Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

MovieBabe Blog

  • Flight of the Phoenix

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    If you don’t want to know the outcome of Flight of the Phoenix, you of course should avoid the 1965 will-they-make-it-out-of-the-desert? drama starring Jimmy Stewart. And you should also, er, avoid reading the title. John Moore’s remake of The Flight of the Phoenix may not measure up to its predecessor with all that movie’s fancy “acting,” and really, the virtually point-by-point reimagining by scripters Scott Frank and—Ed Burns?!—didn’t take much imagination at all.

    But anyone going into this action-adventure with fresh eyes—and low expectations—could do a lot worse. Yes, there are bad lines (“I think a bee stung your big dumbass head!”), highly convenient plot turns (evil nomads who wait until the most dramatic moment to attack), and one cheesy musical interlude (to “Hey Ya!”—hiphop that even the white people can enjoy!). We know that the majority of the passengers took that doomed flight out of Mongolia because their oil rig was shut down, but the movie seems less concerned about who they are than the fact that each adds diversity: The modern cast now includes a woman (Lord of the Rings’ Miranda Otto), two black men (Tyrese Gibson and Kirk Jones, aka Sticky Fingaz), a Mexican (Jacob Vargas), a vaguely Middle Eastern man (Kevork Malikyan), and a handful of white dudes (most notably Dennis Quaid as the cocky pilot and a bleach-blond Giovanni Ribisi as the flight’s Poindexter/Nazi).

    But the scene that takes the plane bouncing through a black-orange sandstorm before it crashes is spectacular, and the continued setbacks the gang faces while stranded in the middle of nowhere are Saturday-matinee suspenseful. And though Ribisi may be the only actor here who doesn’t phone it in, no worries: His adenoidal, Hannibal-on-helium performance as the creepily needy brains behind the group’s Hail Mary shot at survival would make the 1965 Flight crew proud.


  • The Life Aquatic - Vodka Lemon

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Vodka Lemon  (2003)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    Steve Zissou is a man who’s not easy to love. The renowned oceanographer and hack filmmaker at the center of The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou may have the grizzled look of an old salt, but his attitude is more reminiscent of a sulky teenager who can dish it out better than he can take it. Consistently gruff with his family, crew, and strangers alike, Zissou nevertheless expects kid-glove treatment in return, whether it’s requesting that his wife not be so matter-of-fact when telling him how his cat just died or whining that a reporter whom he prodded into a rage subsequently hurt his feelings.

    As the journalist says later: “That’s so...effed up.”

    Fans of Wes Anderson may feel the same way about the director’s strange new flick, his fourth after the widely celebrated Bottle Rocket, Rushmore, and The Royal Tenenbaums. Promoted as being in the same quirky spirit as its predecessors, The Life Aquatic is a surprise—though not exactly a pleasant one. Whereas each of Anderson’s first three projects had a streak or two of melancholy, his latest aims for a much deeper black. Or you at least think it does. Sometimes.

    The crux of The Life Aquatic is a Moby Dick story: After Zissou (Bill Murray) loses one of his men to a so-called jaguar shark, he sets out to hunt down and kill the animal. (“What would be the scientific purpose of killing it?” Zissou is asked. “Revenge,” he replies, after a pause and a shrug.) Because his last few documentaries—projects as laughably stilted as grade-school film strips—were failures, Zissou’s current expedition is launched with precarious funding and diminishing faith from his benefactors, fans, and crew. When even his wife and business partner, Eleanor (Anjelica Huston), decides that his quest is too crazy and returns to land, Zissou’s impending breakdown is staved off only by his budding relationship with Ned (Owen Wilson), whom Zissou invited to join his crew after learning that the Kentucky-bred pilot might be his son.

    If only Wilson had traded in his onscreen appearance for his usual writing credit. After having Wilson help out with the scripts of his first three films, Anderson co-wrote The Life Aquatic with Mr. Jealousy screenwriter Noah Baumbach. The result is a tone that’s as uneven as Wilson’s Southern accent, with characters whose oddness—perhaps to offset Zissou’s cantankerousness—is forced to the point of preciousness. Willem Dafoe plays Klaus, a thick-accented and thin-skinned German crew member who feels hurt whenever Zissou doesn’t pay him enough attention. Robyn Cohen’s intern, Anne-Marie Sakowitz, walks around topless, while Cate Blanchett is a pregnant, squeaky-voiced reporter who refuses to swear. And Brazilian musician Seu Jorge is Pelé, the expedition’s alleged safety expert, who doesn’t do much more than perform acoustic, Portuguese interpretations of David Bowie songs. It’s all fitfully amusing, but the cues to laugh will usually seem stronger than your desire to.

    The look of the movie is also unrelentingly whimsical, from the red balled beanies and matching Speedos (the full-body suits, not the teeny blush-inducers) the crew wears to a dollhouse pan of the ship’s unexpectedly posh rooms, which include a giant gourmet kitchen, a library, and a spa with whirlpool and masseuse. Again, most of it smacks of trying too hard, but to be fair, Anderson’s bits of magic realism are lovely: Animatronic, Crayola-colored sea creatures make regular appearances, and a nighttime scene of a beach awash with electric jellyfish is a sight nearly intoxicating enough to explain why these people are so devoted to the life aquatic to begin with.

    But Zissou’s desperate unhappiness keeps crashing against the movie’s orchestrated fancies. Murray’s deadpan-crank schtick initially elicits a few chuckles, as Zissou rolls his eyes at overenthusiastic autograph-seekers or introduces Ned with “This is probably my son.” But his character’s bitterness and insecurity soon outweigh his sarcasm, and Anderson and Baumbach don’t exactly have the tragicomic touch: “I hate fathers and I never wanted to be one!” Zissou says at one point. Later, he asks his weary crew, “Do you all not like me anymore?” In between, pirates attack his ship, in a sequence that’s sometimes violent, sometimes slapsticky, and completely puzzling.

    The Royal Tenenbaums–ish gist of The Life Aquatic—that even a crushing midlife crisis can be overcome by sharing your life with others—does become more deeply felt toward the movie’s end. And for a few moving scenes, Anderson even forgets about cramming in idiosyncracies and lets relatable emotion take over as a poetically directed tragedy is followed by a bittersweet success that’s witnessed by the entire crew, elbow to elbow in a tiny pod. But it’s not nearly enough to conjure the wistfulness of the director’s previous films—or to overcome the quirkiness that has become less a trademark of Anderson’s than a crutch. These days, it seems, Steve Zissou isn’t the only man who’s not easy to love.

     

     

    Vodka Lemon’s absurdities, by contrast, are so slight that they barely register. Paris-based Kurdish director Hiner Saleem cuts his delicate film about a post-Soviet Armenian village with lightly comic sight gags, but more noticeable is the almost oppressive quietude.

    The film’s laconic, ironic first line is “Darling, everything is fine.” It’s spoken by widower Hamo (Romen Avinian), kneeling in the snow at his wife’s grave and updating her on the events of the day. Of course, everything isn’t really fine, as we soon discover. A frantically awaited phone call—witnessed, it seems, by the entire village—informs Hamo that his son has sent him a package from Paris. When he treks out to the post office on a broken-down motorbike to find only a letter, some pictures, and no money, the apparent slight breaks the struggling Hamo’s heart—as well as those of the neighbors who have lined up for a handout.

    When Hamo goes back to the grave the next day, he shows his wife—or, rather, her creepily etched portrait—the pictures and notes that prove their son “is not very nice.” He wishes for a return to Communism, when everyone seemed to be prospering. Nowadays, Hamo is forced to sell off his possessions to survive, always taking a price much lower than he initially fights for. And he’s not the only one in financial straits: On Hamo’s daily trips to the cemetery, he notices Nina (Lala Sarkissian), a widow who racks up IOUs with the bus driver and is about to lose her job at the liquor shack that carries the movie’s titular libation.

    Christophe Pollock’s white-on-gray cinematography alone is enough to justify the town’s love of drink. It’s hard to believe that this unnamed village is inhabitable: There are barely any buildings to cut the no man’s land of snow and sky, and the one local road is so infrequently driven that travelers carry along mats to sit on should their transportation break down or the bus not come. The Vodka Lemon, the only retail that’s shown, is a fragile oddity, a fruit stand in the middle of the middle of nowhere. Paying a visit is likely a more economical way to stay warm than paying the gas bill—and much easier than another village pastime: dragging large pieces of furniture through the snow.

    A little romance never hurts in the warmth department, either, and a hesitant one slooowly develops between Hamo and Nina as they ride the bus together. At first, their furtive glances seem coy; eventually, their refusal to even say even hello to each other becomes maddeningly inexplicable. As written by Saleem and co-scripters Lei Dinety and Pauline Gouzenne, Nina is practically a mute, both with Hamo as well as with her pianist-turned-hooker daughter. Though some interactions go poetically unspoken, others—such as when Nina’s sitting with her daughter after learning she’s about to be fired and they both start laughing—seem too prosaic even for this setting.

    Toward the end of its leisurely 90 minutes, the movie begins bouncing randomly between its little dramas, including Hamo’s granddaughter’s getting married off for her family’s financial gain, an attempted murder, and Hamo’s constant attempts to sell his belongings. Despite a magical end note and its sporadic humor, Vodka Lemon leaves you briefly forlorn—but with none of its stories developed very deeply, not even the melancholy will stay with you after the credits roll.

     


  • Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events - Spanglish

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Spanglish  (2004)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    The cheery elf in a Technicolor forest, boys and girls, is total bullshit—and the sooner you learn it, the better. In fact, you might as well learn it immediately: As Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events opens, a toothy gnome’s happy dance is interrupted by a grim narrator who advises, “I’m sorry to say this is not the movie you will be watching.” There’s no happy ending, he warns—and worse, there’s not even a happy beginning. The idea, in case you missed it, is that for the luckless protagonists who are about to be introduced, life sucks, you nearly die, and then life sucks some more.

    The narrator, naturally, is the titular Mr. Snicket, here voiced by Jude Law, otherwise embodied by 34-year-old San Francisco author and accordionist Daniel Handler. On the darker and more philosophical side of series-driven kid lit—though not nearly as dark and philosophical as, say, that Philip Pullman trilogy—his 11 Unfortunate Events books chronicle the misadventures of the three Baudelaire orphans, who have lost both their parents and their palatial home to a mysterious fire. In the film, as in the books, these children of woe—14-year-old Violet (Emily Browning), 12-year-old Klaus (Liam Aiken), and baby Sunny (Kara and Shelby Hoffman)—are put under the guardianship of the horrible Count Olaf (Jim Carrey), a stage actor and unknown relative who is only after the Baudelaire family fortune and sets out to rid himself of the children ASAP so he can live with his rats in peace.

    Written by Men in Black II scripter Robert Gordon and directed by Moonlight Mile’s Brad Silberling, Unfortunate Events combines the first three Snicket books, The Bad Beginning, The Reptile Room, and The Wide Window. Of course, there’s more to these stories than gloom, despite what the movie’s hurricane-gray look (courtesy Sleepy Hollow cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki) would have you believe. There’s a good bit of sly comedy, too, and plenty of mock-Gothic adventure. Each of the children has a special talent that helps the trio repeatedly escape Olaf: Violet is a miniature MacGyver, Klaus is a compulsive reader with a photographic memory, and Sunny bites—hard. Remarkable as they are, their ingenuity and courage are never quite enough to counter their terrible luck—which, as the title indicates, doesn’t improve much, even after they’re sent to live with their gentle Uncle Monty (Billy Connolly) and later with their paranoid Aunt Josephine (Meryl Streep).

    Law’s lilting narration maintains the books’ pseudo-high-minded style and dry humor—he suggests, for instance, that one of Sunny’s squeals probably means “Look at that mysterious figure emerging from the fog!”—and Rick Heinrichs’ production design is suitably artificial. Filmed entirely on Hollywood soundstages, Unfortunate Events is long on models, forced perspective, matte paintings, and other self-consciously cinematic devices, most of them coming across as more fun than fantastical. Little Sunny, who is perfectly understood by Violet and Klaus, even gets running subtitles for her gurgling and babbling—a cheap, nauseating effect that is perhaps the most Hollywoodizing of them all.

    For once, at least, the problem’s not Carrey, who is just the right shade of antic as the arrogant Olaf, whether menacing the children, mugging in front of his bored troupe, or approaching each interaction as a line reading to be perfected. Silberling seems to know that Carrey is best in small doses: He wisely limits his headliner’s mania as well as his screen time, keeping the focus on the kids. True, Browning and Aiken aren’t asked to do much more than meet the Baudelaires’ circumstances with stone faces and cool logic, but both bring sufficient gravitas to their smarter-than-thou characters. Streep, meanwhile, displays a surprisingly light touch as phobic wordsmith Josephine, who uses bad grammar as a sort of emergency code and may have a slight quake in her voice but isn’t afraid to address the children as grown-ups. “Be careful of the chandelier,” she tells them. “If it falls, it’ll impale you.”

    That line is a good example of Handler’s talent for ill-wind breeziness—an elusive tone that the big-screen Unfortunate Events captures surprisingly well. Though the film loses its way a bit toward the end, rushing to make an unsatisfactorily explained connection between the kids’ parents and their subsequent caretakers, it never allows its morals—don’t shortchange your gifts; home can be anywhere; and life is tough, but you can be tougher—to seem like moralizing. And even if these lessons escape them, the kids will definitely get that part about wayward lighting fixtures—which, after all, is way more important to know than anything having to do with elves.

     

     

    Spanglish arrives at feel-good-ness by basically the opposite approach: Framed as a college-application essay about role models, this James L. Brooks– helmed dramedy promotes itself as a life-affirming story about strength of character and conviction but manages to sneak in plenty of thoroughly acrimonious content.

    Adam Sandler may receive top billing here, but Spanglish’s central character is played by Spanish actress Paz Vega, best known as the star of 2001’s Sex and Lucía. Vega is Flor, a single mother who moves from Mexico to Los Angeles with her daughter, Cristina (Shelbie Bruce). Flor happily settles into a Spanish-speaking enclave and spends a few years working two jobs, but when Cristina nears puberty, Mom decides to find one higher-paying position so she can better keep an eye on her. Flor is hired as a housekeeper by the Claskys, a well-to-do white family comprising a clichéd wacky-alcoholic grandma, two completely unrealistic children, a pushover four-star chef of a father, and an unbearably shrill matriarch whose head is firmly up her ass.

    Writer-director Brooks, whose last cinematic effort was 1997’s Best Picture–nominated As Good as It Gets, tries to re-create the bittersweet tone of that movie with prickly characters and a relay race of situations that pose Big Questions About Life and Family. Flor walks naively into the Claskys’ polished dysfunction, the wellspring of which is the neurotic, self-centered, and just plain nasty Deborah (Téa Leoni). As Deborah crushes the self-esteem of her chubby daughter, Bernice (Sarah Steele); blames her mother, Evelyn (Cloris Leachman), for making her such a nutcase; and communicates with her husband, John (Sandler), only to argue with him, Flor soothes everyone with her warm Penélope Cruz eyes and proves that a common language isn’t a prerequisite to understanding.

    Despite a few moments of genuine gut-wrenching, Spanglish is essentially unbelievable. Its too-schematic narrative is one problem, with Flor’s desire to keep close tabs on the increasingly Anglicized Cristina at first contrasting with and then echoing Deborah’s atrocious mothering. (Deborah even “steals” Cristina for an afternoon of shopping and hair-streaking, neglecting her own daughter in the process.) But more glaringly, Spanglish is so narratively spotty that it feels as if it has been shorn of an hour or so of storytelling. Evelyn gives up drinking without discussion or apparent reason. The Claskys also have a son, Georgie (Ian Hyland), who is introduced and then, except for a handful of argument cameos, promptly disappears. As for Flor’s overnight mastery of idiomatic English, perhaps she was just playing dumb all along.

    On the plus side, Deborah is brought to hateful life by Leoni’s egoless performance, and Sandler is so low-key and tender as John that he’s hands down the film’s most likable character. Close seconds are Cristina, whom Bruce makes sharp and mature but not above a good tantrum, and, improbably, Evelyn, whose sudden last-act wisdom has her hiss to Deborah, “Lately, your low self-esteem is just good common sense.” But, after apparently pouring his efforts into making Deborah an indelible female lead, Brooks soon forgets all about the rest of the Claskys. By the end, the movie has jumped years ahead to show how what once seemed an unduly harsh move of Flor’s has actually turned out great, for her as well as her daughter. Brooks probably thinks of it as a clever inversion of the assimilation comedy. Ultimately, though, Spanglish’s most ingenious idea is that white people are bad.

     


  • Ocean's Twelve - Blade: Trinity

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Blade: Trinity  (2004)

    Ocean's Twelve  (2004)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    It’s sexier, it’s funnier, and it’s way more stylish. Steven Soderbergh’s Ocean’s Eleven may have been an improvement over the 1960 Rat Pack original, but given its all-star cast, Vegas setting, and cool-criminal crux, it still proved vaguely disappointing in the slick-caper category. With a new screenwriter on board and a few new director’s tricks, Ocean’s Twelve shows what kind of X2 fun a sequel can have when all that pesky exposition is already out of the way.

    Twelve opens three-and-a-half years after the first chapter, which ended with the thievery corporation headed by Danny Ocean (George Clooney) and Rusty Ryan (Brad Pitt) successfully robbing the Bellagio—and owner Terry Benedict (Andy Garcia), new paramour of Danny’s ex, Tess (Julia Roberts)—of $160 million. The gang members have gone their separate ways, making sorry attempts to lead legitimate lives (Danny tells a bank officer that he’s retiring after a career as a high-school basketball coach), when Benedict hunts them down, demanding that the group pay back the money they stole. Plus interest. In two weeks. Or else.

    The only one who’s not short his share of the dough is financier Reuben Tishkoff (Elliott Gould), so the rest of them—Ocean, Ryan, Linus (Matt Damon), Basher (Don Cheadle), Frank (Bernie Mac), Yen (Shaobo Qin), Saul (Carl Reiner), Livingston (Eddie Jemison), and brothers Virgil and Turk (Casey Affleck and Scott Caan)—decide that their only option is to do another job. Because they’re too hot in the States, they hop a flight to Amsterdam to figure out their next heist. Coincidentally, Rusty’s old girlfriend Isabel (Catherine Zeta-Jones), a cop whom he walked out on three years prior, is living in Amsterdam, working as a detective with the European criminal-intelligence group Europol.

    Scripter George Nolfi, taking over for Eleven screenwriter Ted Griffin, gets the balance of slick and silly just right, offering humor that runs from dry (Linus: “God, the interest just kills you”) to adolescent (Virgil and Turk: “You look like a retard.” “I’ll give you a million dollars if you don’t speak for a month”). One odd, if not entirely unwelcome, characteristic of Twelve is that wink-winking nearly takes over for thieving as the film’s central conceit. Roberts gets a chance to poke fun at herself, Bruce Willis makes a cameo, and Topher Grace returns in a completely unnecessary but pretty funny scene in which he plays a distraught version of himself, saying that he “totally phoned in that Dennis Quaid movie” and then yelling, “God, it’s like this Kabbalah crap doesn’t even work!”

