don't know

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Brick  (2005)

    So last night a friend of mine brought over this movie, I hadn't heard of it. Didn't read the jacket, just popped it in and sat down. I was told it's Memento meets Kids meets Limey and that sounded pretty good so I had a positive intentention. Honestly I wasn't all that impressed but I really don't know what to think. It might still be setting in. It was very much a think piece, kind of subsurface. The acting was par but the characters were a little too fictional for my liking. Infact the whole plot seemed like it should exist outside of highschool and yet it didn't bother me. You really don't know what he's doing until he's done it even with the forshadowing in the first scene. I understood why the dialogue was so thick and the fact that they are in highschool made the dialogue reasonable. I do see why this was a sundance favorite. But if your not specifically into sundance/indi films specifically, beware. I feel that the film tried to hard at confusing the viewer, because the plot needed that. I'll need to rewatch this later and update my review.

  • simply WOW

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Zodiac  (2007)

    This was such a great movie. I was glued to my television for over two hours and refused to pause the movie for any reason. Not since Seven have I enjoyed a movie of such caliber then to learn that they were both directed by David Fincher, who also directed Fight Club. This guy not only made it onto my "list" but moved up into the top 5. Jake Gyllenhaul did a vey good job capturing his character as did Robert Downey Jr. All characters did excellent work. There was quite a lot of talent in the film people like Brian Cox who played a smaller role really lended their help in making this movie what it was. Harris Savides did an excellent job adapting to his new camera ( the film was shot fully digital) and the cinematography was really put together well. I felt like the movie was made in the 70's.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement