Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

kristen Blog

  • The White Diamond (2004, Werner Herzog, Germany) **1/2

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

                Herzog meanders through his own clichés in this bizarre and unfortunately substandard documentary. In The White Diamond, Herzog and crew travel to South America to capture the flight of the experimental aircraft (inspired by the Zeppelin and Hot Air Balloon) by innovative scientist Graham Dorrington. The story centers on the flight but Herzog strays numerous times. The story digresses to myths of the waterfall, a hunt for medicinal plants, meetings with roosters, random interviews, rude awakenings, dancing, and many thoughtless conversations all with little to no relevance to the story.

                At one humorous point in the movie, Herzog convinces the pilot to take Herzog up on the dangerous test flight so that they can get footage. Herzog, with great conviction, explains the forms of stupidity- epic stupidity, heroic stupidity, and stupid stupidity. And to not take Herzog on a potentially fatal flight would be stupid stupidity. Herzog later explains that he thought the test flight might be the only flight and so not to endanger his and the pilot’s life would be of the utmost stupidity. I love it when Herzog puts himself in dangerous situations for his movies, but in this instance, his uncharacteristic lack of logic seems almost malicious and is clearly damaging.

                The music in the movie inappropriately romanticizes and glorifies nature. Not only is the music distracting it creates a nature that Herzog does not himself believe in. Chaotic, cruel, uncaring, vicious nature inspires Herzog. He rarely finds beauty without this natural indifference. But with The White Diamond, Herzog glorifies, and thus simplifies nature, reducing it to a mere picture. The music desperately tries to create awe, but it fails to give meaning to the empty image. Herzog tries to hard to create a spiritual experience, an experience he successfully achieves in most of his movies, yet fails to create in this movie.

                Though unsuccessful, The White Diamond has its moments. The meandering narrative is like punk filmmaking in the sense that Herzog does whatever he wants without following the rules. This idea is liberating, even if the execution is amateurish. And of course, Herzog is always entertaining to listen to because, lets face it, he’s the best filmmaker alive!

    ~Kristen Gorlitz           


  • Iron Man- A masturbatory conservative fantasy under liberal guise

    1 out of 3 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Iron Man  (2008)

    Iron Man (2008, Jon Favreau, USA) *1/2

                The previews give way to the awaited event. The marvel logo appears on screen signifying what we already know- that his is a superhero movie, a fantasy. In contrast to the thrill packed logo, the movie begins on a semi-somber note with a truck wheeling through the barren lands of Afghanistan. The rock music begins and everyone forgets that we are indeed at war. After all, this is an escapist movie that promises our nation a night of entertainment. People don’t want to be reminded of the economic hardships caused by the war (such as the rise in oil prices) that affect us on a daily basis.

                The biggest mass murderer in the world and our soon to be superhero Tony Stark sits among the troops. Stark lightens the mood only to awaken to the realities of war as a bomb explodes nearby. Stark, ironically defenseless, watches as the men and women around him give up their lives in order to protect him (he is America’s most valuable commodity). Despite the troop’s valorous efforts, an explosion of metal shrapnel penetrates an unprotected Stark.

                Never again will Stark be this vulnerable. In Las Vegas, we find an excessively self-indulgent Stark surrounded by women, drinking, and gambling. A Casanova figure, Stark easily brings home sexy reporter for a one-night stand. Only later are we introduced to his fetish- weapons. Stark proudly erects Jericho, his latest weapon of mass destruction. With Jericho, Stark can literally move mountains. Throughout the movie, Starks exudes godlike power due to his masturbatory indulgence in weapons. As a hostage, Stark learns, to his horror, that he has been obscenely violated. The weapons of mass destruction that he created for America’s use are in the hands of the enemy. His creations have betrayed him.

                Stark does not want to be remembered as a mass murderer. He does not want to be responsible for the death of Americans from his unaccountable weapons. So he has a change of heart, sort of. He will not produce any more weapons that can get into the hands of the enemy. Yet Stark, while in prison, creates the model for what will be the greatest weapon of mass destruction, his Iron Man suit. Stark uses the suit to kill nearly all the surrounding Afghanis when he breaks out of prison. At home, he shuts down the production of weapons but works obsessively on perfecting his sleek, sexy, ever-evolving suit, which he will later use to kill villains.

                A noble Stark, now armed with the humanist views of only killing the bad guys and only allowing Americans to have weapons of mass destruction, discovers that his partner and colleague Obadiah Stane (perhaps as influential and powerful as Stark) is the true enemy. His most trusted friend, the very person who Stark respected as a leader, has betrayed our noble superhero. Stane is responsible for allowing the Afghanis to have weapons of mass destruction.

                Just as Top Gun express American fantasies about the Cold War; Iron Man expresses fantasies about the War on Terror. We are currently in a weapons based war with Afghanistan. The president’s disapproval rating is at an all time high (at 71%). Many feel betrayed. It was George H. W. Bush who aided Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq War. Now George W. Bush fabricated a war to remove Saddam Hussein from power. In these times, the biggest villain is someone from within, our president. We have no hero, we have no figure to respect, we have no leader. Iron Man is the fantasy of that leader.

    Iron Man can invade a country without the real life consequences. Once his form fitting, muscular, impenetrable iron man armor is complete Stark flies to Afghanistan to destroy the terrorists (who pose a threat not only to the US, but also to their own people). Afghanis are villains too only weaker because they cannot create their own weapons (their Achilles heel). The audience roared with excitement when Stark kills all the terrorists (who threaten to kill the women and children) with one shot. Iron Man offers the ultimate protection for America and the ultimate destruction to the enemies. He is homeland security.

    Tony Stark’s anti-weapons stance is a façade, for Stark, our superhero, is the ultimate weapon of mass destruction. The movie insists that weapons are necessary for security and that war must continue until America again dominates the world. Stark only learns to tame his gun in devotion to love interest Pepper Pots (a conservative view of romance).

                On opening night, fans push their way into sold out shows of highly anticipated Iron Man, the first big Blockbuster of 2008. On Friday alone, the movie grossed approximately $35 million. Immensely popular, Iron Man has an impressive 94% on rottentomatoes.com. Why do people buy this conservative fantasy? The movie resonates because it manifests our nation’s desires. Iron Man is the mascot for a betrayed nation.

    ~Kristen Gorlitz


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement