Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

paul on spout.com

  • The Talent Given Us, brought to you by the Wagners.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I'm halfway through this film right now and I love it. It's fantastic. Everyone should watch it. With family, if possible.

    Part of the amazement I'm experiencing with this flick is I'm watching a real family. Andrew Wagner shot this thing with his parents and two sisters and it's so genuine. I feel like I'm in a minivan with my parents and two sisters. But I'm liking it, so maybe it's more fiction than I thought.

    Anyway, see it. Currently, it's only available through Netlfix.


  • Peckinpah's "Straw Dogs"

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Straw Dogs  (1971)

    The synopsis for this film says that Dustin Hoffman's character, David—a pacfist, "finally resorts to the gruesome violence that he abhors."As if Peckinpah would make something so simple. A pacifist moves to the British countryside where his wife is attacked and when his home is under seige, he resorts to violence. In fact, in Straw Dogs David is not defending his house in the climactic scene when the men who raped his wife earlier in the day try to break in. He's protecting a mentally handicapped man inside they're trying to kill. But it's an ideal David is really protecting. He will use whatever means necessary to prevent violence from entering his house.

    Straw Dogs is a film riddled in emotional complexity. It has probably the most disturbing and complex rape scene I've ever seen. Where as most directors might focus on the crime itself followed up with simple justice, Peckinpah goes deep into the ambivalence David's wife feels afterward as she lashes out angrily at David for not being there to protect her. Simultaneously, she tries to let her attackers back into her home to kidnap the mentally handicapped man. Under extreme circumstances, her disgust for her idealistic husband leads her to identify more with her attackers than with him, a kind of Darwinian decision she makes as violence encroaches and everybody seems to regress to a primal state of being. It's an ugly picture of a wife who's trying to protect herself after  having her dignity stripped. It's ugly but probably more accurate than the classic scenario where she stays home while the husband goes out and defends her honor by gunning down the bad guys in the middle of town.

    David is the only character who does not dive down into animalistic behavior, but uses his ideals to stabilize him. When he finally chooses violence in the end to save the mentally handicapped man, he uses it with cold calculation like a surgeon cutting out a hemmorraging appendix. There can be no happy ending to this film. Whether justice is delivered or not, everybody has to deal with the brutality they participated in that night. For such a violent film, there is not a shred of glorification in any of the violence. The audience is not allowed to relish any vengeance.

    Peckinpah makes brutal films, there's no questioning that. But I find myself returning to them because, although I hate watching violence, Peckipah captures human nakedness when the curtain of civilized behavior is ripped down and hiding behind it is no longer an option.

  • Herzog's Nosferatu

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This is one of those experiences where the video shop gave me about four hours to have this film out and I tried to cram it in despite my better judgement. I was over tired and alone in a really warm house on a really cozy couch. And I was watching the German version (I'd like to go back and try the English one on for size).

    Anyway, I fell asleep. Nothing against Herzog, whom I admire greatly, it  just wasn't in the cards for that night. But I have to say, as I drifted away from dreamland into the scene where the town is feasting with a hoard of rats at their feet, it felt like I was entering a waking nightmare. That scene was unlike anything I've ever seen or imagined. Since then Nosferatu the Vampyre has remained on my list of films to return to.

  • I've seen it.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    So I finally checked out Cane Toads: An Unnatural History. It's alright. Worth watching. Not as hysterical as I expected, however the Cane Toad is a fascinating creature and this documentary is a substantial course in Cane Toad.

    Gist: Cane Toads are originally from Hawaii. In the 1930's, sugar cane farmers in Australia were losing entire crops to beetles. Some "expert" at a conference in Puerto Rico asserted that Cane Toads were the best measure of prevention against said beetle. So one guy halled a boat-load over to Aussie and started spawing them in his pond.  Long story short, the Cane Toad had no natural predators in Australia, adapted beautifully to the climate, and reproduced with an alarming survival ratio. So alarming it's uncanny and the documentary speculates that this may be one of the most robust creatures on the continent.

    I found the most fascinating part of this doc to be how humans react emotionally to the toads. The creature is either loved or adored. Some residents of the northern coast–where the toads live–take civic pride in having them around and consider Cane Toads to be a tourist attraction. Then there are the loathers who often speak of destroying every Cane Toad they have the opportunity to come across. One long shot is composed of a van–driven by a scientist–swerving back and forth down a stretch of country road picking off Cane Toads under his driver side tire.

    All in all, this documentary is chuckling at a hideous creature and the rural residents who love it. So it has the patronizing flavor of big city filmmakers poking fun at a small town subject. I think in the past twenty years since Cane Toads was made, audiences have become more sophisticated in recognizing objective story telling. For the most part, we expect less judgement and more responsibility from a documentary filmmaker and, in that way, this documentary is a dated disappointment.

 


Advertisement