    Another shift from Eleven’s script is that Clooney, Pitt, and Damon are even more in the spotlight this time around, with the other roles pushed into the background for reasons that are only sometimes explained. (Saul, for instance, decides that he doesn’t want to do another job, and Frank ends up in jail soon after they get to Amsterdam.) Each of them easily handles his version of mischievous charmer, but the real scene-stealer is the sleek-haired Zeta-Jones, whose allegiance-shifting Isabel—daughter of a criminal herself—is sharp, polished, and without a doubt the most stunning cop to ever grace the screen.

    Soderbergh, serving as his own cinematographer (as he did in Full Frontal, Ocean’s Eleven, and Traffic), goes schizophrenic with the camera, often zooming in on actors’ faces ’70s-style, then going with a handheld, then offering a bit of grainy, hypercolorized Three Kings stuff. Though the handheld strategy, presumably meant to inject energy, often backfires—not since Dancer in the Dark has watching a conversation been so nauseating—Ocean’s Twelve is otherwise breathtaking: Soderbergh’s extreme closeups of his impossibly beautiful actors, so tight you can see their pores, add immediacy in solo shots and incredible heat to the film’s few kisses, and his shading renders the movie’s historic European locales painting-pretty.

    The plot, light as a pickpocket’s touch, lacks the original’s tendency toward minutiae; it also leaves a few holes. And not everything goes right for our crooks—which is refreshing until, of course, everything does. But, really, quibbles about a sequel’s unrealistic breeziness seem hardly legitimate when its story is based on a $160 million casino heist. By the end, it’s less likely you’ll be keeping score than thinking about the conversation in which Danny tells the bank officer that he once was in a vault while it was being robbed. “That must have been quite an experience,” the guy says. A pause and a smug smile later, Danny wistfully says, “Yeah.”

     

     

    Blade: Trinity seemed doomed from the get-go. When a series’ first installment (1998’s Blade) is ho-hum and its second (2002’s Blade II) is different but not necessarily better, a third chapter starts looking more like a final nail than a triumphant resurrection.

    Consider a couple of new sidekicks—in the form of Ryan Reynolds and Jessica Biel—and straight-to-video suddenly seems like a more appropriate fate for the project. But wait: There’s also Dracula. How could anybody screw up the inherent coolness of Dracula? Maybe he’ll devour Reynolds and Biel, and the trilogy will go out with a delightful flourish.

    What a surprise, then, that Blade: Trinity succeeds and fails in just the opposite way: Dracula (Dominic Purcell) is a disaster, while Reynolds’ Hannibal King (!) saves the movie with his sarcasm. Biel? Well, her role as Abigail Whistler, daughter of the titular vampire slayer’s assistant (Kris Kristofferson), is pretty much the eye candy you’d expect it to be, and she doesn’t embarrass herself with the few lines she is given.

    As for Blade himself (Wesley Snipes), he’s relegated to the sidelines while his uninvited apprentices rescue him from tight spots or do the tiresome killing themselves. Which is another plus for Trinity: Snipes’ snarly, overly robotic half-vampire, half-human Marvel Comics character seems like a slayer as parodied on The Simpsons. Dark glasses, black trench coat, and giant arms aside, Snipes’ Blade is a monotone Terminator whose stiffness is not only far from wicked—it’s also completely uninteresting.

    The story involves Blade’s tussle with “vampire leaders,” who sic the FBI on him and then up and resurrect Dracula. Horribly, one of these leaders is portrayed by Parker Posey, whose too-big fake teeth not only make her mouth look grotesque but also muffle all the ridiculous lines that come out of it. (When she’s about to get Blade and is interrupted by the arrival of an old boyfriend, she screams, “Hannibal King!” serving as Reynolds’ introduction.) Posey’s Danica Talos is, however, occasionally funny, whether intentionally (during a vampire meeting about how Blade escaped, she gets so mad talking about it she punches a nearby blonde) or not (she sports a hairdo that can only be described as a raised swirly).

    David S. Goyer, scriptwriter for all three Blade films, also directs this time around. Apparently, he has a weakness for evil slo-mo walks (there are at least three of them), lots of confusing cuts and flashing lights, and kung-fu action—which seems highly arbitrary, given that the slightest jab with the slayers’ silver daggers disintegrates the vampires into tiny embers. Goyer’s only success is the performance he gets out of Reynolds. Facial hair just barely helps the boyish Van Wilder star teeter toward badass, but it’s a good thing his goofiness can’t be completely hidden: If it weren’t for King’s freakouts about things such as a blood-sucking Pomeranian or one-liners along the lines of “Unlike typical vampires, her fangs are located in her vagina,” Trinity would just be another perplexing big-screen telling of Someone vs. Those Other Guys.

