Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

minerwerks Blog

  • Couldn't have said it better myself!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    One of the top critics working today, Joe Morgenstern, has given some witty, eloquent reasons why the latest 'Indiana Jones' is pretty much as bad as I wrote the other day...


  • Sydney Pollack, RIP

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Firm  (1993)

    Jeremiah Johnson  (1972)

    Out of Africa  (1985)

    Sneakers  (1992)

    Tootsie  (1982)

    The Way We Were  (1973)

    Eyes Wide Shut  (1999)

    Changing Lanes  (2002)

    The Interpreter  (2005)

    Michael Clayton  (2007)

    Nothing like a tragic loss in the film world to remind me how broad the art of film can be and how many worthy films are out there that I have yet to view.

    Earlier this year, when reviewing the Oscar nominees for Best Picture, I singled out Sydney Pollack's performance in 'Michael Clayton' as being particularly good. In the later part of his career - the part most familar to myself as a relative youngster - Pollack was best known as a producer and actor. While I knew of him as a director, it turns out I have been ridiculously neglectful of the man's filmography.

    Of course, most people have seen 'Tootsie,' the 1982 comedy that starred a cross-dressing Dustin Hoffman. But other than this blockbuster, the only Pollack-directred film I've actually seen is 'The Firm' (not a bad film, if I may say). But Pollack, we should not forget, was an Oscar-winner. He directed 'Out of Africa,' starring Meryl Streep and Robert Redford, two of the cinema's most likable performers.

    And though Redford has been in some of my favorite films ('All the President's Men,' 'Sneakers'), I haven't seen a single one of Pollack's films starring Mr. Sundance himself. There's the political thriller 'Three Days of the Condor,' the prototypical romance 'The Way We Were,' and the western drama 'Jeremiah Johnson,' among others (seven in total).

    In the later years, I had seen and admired Pollack's acting in 'Eyes Wide Shut' and 'Changing Lanes,' and I had expected to see his directorial effort 'The Interpreter' when it was released, but it just didn't happen.

    And of all the films in Pollack's filmography, why on earth have I never seen 'They Shoot Horses, Don't They?'

    Thankfully, we have a rich filmography as a director, actor and producer to enjoy for years to come, but it's a shame that Mr. Pollack had to depart this Earth while he still had vibrancy and talent to offer the film industry. He will be missed.


  • Happy Star Wars Day!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ghostbusters  (1984)

    Jurassic Park  (1993)

    Star Wars  (1977)

    A couple weeks ago, I was talking with someone about a mutual friend's wedding.

    "What date is the wedding?" my friend asked.

    "They're getting married on Star Wars day!" I replied

    As a youngster with a burgeoning interest in films, I would go to the library and look up facts about my favorite films. I remember looking up titles in the Facts on File and finding little bits of trivia like the release date of a film. At one point, I had compiled a list of Steven Spielberg films and their release dates. I can remember that 'Gremlins' and 'Ghostbusters' came out in June, 1984, but not the specific dates. I can't even recall exactly when in the summer of 1985 that 'Back to the Future' was released, and that's pretty much my stock answer for my favorite movie of all-time. But the date for 'Star Wars' sticks.

    The one Spielberg film that I can distinctly remember a release date for is 'E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial' - June 11, 1982. Perhaps that's just because my sister's birthday falls on the same date. Or maybe it's because I took note that Spielberg reserved the same date in 1993 to unleash 'Jurassic Park' on the world.

    Most films' release dates are forgotten, but there's something about May 25, 1977 that sticks with us. Even the most casual 'Star Wars' fan knows the date. Is it just that catchy, easy on the ears? Is it just the shared experience, or the coming of a new era?

    Regardless of what makes the date itself memorable, I hope you had a good Star Wars Day.


  • 'Indiana Jones' and the Expectations of Doom

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]

    About 20 minutes into 'Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull,' there is a humdinger of a chase that glides and slides through the streets and corridors around the campus where the legendary Dr. Jones (Harrison Ford) is a Professor. I'm not sure exactly how the conclusion of the chase affected the plot, but I do remember that it ended with a punchline - and nobody in the theater laughed. It's sad to say, but a heck of a lot of this new adventure plays like a parody of the (much better) films that have gone before.

    I'd like to think I gave the film a fair shot. As with the previous Indiana Jones adventures, we open on something natural that resembles the Paramount logo, followed by the credits in the elegant typeface that has graced each film (save 'Temple of Doom'). A simple, fun sequence orients us that this story takes place in 1957, and we end on a military base hidden in the middle of the desert. So far, so good. It's even exciting to get our first glimpse of Indy's fedora, coming to rest on its familar head in sillhouette. But then people start speaking, and it's all downhill from there.

    Harrison Ford seems more than happy to be here, but I really question whether his choice was more dependent on the payday rather than any allegiance to the beloved character he personifies. There is the occasional spark of the Indy we love, but too much of this performance feels unfamiliar, contradictory and (dare I say it) lazy. There is a plot here, too, but I'll be damned if I couldn't make heads or tails of it. But see, it doesn't matter because (SPOILER ALERT) there's a nuclear blast, a chase through the forest that includes a travelling swordfight, a boat that plummets down three waterfalls, giant ants, and ultimately, an alien ship. Excuse me, an "interdimensional being" ship. I hope H.R. Geiger got some royalties on these updated Crystal Skulls - that should tell you a lot. Forgive me for laying it all out, but I don't have much allegiance to protecting a story that so assaulted my intelligence. It truly does play like a Sci-Fi Channel original movie but with Indiana Jones instead of some twenty-something hack.

    Along the way, we are reintroduced to Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen), Indy's love interest from the 'Lost Ark' adventure. Evidently, Marion was always the love of his life, and with a tossed-off line worthy of a Lifetime movie, those years spent split apart are forgiven and they get all pie-eyed over each other. They are brought together again by Marion's son (Shia LaBeouf), who enters the story trying to locate a missing colleague (John Hurt). All these characters are underwritten and underplayed, and their interactions don't amount to a hill of ants in the plot. Even the requisite baddie, a Russian agent played by Cate Blanchett, is severely underutilized. I was bored and distracted, and I lost track of who these people were and what they were trying to accomplish.

    My theory on what went wrong here is that Spielberg and Lucas have unwittingly given in to their worst instincts. A large chunk at the front of this film plays an awful lot like Spielberg's misbegotten attempt at comedy, '1941,' even coming awfully close to copying a couple of the overblown setpieces in that film. The tail end, sad to say, has all the coherency and sense of 'Howard the Duck.' Maybe the idea was to run with the times, and instead of making a WWII-era serial pastiche, they wanted to make a pastiche of nuclear-age B-movies. Either way, the choices are so ridiculous because they don't respect the integrity of the Indiana Jones character.

    When they first announced Ford would be coming back as Indiana Jones, many wondered if they would address how Indy has aged. The resulting film proves that the age isn't really that big a deal. The real missed opportunity here is that Jones is a man out of his own time. He's still an archeologist and a professor, but the word around him is different. There's a bit of humor up front that plays on this idea, but the idea never resurfaces, left in the dust of some broad and ridiculous setpieces with hollow ciphers in place of characters.


  • Mixed Messages

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Africa Unite  (2008)

    Out of Balance  (2007)

    The overdue reviews of two DVDs sent to me by Spout:

    "Out of Balance" and "Africa Unite."

     

    At a recent film screening I attended, an audience questioned the cast and crew, "Was that a movie or a message?"

    The surprisingly appropriate reply from an actor was, "What is a movie BUT a message?" In recent years, we have seen the venues for self-expression blossom, and among the various clutter out there, determined people with a message have found ways to break through. Two documentaries I viewed rely to some extent on the portable camera to collect material for their stories.

    The first of these is "Out of Balance," subtitled as "ExxonMobil's Impact on Climate Change." Writer/Director/Narrator Tom Jackson takes viewers through the basics of climate science and global warming before moving on to the corporate actions of ExxonMobil to vaunt public image and profits over public responsibility. The documentary relies on the modern approach epitomized by the works of Michael Moore, with the documentarian taking a central role in the proceedings and linking his personal story to a larger issue. Unlike Michael Moore, however, Jackson hasn't succeeded in developing a structure that engages the viewer's emotions. Outside of the open and close, the bulk of the film is a standard talking-head/fact-and-figure affair, admittedly with a strong roster of participants.

    What I appreciated about this doc was the early section that addresses the studies and data that lead to scientists' conclusions about global warming. This part does succeed in making the material accessible. The rest of the film unfortunately couldn't maintain my attention. When judging a documentary, I struggle with the question of how much my personal opinions of the subject should play into my critique. I'd hate to discourage people who have good ideas, but I am also offended by the idea of giving a pass on shoddy work because it means well. Ultimately, I believe a political documentary should strive to engage viewers who hold opposing viewpoints, and to reach those people, facts, figures and style must be extremely well thought out.  This is not to say a film can't be partisan, but a conscious choice to do this suggests a filmmaker knows he is likely to be criticized and should be prepared. Unfortunately, "Out of Balance" just barely rises above the norm for the grassroots political docs exemplified by Robert Greenwald's "Outfoxed" and "Uncovered: The War on Iraq." Most of the auxiliary graphics are extremely basic and illustrations are poorly integrated with the interviews.  In the end, "Out of Balance" is just average, and therefore probably will only reach sympathetic audiences.

    A slightly better example of documentary is "Africa Unite," billed as "A Celebration of Bob Marley's Vision." At first glance, this appeared to be a record of a 2005 concert that both commemorated Bob Marley's 60th birthday and encouraged the uniting of the African nations. The film actually succeeds, oddly enough, by relegating the concert to a lower priority in the mix.

    Early on, "Africa Unite" follows several delegates and attendees that made their way to Ethiopia for a conference on African unity. As the film slides sideways into the issue, it becomes a compelling chronicle on the history of Rastafari, the movement made famous worldwide by Bob Marley. While not explicitly a Rasta documentary, "Africa Unite" operates from the viewpoint of the Rastas, who believe in the divinity of Haile Selassie, former ruler of Ethiopia, as he was the sole native ruler on a continent that had fallen prey to European colonialism. The film's view of Ethiopia is reverential, dwelling on the spiritual significance of the country and some locations within. These angles are most compellingly personified in a 70 year-old named Bongo Tawney, who makes his way to the celebration from Jamaica. The filmmaker also makes clear the connections between Selassie and the political content in Bob Marley's music. In possibly the best sequence, we see how a speech by Selassie inspired one of Marley's most famous songs, seamlessly transitioning to the contemporary concert where one of Marley's sons continues the performance.

    In the quest for the positive message, "Africa Unite" tends to ignore the unrest that pervades many parts of the continent. In a way, I can't blame the film, because ultimately, the people who travelled to Ethiopia - itself an unstable country - came to honestly seek answers and guidance on how to be good neighbors.  The goal is not to convince the uncertain or profile the hurdles the activists face. The film is about the vision.

    The vision is persuasive, but unfortunately, not all elements of "Africa Unite" are working together positively. Several different types of cameras captured the modern-day footage of the events, and occasionally this clash is incredibly distracting. Adding to the disconnect are many handheld shots that indicate a complete lack of skill on the behalf of the camera operator. Many of the decent shots are marred by a horrible strobe-like effect that makes movements blurry and jumpy. This is something that should simply never be applied to handheld footage. The effect continues in many of the concert scenes, exaggerated by scattershot cutting. At one point, I felt sorry for UN Goodwill Ambassador Danny Glover being shot handheld, in profile, with a strobe effect applied. To make matters worse, a flickering lightbulb could be seen over his shoulder. His family probably has home movies that blow this away.

    Being someone who doesn't really get into reggae music or Bob Marley, I have to admit that I found "Africa Unite" more interesting than expected. This is probably due to the fact that there is more political content than musical content. For those disappointed by hearing this, the screener DVD promises the regular version will include 45 minutes of the concert as a bonus. But I also warn anyone looking for a cogent analysis of the political environment in Africa. It's only alluded to occasionally here. The message, you see, is hope.

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement