Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

go blog yourself...

  • ...lame

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Fracture  (2007)

    Hopkins' acting was absolutely the only thing holding this anti-climactic film together.

    ...and that's all I have to say.

  • FourEyedMonsters

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This film is unlike anything I have ever experienced.  While watching it I found myself questioning whether what I was seeing was reality captured on camera, or a very close representation of that reality that was filmed specifically for this feature.  This diary/blog/relationship/romance/emotion/art is truly unique and inspiring...and I hope that more and more people get to see it each day.  Four Eyed Monsters is destined to become a huge part of the art community and the counter-culture in general. 

  • not a typical cartoon...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I really wish that more people have seen this cartoon.  It's a really good story about self discovery, and it is also an awesome avenue to learn more about everyone's favorite holiday, Halloween.  This animated (semi)feature has a really old school vibe about it.  The animation is very storybook-esque, but I think it really works.  Learning about how different cultures celebrate the day of the dead was also really gratifying.  And of course Ray Bradbury does a kickass job of narrating the whole thing.  If you're lucky, your  local video store MAY have a copy of this on video, and if they do it shouldn't cost you more than a dollar to see a cartoon that actually has some educational merit.

    I'd give it three thumbs up...if I had a third thumb.

  • Only watch this film if you are ready for an amazing experience...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

        The Rules of Attraction, Roger Avary’s adaptation of Bret Easton Ellis’ second novel, is a clever look at the lives of several selfish, morally corrupt college students.  Sean Bateman (James Van Der Beek) is a drug dealing anti-hero who wants to relate to the sensitive, pot-smoking virgin, Lauren Hynde (portrayed by Shannyn Sossamon) because he believes that she has been writing him love letters.  Meanwhile, Paul Denton (Ian Somerhalder), Lauren’s bisexual ex-boyfriend, is pursuing Sean for his own romantic needs.  
        
        When this film was originally released, it was marketed as being a typical teen sex comedy that nudged the volume up to eleven.  No wonder The Rules of Attraction became such a notorious flop at the box office, it was made to be something it was not.

        For the record I am a big fan of this movie, and I have been since my first viewing four years ago.  What I have discovered, however is that very few people find this film as pleasing as I do (which is a pity, in my opinion).  It has taken me a few years, but I think I have finally figured it out.  Many people find this film unbearable for one primary reason; it represents a complete disconnection from the typical prepackaged Hollywood movies we have all come to expect.  This lack of familiarity can be very uncomfortable for some people, but personally I believe that this is what makes the film so interesting.

        This film is disorienting and it has a very dangerous vibe.  Nothing at all seems to connect; the narrative structure of the film begins and ends mid-sentence during a monologue, time shifts backward and forward (sometimes without viewers even taking notice), the tone goes from light and hilarious to dark and disturbing, and there is a four minute montage in the third act of the film that completely deters viewers from ever thinking that Roger Avary will eventually let on to a pattern.  Even the characters cannot seem to connect with each other.  Virtually every conversation depicted in this film is superficial and misconceived.  In this case it is not indicative of bad writing or directing, instead it reinforces the notion that these sex-crazed, alcohol-soaked twenty-somethings will never truly “know” each other (whether they want to or not).  In fact, the only scene in which Sean and Lauren almost connect with each other shows both characters in a split screen, completely cutting off one from the other (this scene also involved some impressive camera work and very long takes, which just go to show how talented the cast and crew were on this feature).

        The Rules of Attraction is brimming with moments that make viewers feel extremely uncomfortable.  As we invest more cognitive thought into these characters and the situations we find them in, we sometimes feel as though we are intruding upon something that is very personal.  For instance, the sex scenes in this film are terribly raw, they are not glorified or romanticized in any way.  Viewers are even forced to look at nothing but Sean’s face as he aggressively indulges in his one-night-stands.  Avary also depicts the most emotional and yet the most visceral suicide I have ever seen in a film.  Although tastefully done, this scene captures the complete contemptuous nature of suicide to a degree that I find hard to match.  In my honest opinion, any film that can make me feel so voyeuristic, as if I should not be watching at all, has done it’s job depicting a gritty reality, which I find very admirable.  

        Do not let it depress you, this film also has some hilarious moments, and the soundtrack (created by tomandandy) keeps the mood very light and whimsical for the bulk of the movie.  Much of The Rules of Attraction will have you laughing, the actors have a great sense of comedic timing, but keep in mind that Ellis’ characters are not meant to be looked up to, they are one dimensional, egoistic caricatures of college life, they are not to be trusted.

        I commend Van Der Beek and Sossamon for their subtle yet charismatic performances.  Clifton Collins Jr., Russell Sams, and Fred Savage (of all people) also make very pleasing additions with their smaller roles.
        
        Sadly, no matter how many times I attempt to convince everyone to see this movie, there will always be those who don’t think it is worth their time.  To those people, I would like to say that if you refuse to see this movie because it is “different”, then instead see it because it is interesting.

  • well done...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Jacob's Ladder  (1990)

    back when thrillers were still thrilling.....back when monster effects were actually still done on camera (not CGI)......back when I was four years old, this crazy concoction of awesome came out. 

     This movie is chilling.  It has a wierd way of making you question reality (in almost the same way as Wes Craven's New Nightmare).  Any film that can actually make you think is definitely worth watching, and watching again.

    This isn't your typical, run-of-the-mill psychological thriller, do your self a favor and see this film.


  • whoa.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Troll  (1986)

    All I have to say is that the musical number toward the end of the film is mesmerizing...

  • An aquired taste....WAAAAAAAAY aquired...

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Troll II  (1992)

    Few movies make me cringe in a good way...and no, I don't mean because of excessive gore or gross out effects.  This film is hilariously horrible...but that still doesn't mean it should be thrown out of the mix.  The first time you see this film, you're going to think you wasted your time.  Upon second viewing it may seem that this film was made to be intentionally bad, I do not know if this is the case or not, but it seems that way on some level.  When you watch it a third time, you will laugh your ass off.  That's the bottom line.  This movie is so bad that its good (an expression used often but never has it been so true)...NILBOG for life!


  • Can there ever be a perfect movie?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The answer is YES...

    Now I MAY be a bit biased (considering that the hours i spent watching this little gem throughout my childhood probably could total to a couple of weeks) but frankly I don't give a damn, this is a classic.  I mean think about it, you've got a typical 80's film (it even has a KILLER montage to the tune of "Rock Until You Drop") with the typical non-politically correct cast of preteens...you've got tons of monster archetypes...you've got Tom Noonan in one of his best roles ever (the loveable heart-warming Frankenstein's Monster)...and best of all you've got a (light-brown-haired) Dracula calling a 4 year old girl a bitch and then hissing at her...what more could you want?

    I just found out that this film (the absolute MOST deserving B-Movie out there) has finally gotten a proper DVD release.  Now I will not be forced to deal with my crappy bootleg copy any longer.  If you will excuse me, I have a DVD to purchase, and so do you...

    THE END.

    PS:  Always remember kids, Wolfman's got nards...


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

Dig through the archives

Categories
 


Advertisement