Join the Comic-Con group
Advertisement

NevermoresRaven Blog

  • One of the best foriegn war flicks EVER.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ah, the Korean "war". The wonderful times when we were paranoid about Communist and not "terrorists", but enough polital babble, this is a film review! So what movies do we have about this "war" between the two Koreas? Uh, well we have M*A*S*H. Yeah, that's about it. But now we have Tae Guk Gi(which is Korean for "The Brotherhood of War"). The film follows two brothers living in south Korea who get drafted to fight the "Red Menace"(yeah, there's going to be a lot of political jokes/puns so get used to it). So they go off to fight, and it all goes down hill from there...well, for the characters at least.

    This film is a masterpiece of the art that we call movies. The acting is above standard with the actors showing real terror and care throughout the hardships that is war. The music was well orchestrated and fit every scene very nicely, and the actual combat sequences really drive the point that "war is hell" home. The best part, and this might just sound a wee bit odd, is the way this film touches it's viewers emotionally. This is, by far, the saddest movie i've ever seen. I'll give you an idea for it, on a scale of 1-10 Bambi's mom being shot is like a 6, this whole movie is a 28 1/2. It's been a long while since a movie made me tear up without it being because I was laughing(Superbad), but the scene when the mother is chasing the train as the two boys leave is so sad because she can't talk and she's sort of psudo-screaming to them.

    So what was bad about this movie? Well, it again sort of presses the whole "Cummunisim is evil" deal that drives me up the wall. But this is a film made in South Korea about a war where they were "invaded" by the North Koreans. So the political agenda can seem a little over bearing at times when you watch it, especially if you're like me and think the whole "cold war" was the stupidest thing to ever take place(until the mighty "war on terror" took it's spot at the top of the "big dumb paranoid mistakes" list).

    If you can get past the obvious agenda, this is an enjoyable, albiet sad, movie. Check it out if you don't mind the subtitles, or if you speak Korean.

  • To be or not to, wait...this isn't a Shakspeare movie?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Darren Aronofsky is known through the film world as the guy who made the movie 3.18462387343(or whatever the hell Pi is). Yes, that is a math joke, thank you for noticing. In case you don't get math jokes, he directed a movie called "Pi". So what do we have here? Sweet, it's going to be...no...hold on. I'm being told it's not going to be Shakespeare, instead we get a movie about....drugs? What? Oh come on, seriously? Alright, it's a movie about drugs.

    So yeah, it's a moive about drugs and addiction and people having no grip on reality. Mostly it focuses around A mother who wants to be on some TV thing(ellen Burstyn), her deadbeat drug peddling son Harry(Jared Leto), his crackhead girlfreind Marion(Jennifer Connelly), and his best buddy/partner in crime Tyrone(Marlon Wayans).

    The film lacks one big key element, good acting. And a second big element, good actors. I'm sorry, but how did Jennifer Conelly go from David friggin' Bowie to the whiney little moron from Thirty Seconds to Mars? Hm, Ziggy Stardust(awesome), Jared Leto(should die in a fire)...tough choice. Above all else, the movie's characters lack real depth. They all seem sort of hollow after the first 20-30 minutes of viewing. And the mother is particularly anoyying, and after a while you kind of hope that her firdge really will eat her alive(you may have to see the movie to get that one).

    Things become very repedative, which I get was part of the point all along but it still gets to be a pain after a while, when everyone starts doing all their different drugs. After a while the constant reuse of scenes doesn't seem innovative, it seems cheap. It's like a cartoon using the same pannel 32 times for different scenes.

    So what did I like about the movie? The soundtrack, it is spectaular. It's the best part of the whole thing, and it doesn't get boring at all. The Kronos Quartet provide strings for it and give the film some atmosphere and depth. Problem is, the charcters should be filing the role of adding depth.

    All in all, if you're into the drug movie scene and enjoy the same thing voer and over again then this is for you. I'd just go grab a copy of the soundtrack and leave it at that.


  • Spike Lee, doing the thing he does right....get it...it's a play on words.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Oh Spike lee, you're movies, err....joints, sorry, are always worth a good watch. "Mo' Better Blues"(1990) being a personal favorite of mine. But lets go to a year before that, to 1989 and "Do the Right Thing".

    The movie follows a sorted group of characters, including pizza boy Mookie(Lee), his boss Sal(Danny Aiello), his two sons(John Turturro and Richard Edson), and the best DJ ever(played by one mister Samuel L. Jackson). It takes place on the hottest day of the year in New York City(Brooklyn to be exact). It's no surprise that a Spike Lee joint takes place in NYC, god forbid he make a movie someplace else. Of course this joint, like all his others, deals mostly with racial tensions. Because of this somewhat standard idea for him, the plot's a little thin.

    The acting isn't great, but it's better than good. It's sort of "Quasi-Great", if you will. The actors are able to portray the characters they were supposed to be, and interacted well with each other on screen, but because of the thin premise of the plot it only gets so far before it becomes another "White Devil!" movie. The only character I can say was done in a manner that made me smile profoundly was Sam Jackson's character. Playing sort of the middle man and also some what of a narrator, he just comes into his role so well.

    So, as with every Spike Lee joint, there's bound to be the big racial blow up at the end right? You bet there is. The only problem is, the movie still gives off that "White Devil!" vibe. I'll leave you to read the plot synopsis to understand everything in between, but needless to say a black charcter gets killed by white cops after getting into a fight with Sal and then the other black characters destroy Sal's shop, including his own employee Mookie. Problem is, I don't see how Sal did anything wrong by having rules for his store. Look, i'm not going to get into a debate about racism and ethnic devides here, just giving my two cents.

    Overall, it's a good movie and well worth at least one viewing. Check it out sometime, just don't expect anything spectacular.

  • Wait...what?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sometimes someone making a movie will get way too far ahead of themself, or they may just not even be in the same zip code anymore. Well, Michel Gondry is just that type of film maker and "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" is just that type of bad film.

    So where, oh where, does this moive go wrong? Well, that's such a long list that even i'm not smart enough to be able to remember it all. I can tell you a few good flaws with this film, and i'm sure i'll get flamed for saying this too, but bring it on. First off, the acting. It's uninspired and bland. The characters have no real feel to them, no demension, no humanity. Add on top of that the bad stereotypical character types(i.e. Joel and Celmentine being the socially awkward outcast types), and you've got a great idea on paper. But hey, Communisim worked on paper too. Joel is such a quiet and subdued role, and just seems to boring that it made me cry a little inside to see Jim Carrey in that spot. Again the character, and thus the acting involved, are uninspried and bland. Clementine is the exact opposite of Joel, though. She's loud, outgoing, with anoyyingly bright colored hair and an attitude(that girl has to have bi-polar disorder or something to have those mood swings) that matches it. So one has to wonder, how the hell could two people who are so very different from one another ever ever look at each other in a romantic light? The rule of "opposites attract" only applies to magnetics and quantum physics. Speaking of quantum physics, how about this "plot"? They decide to have each other erased from the others memories to avoid anything weird, right? So how is it that at the end of the film, they still know who the other person is? That's simply not possible by any laws of the universe. If something is erased from your mind, you don't remember it again. Now, if you get a bump on the head and forget something for a while that's different. To have your mind systematically wiped clean with some over the top machine would not allow such a thing to happen. Laws are there for a reason, and it's not so that hacks like Gondry can break them at his damn desire.

    So, is there actually anything I did like about this movie? Ok, Kate Winslet is a fairly decent actress who's not exactly hard on the eyes, and there's a scene where Kirsten Dunst is dancing around in her underwear. There, I gave you the two good things about this film. Be happy I could even find that many. Avoid this film, avoid it like the bloody plauge.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<April 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement