Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

laststarfighter Blog

  • less patriotisim & a better ending needed.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Honestly, I'm going to admit right now I liked most of the film. I'm currently studying Global warming and climate changes in an enviromental science: Global Science Issues and if it wasn't for this class, I wouldn't be as aware of the problems that are going on in our eco-systems. If it wasn't for this class, I wouldn't of watched this film (it was on a list for credit). I more than believe global warming is real. I honestly think I've seen enough evidence to prove that things are changing...they are changing fast and they are changing for the worse. The facts given in the beginning in the film were all things I had heard countless times in articles and research studies I'd used in class. The events that occur in this film, may be an over extention of the truth (I don't believe that much could happen in such a short time, but I believe it will happen over time)...But honestly, I don't think anything has terrfied me as much as the idea of things like this actually happening. The film was honestly in most cases great. I honestly loved the effects, i love what was taught and what was "learned", but what honestly annoyed me was the fact the whole film pretty much revolved around One man and his son. I mean yes, there were many times when the whole united states was involved, there were times when other nations were involved, but honestly the whole David Quaid - Jake Gyllenhall I'm going to walk from DC to New York to save you deal, was just unneccissary. I think there should of been more focus on the people of America, The people of europe, the people of asia...the people of the northern hemisphere...rather than just one man and his one son. This was about a WORLD CRISIS and the most important thing it seemed was the story of one man risking it all to save his son. I mean honestly, don't get me wrong. There have been quite a few risk it all-for-one type films that have been worth watching. But honestly, this shouldn't of been one of them. The focus of the film should of been more on the people [of the united states] as a whole, the people of the world as a whole ...I would of loved to of seen more of britain, more of europe, more of Asia survive than was shown...It seemed as though, they played it off as everyone in the northern hemisphere aside from half of america and Mexico were too unprepared to survive. That there were no survivors and they all froze to death. The film made these nations seem, as though they would of all together been unable to survive something like this...and only americans could previal. Then again, that's how most patrotic films go. Honestly, I give this film a 4 out of 5.

  • Page's Better performance.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Hard Candy  (2006)

    It was the cover that caught me at first. Browsing Hollywood Video for something new. Something I hadn't seen before and on the new release shelf there it was, two copies of this film next to eight hundred copies of some big huge blockbuster (I can't remember what it was at the time, but i do recall it looked very unappealing).

     It was the first time I had ever grabbed a movie off the shelf without even reading the synopsis. I just said "this one" and checked out. 

    It sat in my room a few days before I watched it, at night might I add. On my small 13 or so inch television with headphones plugged in.  I wasn't aware at the time what I was getting into.

     And there it was. Fourteen year-old Hayley and 30-some year old Jeff. I'd seen these relationships before. I'd been in one of these relationships before, and I was honestly, digusted. A lot of the times I honestly, don't have a problem with Age differences when it comes to 20-some year olds or older, but older guys with a 14, 15, 16 year old girl "fetish" I guess you can say is utterly...ugh, I don't even want to put it to words. I  kept thinking "What are you doing?" "what are you doing" Get out of there. Get out of there, don't you see this isn't right? Both of you."

    And then things started to turn around.  Although, she may of actually been a chosen "vicitim" it was him in the end being terrorized. It had my heart racing and at times, I even felt incredibly sympathetic for Jeff. It had me on edge from the moment they met to the moment they "parted" 

     The filming was spectacular. the acting was incredible. Honestly, I'm glad I saw this before Juno, though I liked the film, I do think this is Ellen Page's better performance. She is quite an amazing young actress.

    rating 5 out of 5.  

    [though i do think i should re-watch and re-review] 


  • Powerful.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Honestly, It's one of those films that I "hate to love" i guess I can say. It honestly gets me sick everytime i watch it (I guess it's because I relate to Sarah and her son Harry so well), but it's also one of those films that I can't help but watch over and over again. The way it was put together was outstanding, the charcters are so powerful, & Mansell's music is also very powerful. 

    How the film all starts with each character's connection with Harry and then braches off into their own horrible mishaps is just --- i don't know how to explain it. I love how it's different from most "storylines" where everyone comes together. In this case everyone breaks apart.

    It's frightening, it's sickening, disgusting, and yet so relateable.  

     I give it a 4 out of 5.

     


  • Worse or equal to as bad as SNAKES ON A PLANE.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Jumper  (2008)

    I read part of the book once back in middle school and became rather bored. I figured the movie would be just the same but in a group of friends 2 out of 3 majority ruled for the film. So  I went to please them. 

    Although I consider myself a rather large Star Wars Fanatic, I never cared for Hayden Christensen and his acting career (especially in Star Wars Episode 3: revenge of the sith. But that's another story for a later time).

    Overall I was not surprised at how my final reaction was to the movie. It sucked. Hands-down. The only parts I really did enjoy was the idea of Jumping (hey, admit it'd be kind of cool to have the power) and well I guess the locations (But those weren't even half as interesting as I would of hoped). I mean seriously, there could of been way better shots and more locations. What bothers me also was WHY WAS ROME the number one choice and not PARIS. I think france would of been a better choice for -- ooh.

    DO NOT READ AFTER THIS IF YOU DON'T WANT SPOILERS.

    France would of been a better choice to of taken his stupid little girlfriend, considering it seemed to connect more to the tour de efiel snow globe he gave her. But whatever, the whole romance in the film could of been excluded entirely. I hated his "girl friend" whatever the hell her name was. The way she responded when he first came back to town, "Oh long time no see." PSHT. If I we're here I would of been all over him even if I knew he was already alive. The way she acts when he confesses his power...I mean seriously, even though most people wouldn't react well to that kind of ability I think she would (of all people) would of understood just a little better. What a twat. And As for Twats, Samuel L. Jackson's Role in the movie was, utter crap. It seeemed like another SNAKES ON A PLANE perfomance. "Just doing it for the little amount I can get from this...and the fact that more people will see it because I'm in it. I disproved of his character and believe he could of been scripted better. His orginazation could of been better explained. The connection his mother had with the company could of been more included AND HER FINAL REACTION IN THE END WAS UTTER CRAP. "I love you, but I'm probably going to kill you anyway because you're some sort of an abomination. Here's a head start, now get out of my house." Pft.

    The film would of been better with better scripting, better locations and JAMIE BELL as the lead. I believe he would of played the role better than Christensen.

    Overall 2 out of 5 stars.


  • another 5 out of 5 for miyazaki

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Favorite Miyazaki film [I've seen] hands down. Again I'm not entirely big on the Anime sub-genre but honestly I fell in love with this one instantly. The many main characters in this film are all very strong and hold strong to their beliefs & their desires. I think this is one of the films that got me very enviromentally aware at such a young age.

    Powerful, beautiful, I cant help but watch it again and again.

    5 out of 5 


  • 5 out of 5 for Miyazaki

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Spirited Away  (2001)

    I fell out of the Anime fad almost as quickly as I dove into it, and now 95% of the time refuse to see anything "Anime" (it's not the art, honestly, I really like the style and think alot of work  is put into it...It's the Fandom-and-animated series that get to me). I was worried at first to of seen Disney getting together with the anime, i thought that the "trend" had become even bigger and soon everything was going to be like Naruto. But after I heard it was directed by Hayao Miyazaki, I honestly calmed down and was quite excited to see how it turned out. I more than enjoyed Princess Mononoke and a couple of his other films, never once before had he disapointed me. 

    And Spirited away wound up being one of the best Disney/Miyazaki films I had seen in quite a long time. It was very Alice in wonderland like but more heart-touching. I became quite attatched to little Chihiro and there were quite a few scenes that i felt i could relate to. I'll admit right now I almost cried in the end. The animation was outstanding, and the English Dubs actually fit well with the characters.

    Overall, I give 5 out of 5.


  • if you read the graphic novels first, you'd probably hate the film.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Akira  (1989)

    I probably would of liked it more if i hadnt read the comic (manga) series first. Honestly, after blasting through the six or so 200+ page graphic novels i was completely excited to watch the film. But it wound up being a huge dissapointment and so much was left out. It's been atleast 5 years since i read or watched either, and i'm interested in reading + watching both again, to write a better revivew. But trust me, i do recall being very displeased and unsatisfied with it's comparison to the original medium. 

     

    1 of 5 stars. 


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

Dig through the archives

Categories
 


Advertisement