Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

lrsk Blog

  • Where few stood against many

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    300  (2007)

    The story of the 300 Spartans has no doubt been told countless times thoughout history, and as the box office records reflect, bears telling once more.

    I had been eagerly anticipating this film since I first saw the trailer several months before its release. I still managed to keep my expectations rational, in that I did not expect a great script, or great acting; I expected to be hugely entertained. To this extent, I was very satisfied with the film.

    To address some of the criticism that this movie has recieved, specifically about historical accuracy and racism. These are essentially moot, since this film is a bastardized version of the true events of 480 BC. Being based on a graphic novel, which in turn is based on over two thousand year old history, is bound to yield some room for artistic license.

    These flaws have largely been addressed in most reviews of this film, but I will take it a step further. The story is told by Dilios, the sole Spartan survivor of the battle. To me, the freakishness of the Persians fits in well with how you would describe your enemy, which you regard as culturally inferior. The storyteller no doubt embellished the scenes that unfolded for dramatic effect. To this end, the strange characters are perfectly executed: the Spartans are all beautiful people, while the enemy (including Ephialtes the traitor), are beastly and filthy.

    The action scenes are really the meat of the film, and are in my opinion really great. I truly didn't mind that there was a lot of slow motion effects, they only enhanced the exerience. Paired with the score of the film, which I believe was hard rock ala Nine Inch Nails, these scenes gets your blood pumping. Some people argue that it became repetitive, and even boring. I felt like they were always fighting ever more dangerous foes, which kept me interested throughout. The film was also visually stunning, keeping with the graphic novel theme by enhancing certain colors.

    I wanted this movie to be my favourite movie of all time, but it simply isn't. I feel that e.g. The Gladiator was far better in many aspects. I felt that the script was spotty, and sometimes even corny. David Wenham, who I usually enjoy as an actor gave me some chuckles. Perhaps it is just the way he talks normally, but I felt like he was trying to sound like Winston Churchill, which for me was borderline comical. As I mentioned before however, I was expecting this film to be delightfully over-the-top, and it delivered.

    Another note for me was the end credits, which I sat through both times I saw the film (once in regular theatre and once in IMAX, which I recommend). They were very cool looking, and was almost a show in itself, especially with the driving score in the background.

    See this movie if you love action flicks, and ancient battles of epic proportions.


  • How the world is really smaller than you think.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Babel  (2006)

    I had somewhat high expectations about this movie, as it had 7 nominations for an Oscar. I also enjoy Iñárritu's work. As movie craftsmanship, this film was very solid, and I never felt lost as to what was going on. I do feel however that Babel didn't quite meet my expectations.

    As the title leads us to believe, this movie is ultimately about people and culture. How humans live quite different lives, yet we have the same problems. Babel of course meaning the Tower of Babel that humans tried to build to reach the heavens, and were punished by God by giving us different languages so that we couldn't communicate and finish the tower.


    The movie presents four sets of stories that are somehow connected, whcih works for the most part. It was very easy for me to identify with each of the characters, even though they were part of seperate cultures. It made me realize that you could have switched any of the characters around and you could have found the same problems.

    The Japanese deaf girl is looking for affection, and the feeling of being loved. The Moroccan kids acted pretty much like any kid that has not been taught to respect a weapon's power. The married couple finds kindness is a desolate Morrocan village, and are treated *(somewhat to their surprise) as if they were in midwestern US. The Mexican nanny makes a mundane, but fateful decision to bring the children she looks after to her son's wedding.

    Reviewers that compare this film to "Crash" have the right idea, and this could have been a film about inequality in the world. This is not what the movie intends to do, quite the opposite. To me the whole movie gives me a resounding message that we are all human in the end, and that the world is much smaller than we think.

    The negatives are minor, but are just visible enough to leave me somewhat dissatisfied. Mostly it was due to the fairly predictable storyline, and the frustrations that come with this. On second thought this might end up being one of the movie's strengths, since you get even more involved in the character's predicaments.

    I would definately rent this movie if you have not seen it, and you enjoy dramas, and cross cultural issues.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

Dig through the archives

Categories
 


Advertisement