Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

minjoe Blog

  • What I Expected...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Stop-Loss  (2007)

    Did I really want to go see Stop-Loss?  No.

    Do I see too many movies, was bored, and therefore had no other movies currently available for me to see?  Yes.

    Anyone who happened to stumble upon a trailer for the film Stop-Loss could probably give you the idea of what the movie was going to be about.  Part of me wondered whether or not they would deviate, in any way, from the trailers message of the war in Iraq being wrong and the United States Stop-Loss program being evil.  As I expected, the film veered very little from the path of shoving the idea that the war in Iraq is wrong and being handled poorly down the audiences throat. 

    To be fair, the film was well shot, had some fairly consistent and well thought out characters, and an ending that made you think.  However, the film will be simply catalouged as "another anti-war" picture because of its inability to grow beyond that subtext.  There were many opportunities for the film to examine, more in-depth, the effect the war has on a soldiers mind, on his family life, etc.  Unfortunately, the plot revolves around the main character going AWOL and essentially running away from all those issues which could have made for an infinitely more interesting and poingant movie.

    In the end, Stop-Loss just left me wanting so much more.  It wasn't a terrible movie, but it wasn't very great either.  I haven't felt so much indifference toward a movie in a long time.  

    If you're a big advocate for or against the war, you may want to take a look at Stop-Loss to see what it has to say--but don't expect to hear anything new or original.   


  • Dissapointing.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Rounders  (1998)

    21  (2008)

    Not since the hit gambling film Rounders have I found myself looking forward to seeing a movie of this nature.  While I enjoy playing cards, I usually find blockbusters about any form of gambling to be riddled with cliches and usually pretty boring.  With a cast that included the likes of Kevin Spacey and Kate Bosworth, I expected 21 to be different...

    ...I was wrong...

    This movie revolves around a group of MIT students who learn how to count cards and spend their weekends in Vegas racking up cash.  In theory, this sounds like an action packed, solid idea.  However, the movie is painfully long and takes a great deal of time to get going.  About 45 minutes into the movie I found myself already losing intererst wondering why I should care about their method to counting cards when it was incredibly obvious the director of this film had no desire to actually try and make the audience understand how that works.

    Thus, for around the first hour you are treated to some of the most trite and over the top dialouge I have ever heard from someone playing a college professor, courtesey of the usually great Kevin Spacey.  In fact, as a whole the dialouge throughout this film was laughable at best and downright embarassing at worst.  The problem is that the plot of the film is also flimsy and is therefore reliant on the actors to save it and they fail miserably in their attempt to do so...

    As the film "picks up steam" it does have redeemable moments, but they are far outweighed by the negatives.  So much of what they do is never fully explained, their trips to Vegas are filled with gaping plot holes, and their time at MIT is so cliche at times that you will laugh out loud with the rest of the audience.

    At the end of this film, which runs a touch over 2 long hours, you will be very happy to be leaving the theatre.   


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<April 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930123
45678910

Dig through the archives

Categories
 


Advertisement