    Even though one of those other guys is Dracula. Purcell, with closely shorn brown hair and not a terribly menacing demeanor, looks as if he’d be more at home in a Bally’s commercial than portraying the undead. His Dracula is suspiciously wussy throughout, and at Trinity’s lame end, the suspicion is confirmed: Outfitted in what looks like a metallic ruby tank top, vinyl pants, and a silver shield on one shoulder, the character gives up the fight with “You fought with honor. I respect that.”

    At the beginning of the film, a narrator disparages the classic Hollywood Draculas by saying, “Everyone knows that movies are full of shit.” Despite surpassing low expectations, Blade: Trinity makes this a self-fulfilling prophecy.

     


  • Closer

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Closer  (2004)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    It’s quite possible that Mike Nichols wants his audience never to get involved in romantic relationships again. After mulling terminal illness in the recent television specials Wit and Angels in America, the director has returned to the sometimes equally brutal subject he’s been exploring every few years since his 1966 debut: love and sex, or the ties that scald. Add Closer to Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, The Graduate, Carnal Knowledge, and even Primary Colors, and you have enough train wreckage to scare the Kinsey out of casual boot-knockers for good.

    Like both Woolf and Carnal Knowledge, Closer is a mesmerizing, zoomed-in meditation on the coupling of four. The film is bookended by the slow-motion stroll of a beauty on a busy city sidewalk: As Damien Rice’s aching “The Blower’s Daughter” plays—“And so it is/The shorter story/No love, no glory/No hero in her sky”—a young former stripper named Alice (Natalie Portman) cuts through the unwashed, commanding the camera’s attention first in London and later in New York. Naturally, she also commands the attention of the men around her, who in the opening scene include Dan (Jude Law), a shabbily dressed obituary writer whose eye-lock with Alice may well be the most thrilling moment of his life. When Alice, apparently either smugly distracted by her effect on the guys or just too damn ethereal to be bothered with tedious matters such as traffic, gets hit by a car, Dan takes the opportunity to be her knight in shining armor.

    Thing is, Dan isn’t the lonely heart he appears to be: He’s living with someone when he and Alice spend that afternoon in the hospital. A year or so later, American photographer Anna (Julia Roberts) is taking Dan’s picture for the jacket of his first novel—dedicated to Alice—when artist and subject share an urgent kiss. Anna’s reaction when she finds out Dan is now living with Alice, however, isn’t so friendly—and when Dan responds to her sudden cold shoulder with “But you kissed me!” she replies, “What are you, 12?” By this early stage of the film, you’ll realize that, emotionally, that’s about right: When he can’t get Anna out of his head a few months later—Closer jumps, seamlessly, forward and sometimes back in time—Dan, in a chat room called London Sexanon, poses as Anna while IMing a freaky dermatologist named Larry (Clive Owen), which leads to Larry and the real Anna’s meeting and subsequent relationship.

    In his production notes, Nichols comments that when people think about intimate unions, “we remember beginnings and endings and tend to edit out the middles.” The odd thing about Closer is that even though it doesn’t bother with the worn-in, contented stage of these affairs, skipping months and years between first meetings and death-knell problems, it also barely re-creates the thrill of falling in love. Based on the Broadway play by Patrick Marber, a TV veteran who also shaped the screenplay, the film remains highly theatrical, offering one stagy beginning and knee-jerk “I love you” after another. Of course, the dramatis personae are so flawed that even new relationships smack of distress: Attraction, especially in Dan’s case, nearly always comes off as neediness, the promise of the new feeding the ugly, gaping holes in people who, in the film’s psychospeak, think they “don’t deserve happiness.”

    So every relationship kicks off with a sinking feeling, even when things could work out nicely. And when they work out not so nicely—well... One situation that Closer brings to especially horrible life is the confession, including all of its messy follow-up talk. With all the shifting loyalties at play here, Nichols gets to present Marber’s variations on this conversation four times, and each is wrenching. Take the George-and-Martha vitriol in the sorry-I’ve-been-cheating scene between Larry and Anna, who’ve married. Both have secrets they suddenly want to reveal the night Larry comes home from a dermatology convention, though Anna’s is much more devastating. The grilling that ensues as the camera follows the couple around their apartment is merciless: Where did you *** him? How recently? Is he good? Do you go down on him? How does it taste? When Anna, at first weepy and regretful, is finally pushed to hiss, “It tastes like you but sweeter!” Larry responds with “Thanks for your honesty. Now *** off and die.”

    The film’s four big names are quite effective as morally bankrupt but still sympathetic characters. If there is a weak link, it’s Portman, but only because she looks like a preteen next to the others and is unsurprising—which simply means that she’s as subtle, magnetic, and heartbreaking as she was playing the romantic lead in Garden State. Everyone else, meanwhile, brings a little something different to the table: Law’s performance as a compulsive working-class philanderer is much more nuanced, raw, and ultimately believable than his turn in a nearly identical role in Alfie. Roberts sheds her sassy America’s-sweetheart demeanor to play the twice-divorced Anna as a woman who isn’t quite jaded enough not to have a serious grass-is-always-greener complex. Owen, far from looking the suave heartthrob of King Arthur or Croupier, wears Larry’s insecurity and desperate unhappiness with slightly deluded goofiness, best shown when he first meets Anna and cheerily, unabashedly describes the pathetic cyberencounter he thought they had the previous day.

    Cinematographer Stephen Goldblatt and production designer Tim Hatley create a London that, like Closer’s central relationships, alternates between lived-in and cold: The cramped apartments, offices, and gray-day commutes that make up the men’s lives contrast with the spectacular art galleries, spacious lofts, and slick strip clubs the women tend to occupy. The characters are as comfortable inhabiting the opposing worlds as they are with their fluid ethics: The most obvious behavior pattern in Marber’s script (besides cowardice, of course) is mewling about how you can’t help but tell the truth—though only after extended periods of betrayal.

    At the end of all the crossing, double-crossing, and expert unpacking of a caseload of issues, you’ll probably find these people dreadful. But anyone who doesn’t see a little bit of him- or herself in the wickedly honest portrayals has got to be a saint. And whatever your malfunction, Dr. Larry has you diagnosed: As he points out in one particularly Nicholsesque metaphor, the human heart resembles nothing so much as a fist covered in blood.

     


  • Overnight - Paper Clips

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Overnight  (2004)

    Paper Clips  (2004)

     

    By Tricia Olszewski 

     

    Clerks director Kevin Smith once wrote, “It feels like every year at this time, someone ‘discovers’ that Harvey Weinstein is a tough businessman with a temper as large and legendary as his passion for cinema. Whoa. Stop the presses.” In 1998, that someone was Troy Duffy. The New England native was 25 when he was tapped by Weinstein as the next Great American Independent Filmmaker; he was 26 when the Miramax co-founder decided to stop returning his calls. But because Duffy, the subject of Tony Montana and Mark Brian Smith’s quick-rise-and-long-fall documentary Overnight, is such an unbelievable prick, it’s arguable whether even the schadenfreude offered by his undoing is enough to make watching the guy’s story satisfying.

    Mercifully, at least, it’s short. But it won’t be long into Overnight’s 82-minute runtime before you start rooting for Duffy’s failure. In 1997, the aspiring director was tending bar in Los Angeles when his script, The Boondock Saints, was bought by Miramax for a “high six figures.” Not only did Weinstein agree to make the movie, he also decided to let Duffy direct, have casting approval, and supply the soundtrack with his unsigned rock band, the Brood. For good measure, Weinstein also threw in ownership of J. Sloan’s, the bar where Duffy had been working.

    Duffy’s Cinderella deal made him the toast of the tabloids, with Variety and other entertainment rags quick to grant him next-big-thing status. As Duffy, a bearded Kevin Smith look-alike, proudly points out his headlines or gleefully moves into his production office, he’s initially likable, apparently a decent and hardworking, if occasionally misguided, blue-collar boy. He insists on including his brothers and bandmates in the deal, and he seems appreciative to have been recognized. Or maybe not: Between chain-smokes and expletives, Duffy boasts, “If you got the goods, you got the goods—no matter how much of a fuckup you are.”

    It turns out, though, that Duffy much preferred to talk about the goods than to deliver them, which shifted Montana and Smith’s project from a making-of doc to a caught-on-film train wreck. The filmmakers are there from the signing of the deal until 2000, when most of his partners are working construction jobs and Duffy is far from the superstar he’d imagined himself becoming. Besides a tangential, gee-whiz look at Duffy’s flood-ravaged apartment, the narrative is simple and relentless: success, failure, failure, failure.

    Montana and Smith never actually give us the Weinstein view, but it’s not hard to guess what colored it: Duffy’s mouth, which is giant, hateful, and never-shutting. The man’s logorrheic megalomania runs uncensored throughout Overnight, souring the deal with Miramax (which he insists will “pay dearly”), scotching a contract with a record label that was going to sign the Brood sound-unheard (which Duffy then accuses of being “scared of me”), and dissolving the goodwill of Duffy’s bandmates, to whom he refuses to give any money until he’s good and ready (“‘This is a band—we all did this,’” Duffy sneers. “Did we all do this? I don’t think so”). After this no-name is shown itching to play hardball with the William Morris Agency and calling Jerry Bruckheimer an idiot—OK, that’s forgivable—it’s clear that “Hollywood’s new hard-on” doesn’t have an inch of sense.

    As deals continue to fall through and Duffy gets increasingly unhinged, Overnight skirts Some Kind of Monster territory, with Duffy’s associates sometimes defending him but more often expressing their misery. The Boondock Saints eventually does get made for another studio, starring, unfathomably, Willem Dafoe and Billy Connolly (both of whom supply some welcome humor by taking shots at their asshole boss), and the Brood, now renamed the Boondock Saints, even manages to put out a record (total sales: 690 copies).

    Though each project fizzles pathetically, the directors’ attempt to make Overnight a cautionary tale never quite succeeds. It’s impossible to relate to Duffy, or to imagine that sudden success could go so wickedly to one’s head. And because Montana and Smith never really take us out of Duffy’s world—agent, distributor, and family-member interviews are fleeting and uninsightful—the result is more psychological torture than psychological portrait. Overnight’s resounding—and ultimately insignificant—message is only this, spoken by one of Duffy’s cohorts: “Why am I doing business with this man?”

     

     

    Whereas Overnight provides a bitter example of humanity, there’s enough goodness in Paper Clips to make your teeth hurt. And though cynics may find salt-of-the-earth saintliness and disenfranchised demonic self-possession equally distasteful, this documentary about a backwoods school’s unusual history project, despite itself, does exactly what it sets out to: move you to tears.

    Paper Clips tells the story of a middle school in Whitwell, Tenn., a “poor but not depressed” town of 1,600 with two traffic lights and almost zero diversity. Principal Linda Hooper, noting that her student body contains five African-Americans, one Hispanic, and no Jews or Catholics, admits that when the people of Whitwell meet someone different from them, “we don’t have a clue.” What the school has long needed, she says, is a way to teach the kids that, outside of their Mayberry borders, “not everybody is white and Protestant.”

    In 1998, she and Assistant Principal David Smith decided to introduce an intensive study on the Holocaust into the curriculum, reasoning that it would both expose the students to another religion and different nationalities and teach them the consequences of intolerance. When one student responded to the statistic that 6 million Jews were killed during the period by asking, “What is 6 million? I’ve never seen 6 million,” the administration suggested that the kids figure out an object they could collect 6 million of to help them visualize the enormity of the genocide. Once the students learned that the citizens of Norway, where the paper clip was invented, had worn the lowly bit of hardware as a symbol of patriotism and Nazi resistance, the after-school project was born: With the help of Hooper, Smith, and eighth-grade teacher Sandra Roberts, volunteers began sending out letters to organizations and famous folks (including Tom Hanks, Bill Cosby, and the George Bushes) to ask for paper-clip donations.

    Somewhat haphazardly directed by Elliot Berlin and Joe Fab, Paper Clips consists mostly of interviews with the school’s administrators and students and footage of these tirelessly sunny Southerners as they meticulously catalog their booty—which, for the first few years, came in waves so unremarkable that Roberts determined it would take them 10 years to reach their goal. After the project caught the attention of NBC Nightly News and the Washington Post in 2001, however, things changed, leading to a chain of events that culminated in Whitwell’s acquiring its biggest piece of hometown pride, a German rail car formerly used to transport Jews that was turned into the Children’s Holocaust Museum.

    Similarly, it’s only the final third of Paper Clips that makes the project seem worthy of celluloid instead of the news blurbs that it had already garnered. Berlin and Fab embellish the film with constantly swelling strings as both the student and adult volunteers talk about what they’ve learned, predominantly about not stereotyping and recognizing that others may be less fortunate. That’s nice, but, well, who really cares? Kids learn to look outside of their own isolated little worlds every day, courtesy of millions of educators whose creativity is just as remarkable as the Whitwell bunch’s. As the project’s collection soars—at the end of the film, more than 29 million paper clips have been collected—the boxes of clips and volumes of books recording every donor’s contribution simply seem like a colossal waste of time, space, and office supplies.

    But then Berlin and Fab inject a dose of much-needed reality: The school invites Holocaust survivors to speak to the community, and the episode is devastating. As a series of elderly, heavily accented men and women tell of their personal experience—one man chokingly tells of asking a guard what happened to his mother and brother, only to see him point to the smoke in the sky—the project suddenly takes on a poignancy that moves it beyond mere homework. The survivors are grateful that their trauma is still being remembered, and remind their listeners that in not too many more years, people will be no longer able to hear their accounts firsthand. As one notes, “There’s not enough paper in the whole world and not enough pens to write down what we went through.”

    From this point until its finale, Paper Clips argues that although the resulting Children’s Holocaust Museum, which houses 6 million paper clips for the deceased Jews as well as 5 million for other Holocaust dead, may not rival other memorials in size or sophistication—or, for that matter, the resonance of Berlin and Fab’s most unflinching footage—it’s still valued by those whom the tragedy has personally touched. “If we have accomplished nothing else,” Hooper summarizes, “we have helped these people find a resting place.” Of course, memorials, like documentaries, are also for the rest of us. And in that respect, Paper Clips is marginally more successful than its subject: For a few minutes, at least, it connects past and present in a way you won’t soon forget.

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement