Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

MovieBabe Blog

  • Primeval

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Primeval  (2007)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    Inspired by a true story; promoted by a misleading ad campaign. Primeval isn’t about an African “serial killer” who’s taken 300-plus lives and remains lurking. It’s about a crocodile, and to openly compare a crocodile to the likes of Ted Bundy and BTK is—how do I put this?—stupid.

    To further disappoint filmgoers expecting a slasher, Primeval doesn’t even focus exclusively on the croc; instead it tries to be a looks-and-brains girl by mixing politics with its gore, à la its big stepsister, Blood Diamond. But don’t balk just yet: This approach potentially doubles the ways in which the annoying lead characters may die. Screenwiters John D. Brancato and Michael Ferris, who also wrote Catwoman—I should give up here, shouldn’t I?—put American television journalists Tim (Dominic Purcell), Aviva (Brooke Langton), and Steven (Orlando Jones) in South Africa to report on the freshwater murderer, dubbed Gustave. Tim is dour and arrogant, and, amazingly, perpetually wearing his shirts half-unbuttoned isn’t the most irritating thing about him: He’s condescending to Aviva because she’s pretty and a relative newcomer and is downright floored when he finds out she attended Columbia. Aviva, on the other hand, is perhaps the most naive journo ever, willing to risk her life to save a puppy but clueless that the natives’ civil war might put them in danger, too. Meanwhile, cameraman Steven is the intended comic relief, but somehow he gets the only lines that pass Dialogue 101. (For an example of the rest, consider the wounded African boy who mutters, “I catch Gustave. Maybe he take me to America!”)

    Though Primeval’s cinematography is gorgeous from the start—it was shot on location in South Africa—first-time feature director Michael Katleman seems to have dropped the ball at first, employing the shaky-camera, low-budget style of showing a monster attack without showing the whole monster. We do eventually see the croc in its entertaining entirety, however, with Katleman adding a couple of unique touches to the gruesomeness. (Wait ’til you see one dude’s head pop.) And the corruption and brutality of the local government, which keeps a gun-scoped eye on the crew, is, admittedly, an interesting story in itself. It just belongs in another movie—as, perhaps, do you.


  • Pan's Labyrinth

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Pan's Labyrinth  (2006)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    Pan’s Labyrinth is one fairy tale whose characters won’t accompany Happy Meals. Not for the kiddies is writer-director Guillermo del Toro’s masterpiece, an intricate epic in which an 11-year-old girl’s escapist fantasies are set against the reality of fascist rule in 1944 Spain. For Ofelia (Ivana Baquero), the tyranny begins at home: She and her pregnant mother, Carmen (Ariadna Gil), have moved to a rural military post to live with her stepfather, Capitán Vidal (Sergi López), an officer in Franco’s army. A kill-first-and-question later type, the captain values Carmen only for the boy he’s sure she’s carrying and is openly disdainful of his bookworm stepdaughter, who refuses to call him father despite her submissive and sick mother’s argument that “it’s only a word.” So Ofelia, though often scared silly in the captain’s creaky old house, welcomes the way-more-terrifying adventures she’s invited on after she excitedly pegs a praying mantis as a fairy.

    Like del Toro’s previous film, Hellboy, Pan’s Labyrinth is painted in shades of red, bleak, and blue, the latter suggesting a perpetual twilight as Ofelia meets and obeys the orders of a monsterish faun (Doug Jones) who says that, upon completion of his tasks, a royal fate awaits her in an underground realm. The movie is brutally violent, chillingly beautiful, and utterly original—del Toro, in one of his nightmarish villains, has rendered one of the most memorable images to hit a screen—as it follows the struggles of good versus evil in both worlds.

    López, too, is unforgettable as the frighteningly unflinching captain, his dark eyes occasionally belying flickers of doubt in his character’s otherwise square-jawed, stern façade as he, say, confronts Ofelia or realizes a political resistance has developed within his own home. But this is Ofelia’s story, and Baquero is a worthy anchor: Old enough to rebel yet still quite naive, wide-eyed, and desperate for grown-up guidance, Baquero’s heroine is contradictory and expressive as she grasps for a magical ending to her real-life unhappiness. Her books have prepared her for the fantastic underworld she meets here; thank God there hasn’t been a film that’s done the same for us.


  • Black Christmas

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Black Christmas  (2006)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    Funny that the maniac in the holiday gorefest Black Christmas has a taste for tearing people’s eyes out—it might just make you wish the guy would pay you a visit not long after the opening credits roll. Sadly, writer-director Glen Morgan’s remake of 1974’s original isn’t even the worst horror movie of recent months; that doesn’t mean, however, that your mind won’t wander to less mundane activities, such as cleaning up every last pine needle dropped by your bone-dry Christmas tree.

    Morgan, who has done some fine, funny work as the scripter for Final Destinations 1 and 3 and as the writer-director for 2003’s Willard, has whiffed here in adapting and adding to Roy Moore’s old screenplay. Billy (Robert Mann) is the dude who makes the young girls cry, an escaped mental patient (aren’t they all?) who wears not a mask but a jaundiced face from the liver disease that made his mother (Karin Konoval) hate him. (Perhaps the caricatured boozehound was hoping she’d given birth to a future donor.) This family 411 is already more background than the first movie offered, but it goes on—and on and on. Different characters are tasked with long, awkward expositions about the freak who once was kept locked in the attic of the very house where a bunch of blank sorority sisters are currently ho-ho-ho-ing. (Among the recognizable actors are Lacey Chabert and Michelle Trachtenberg, though it should be said that the cast is uniformly bad.) But a hole can only be filled so much. Really, do you need to know anything else once a murderer is shown baking a family member’s flesh into Christmas cookies?

    Worse than hearing about Billy’s entire permanent record are master-of-the-obvious lines such as “He’s in the attic!” (after somebody, while pointing upward, twice calls the cell phone of one of the missing that can be heard up above them) and typical but too ridiculously drawn slasher-movie clichés, such as the bad guy’s apparent teleporting abilities and targets who are way, way dumber than usual. Morgan does get a bronze-plated star for pulling off a few creepy visuals of the stalker and, well, actually that’s about it.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement