Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

laraemeadows Blog

  • Most honest super hero movie I've ever seen

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hancock  (2008)

     

    Hancock is Los Angeles’s drunk, low-flying sometimes hero.  With all the exciting aspects of an action movie, sparkling comedy and a heartfelt plot, Hancock is the most honest super hero movie I’ve ever seen.

    John Hancock (Will Smith) flies around Los Angeles, protecting innocent people from criminals and disaster, when he could be bothered or wasn’t too drunk.  Ray Embrey (Jason Bateman), public relations specialist with a big heart, is one of the people Hancock has rescued from tragedy.  It was a lucky connection for each, because Hancock had earned a reputation for being a drunk bastard, whose reckless rescues often seem worse than the danger and Ray can’t get his idea to save the world off the ground.  Mary Embrey (Charlize Theron), Ray’s wife, hates, and Aaron Embrey (Jae Head), Ray’s son, adores Hancock.  Ray, Mary, Aaron and Hancock struggle to repair Hancock’s reputation by making him a hero worth admiring.

    It is no simple feat to make a character multi-dimensional, but to make him supernatural and believable is no less than applause worthy.  Writers Vincent Ngo and Vince Gilligan should be credited for creating a character, Hancock, rich in complex emotions, veiled under an alcoholic veneer, which shields him from his sheer loneliness and protects him from the hate spewed on him by the public.  In the beginning of movie, it is hard to like Hancock, even when he is mid-heroic act.  As the movie progresses, so does Hancock.  He grows, he learns and he tries.  Ngo and Gilligan’s accomplishments don’t end with Hancock himself.

    Hancock the character was not the only great part of Hancock.  The comedy leaves the audience in high spirits, so the moments of sincere tenderness and disturbing scenes land especially hard in the laps of those watching.

    I won’t be ruining it for you to tell you there is a surprise so huge in Hancock, it couldn’t fit in a fridge.  The entire audience gasped and sat in stunned amazement as the plot unfolded in a way none of us saw coming.  Calling it a jaw dropper would not be an exaggeration.

    Will Smith is sinfully sinful as Hancock.  He gives such a raw dirtiness to Hancock, but does not make him unlovable.  Smith’s comedic timing was flawless.  His attention to the emotional details at the end of the movie make Hancock worth the audience’s forgiveness.

    Charlize Theron goes toe to toe with Smith in a thespian tug of war that ends in a tie.  Her performance brought tears to my eyes and made my heart break.  Theron should be locked up for how often she steals the scene in Hancock!

    Jason Bateman is no slacker either.  His wide-eyed, bushy-tailed enthusiasm portrayal of Ray cheers up the audience when it’s his turn on screen.  Look to Bateman to make you laugh more than any other actor.

    Hancock has sensational visual effects.  There is no shortage of explosions, destroyed streets, and buildings falling down.  In the opening scenes there is even a scene inspired by the Flintstones but done with such great visuals, there is nothing stone aged about it.   I had completely suspended my disbelief, lost myself in the story and became entranced in the visuals.

    Heck, even the music is good.  There is a song in Hancock with all of the brass a super hero deserves but is fresh and original.

    When the music, acting, writing, and visuals all come together to become one great movie, not separate things from each other, the director should take all the credit.  Peter Berg’s direction in Hancock is deserving of merit and earns my acclaim.

    My only complaint is the shallow villain.  While his part is small and simple, it was not given the same care the other characters were and there was a missed opportunity to create another layer of depth.

    I have had serious problems with typical tight wearing super heroes and their tactics.  The tax payers have to clean up after them, they are never accountable to anyone once they kill and the topic of loneliness is often ignored.  Hancock addresses all those points and does it in a way that leaves the audience nearly in tears, high from laughter and wanting to know more.

    Hancock is heartfelt, funny, abrasive, and fantastic with eye candy that captures the audience and doesn’t let go.  Don’t miss Hancock.  It’s time well spent.


  • Stole my heart

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Wall-E  (2008)

     

    Wall * E is Pixar’s story of a small robot that is left alone for hundreds of years.  Charming, beautiful and with an important message, Wall * E is flawless.

    When the people of earth cover the world in garbage, they take off on a five year cruise, but they leave a team of robots, called WALL * Es, behind to clean up the mess.  As they live generations of lives in hover chairs, tied to their projected televisions and easy-come food, WALL* E works diligently and becomes ever more lonely.  That all changes one day when a cute, white robot named EVE comes to earth and begins scanning everything.

    As I watched WALL * E I was taken by beautiful acting by animated characters, who essentially did not speak, create such remarkable performances that I was sucked in from the first scene.   The animators are like demi-gods, creating animated life and showing it to us on screen.  WALL * E’s mechanical eyes appear that they should be welling up with tears and his body language is easily the most expressive I’ve ever seen by an animated character.  WALL * E’s little mechanical arms squeezed my heart tightly and hasn’t let go.

    When WALL * E is on earth the lighting natural and radiant.  It seems even the dust is shaded properly.  When WALL * E is in artificial light, his appearance changes appropriately to a more artificial look.  When WALL * E watches TV the blue colors are spot on, his eye reflections bewitchingly realistic.  EVE, the white robot, sparkles in the light and is luminescent in the dark.  It is that level of attention to detail that allows the audience to believe completely that this little robot has come alive.

    WALL * E isn’t just easy on the eyes, it is chalk full comedy that nearly emptied my bladder and actually caused me to snort.   WALL * E doesn’t really talk so all his humor is done through expression and situation.  WALL * E isn’t really able to do slapstick, but if he could, he may be called the Charlie Chaplin of robots.  No opportunity to bond with WALL * E through laughter was missed, but it was obvious the writer didn’t force any comedy either.

     WALL * E has a message about responsibility to tell children, and their parents.  When you stop paying attention to the world around you and you let your chair be your entire universe, it effects more than just you.  Moreover, you miss out on the things that are truly important and the amazing things people experience when their TV’s are off.  Sneakily, Andrew Stanton, the writer and director, peels away the curtain of what he feels is societal wrongs, but makes you feel good that you peeked behind the curtain.  How often can we be told what we are doing wrong, face it and still love the experience?

    WALL * E stole my heart right from my chest and for that reason I rule that WALL * E is criminally cute.  WALL * E challenged my behaviors and for that I’m grateful.  I promise, you won’t regret seeing WALL * E.

    Disclaimer:  Two years ago, before I was a movie reviewer, I was hired by Andrew Stanton’s wife to wrap gifts at Christmas time for about $300.  I believe I can fairly review this movie and am not influenced by the experience.  Integrity is important to me so I disclosed this even though I was not required to by my websites. 


  • Almost a brilliant train reck

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

     

    The Heart is Deceitful Above All Things tells the story of a small boy passed around from person to person but always haunted by his mother.  There were a lot of aspects of this movie that resonated deeply with me because I had a similar upringing but strange visuals ruin any brilliance the movie may have reached. 

    After being in a loving foster home for several years, Jeremiah (Jimmy Bennett, Dylan Sprouse, Cole Sprouse) is returned to the care of his narcissistic drug addicted mother.  When he tries to return home, his mother, Sarah (Asia Argento), convinces him his foster parents don’t want him anymore.  She also leads him to believe that if he were to return to his foster home, he’d end up dead.  She leads him on an escapade through several moves, several boyfriends, a few husbands, and endless abuse.  She goes as far as introducing him to drugs at a very young age.   Jeremiah looses himself through time and begins to fall into his mother’s insanity. 

    My biggest complaint is the director/writer, Asia Argento creates such a great gritty movie with such realistic elements of emotional malnourishment and physical abuse but dashes them away when there is a visual effect using red crows that shattered my complete submission to the story. 

    Argento splashed the screen with honest depictions of what happens to abused children.  When they moved using black garbage bags I broke down in tears because most of the dozens of movies I’ve had to make were made using the illustrious garbage bag.

    Then out of nowhere, a crappy red crow.  The crows look like they were physically painted with acrylic paint, photographed, pasted in a flip book and filmed.  After they were filmed they were placed in a scene in the most bizarre way possible.  It felt like Argento slammed on the breaks while driving 100 miles per hour for no reason in rush hour; it causes a pileup.

    Most of the acting in The Heart is Deceitful Above All Things, is phenomenal.   All of the actors do a great job of showing true packaging in which evil comes.  Most of the actors know when to pull the character back from obviously monstrous and make the character so incediously subtle they would be hard to spot by normal people in the real world. 

    I admit, I was too let down by the visuals and some herkey jerkey camera work to enjoy this movie.  I will recommend it as an explanation to why being bounced from place to place, from home to home is damaging to a child and how a child can become very good at survival techniques. 

    The Heart is Deceitful Above All Things (2004)


  • Get Lost

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Get Smart  (2008)

     

    Get Smart, a spy guy tale of good vs. evil and Smart vs. dumb.  Get Smart should follow their own advice when it comes to the script, the acting and the action.

    After overcoming personal obstacles, Maxwell Smart (Steve Carell) would give almost anything to be a field agent for Control, a covert American agency who battles the evil group KAOS.  After his overwhelming talent gets him stuck as an analyst, he finally gets his break when Control is infiltrated and The Chief (Alan Arkin) gives him the bump to agent.  He is assigned to be the partner of the beautiful and bad-ass Agent 99 (Anne Hathaway).  Together they take on KAOS and try to stop them from handing out nuclear weapons like candy and killing exposed Control agents.

    There are a few scenes, particularly pertaining to our current presidential situation, that earned a hearty chuckle.  A few non-electoral scenes also went over well.  How can you not laugh at “Holy Shit!  Holy Shit!  A sword fish almost went through my head!” 

    Even still, it’s obvious throughout the movie that director Peter Segal and writers Tom J. Astle and Matt Ember are desperately struggling to create moments of brilliance and silly splendor.   Like a swimmer fighting a rip tide, their attempts only make Get Smart exhausting.  The situational jokes are that a five year old boy might think up, and the visuals are often childish and shallow.

    Character writers Mel Brooks and Buck Henry did a terrible job with Maxwell Smart.  They can’t decide if he is a misunderstood savant or a total idiot.  Maxwell Smart often wavers between what might be called slight retardation and exposing his hidden super spy talents.   Steve Carell is sometimes charming and sometimes grating but Maxwell is so poorly written, it is a constant push-pull tug of war and is impossible for the audience to know if we are supposed to admire or loathe Maxwell and Carell. 

    Agent 99’s character development isn’t smooth sailing either.  Distant and pissed off one minute, she succumbs to her desires as easily as a drunk catholic school girl.  There is no reason for the change, nothing really happens and yet we are supposed to believe Agent 99 just throws in the towel and changes in one second?  Oh, please.

    Get Smart isn’t entirely horrific; it’s just average and unremarkable in every way.  The acting is fine.  The camera work is adequate.  The direction is common.  There is not much for the audience to take away.  There is no succulence, no flavor or depth.  There is no take away for the audience, even a bad one.  I felt like I walked into the theater the same as I walked in, only two hours older. 

    Stay two hours younger, skip Get Smart.  Watch it when you’re doing your dishes and it runs on the local television station.


  • The Incredible Snore

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

     

    “Where is the gunship?”, is the theme of The Incredible Hulk.  Edward Norton stars in this smashing (get it?)  story of love, guns and really big pants.

    After exposure to gamma radiation, whenever his heart rate skyrockets, Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) turns in to a huge, green, uncontrollable destructive machine, dubbed “The Hulk.”   Desperate to rid himself of the radiation poisoning, he begins a relationship with a scientist he calls Mr. Blue (Tim Blake Nelson) to find a cure.  He has to do this while in hiding because he is being hunted by the military, who believe he is property of the United States Government.  He has to come out of hiding to get data before his accident and the only person he can get it from is his former girlfriend Betty Ross (Liv Tyler).   A dangerous excursion, The Hulk is forced out.                                                                                                                                                 

    There are attempts to make The Incredible Hulk about more than explosions and crushing things, but none of the plot points are enough to make the movie about anything other than bent metal.  The Hulk is so strong, he can split a car in half.  The Hulk is so tough, bullets don’t pierce him.  The Hulk is so crazy he destroys everything.  Yeah, yeah, we get it, Hulk Smash!  I could get the same effect from a Gallagher show.  A memo should be sent to all writers in Hollywood that guns and explosions are not plot. 

    The notable exception to the plot shallowness is the humor.  Well timed jokes are spread evenly throughout The Incredible Hulk save it from abysmal failure.   The chuckles were my favorite part of the movie because they were the only remarkable thing about The Incredible Hulk. 

    Even given the fact that it is difficult to imagine visually how a person would become The Hulk, the transitions in The Incredible Hulk does nothing to help.  The computer generated graphics looked last generation.  The Hulk character is often flat, lacking any significant distinctions of light and shadow.  The villain is equally unvaried.  The two make The Incredible Hulk feel cheap and in places, downright awful. 

    Some of the dialogue may cut it in a comic book but can’t be said out loud without sounding as natural as polyester wigs.  “Is that all you got?”  Yes, Mr. Villain, it is all I’ve got.  You have maxed out my allotment of stupid lines in one movie.  It would be best if, when writing the dialogue, Zak Penn had a few of his friends over to actually say the lines out loud and see if any of them laughed out loud in his face.  I suspect there would be an endless night of laughter and the next day would be full of rewrites, Potentially saving the audience from the dull and creating a polished script.

    Edward Norton and Liv Tyler are supposed to be over the moon in love with each other but their performances could not send them over a cow.  Their chemistry is so badly mixed it couldn’t blow the top off a third grade science project volcano!   

    There is nothing special about The Incredible Hulk.  It doesn’t even get the heart pumping.  The Incredible Hulk may be a comic book best left in paper form.


  • Animals + Kung Fu = Fan-Freakin'-Tastic

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Kung Fu Panda  (2008)

     

    Kung Fu Panda, an animated story about a panda, noodles, duty and laughter.  Kung Fu Panda made me “blind from an overexposure to awesomeness.” 

    Po (Jack Black), a clumsy panda, son of a noodle vendor, dreams of meeting “The Ferocious Five.”   The Ferocious Five, composed of Tigress (Angelina Jolie), Monkey (Jackie Chan), Mantis (Seth Rogen), Viper (Lucy Liu), and Crane (David Cross) is a band of kung fu masters that protects the valley.  The Ferocious Five are led by their master, Shifu (Dustin Hoffman).  Fear of previous foe Tai Lung (Ian McShane) brings Po in direct contact with the Ferocious Five. 

    The animation in Kung Fu Panda is phenomenal.  The lighting glimmered as the sun moved across the day.  I could almost feel most of textures on my fingers.  There are hysterical stop motion sequences that shamelessly draw the attention of the audience right into the story.  Dan Wagner, the head of character animation, earned every penny as the head character animator because the characters sparkled with life.  My one exception would be Tigress, often comes off flat.  All in all, my eyes were remarkably satisfied by the exceptionally beautiful animation.

    The dialogue was equally pleasurable.  While there are a few one line jokes in Kung Fu Panda that come across my taste as sour apples, most of the script is bright and appealing.  Silly, memorable, and entertaining verbal parlays will make even the most serious in the audience chuckle out loud.  The plot takes every opportunity to sprinkle the delightful spices of sweetness and sincerity.  The characters were a bit shallow but considering the age of the target audience, the slightly less complex character development is appropriate.  Don’t be afraid though, the shoal nature of the plot doesn’t detract for adults.  It is a nourishing respite from any case of the doldrums and hum-bugs.

    I find it important to watch and listen to children as they see a children’s movie, I’m not young enough to truly judge how good it is for a little one.  The youngsters responded in awe because Kung Fu Panda combines two things kids love, adorable animals and high jumping, fist flying, round house kicking martial arts.  As I scanned the audience, I saw seas of little smiling faces leaning forward, completely enraptured but more surprising was the look on the bigger faces.  Even the unaccompanied grown-ups looked like they wanted to cuddle the characters but hesitate out of fear of their martial arts skills. 

    I was utterly surprised by the quality of the voice acting in Kung Fu Panda.  While none of the scenes are emotionally challenging, they are comedically challenging.  Jack Black, Angelina Jolie, Jackie Chan, Seth Rogen, Lucy Liu, David Cross, Dustin Hoffman and Ian McShane each give such a glimmering energy to their characters, it made the entire movie a delightful story, easy to get lost in, and sure to rise your serotonin and dopamine levels. 

    I think the most sociologically exposing movies a society creates are their children’s movies.   They always show the basest values of a society.  Kung Fu Panda’s message is one I love; “You’re good enough.”  Couple that with two butt kicking girls, Tigress and Viper, who don’t show their boobs or have ridiculously narrow waists and are treated just as equals to their male counterparts, I am so happy about what this movie says about us.

    An unexpected surprise, Kung Fu Panda made me laugh audibly, it made giggle and made me hopeful.  Mostly, it just made me feel good as I found myself completely lost in the story.  I would suggest this movie only for those who enjoy lovely visuals punctuated with laughter.

    Kung Fu Panda (2008)


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345


Categories
 


Advertisement