Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

MovieBabe Blog

  • 13 Going on 30 - Mean Girls

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    13 Going on 30  (2004)

    Mean Girls  (2004)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    The line-dance scene is rarely a good idea. The one in 13 Going on 30, Jennifer Garner’s vagina version of Big, is no exception: At a swank present-day publicity bash for a Manhattan women’s magazine, our not-a-girl-not-yet-a-woman editor heroine, Jenna, tries to get the party started by requesting that the DJ replace his antiseptic house beats with “Thriller.” In tottering heels, a kicky dress, and makeup reminiscent of MJ’s finest era, Jenna rushes the dance floor and earnestly begins performing the clawing, head-dipping, completely awkward monster mash from her fave video. Slowly, others join her, until all the hip revelers are looking just as stupid/happy as can be.

    Taken out of context—the clip is being used to promote the film—the scene is nothing less than squirm-inducing. Within the movie, it’s not much better, yet because of the irresistible ebullience of Garner’s Jenna, it’s forgivable. So, in fact, is the film’s It’s a Wonderful Life–esque universe-hopping, as well as the many predictable turns it takes. Ditto for the faintly pedophiliac plot and self-empowering morals about not being a jerk and recognizing your true friends.

    Indeed, the success of 13 Going on 30 is due almost entirely to the giddy performances of Garner and co-star Mark Ruffalo, who plays the grown-up version of Matt, Jenna’s girlhood neighbor. The two share a not-so-rosy past: Back in 1987, on her 13th birthday, the eager-to-grow-up Jenna (Christa B. Allen) submits to blackmail in order to get the cool girls, known here as the Six Chicks, to come to her party. When they play a trick on her that lands Jenna in a closet, blindfolded and awaiting her seven minutes of heaven with a crush as the Chicks make for the exits, she blames her nerdy best bud and new closetmate, Matt (Sean Marquette), for scaring them away. Matt, who has just spent three weeks building Jenna her own personal version of a Barbie Dream House complete with “wishing dust,” is naturally crestfallen. Jenna tells him to get lost and goes back to yearning to be “30, flirty, and thriving,” just like the pretty women featured in Poise, her favorite magazine.

    Jenna, of course, wakes up the next day blessed with a fab apartment, great bone structure, and the kind of rack that doesn’t hold mix tapes. At this point, of course, 13 Going on 30 stops making much sense. But it also starts being a lot of fun, as Jenna tries to improvise her way through her sudden life as a chic Poise editor.

    Garner’s playful, believable turn as the ever-adolescent Jenna is miles away from the action-girl persona that made her a star in Alias. Jenna is a just-right mix of silliness, timidity, and “I never!” bluntness that’s especially refreshing—and surprisingly attractive—coming from a woman who looks as if she’d sooner stick her Prada heel in your eye than giggle. But giggling is something Garner does plenty of here, often accompanied by general freaking out, a combination most entertainingly displayed in a love scene in which Jenna scrunches up both face and body as her boyfriend kisses her ear and then hides behind a pillow as he performs an awful striptease—right down to the tightie-whities—before finally entreating him to “Put it away!”

    Ruffalo’s genial, understated Matt is equally—and sorry, there’s no other word for it—adorable. Matt’s skepticism when he one day opens his door to find the grown-up and confused Jenna never quite dissipates, but after he informs her that they’ve barely spoken since that fateful day in the closet, he begins a slow, convincing transformation. Ruffalo’s expressions as Matt watches Jenna act like a nut—smiles at first tentative and cynical, then hopelessly smitten—are aching displays of his recognition of the girl he loved within the woman he loathes.

    Musically, the movie is a slightly less obvious version of I Love the 80s!, from the “Head Over Heels” intro to the “Crazy for You”–accompanied closet scene to Jenna’s undying devotion to Rick Springfield and Pat Benatar. (And when was the last time you heard Billy Joel’s “Vienna” played in its entirety in anything?) Good ideas, all, but 13 Going on 30 should really be commended for making appropriate use of yet another bad one: Liz Phair’s unsettling “Why Can’t I,” a dreamy bit of puppy-love wistfulness that starts to seem icky after you discover it’s being sung by a 37-year-old mom. Next to that, a little line-dancing looks positively brilliant.

     

     

    The cool kids in Mean Girls aren’t the Chicks but the Plastics, and the lead character doesn’t have to skip through time to learn how to deal with them. But otherwise, Saturday Night Live head-writer Tina Fey’s screenwriting debut offers life lessons very much like 13 Going on 30’s, albeit with an evil twist.

    Fey based her portrait of socio-academic hell on the ideas of Rosalind Wiseman’s pop-psychology study Queen Bees and Wannabes: Helping Your Daughter Survive Cliques, Gossip, Boyfriends, and Other Realities of Adolescence. The book views teenage girls as a species as mysterious as the apes, suggesting that their society boasts a natural order and ruthlessness that’s more animalistic than human. Helpfully, it also provides advice on overcoming stereotypes and the depression, eating disorders, and backbiting hostilities that accompany them.

    The movie’s sorta-anthropological basis, however, doesn’t much help to distinguish it from your usual tired teen comedy. The story of Cady (Freaky Friday’s Lindsay Lohan) is fairly typical: The 15-year-old is a new student at a Chicago high school and is trying to figure out which group to hang with. And Cady is really, really new, having previously been home-schooled by her parents in Africa.

    Cady is first taken in by the fringe, consisting of the punky maybe-lesbian Janis Ian (Lizzy Caplan) and tubby gay boy Damian (Daniel Franzese). They warn her of the Plastics, and when the pretty newcomer is lured by the siren song of the ringleader, Regina (Rachel McAdams), Janis and Damian encourage her to infiltrate and sabotage.

    Mean Girls is saved from total ho-humness by Fey’s script, which contains some on-target parodies of the ridiculous stuff of high school: “Don’t have sex! Because you will get pregnant—and die! Here’s some condoms.” Director Mark S. Waters, who also worked with Lohan in Freaky Friday, is a little less original this time around, though, including scenes such as the slo-mo cool-girl parade down the hall and lighting the Plastics glamorously while keeping Cady & Co. unenhanced and “real.”

    Until about the film’s halfway mark, that is, at which point Cady stops being a natural teen and starts walking around with her boobs pushed up to her neck. The worst sin committed by Mean Girls is not its pratfalls or its fart jokes—it’s the movie’s blatant hypocrisy. Even when Cady does get the message that it’s better to be faithful to your real friends than to go around hatin’ in the name of popularity, her shirt is about two sizes too small and her long hair is flowing. Cleavage is rampant, and a talent-show performance of “Jingle Bell Rock” is nearly worthy of the adult section. There’s even a shot of Regina’s kid sister practicing her, uh, milkshake in front of an MTV-blaring television.

    So...whether you’re a mean girl or a good girl, it doesn’t hurt to be sexed-up and camera-ready? Somehow, I doubt that’s what Wiseman had in mind.

     


  • Close Your Eyes

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Close Your Eyes  (2002)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    Close Your Eyes is a straight-up horror flick features a Poltergeist-ian little blond girl who spends most of the movie mute or in a trance—a scary-as-shit sight whose effectiveness decreases as the stupidity of the adults around her skyrockets.

    ER’s Goran Visnjic stars as Michael Strother, a hypnotherapist who has recently moved his family from America to England and opened a practice devoted to helping smokers quit. The good doctor, it seems, can not only rid people of unwanted behaviors, but also occasionally catch glimpses into his patients’ minds—which is what happens when he treats police investigator Janet Losey (Shirley Henderson). Near the end of Losey’s hypnotic trance—a very cool, partly animated sequence in which a Crayola-colored background of a sunny field and burbling brook turns sinister and ashy at the drag of her cigarette—the Silent One, Heather (Sophie Stuckey), appears in a vision.

    Strother, master of discretion that he’ll prove himself to be, mentions the little girl—whoops!—as he’s ushering Losey out the door. Losey soon returns to insist that he help her on a case: She’s been assigned to protect Heather, who recently escaped from a serial killer and now refuses to talk. After some hesitation, Strother agrees and becomes consumed with the case—though not so much that he’ll share what he’s doing with his way-pregnant wife, Clara (Miranda Otto).

    Director Nick Willing, who most recently helmed the TV movies Jason and the Argonauts and Alice in Wonderland, sets up the story, based on the Madison Smartt Bell novel Doctor Sleep, with surprising restraint. Strother becomes privy to mere snippets of the evil experiences lurking in Heather’s head, which are revealed in typical cheap-scare fashion but infrequent enough not to annoy. A re-creation of Heather’s kidnapping is also accomplished with eerie grace, cutting back and forth between Heather’s semiconscious re-enactment of her activities that day and the actual event, which is recounted only as far as the image of a shadowy figure behind her home’s frosted-glass door.

    But the early chill of Close Your Eyes dissipates as its story becomes more involved—and more absurd. Heather’s kidnapper, who is suspected of having killed other children by injecting them with blood of an incompatible type, is thought to be involved in an ancient religious ritual involving—right—the transfer of consciousnesses between humans. (The laughable comparison that’s made is to tech nerds’ attempts to “transfer their souls into computers.”) This information is pieced together by full-of-trivia model-shop owner Elliot (Paddy Considine), who, though he’s the only weird guy here besides the actual killer, proves that it takes just a touch of overfreakiness to turn a horror film to cheese.

    Visnjic and Henderson are worthy enough leads, and though Strother isn’t given much in the way of personality besides a history of insomnia and the requisite dark secret, Losey is a vivid tangle of nervous tics and visible frustration. The pair’s performances can’t hold together a script that collapses under its own ridiculousness, however. Each development is increasingly unbelievable, including a revelation that results after tea is spilled on a map, a child picking up the phone and serving as the killer’s personal 411, and jaw-droppingly dumb behavior by nearly all involved in the case.

    Admittedly, sometimes the sheer stupidity of the characters in a killer-thriller is half the fun, but here it makes Close Your Eyes truly a horror.

     


  • I'm Not Scared

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I'm Not Scared  (2003)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    In I’m Not Scared, a 10-year-old boy sees dead people. Well, for one thoroughly creepy moment in this Italian quasi-thriller, he at least thinks he does. But though director Gabriele Salvatores commits the recently clichéd sin of pairing cute kids with spooky situations, he proves that it can be done without oh-please predictability.

    That isn’t to say I’m Not Scared is a complete success. For approximately the first third of this leisurely hour-and-48-minute film, though, the story is mesmerizing. Based on a novel by Niccolò Ammaniti, who also adapted the script, I’m Not Scared takes place in 1978. It begins with Michele (Giuseppe Cristiano) and his little sister, Maria (Giulia Matturo), running with their friends through the golden wheat fields of a southern Italian village. With nothing but sun and open space filling their days, the kids create their own dramas—races, dares, fantastic tales—until Michele stumbles onto something more exciting: While searching for Maria’s gigantic glasses near an abandoned house where the gang was playing, he uncovers a pit, at the bottom of which he spies a motionless foot sticking out of a blanket.

    To this point, I’m Not Scared is as lyrical as Salvatores’ 1991 Oscar winner, Mediterraneo. Training a camera on a lush Italian countryside may seem like an easy way to create a blissed-out atmosphere, but if Under the Tuscan Sun was good for anything, it proved that it takes more than sunny vistas to make a movie. Wisely, Salvatores fortifies the charm of his fluidly shot landscapes with a depiction of a joyously simple lifestyle and quietly irresistible characters. When the adorable (but rather serious) Maria tries to talk Michele down from a tree, for example, she responds to his petulant assertion that he’s no longer her brother with “Can I have your comic books?”

    Salvatores maintains a sense of wonder throughout the movie by holding fast to Michele’s perspective, keeping mysterious a plot line that an American thriller would likely hit us over the head with. A crime has been committed, and the film’s gentle setup makes the dark turn as surprising to the viewer as it is to Michele. What makes I’m Not Scared problematic, however, is that as suddenly as the spine-tingling development is introduced, it’s just as quickly backed away from. There’s a simple explanation to what Michele has found, and Ammaniti reveals it at the film’s midpoint—which is pretty much when things stop being interesting. I’m Not Scared then reverts back to joie de vivre atmospherics, kids giggling and rolling around in the fields and all.

    After a taste of blood, Salvatores’ idyll may start to feel a little trite. But then again, judging the film’s success might be a matter of perspective: Depending on what you’re hoping to see, I’m Not Scared is a failed thriller, an exceedingly tame crime drama, or an enjoyable, Stand by Me–esque end-of-innocence story. The body-in-a-hole angle doesn’t get nearly as disturbing as it could, but given the obvious directions I’m Not Scared’s many predecessors have taken similar ideas, that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

     


  • Connie and Carla

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Connie and Carla  (2004)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    For the first half-hour or so of Connie and Carla, you’ll empathize with the Russian thug: “Stop talking, strange women.” The strange women in this case are Toni Collette and screenwriter and My Big Fat Greek Wedding star Nia Vardalos, who play the title characters in this gradually likable fake-drag-queen comedy. Sassy Connie (Vardalos) and sulky Carla (Collette) are lifelong fish-out-of-water friends who began inflicting their song-and-dance routines on the masses back in grade school. Now performing regularly in an airport bar, the heavily made-up, mall-haired duo are forced to take their show on the road when their boss gets them mixed up in a drug deal. In order to divorce themselves from their dinner-theater past, they decide to hide out where “there’s no culture at all.” Cue easy punch line: L.A.

    More obvious humor ensues when the pair arrives in California, cluelessly dancing with men at a gay club and then realizing their perfect cover—and career opportunity—would be to perform their campy, show-tune-laden act as men dressed as women. Surprisingly, Connie and Carla gets better at this point, mostly because of Vardalos and Collette’s impressive ability to belt out a song. Much of the movie is, in fact, a series of musical numbers, whether it’s the gals singing “Don’t Rain on My Parade” or casts in dinner theaters across the country doing “Mame,” to the increasing (and rather funny) enjoyment of the aforementioned heavy (Boris McGiver), who’s tasked with finding the women. The midfilm arrival of Jeff (David Duchovny), conflicted and long-lost brother of cross-dressing barkeep Robert (Stephen Spinella), helps, too, adding nuance to Vardalos’ at times eye-rollingly cheesy script. Jeff’s difficulty in accepting Robert, as well as his fondness for Connie, who he believes is a man, are refreshing spins on the requisite relationship issues, and all three actors wear their characters’ respective turmoils charmingly.

    Vardalos makes her character the too-obvious center of the movie, taking all the snappy one-liners for herself and leaving Collette little to do but pout, it’s true, but she can be forgiven: Connie and Carla’s sweet but uncloying message of acceptance and being true to yourself just about makes up for anyone’s big fat ego.


  • Yves Saint Laurent: His Life and Times and 5 Avenue Marceau 75116 Paris

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    In another realm, a more discriminating artist has devoted himself to clothing the masses instead of debasing them. At age 3, Yves Saint Laurent persuaded his aunt to change her dress before heading out to a big event, and it’s this precociousness that is the most interesting aspect of Yves Saint Laurent: His Life and Times, a short and spotty biography by filmmaker David Teboul.

    Life and Times, which is being shown with another Teboul documentary, Yves Saint Laurent: 5 Avenue Marceau 75116 Paris, seems meant only for those already familiar with the reclusive designer. The director begins Saint Laurent’s story with a light touch, showing him in the present day viewing photographs from his “wonderful” childhood in Algeria and then detailing his preternatural ascent to the top of Christian Dior at age 21.

    With the rest of the designer’s life, however, Teboul bobbles. Besides interviews with Saint Laurent, Teboul speaks with his mother; his lover and business partner, Pierre Bergé; and his “muses,” Loulou de la Falaise and Betty Catroux. But they’re introduced by name only, and their various relationships to Saint Laurent are hardly clear. Equally befuddling is their commentary, which forms the bulk of His Life and Times’ narrative: Each speaks generically about Saint Laurent’s talent and only cryptically about his more compelling “hard times,” or battles with depression. Bergé ends up being the most thorough source, but his fleeting mentions of Saint Laurent’s “narcissism,” “megalomania,” and stay in a mental hospital hardly give a satisfying overview of YSL’s dark side.

    Saint Laurent doesn’t do a much better of job telling his own story. Though his soft-voiced, gentle demeanor is in itself captivating, he discusses little about his revolutionary approach to fashion, which included favoring pants on women and using black models on the runway before any other designer.

    Teboul hits a low point about three-quarters of the way through His Life and Times by including a comment by an associate that Saint Laurent’s “style is probably how he made a name for himself.” That film, however, is a masterpiece next to 5 Avenue Marceau 75116 Paris. Opening with a chaotic scene of Catherine Deneuve trying on some of Saint Laurent’s suits, the film then moves to his design house, where the clothier and his deferential band of helpers are working on a collection.

    For the next 80 or so minutes, Teboul’s camera doesn’t move. It’s unlikely that anyone besides devotees of Saint Laurent or aspiring designers will find the stuff of 5 Avenue Marceau as fascinating as Teboul does: Scenes consist of outfits getting constructed and models walking listlessly in front of Saint Laurent and his cohorts, who then mutter “Pretty,” “Ravishing,” and “Thank you” so much you start thinking that maybe these folks aren’t very creative after all.

    Throughout, Saint Laurent barely changes his tone or temper—except for one instance in which he isn’t completely satisfied with a dress. “I almost cried!” his apparently hypersensitive assistant says—which is the only indication that anything upsetting occurred. Indeed, unless you’re gripped by the process of sewing on a button, Teboul’s explorations of artistry are about as exciting as watching paint dry.

     


  • Games People Play: New York

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    With Games People Play: New York, director James Ronald Whitney has gleefully ushered humanity into whatever circle of hell lies beyond The Anna Nicole Show. The documentary, which Whitney allegedly filmed to serve as the pilot of “America’s most uninhibited game show,” is the latest and most shameless addition to the reality genre, an experiment in which many carrots are dangled and much dignity is lost.

    Not that this cinematic car wreck is completely without merit. During auditions in which Whitney cherry-picks three men and three women to compete for a $10,000 prize, you’ll be genuinely touched by contestants such as Keith, who shares how tough it is to be a kid with Tourette’s: “I’d get basketballs thrown at me.” And during the impromptu what-kind-of-tree-would-you-be interviews with the finalists, you’ll gain insight into what motivates their free-spirited behavior: “You’re baring your body, which is not your soul, but it’s more than a lot of people bare.”

    Sadly, though, the strongest impression the documentary leaves you with is this: Even among beautiful people, there is good naked and bad naked. And Games People Play offers way too much of the latter.

    Whitney begins with the long line of hopefuls who have answered his call for six actors aged 21 to 30 who are “in shape and attractive.” Immediately, the film becomes an exercise in cruelty, zeroing in on the overwhelming number of respondents who not only have rather elevated opinions of themselves but who also are strong reasons for staying the hell away from personal ads. Out of the great unwashed, the comeliest are invited to participate in photo shoots and screen tests that evaluate, respectively, their ability to sizzle and cry on demand. Then the Six are selected, and the games begin.

    The contestants—Dani, Elisha, Sarah, Joshua, David, and Scott—win points by—what else?—participating in ridiculous contests. There’s Casting Couch, for example, in which the men pretend to audition actresses and see how far they’ll take a love scene. There’s also Naked Trio, in which the guys and gals are paired off and tasked with finding a stranger willing to come back to their hotel room—and do nothing but perform a little soft-shoe in the buff.

    Fans of reality shows will likely be entertained by Whitney’s creation, which has already been turned into a franchise with impending Hollywood and Bible Belt versions. For the rest of us, though, there’s a little more going on here than the usual hoop-jumping by people desperate for their 15 minutes. And Whitney’s uneven tone makes it difficult to know whether he wants you to laugh at these folks or feel sorry for them.

    The rather funny soundtrack, for example, includes a “Making Love Out of Nothing at All” sendup with the line “You’ll be acting, I’ll be lying/When I’m lying here with you” that provides some snide commentary on the Casting Couch sequence. But alternating with the game scenes is a whole lot of weepiness: From the opening screen tests to the in-room interviews—helmed by “judges” Jim Caruso and Dr. Gilda Carle, who asks such poignant questions as “How do you feel about faking?”—contestants confess atrocities from molestation to eating disorders. Some make you cringe; others, mostly the ones preceded by “I’ve never told anyone this”—and especially the one that ends with “I offered my butt as a peace offering”—you don’t quite believe.

    Consistent, though, is the astonishing ease with which all of the participants, both the contestants and the unwitting boobs they solicit on the street, will shed their clothes and generally humiliate themselves when asked. Viewers should prepare themselves not only for naked seduction, but also for naked singing, naked dancing, and, God help us, naked cartwheels. There’s no soft focus or clever editing, either: The goods flop around the way nature intended. And Whitney, naturally, shows everything—though he and his editors sometimes can’t help but make fun. When Dr. Gilda asks Sarah, the daughter of a diplomat who was shot in front of her, what her dad would think of her participation, her response is predictable: “I’d think he’d be OK with it.” What accompanies that pronouncement, however, is not: her lying onstage in the buff, getting her toes sucked, screaming and pulling her hair in fake ecstasy.

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement