Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

ktincu Blog

  • Whatever you think, don't think Woody Allen

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Match Point  (2005)

    I had been told. I had even read it. "It's not a typical Woody Allen film." But I still wasn't prepared for how un-Woody-Allen-like Match Point is. As your self-appointed Expectation Adjustor, I feel it's my duty to warn you. More importantly, though, I'm here to encourage you to check out this film, even if you think a Woody Allen film is the last thing you feel like watching (perhaps that moment is precisely when you should pick it up).

    First, let me say I think it's a good thing that Match Point is so not Allen. I'm a fan of his films, but mostly the older ones, and I'm very glad to see he's becoming less predictable in his old age. The biggest surprise—even though MP has been described as a "comedy drama"—was that I detected exactly no humor in this film. Not even a smidgen of wry, dry, vintage Allen humor.

    Maybe I just missed it because I was too busy trying to calm the dread in my stomach as the story progressed. It's a classic, impending train wreck, in a Russian literature sort of way. At the beginning of the film, the main character is even reading Dostoevsky, which, along with the film's tragic-opera-laden soundtrack, sets up a story as wrought with doom as one could be.

    There's too much I don't want to give away, so I'll stop here. Just be sure to check out the film's tags for a more gutteral sense of what to expect. (And I'd love to hear from anyone who sees the film and detects any clear markings of Woody Allen.)




  • Ben Kingsley at his best

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sexy Beast  (2000)

    I just watched Sexy Beast for the second time. It had been a good four or five years since I first saw it—I remembered really enjoying it, but other than the memorable opening five-or-so minutes, I couldn't recall much else.  Now that my memory has been jogged, here's what I think makes it a great film:

    1. Ben Kingsley is at his best in this film, playing a super-intense yet quirky bad guy.  He totally sucks you into his intimidation techniques and low-level insanity. (His use of repetition is particularly gripping and chilling.)

    2. The use of flashback as a storytelling technique is done in an extremely interesting and engaging way. It creates a certain brand of suspense and tension that is very different from the usual edge-of-your-seat action-oriented kind of suspense.

    3. In general, this film falls into that somewhat unique category of "action without much action." Some people might be disappointed in this, especially if they're expecting a lot of bank robbery scenes. But I find it very refreshing. There's plenty of action--in the dialogue, in the characters' minds, and off the screen.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2006>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement