Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

MovieBabe Blog

  • Lucky Numbers

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Lucky Numbers  (2000)

    Thanks to Lucky Numbers, I can respect Nora Ephron again. Sort of. Always a fan of her essays but slightly sickened by the down-your-throat romanticism of films such as Sleepless in Seattle and You've Got Mail, I had since stopped paying attention to projects labeled with the Ephron moniker — Lucky Numbers being no exception. Not to say that the movie is very good, but — and I'm not sure what this says about me — sprinkle some thugs, a couple of bodies, and a little profanity into what promises to be a feel-good comedy, and you're a friend of mine.

    Lucky Numbers tells the story of Russ Richards (John Travolta), a celebrated meteorologist in dismal Harrisburg, Pa., whose money troubles compel him to follow the nontraditional financial advice of seedy pal Gig (Tim Roth). When an insurance-fraud scheme goes awry and leaves him with a new debt to Dale the Thug (Michael Rapaport, a reliable one-trick pony), Russ becomes truly desperate: Taking advantage of his position at a local television station as well as his relationship with trashy Lotto-ball girl Crystal (Lisa Kudrow), Russ decides to rig the state lottery.

    Because none of the people who end up involved in the scam are the sharpest knife in the drawer, circumstances quickly turn dire, and that's when you forget that you're watching an Ephron movie. Kudrow, who yells suggestions like "Put a motor on it!" to horse-driving Amish, is the ironic bright spot of the film, giving the greedy-turned-murderous Crystal a haughty but understandable I'm-so-much-better-than-this-place attitude. Travolta's whiny, aw-shucks desperation gets tiresome really quickly, however, and even the admirable bit players — Roth, Rapaport, and Bill Pullman as Lakewood, an easily distracted, Fargo-esque cop — aren't enough to salvage the film from the annoyance of Russ' boobery. The movie is best when it's being bad — Lakewood's fascination with the dancers in Gig's strip club ("They seem like Albany girls!") is a highlight — but Lucky Numbers is still a long two hours.


  • Bedazzled

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Bedazzled  (2000)

    A guy who goes around exclaiming things like "Ho doggy!" and remembers verbatim a pedestrian conversation he had with his dream girl years after the fact could obviously use a little help in life. And it doesn't hurt to get it from Elizabeth Hurley.

    In Harold Ramis' Bedazzled — an Americanized and, in many respects, inferior remake of Stanley Donen's 1967 Dudley Moore and Peter Cook comedy — Elliot (Brendan Fraser) is struggling. He's the worst kind of doormat: a loser who doesn't quite know he's a loser. So he keeps cracking cringe-inducing jokes, inviting himself to after-work get-togethers, and pining ever-so-obviously after Allison (Frances O'Connor), a pretty co-worker who hurtfully doesn't remember him — despite their intense exchange about the weather a few years back.

    Enter a savior, although things don't unfold in the typical your-misery-now-will-earn-you-heaven-later way: With Hurley's Princess of Darkness dangling eternal happiness in front of the soon-to-be damned, hell has never looked so good. She offers Elliot seven wishes in exchange for his soul, and although he initially rebuffs her with lines like "You seem really nice in a strong, scary kind of way," he can't resist temptation. When each of Elliot's wishes turns out to be significantly less fulfilling than he expected, he finally finds true happiness (or, rather, a renewed appreciation of his old life) by using his last wish for an unselfish purpose. (Ah, Hollywood.)

    Hurley's Devil lacks the gleeful, childlike mean streak of Cook's original, although I suspect contemporary audiences won't try to see much beyond her red leather outfits and great hair. Fraser uses his natural oafishness to great comedic effect as he morphs into the not-quite-right incarnations of Elliot's dream lifestyles. From cliché-spouting NBA star to ultrasensitive nature-lover who writes songs about dolphins ("You're more than a fish to me"), Fraser's characterizations are the only substantial moments in this wisp of a film.


  • Loving Jezebel

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Loving Jezebel  (1999)

    Most fluffy-and-sweet romantic comedies fill the screen with good-looking, charming singles who are smart and funny and say all the right things at the right time. Marathon hookups ensue, maybe a little conflict is thrown in, and the audience goes home happy, dreaming about the perfect mate.

    Loving Jezebel, on the other hand, throws together the most odious cast of characters this side of reform school and, although it purports to celebrate the power of love, will leave the emotionally unfettered looking forward to spending next Saturday night alone with a DVD and a bottle of wine. The story belongs to Theo (Hill Harper), an allegedly cute-as-can-be bachelor who's been drawn to other men's women since his first game of Duck-Duck-Goose. And, of course, even though his personality is Wonder Bread-bland and his most passionate display is a whiny, insistent "I wanna be with you, OK?" to someone who tells him she has other plans (the bitch!), every woman who comes into his life falls crazy in love with him.

    Not that the Jezebels are prizes themselves: There's the obnoxious one who pissily tells Theo during a date that she thinks sex and kissing are disgusting; there's the obnoxious one who not only surrounds herself with teddy bears but also shoves them in Theo's face while they're fooling around; and, oh yes, there's the obnoxious one who comes on to Theo, tells her boyfriend that Theo got her drunk and started feeling her up, and then follows Theo around professing her love for him before finally shouting, "I need communication!" when he doesn't reciprocate. Yet Theo can't help desiring each and every one of the shrill clucks, whom we are supposed to see as epitomes of Beauty and Poetry and Love.

    And the award for worst line of dialogue? You be the judge: "I told her the story I was sure would scare her away, but Samantha wept like Shakespeare's Desdemona for the distressful strokes I had suffered" or, "History called them Jezebel, but I called them love."


  • Lost Souls

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Lost Souls  (2000)

    Apparently, if you've seen one exorcism, you've seen them all. The versions that are offered in Lost Souls have the guttural roars, acrobatic thrashing, and poltergeistian mayhem that befit a satanic ouster. Unfortunately, that's all that the movie manages to get right.

    Winona Ryder plays Maya, a formerly possessed woman who gets chummy with the band of priests who helped deliver her from Evil. They believe that another possession is about to take place. A mental patient has predicted — through an elaborate numeric code that clever Maya cracks — that, just as God took the form of man, Satan is going to be paying the kingdom a visit in the body of one Peter Kelson. Turns out that Peter (Ben Chaplin), beyond being the subject of the kook's prophecy, has another surefire characteristic of a future Man in Red: As the film's opening quotation informs us, "A man born of incest will become Satan." (There's a reason why Peter's uncle, Father James — Philip Baker Hall, forever Seinfeld library detective to me — is so close to his nephew.)

    Maya finds Peter, a best-selling author specializing in murderers, and tries to persuade him that he has only until his 33rd birthday (tomorrow!) to — well, she doesn't actually mention any way to prevent the devil from moving in, short of Peter's death ("If you die, Satan can't stay!"). Peter eventually accepts Maya's story, along with the fact that he essentially has less than 24 hours to live, and expresses his grief in true cinematic fashion — by not-so-passionately trashing his room. (Maybe it wasn't such bad news after all.)

    Chaplin's controlled outburst isn't the only instance of listless acting: Ryder is twice seen disarming a would-be attacker, and the slow and perfunctory manner in which she slaps aside the weapons and escapes harm makes me think even I could be a superheroine. The movie's biggest surprise is that Meg Ryan is one of the producers. I'm guessing that, after audiences see Lost Souls, Ryan won't consider Russell Crowe her only dreadful mistake.


  • Meet the Parents

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Meet The Parents  (2000)

    Forget Urban Legends: Final Cut. And that overhyped devil-in-a-blue-nightgown rerelease. I have seen hell, and its truest cinematic portrayal can be found not in these slash-and-spew horror flicks but in Jay Roach's comedy Meet the Parents. It's the hell of anyone who's ever had a joke fall flat. Or who's walked into a roomful of strangers and felt as if he had just landed on Mars. Or who's desperately wanted to say to people whom he's trying to impress that he really is charming and intelligent and not a freak who, cracking under the pressure of making dinner conversation, will say he'd once milked a cat on his Detroit farm.

    Meet Greg "You Can Milk Anything With Nipples" Focker, my hero. Greg (Ben Stiller) is about to propose to his girlfriend, Pam (Teri Polo), when he learns of both her sister's engagement and the importance of securing her father's approval. Seeing an opportunity to do things properly, Greg holds off on the proposal and instead waits to impress Pam's family at the upcoming wedding festivities, when the couple will be staying with Pam's parents, Dina and Jack (Blythe Danner and Robert De Niro). Shortly after Greg and Pam arrive at her idyllic suburban childhood home, Greg's city-boy suavity is quashed by Jack's polite but disarming interrogations. A short list of Greg's faults: He's a nurse ("Not many men in your profession, huh?"), he hates cats (Jack on dogs: "Emotionally shallow animals....You need that reassurance?"), and he has that unfortunate last name ("How do you pronounce your last name, Greg?" Dina delicately asks).

    Indeed, it's pronounced just as it's spelled, and the running joke only gets more effective as Greg's confidence diminishes and Jack zeroes in for the kill with accusatory questions like "Are you a pothead, Focker?" And for those less amused than I am by the brilliance of well-placed profanity, there are plenty of loftier laughs, thanks to Stiller's trademark sarcasm and De Niro's comedic take on his usual tough-guy persona. If you've ever had to respond to such a no-win challenge as "I've got nipples; can you milk me?" Meet the Parents is for you.


  • The Exorcist

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Exorcist  (1973)

    Captain Howdy is such a fun name for a demon. I suppose "fun" isn't exactly the word that people who saw The Exorcist in 1973 used to describe the "Scariest Movie of All Time," but the audience attending a screening of the film's rerelease ("A Version You've Never Seen") seemed more amused by its camp value than frightened.

    Everyone knows the story: Satan moves to Georgetown and temporarily takes up residence in the MacNeil family attic, first making his presence known through fantastic roars that Chris MacNeil (Ellen Burstyn) imagines must be coming from some very vocally talented rats. He then settles into Chris' daughter, Regan (Linda Blair). The girl starts behaving strangely — cursing, acting defiant — but instead of blaming it on normal prepubescent pissiness, her doctor pushes Ritalin (a visionary!) and suggests that psychotherapy might be in order if things get worse.

    And then they do, of course — to the tune of dancing furniture, swiveled heads, and, ah yes, spider-walking. Probably the most anticipated of the film's extra footage (unless there's someone out there who really, really wanted to see a bunch of doctors fumbling for an answer the audience already knows), Regan's spider-walk down the stairs isn't worth the hype (especially if you've already seen it on the extended trailer). Creepy for an instant, it's over before you can say "double-jointed." Fan sites on the Web describe the scene as ending with Regan chasing Mom in that crazy crablike way, but that part is either just a rumor or stayed on the cutting-room floor. Regardless, the spare footage that was added just looks tacked on.

    Also added was a feel-good final scene, which writer William Peter Blatty thought was necessary to assure the audience that all is right with the world again. But after hearing moviegoers laugh whenever the once-angelic Regan hisses stuff like "Your mother sucks cocks in hell," I don't think Blatty has to worry about whether contemporary audiences will leave in a good mood.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<February 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement