Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

paul on spout.com

  • SITA SINGS THE BLUES available free online

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    SITA SINGS THE BLUES available free online

    One of Karina Longworth’s favorite undistributed films of last year is available to watch for free on Reel 13. Sita Sings the Blues won the Best Film Not Playing at a Theater Near You award at the 2008 Gotham Awards. In Karina’s review from Tribeca 2008, she called it, “a strange and beautiful little film, a potentially wispy slice of autobiography smartly elevated through irresistible, orgiastic style.”

    Watch the movie and read Brandon Harris’ interview with director Nina Paley from last November (republished) after the jump.


    Originally published on 11/17/08 as SITA SINGS THE BLUES Director Nina Paley: The Media Diet by Brandon Harris

    For fans of relatively offbeat animation, 2008 seems to have been a banner year. Pixar produced perhaps their most acclaimed effort yet with Wall-E, which is drawing considerable heat for a best picture nomination. Ari Folman’s Waltz with Bashir thrilled and horrified audiences in Competition in Cannes with subject matter and personal introspection not usually broached by animated films. Yet the most satisfying animated film that surfaced in 2008 may well have been Nina Paley’s delightful Sita Sings The Blues, which marries the tunes of obscure 30’s blues songstress Annette Hanshaw to a retelling, by three hip, Gen-Y Indians, of the Indian myth Ramayana and a mildly autobiographical story of a Seattle-based female cartoonist loosing her husband to his job in India. The film, a nominee for this year’s Gotham Award for the Best Film Not Playing at a Theater Near You after an impressive festival run that began at this year’s Berlinale, screens at MoMA on Thursday and Saturday. Clearly a dedicated postmodernist, Paley discusses Sci-Fi channel’s Eureka, Lawrence Lessig’s Free Culture and the strange ambiguities of influence.

    What films or television shows have you seen recently?

    Whatever they had on the airplane. It was Virgin, and they charged $7.99 for movies, so I stuck with the free TV channels (I don’t have TV at home). The SciFi channel was showing a commercial-free marathon of Eureka which I had never even heard of before, but it was pretty good plane fare. Also some other station was playing Spiderman, but with tons of commercial breaks which made it kind of tedious to watch.

    Which ones stuck with you and why?

    Eureka because I saw like 5 episodes, without commercials.

    Does your interest in them have anything to do with your own work as an animator?

    Not in any way I can identify consciously, but I’m sure it does somehow.

    How do the films that you think of as “influences” affect your own style and preoccupations as a animator, if at all?

    So many people have asked “what are your influences” over the years. I now conclude my answer is: EVERYTHING. Everything I see, even if it’s just out the corner of my eye, is an influence.

    I’m one of those crazy free culture people who insist there are no original ideas; all creativity builds on what has come before. As an artist I pull stuff out of the hive mind, the culture that’s all around me. I’m so saturated in culture I can’t separate influences out, or keep track of each discreet one. Just as corals build complex structures from the calcium floating in the ocean around them, artists pull ideas and influences from the sea of culture, and organize them in ways that suit us.

    How often do you read fiction? Do you wish you read more?

    I read a lot. I prefer reading to watching TV. I also read nonfiction.

    What would be your ideal literary adaptation and why?

    Hmm. Free Culture by Lawrence Lessig would make a good movie, because people need to discuss this stuff and most can’t be persuaded to read a book.

    How, if at all, has reading informed your animation?

    It gives my mind an escape, something to do in “foreground” while my subconscious is solving problems in “background.” And it enriches me as a human being. My work is an expression of my whole being, so anything that touches me will in some way touch my art too.

    What are you listening to recently?
    I’m currently staying at a friend’s house in Oakland (I’m in town for the San Francisco Animation Festival). My hosts are cleaning up the kitchen right now, playing something on their boom box. I have no idea what it is, but I know I’m absorbing it and if I ever hear it again, it’ll sound familiar.

    I almost never sit down and consciously listen to music. But just walking around, I hear tons. Stores and restaurants pipe in music, people play it in subways and on the street, it’s on people’s cell phone ringtones, it blasts from the windows of passing cars, it’s in the background everywhere. I can’t close my ears. I may only hear snippets at a time but it sticks in my mind, somewhere, adding to all the other influences in
    there.

    I enjoy quiet. In silence I can play back all the junk my mind has collected, and really listen to it. I have a lifetime of music playing in my head constantly. The DJ is my id, or subconscious, or maybe God.

    Since I typed all that, my host’s soundtrack has turned to the Talking Heads, “Once in a Lifetime.” I’ve never owned a Talking Heads record, and don’t have an MP3 collection, but I know that song, and countless others.

    If you could collaborate with one musician on one of your own films, whom would it be and why?

    That would depend on the story, the idea behind the piece, and a lot of other factors. Right now I’m looking for a 30-second ditty on the theme of “copying isn’t theft.” Anyone have one or want to write one?

    If there were such a thing as an “animated concert film”, who would be the best subject?

    Live, from the Inside of Nina’s Head: God the DJ! That’s one long concert though.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Paul Moore

  • FilmCouch 110: Movies That Should be Graphic Novels

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Die Hard  (1988)

    Mystery Train  (1989)

    Zardoz  (1973)

    Walkabout  (1971)

    Hero  (2002)

    Iron Man  (2008)

    In episode #108, we posed a simple question: Which movie should be turned into a graphic novel? Your responses to the question became the fodder for a great conversation. Turning the typical page-to-screen progression on its head, we dig into the strengths and weaknesses of each medium. We discuss the possibility of seeing Mystery Train, Walkabout, The Man Who Fell To Earth, Zardoz, Hero, Die Hard, and Gangs of New York crammed into little action-packed drawings.

    We check in with Karina for a hindsight conversation about awards season. She poses the question: Who would win in a fight, Benjamin Button or Iron Man? The answer is as obvious as it seems, but not for the reason you think.

    Want to win a copy of Watchmen: The Official Film Companion? Send us an e-mail telling us what film you think has the best production design in entire history of cinema. It’s that simple. E-mail filmcouch [at] spout [dot] com.


    (Subscribe to FilmCouch–Spout’s weekly movie podcast–in the iTunes store or to our RSS feed and an episode will download each Friday)

    0:00 - Intro

    3:22 - From film to comic.

    26:40 - The Oscars. What happened?

    filmcouch-110


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Paul Moore

  • Twittering The Oscars and Spirit Awards

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Twittering The Oscars and Spirit Awards

    My favorite memory of the Oscars last year was Karina Longworth’s Twitters hitting my iPhone every few minutes. The way she can describe Diablo Cody’s dress in one sentence had me turning to my wife saying, “You’ve got to hear this…” By the end of the night we had the iPhone sitting between us, propped on a pillow where we could both see each twitter as it popped up.

    Sunday, February 22nd, Karina and a gaggle of other SpoutBlog writers will live-twitter the Oscars again. Check back here at 8:00 EST. If you won’t have a laptop with you to see all the action, you can at least follow Karina on Twitter.

    Saturday, February 21st, Karina will also be at The Spirit Awards, twittering from the scene.  IFC’s televised coverage begins at 5:00 EST, hosted by Steve Coogan.

    Want to see Karina’s Twitter stream? It’s embedded after the jump.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Paul Moore

  • 500 Days of Summer: Why I Walked Out Of The Sundance ‘Hit’

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Typically at SpoutBlog, we rarely state the obvious when it comes to a mediocre movie, trying to instead direct our gaze toward a gem that deserves some advocacy. Unless, of course, there’s a danger that said movie is going to overshadow the much earned good buzz around a great film. Such is the case with 500 Days of Summer starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel. It’s a movie I walked out of at Sundance 2009, not because it sucked, but because it was lukewarm. I figured I’d never write, “It was so-so” for a review, so I left. But in the past week it has, surprisingly, garnered ovations that threaten to eclipse so many excellent films coming out of that festival.

    Case in point, it’s number one in Coming Soon’s Best of the Fest:

    Clearly the biggest crowd-pleaser at this year’s festival was this romantic comedy from first-time director Marc Webb and screenwriters Scott Neustadter and Michael Webber, which covers a year and a half in the relationship between Tom Hanson (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) and Summer Bishl (Zooey Deschanel), the latter a flighty woman who breaks the former’s heart. While some of the ground covered is stuff we’ve seen before, the film is told in an innovative and clever narrative style, jumping around in time from the height of their developing love affair to the months that follow their break-up. Gordon-Levitt creates an infinitely likeable character that both guys and women can relate to, much like John Cusack in his heyday…. What could easily be seen as a “…Say Anything” for the younger generation, the film’s Sundance premiere received a standing ovation from the audience, and one can expect that when it opens in July, it will be another Searchlight hit in the vein of Garden State and Once.

    Of course, I can’t write a “review” of a movie I didn’t fully watch. I can, however, write a review of my decision to walk out a half hour into it. In fact, I’ll use the above blurb to record what was going through my mind in the half hour before I left.

    “Clearly the biggest crowd-pleaser at this year’s festival…” Must be taken with a grain of salt. A festival like Sundance combines star-spotting mania with meditative art films, wrist-slashing character studies and unsellable passion projects. So, seeing a couple stars (who happen to be seated in the audience) perform in a mildly funny comedy often brings the house down when, in a regular multiplex, the house would shrug and head to the bathroom when the credits roll.

    “… from first-time director Marc Webb and screenwriters Scott Neustadter and Michael Webber, which covers a year and a half in the relationship between Tom Hanson (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) and Summer Bishl (Zooey Deschanel), the latter a flighty woman who breaks the former’s heart.” Deschanel’s greatness in other roles is that she can be flighty without being shallow. She has an introspective, girl next door quality that gives her romantic leads the feeling that she’s not the girl you get, she’s the girl you marry. It appears that Neustadter and Webber probably had Deschanel in mind for the part when they wrote it, but in their mind she’s Kate Hudson.

    “… the film is told in an innovative and clever narrative style, jumping around in time from the height of their developing love affair to the months that follow their break-up.” Non-linear story-telling can make an already compelling story that much more compelling (Pulp Fiction, Memento). But if you take an old episode of Two Guys and A Girl and recut it with a non-linear plot, it’s still an ABC sitcom that’s easy to watch, but doesn’t compel you to laugh out loud.

    “Gordon-Levitt creates an infinitely likeable character…” It’s not that he’s unlikable as much as tedious. If the male lead is a bore for at least a half hour of the movie, can you really say “infinitely likable?”

    “…the film’s Sundance premiere received a standing ovation from the audience, and one can expect that when it opens in July, it will be another Searchlight hit in the vein of Garden State…” If there is one thing that Summer does have in common with Garden State, it’s that it tries to be a cinematic mix tape. But there was a certain chemistry between Zack Braff and Natalie Portman in that movie. However corny, the scene where Braff falls for Portman when she plays The Shins for him doesn’t have the screeching-brakes feeling to it that Levitt’s swoon does when Deschanel says, “Are you listening to The Smiths? I love The Smiths!”

    In a lot of ways, 500 Days of Summer feels derivative of Garden State and a lot of other better romantic tweener comedies. It’s kind of like if Garden State had been turned into a TV series, recast, cancelled, then bought by USA network and restarted. Which is maybe why I felt watching half an hour was enough.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Paul Moore

 


Advertisement