Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

mnoo Blog

Reviews

Reviews of movies
 
  • Catching up with old friends

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sex and the City  (2008)

    I remember when I saw the first episode of Sex and the City (and I just can’t believe it was 10 years ago!). A Finnish cable channel was showing the first season, before the show hit mainstream TV, and the title (ha ha) somehow caught my eye. I was hooked from the first minutes. I imagine there are a lot of people (majority of whom are probably men) who don’t really get what’s so great about the show. But for me, it just has everything a girl needs. Candid conversation, great clothes, fabulous shoes, real issues that are not usually portrayed in such an honest manner and an all-round comfortable, even cozy, atmosphere that makes you feel like you’re spending time with your friends. And even though Carrie as a character is someone we feel we should envy, if not only for her job and her wardrobe, her problems are real and universal and there’s something exceedingly comforting about the thought that despite the circumstances all women ultimately have to deal with the same issues.

    It was a sad day when SATC came to an end as a series. It was truly like losing a friend. That’s why more than anything the prospect of seeing SATC: The Movie felt like a reunion, like finally catching up with the friends you haven’t seen for ages because all of you have been too busy with your lives to organize a get-together.

    And the movie certainly didn’t disappoint. I was hesitant to begin with about how the half an hour, one-issue-per-episode, format would convert into a full-length movie. The way they dealt with it was to have a wider subtext, i.e. love, on which you can easily build a whole movie on, while dealing with multiple issues and not making the film feel like it was just an overly stretched episode. Obviously with a underlining subject like that, yes, it was sugary, yes it was soppy at times, but in the end everything was just in the right proportion. There were a lot of laughs, there were moments that made your eyes water, there were moments that made you relate. And there were lots and lots of fabulous clothes and lots and lots of to-die-for shoes.

    There were also some great performances. I was especially moved by Kristin Davis’s Charlotte. The length of the movie gave her the chance to show off her range, which covered everything from superbly funny to some fiercely raw emotions. Charlotte was never my favourite character in the series, but I have to say that she just might have been my favourite in the movie. And she certainly delivered the biggest laughs of the film in a scene, which should have been the lowest form of humour, but got elevated to something more complexly funny just because of the fact that it was Charlotte.

    All in all, I think the movie was a success. The same atmosphere was there, but at the same time it managed to elevate some of the elements to a higher level. Most of all, it left me feeling comforted. Safe in the knowledge that life goes on and that it’s forever evolving and that even after the happy endings there’s work to do and issues to deal with. It also made me feel like picking up the phone and getting in touch with the real life friends that I haven’t seen in a while. Oh yeah, and it also left me with this unexplainable urge to go shoe shopping…


  • Love at first sight

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Apocalypto  (2006)

    It pleases me greatly when a movie surprises me positively. I'm not sure what exactly I was expecting from Apocalypto, but it certainly delivered something a whole lot different – in the most positive way possible. I guess I was preparing myself for an 'epic' movie about the Mayas, a clumsy page of a history book with great sets, cardboard people and a native language thrown in just to up the 'art' value. What I actually got was an extremely enjoyable, and personable, two hours with a well-structured action movie.

    For a very short while my expectations of an epic tried to make me wish for something 'more grand', but pretty quickly I was sucked in by the action and just sat back to enjoy the simple, but universally touching, story unfold.

    Of course, visually the film was stunning, and not just for the lingering light in the rainforest or the intricately constructed Mayan city, but for the attention lavished on the tiniest of details. The make-up and costume work was superb, so superb in fact that you completely forgot about it and just believed. Believed that these people were actual Mayans, and not actors, who had sat in make-up for hours to create the illusion.

    I really liked the way the cards were laid out right from the start. There was a clever trick of kicking the film off with an almost stereotypical 'natives hunting' scene and then blowing that whole premise out of the water with inventive and funny dialogue, thus humanising the characters from the get-go. Often the biggest failure with action films, what ever sort of surroundings they are set in, is that the characters don't have enough flesh on their bones, you just don't care about them enough to be that involved in what happens to them. Not so here. I was amazed how quickly quite a few different characters were introduced in a very emotionally thorough way, and how quickly you developed a bond to them. Which of course made all the suspense to come that much more nail biting and the cruelty heartbreaking.

    It blows my mind how most of the actors were either at the complete beginning of their acting career or just regular people; carpenters, farmers and so forth. At the start you could see that some of them were new to being in front of the camera, but so many of them grew throughout the film to give pretty spectacular performances, not least Dalia Hernández as 'Seven' and Rudy Youngblood as 'Jaguar Paw'. Having said that, experience does count for something, and in my opinion Gerardo Taracena gives the best and most consistent performance of the movie as a sadistic sociopath 'Middle Eye'. He really owns the character and embodies it with his whole being, from delivering his lines to subtle facial expressions, and manages to be at the same time scary and disgusting, but also amusing.

    Sometimes it's just love at first sight. Apocalypto certainly managed to seduce me, somehow in a similar way that The New World did, but with more mainstream entertainment value added. In fact, I liked it so much that I watched the film two times back to back, first without commentary and the second time with. And it didn't feel like time wasted at all.

  • Have you ever seen a human heart?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Closer  (2004)

    I'm not quite sure why took so long for me to watch Closer initially. I think it was partly due to the fact that when it opened people, who'd seen the original play by Patrick Marber, expressed very strongly their disgust of someone like Julia Roberts et al taking on these roles. Probably my first impressions of the film came from people who disliked it, not for the story but for the vehicle it was delivered in, and that possibly put me off of the idea of seeing it... at least before I had the chance to read the play. Never got around to that so I thought it was time to take the plunge.

    There's no mistaking the brutal brilliance of the play/script. There are no empty words at all, everything is delivered with precision and on purpose. I can't remember when I've seen Jude Law in a role where he's not a sleaze ball of some kind, but he was certainly perfect for this role. And it was interesting to watch his character moving through from one end of the moral spectrum to the complete opposite in the course of the story. Julia Roberts I've never liked... but she was, if not brilliant, at least believable. Although very much the underdog in every scene. Natalie Portman (again!) was the backbone of the story in my opinion. She has the ability to portray sincere vulnerability, without it eclipsing her strength. Really a great performance. But I think everyone would agree that Clive Owen is the absolute core of this film. He is the mirror through which we are forced to look at ourselves as the primal creatures that we are. Raw, bruised, dark and true. He makes the whole movie for me.

    With wonderful performances from everyone I think the movie still manages to be more than just the sum of the actors' success. There's this atmosphere... a constant build up, a constant need to know more, a constant craving for... the truth of us as humans? It was hard to give rave reviews to any film right after seeing Brokeback - which was still in my heart at the time - but here's definitely one adaptation which didn't disappoint in the end, like I was afraid it would. I should have trusted Mike Nichols more.

    Have you ever seen a human heart? It looks like a fist wrapped in blood....

  • Life and how it throws you

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sideways  (2004)

    Finally a film that was exactly what I thought it would be. A funny, moving, and at times painful glimpse of ordinary life and human emotion. Paul Giamatti was certainly the perfect choice for the role of Miles, a failed writer and a wine buff. He gets you to feel sad with him, be happy for him and to laugh at him.

    There are definitely a lot of laughs to be had in the course of the road trip that Miles and, his soon-to-be-married friend, Jack are on – quite a few of them bittersweet. In a funny way, as different as this movie was to Irréversible, it somehow leaves you with a similar sad feeling. Of how small and inconsequential we really are, and how life can break you if you don't fight back hard. And yet, most of the time it's all out of your hands anyways.


  • Life-sized lovestory

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Walk the Line  (2005)

    I've never been a huge Johnny Cash fan (in fact, I always preferred Waylon Jennings in the bad boy of country stakes. :P), but never the less, I quite enjoy this sort of biopics.

    All in all, the movie was quite predictable (in terms of how biopics are played out) and in some ways a very cliché story of fame, drugs and passion. Joaquin Phoenix most certainly gives his all and wears the Johnny Cash suit with relative ease, seeing how hard it is to portray someone known for being 'unlike anyone else'. The problem I have with Phoenix at times is the fact that he throws himself so completely into his roles that sometimes you start feeling a little detached from the character, you just look at him acting hard. And there were moments where I felt like this. Don't get me wrong though, I don't think there's anyone who could have done a better job.

    As shocked as I was to see Reese Witherspoon pick up the Oscar for playing June Carter, I was happy to learn that it was for good reason. She kept the movie grounded and was so genuine in portraying what her character was feeling that I think she gave a heart to the movie. The best thing about the whole film was the chemistry between the main actors and the way the Cash/Carter love story was played out - in anything but sentimental way. It certainly tasted like life. I don't think the film was larger than life, but perhaps that also helped in making it feel more real.


  • Too high expectations

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Oldboy  (2005)

    Oldboy is in so many people's Top 10 and I've heard so much praise and been pestered to see it forever. So, needless to say, the expectations were perhaps very much too high going in. I did rather enjoy the first half. The plot was certainly original to start with, and the cinematography definitely ranks quite high on the visually gorgeous side of things.

    My problem is that I usually have an annoying talent of spotting where the plot is going quite early on (yes, I'm one of those 'I bet he killed her' people, which annoys others who might have wanted to stay in suspense until the final showdown. :P), and with this plot it was just glaringly obvious to me where it was going. So for most of the film I was just waiting for the plot to catch up and put me out of my misery.

    I also think that after showing so much promise at the start, and having gone to all the trouble of trying to confuse the watcher, the actual underlining story was way too simplistic and insipid. I was desperately hoping that I would get surprised at the end, which didn't happen. Having said that, I can certainly see why people rank Oldboy so high. It's definitely head and shoulders above the standard of a stereotypical Hollywood production. And it does look very good indeed. I think it suffers from building up too big expectations without delivering the depth of a masterpiece that it aspires to be.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Dig through the archives

Categories
 


Advertisement