Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

MovieBabe Blog

  • The Prize Winner of Defiance, Ohio - Domino

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Domino  (2005)

     

     By Tricia Olszewski

     

    Everyone knows that the ideal ’50s housewife reared her children, kept a spotless home, pampered her husband, and was perfectly pressed, coiffed, and made-up while doing it all. But according to The Prize Winner of Defiance, Ohio, this suburban legend also managed one other feat: instantly defusing her spouse’s alcoholic rages, with a quip, a bright smile, or, when things got especially tense, maybe a flung bowl of Jell-O.

    As portrayed in writer-director Jane Anderson’s debut feature film, this type of woman—forever to be played by Julianne Moore—is plucky, yes, but also a bit psychotic. Moxie is one thing. But laughing in the face of a desperately self-hating man when he’s drunk? Moore’s Evelyn Ryan does just that—and more: She ignores him while giggling with the kids, condescendingly but chirpily says, “Yes, I can hear you!” when he freaks about not being listened to, and dismisses him with “Really, where do you come up with these things?” when he hisses out what he thinks her problem is.

    Such moments aren’t emphasized in Prize Winner, but they do make the apple-cheeked Evelyn just a mite harder to buy as an example of human perfection. The film is the true tale of Evelyn Ryan, a mother of 10 who kept her household afloat by obsessively entering jingle contests that awarded big bucks or prizes. The script, adapted by Anderson from a book by Evelyn’s daughter, Terry “Tuff” Ryan (here portrayed as a teenager by Ellary Porterfield), strains mightily to at least justify Evelyn’s sometimes shabby treatment of her husband, if not excuse it entirely.

    While husband Kelly (Woody Harrelson), a former singer forced to punch a clock after an accident ruined his vocal chords, spends every paycheck on alcohol, Evelyn wins the cars, cash, and supermarket sprees that allow the couple to buy their first home and keep food on the table. There’s not much more to the plot than that. Of course, Evelyn keeps a stiff upper lip while suffering—through Kelly’s tantrums, through the lack of sympathy for her plight from policemen and even members of the clergy, through her inability to attend a weekly out-of-town gathering of other jingle-happy housewives (led by Laura Dern’s chipper Dortha Schaefer) because of Kelly’s refusal to drive her.

    Cinematically, Prize Winner is pure sunshine, as bouncily stylized as the wordplay in Evelyn’s jingles. (Sample line: “My frisk-the-Frigidaire, clean-the-cupboards-bare sandwich.”) Moore sometimes addresses the camera directly as her character provides narration, often while standing next to herself; there are frequent whimsical touches such as Evelyn’s riding an envelope as she explains the judging process of her contests, and backup singers who appear whenever Evelyn or Dortha are sharing their jingle entries. Period print ads brightly decorate the opening credits; the soundtrack includes such saccharine ’50s pop songs as “Bye Bye Blues” and “I’m Sitting on Top of the World.”

    Of course, it’s all presided over by Moore’s preternaturally cheery—and, after very similar turns in Far From Heaven and The Hours, now probably rote—domestic goddess. Mercifully, just when Evelyn’s strenuous smileyness and prim reserve start seeming ludicrous, she gets to show a human side. Moore, as ever, expertly portrays her character’s cracking façade. Evelyn’s is a quietly tearful desperation; even her gut-wrenchingly sudden breakdowns are remarkable for their restraint.

    If only Anderson had the same discipline. But soon after Prize Winner finally counters its gimmickry with a dash of realism, the film goes past the expected last-act feel-goodness with an appearance by the actual Ryan children, in a move that’s blatantly tear-jerking and borderline maudlin. You get the feeling that the real Evelyn, never one to go for the obvious in her craft, would not approve.

     

     

    Domino Harvey took a less shiny but no more realistic approach to unruly men. At least that’s the case in Domino, Hollywood’s sorta-true version of Harvey’s model-turned-bounty-hunter story. For example, when a couple of grifters take off with her and a classroom full of other toughs’ money instead of delivering a bounty-hunting-for-dummies lecture, the wispy Domino flies out a window, hurls a knife into their windshield, and shrieks, “Where the *** do you think you’re going? There are people in there expecting a seminar!”

    It’s a line that not even Uma Thurman could pull off. But attempted by ingénue Keira Knightley, it’s downright laughable. Luckily for Knightley, though, it’s the only moment that her casting as Domino feels very, very wrong. Under heavy makeup and studded punk-whore wear, she’s as good a stand-in as any young, pretty actress—because between Tony Scott’s infuriating direction and Donnie Darko auteur Richard Kelly’s script (with a story credit going to Steve Barancik, who penned an earlier draft), the movie is less a look at the life of the real Domino Harvey than it is an excuse to deliver another taxingly edgy, needlessly complicated variation on the crooks-and-guns theme.

    Domino gets the most interesting part of the story—why Harvey, the recently deceased daughter of actor Laurence Harvey, turned her back on a career as a Ford model to catch criminals—over with quickly. Sure, she’s shown playing with nunchucks as a sullen teenager, then punching her way out of a sorority as a sullen co-ed. And her dad died when she was young, along with her goldfish, so she learned to be cold. But the closest thing we get to a reason for Harvey’s transformation is a shot of a catwalk with the words “I am bored” appearing next to a model. Then the bloody rampages begin.

    It’s not the only time Scott, whose last effort was 2004’s Man on Fire, throws words onto the screen, and each time is more random than the last. Mostly, they’re bits of dialogue spelled out as the line is being said, though for variety, sometimes they’re an echo instead. Knightley provides a voice-over that’s occasionally fuzzed out to sound as if she’s, well, phoning it in. And as if all of these puzzling touches weren’t enough, Scott went the extra mile to ensure his movie was unwatchable: Between the constantly moving camera, dizzying in-and-out zooms, and bizarre flashes that accompany both ultraviolent busts and scenes from Harvey’s childhood, Domino is such a mess visually that it almost doesn’t matter whether the script is any good.

    For the record, it’s not. Once Domino earns the respect of partners-in-thuggery Ed (Mickey Rourke) and Choco (Edgar Ramirez) after that knife-throwing incident, she joins them on their assignments, leading to a project in which lots of money, some “sassy black women,” and a few mobsters’ sons are involved. The success of the team and the novelty of a gun-toting Barbie gets it a reality show. Worst of all, in the last chapter of this seemingly endless two hours, romance absurdly blooms. If only your head didn’t hurt so much, you’d laugh.

     


  • In Her Shoes

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    If for no other reason, admire In Her Shoes for this: Perhaps for the first time in a gooey family film, the introduction of a grandma actually improves the story. Shirley MacLaine plays Ella, the grandmother who grown sisters Maggie (Cameron Diaz) and Rose (Toni Collette) never knew was still alive. For the first half of Curtis Hanson’s film (adapted by Erin Brockovich scribe Susannah Grant from Jennifer Weiner’s bestselling novel), the focus is on the two only-in-fiction siblings, who are such opposites that they seem to have been born to different families. Rose, a little tubby, a little plain, is a lawyer who does everything right. Maggie, a lot thin, a lot gorgeous, is a perpetually unemployed party girl who, naturally, does everything wrong. Maggie moves in with Rose; they clash, eventually so badly that Maggie heads down to Florida to find Ella, evidence of whose existence she discovers while snooping in her dad’s desk for cash.

    In Her Shoes becomes less clichéd once Ella enters the picture, with the story morphing from the tired-if-charged fighting-sisters plot into a more intricate one involving the girls’ dead mother and their father’s complicated relationship with Ella. Even Maggie is allowed to be more than just a wild child, and Diaz does a surprisingly competent job of garnering a little sympathy for a character who’s hitherto been a contemptible brat. Less believable, or even necessary—really, how many members of a family undergo massive life changes at once?—is Rose’s transformation, though Collette, as always, gives a solid performance.

    MacLaine, however, is the star here, a powerful but never overwhelming presence whether Ella is proving herself sharper than anyone in her retirement community or stronger than Maggie’s scorn. Ella’s developing bond with her adrift grandchild is the most interesting part of In Her Shoes’ story, but not quite interesting enough to justify its 130-minute unfolding. Though the movie is never quite boring, it’s never terribly funny or touching or sad, either—even when everything starts falling into place as neatly as the passed-around shoes that fit all the women in the family. If you really want to shed a tear over Grandma MacLaine, you’re better off waiting for Terms of Endearment to hit AMC.


  • Waiting...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Waiting...  (2005)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    Let me tell you from experience: When restaurant workers struggle to find the humor in their soul-sucking jobs, they’re not thinking about genitals. Yet those are the primary obsession of writer-director Rob McKittrick’s debut, Waiting..., a behind-the-kitchen-door comedy as funny in concept as it is painful in execution. The film takes place in the chain restaurant Shenaniganz, a clear Bennigan’s ripoff, as Monty (Ryan Reynolds), a sarcastic longtime server, trains Mitch (John Francis Daley, also in TV’s similarly themed Kitchen Confidential) on his first day. The most important thing Monty teaches Mitch isn’t about customer service, though the newcomer does get to watch the team treating a bitchy customer’s steak with dandruff, snot, and groin sweat. No, instead Mitch learns about “the Game,” a pastime of male Shenaniganz employees (who, horrifyingly, include Luis Guzmán) that involves getting another dude to look at your package, then kicking him in the ass. Strategies of how to accomplish this—as well as frequent actual attempts—dominate the script, along with Monty’s obsession with underage girls.

    Alas, there’s also some heart to go with all the balls, as community-college-student Dean (Justin Long) gets depressed about his employment and starts rethinking his immediate future, which not-so-tantalizingly includes the possibility of becoming the restaurant’s assistant manager. Dean’s quandary is handled with surprising sensitivity, but most of Waiting...’s 93 minutes are spent on predictable stupidity and raunch. Staffers continuously dropping food on the floor? Check. Busboys getting high all day? Yup. A cook screwing the hostess in the bathroom? But of course. Reynolds, who quirkily embodied another underemployed restaurant staffer in the short-lived ABC series Two Guys, a Girl, and a Pizza Place, is (as usual) wasted on the big screen. Ditto for Scary Movie vet Anna Faris, stuck in the role of Monty’s bitchy ex. To be fair, McKittrick at least gets some of the details right: the lingo, the jaded veterans, the binge drinking that tends to take place after long, breakless, physically punishing shifts. But spend some time with his crew and it won’t be long before you’re thinking about the booze, too.


  • The Greatest Game Ever Played

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    The title might have made it inevitable, but here it is: The Greatest Game Ever Played is a big letdown. Well, at least the cinematic version of it. Screenwriter Mark Frost works from his own book here, which tells the true story of allegedly the Most Exciting U.S. Open in History—1913’s, when a 20-year-old, working-class amateur named Francis Ouimet rocked the then-genteel golf world by defeating British champion and record-holder Harry Vardon.

    Holes’ Shia LaBeouf plays young Francis, his earnestness if not his charisma oozing through as Bill Paxton unsubtly directs. Have trouble following the ball as it soars over the green when you watch golf on TV? Don’t worry; Paxton favors disorienting, warped zooms of the holes—or, sometimes, just cartoonishly flying along with each shot. Don’t like those stovepipe-hatted aristocrats who taunted the also-working-class Vardon (Stephen Dillane—you don’t know him) when he was young? Get used to ’em, because they come back a lot. The run-up to the Big Match is quite leisurely, with plot lines including Vardon’s early difficulty breaking the class barrier, Francis’ fascination with golf as a child, and the young phenom’s later swearing off of the game, spurred by the demands of his increasingly accented father (Elias Koteas) that he dedicate himself to work.

    Francis is, well, nice, though neither he nor any of the other characters have any personality—except for Eddie (Josh Flitter), Francis’ 10-year-old caddy, who has so much you’ll want to strangle him. And although Vardon is portrayed as a good guy throughout most of the film, he starts scowling with over-the-top (and most unsportsmanlike) menace toward the end, along with a couple of other British players who aren’t really introduced but are supposed to be of some significance. Sure, the final scenes are mildly exciting—though Disney isn’t even trying to keep the already-in-the-record-books conclusion a secret—and Paxton manages a couple of neat, nearly silent shots in which all you hear is the ball on the grass. But that’s not enough to make this even The OKest Game Ever Played.


  • Flightplan

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Flightplan  (2005)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    With M. Night Shyamalan still in hiding after The Village, you’d think big-budget suspense movies would have given up on the Big Surprise for a while. But no, here it is again in Flightplan—and you won’t buy it for a minute. Fortunately, even as you’re scoffing at this apparently requisite revelation, the film works itself back into a frenzy and returns to being fun, fun, fun.

    And by “fun,” of course, I mean edge-of-your-seat-tense. It’s Jodie Foster’s own little Red Eye as she plays Kyle Pratt, a recent widow who’s flying to New York from Berlin, where she works in aeronautics. Traveling with her is her 6-year-old daughter, Julia (Marlene Lawston), the kind of movie moppet who draws a heart on the cold airplane window when she sees her dad’s casket getting loaded into the cargo bay. After takeoff, Kyle and Julia spread out in some empty rows and fall asleep; when Kyle wakes up, Julia’s gone. Because Mommy knows her planes, she’d already pointed out to Julia that the one they’re flying is the biggest ever, which makes for a frantic and wide-ranging search that the flight crew soon gets in on—until they tell Kyle that there’s no record of Julia’s being on the plane, and, by the way, you’re nuts, lady.

    Foster is in pretty much every scene, and from the first shot of Kyle looking stricken, then seeing her husband in an obvious fantasy sequence, her grim-faced performance makes it clear that this is one mom on the edge. But like Rachel McAdams’ heroine in Red Eye, Kyle is as observant and quick-thinking as she is unrelenting, ensuring that she remains sympathetic even after everyone else on the plane starts wishing she’d shut the hell up. German director Robert Schwentke lends a Das Boot– ish claustrophobia to his American feature debut, and new scripter Peter A. Dowling and Shattered Glass writer Billy Ray infuse the story with plenty of post-9/11 paranoia while keeping the fever-pitch dialogue to a minimum. Add in supporting roles efficiently handled by Peter Sarsgaard and Sean Bean, and you’ve got yourself a nice fall popcorn-hoister. The Big Surprise? In this case, it’s that the story doesn’t need one at all.


  • Proof - Everything Is Illuminated

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Proof  (2005)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    At 27, Catherine is already worried about turning into her parents. “I think I’m like my dad,” she says. “I’m afraid I’m like my dad.” She’s not talking about a tendency to be critical or scavenge the refrigerator late at night, though: Her father, a brilliant mathematician at the University of Chicago, is also mentally ill.

    In Proof’s opening scene, Dad—aka Robert (Anthony Hopkins)—reassures Catherine (Gwyneth Paltrow) that she’s just fine. “Crazy people don’t sit around asking if they’re nuts,” he says. Catherine buys this for a minute—it’s her birthday, after all, and her father and his bottle of cheap champagne constitute her midnight celebration. But then she points out that it’s not a sound argument, because Robert is sitting around discussing the topic despite the fact that’s he’s clearly certifiable himself. He concedes to her logic, then counters, “Yes, but I’m also dead.”

    At this, Catherine’s face falls, and already Paltrow is doing a better job playing a woman on the verge than she did in 2003’s Sylvia. Perhaps it was the pressure of representing a beloved literary giant, because whereas Paltrow’s Sylvia Plath was stiff and ridiculous, her Catherine is petulant, defensive, desperate, and generally cracked. And when she gets a little love—and relief from the family and professors who also doubt her prospects—she’s radiant.

    The fact that Paltrow had experience playing Catherine onstage in London couldn’t have hurt. Proof, directed by Shakespeare in Love’s John Madden, is an adaptation of the Pulitzer Prize– and Tony Award– winning 2000 play by David Auburn. He co-wrote the screenplay with Rebecca Miller (The Ballad of Jack and Rose), and the engrossing story about trust and love and family remains the same: Catherine’s been her father’s caretaker for the past five years. After his death, she must contend with a former student, Hal (Jake Gyllenhaal), who wants to dig through Robert’s 103 notebooks of nonsense in the hope of finding something publishable, as well as with her sister, Claire (Hope Davis), a well-put-together sort who’s come in from New York to sell the house and drag the surely batty Catherine back with her.

    The opening scene’s not the last we see of Robert. Madden relies on flashbacks to illustrate the way Catherine became so angry (at the people who show up for his funeral but were never around when he was sick) and so uncertain (of her own mind and abilities, provoked by her dad’s frequent reminders that he’d done his best work by her age). Woven through these scenes are hints about Proof’s central question, unresolved until the end: After Catherine decides to trust Hal, she gives him the key to a desk drawer that holds what he was looking for—a remarkable proof that will rock the math world. Hal’s beside himself, as is Claire, but they’re really thrown for a loop when Catherine tells them that Robert didn’t write it—she did. Neither believes her, and it’d be difficult to prove the authorship either way.

    Paltrow’s impressive performance is matched by those of her co-stars. Davis is friendly but crisp as Claire, appropriately straddling the responsible/irritating caretaker line even though, as written, her character veers toward a knee-jerk assessment of Catherine as completely delusional. Gyllenhaal has standout moments, notably his pained expression during an impromptu eulogy by Catherine and the tricky way Hal, in love with Catherine, agrees with Claire that she couldn’t have written the proof but keeps backpedaling in an attempt to preserve his personal interest. Hopkins, too, gives a sprightly performance, his Robert energized by talk of work and numbers even though he’s no longer as sharp as he thinks he is.

    Auburn and Miller’s script is, of course, full of sadness and angst. But there’s cheerfulness—and humor—here, as well. Nerds will love the way Catherine, Hal, and Robert convivially approach nearly every conversation with cold logic instead of meaningless small talk, and the really nerdy nerds will snort at math jokes such as a song called “i,” during which Hal’s band stands silent for three minutes. (The imaginary performance, naturally, represents the imaginary number of the song’s title.) And Catherine keeps up her sarcasm throughout, especially when everyone around her is failing to point out the obvious. It’s one indication that although she may be damaged, she’ll probably be all right. Even if Catherine doesn’t quite believe it, Paltrow makes sure we do.

     

     

    Moviegoers who prefer sheer wackiness to math jokes should have a fine old time with Everything Is Illuminated, writer-director Liev Schreiber’s adaptation of Jonathan Safran Foer’s best-selling novel about a young man researching his family’s past. At least until its second half, when the film turns solemn with whiplash abruptness.

    But I suppose that’s what happens when you try to meld humor with the Holocaust. Foer’s ballyhooed debut, heralded by some while pronounced unreadable by others, juggles stories-within-a-story. But Schreiber extracted only the main plot, which focuses on an American Jew, also cutely named Jonathan Safran Foer, who visits the Ukraine in an attempt to locate a woman who appears in an old picture with his grandfather, whose life she might have saved. Jonathan (Elijah Wood) retains the services of Heritage Tours for his trip, an agency that turns out to be Alex (Eugene Hutz), a bling- and track-suit-wearing college kid who’s obsessed with American culture, and his grandfather (Boris Leskin), a cranky codger who thinks he’s blind and therefore has a—sigh—“seeing-eye bitch” named Sammy Davis Jr. Jr. Grandpa drives.

    Schreiber packs his film with as much tired affectedness as Foer’s book, if not more. Klezmer plays incessantly, and Alex’s thickly accented, “comically” malapropian English (“Girls want to get carnal with me, because I’m such a premium dancer”) serves as irksome narration. There’s also a giant, mean waitress who appears when the tourist attempts to order vegetarian food, and, of course, several cuts to Sammy Davis Jr. Jr., who for the entirety of the trip is actually outfitted with a shirt announcing the dog’s status as a—ugh, don’t make me say it again.

    Amid all the yuk-a-minute daffiness, Jonathan is as impassive as wallpaper. Always in a black suit, Wood wears big, heavy-framed glasses thick enough to grotesquely magnify his eyes, and his skin is pale and pancake-smooth. Jonathan barely reacts to his sometimes-boorish traveling companions, timidly submitting to their company even though he’s terrified of dogs. In short, he’s infuriating. And after a while, he’s even more infuriating than Alex: It seems an impossible feat, but Hutz, leader of a “gypsy punk band,” eventually transforms his character from a caricature to someone with goofy warm-heartedness and good intentions. He may kinda mean it when he tells the waitress, “Please, this American is deranged” as he tries to order a potato for Jonathan, but his pleading works. Even his cracked English is funny once in a while, though Schreiber ruins one of Alex and Jonathan’s livelier conversations—“I’ve heard of this John Holmes. He has a premium penis!”—with a shot of the damn dog.

    Once the trio find the shtetl where Jonathan’s grandfather once lived, the klezmer turns poignant and the car rides get quiet. But from that point, very little is illuminated, really, especially not to an audience unfamiliar with the book. There are flashbacks to executions, sometimes through Alex’s grandfather’s eyes. A lovely elderly woman (Laryssa Lauret) figures into the finale, and there’s a curious but interesting hint of the magical realism that’s more prominent in the book. There are some revelations, and everyone is touched. If you can survive wacky-foreigner jokes, dog jokes, old-man jokes, Sammy Davis Jr. jokes, klezmer, and the Holocaust, you might be, too.

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement