Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

kristen Blog

  • Speedracer (2008, Wachowski Brothers, USA) ****

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Speed Racer  (2008)

               Speedracer is to me what Iron Man was to a lot of people- pure entertainment. No, Speedracer does not have much complexity or depth but I would argue that it is not a movie about ideas or characters- it is about aesthetics. The movie has a unique vision never before put to screen. Yes, it is a candy-colored world with child-like imagination but the movie is not innocent. It is not a Spielberg world where everything is childlike. There are some chillingly violent scenes in Speedracer that are almost too bizarre. In one scene, a henchman’s finger is shredded by neon colored piranhas. Other scenes on the death race are equally eerie.  

               One might make the claim that this is damaged art, like Sydney Lumet’s The Wiz but I’d say that Speedracer is too intentional. I feel that the directors achieved exactly what they set out to do, and that is to put a unique cinematic vision to screen. From the source material one can gather that they were not trying to make a profound movie.

                No, I cannot defend this on an intellectual level, but I loved watching the movie. And I cannot think of another movie like it. That is why I think it is great.

    ~Kristen Gorlitz


  • Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008, Nick Stoller, USA) ***

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

               To my dismay, Forgetting Sarah Marshall beings with all the college student movies clichés. A boy comically brushes his teeth in the mirror. Then he grabs a whole box of cereal and eats it in his grossly decorated apartment. The montage of lazy, filthy boy continues. We see him in sweat pants flopping from one lazy position on the couch to another. He tries to exercise but can’t find the motivation. Then his lovely girlfriend calls and says she’ll be home early. Boy must clean the house.

               When Sarah Marshall arrives Peter steps out of the shower completely naked to greet her only to realize that she is breaking up with him. Instead of being awkward and vulnerable comedy, the scene drowns in insincerity. Every real moment is traded for the laugh. The director seems to celebrate his cleverness yet at every step falls flat to cheap jokes.

               I almost walked out of the theater. Fortunately, the movie gets a lot better. Peter tries to escape his misery by going on vacation to a lovely spot that Sarah and he frequently talked about in Hawaii. Only it turns out that Sarah had the same idea. To his horror, Sarah is at the same hotel with her flippant pop singer boyfriend Aldous Snow- a recipe for cheap jokes. For example, Peter stalks them back to their room and interrupts their kiss. He tells his stepbrother on the phone that he thinks her ruined Sarah’s day. Cut to Sarah having orgasmic sex with Aldous. There are jokes about Peter sobbing in his suite like an old woman, jokes where Peter has to sit at a table looking at Sarah, jokes about Peter drinking all the time.

               Only when the movie stops the cheap jokes and relies on sincere drama does it work. Peter meets a wonderful girl named Rachel who seems to be the perfect girl. But the movie understands what it is like to get over an ex. It takes time, even if you meet someone else. Rachel does help Peter to have fun, but when Peter sees Sarah again, he cries. Sarah then begins to realize how great Peter was only when Rachel threatens to take him away. These are the remnants of a real relationship. Sarah realizes that her pop-star boyfriend is not as special as Peter. Peter realizes that Sarah was great but maybe she didn’t always understand him.

               There are some fantastic moments. When Sarah’s TV show is canceled Aldous cannot understand her fear about the future. Peter walks by Sarah and recognizes her pain. Peter is able to comfort her, a reminder of the relationship they once had. At another point, Sarah confesses to Rachel how pretty Rachel is. This shows both jealousy and real respect for Rachel as a person who is able to help her ex in his time of need. At an awkward dinner where Sarah accepts a courteous invitation to dine with Rachel and Peter, Peter and Aldous bond over laughing at Sarah’s ridiculous role in a movie (where cell-phones kill people). Rachel seems to bond with Sarah, respecting her role as a movie star. While surfing, Aldous comes up to Peter and gives him a respectful compliment about his music. Peter is grateful and feels that Aldous really understood what he was trying to do with his music. At another point, Sarah confesses how hard she tried to make the relationship work, but that Peter was too lazy to notice. This is the first point where he seems to understand what went wrong.

               The movie evolves into a pretty realistic look at break-ups, the struggles with getting over a past love. It is clear that the relationship is over for these two, but that in no way means it is easy. The rebound relationships aren’t perfect. Peter has to evolve before he can make things work with Rachel, who genuinely seems a perfect match.

               The comedy does not work for the most part. The Dracula musical seems to rely on a Dracula musical with puppets being inherently funny. No thought or effort is put in to developing the joke. The movie works best with its realistic depiction of relationships and breakups and fortunately there are a few funny moments that make this entertaining. I was pleasantly surprised with the way the movie turned out.

    ~Kristen Gorlitz


  • A Boy and his Dog (1975, L.Q. Jones, USA) ***

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

               I just saw the amazingly bizarre A Boy and his Dog. Set in apocalyptic earth after WWIV, Vic (Don Johnson) telepathically communicates with gifted dog Blood.  Blood has the infallible ability to locate females, a fantastic gift for endlessly horny Vic. Starving and horny the two wander the desolate land. Their only hope for is the world over the hill- utopia (one conversation suggests that this is the dream of lost civilization, the idealized world of yesterday). In this animal world, a primitive and violent Vic survives solely on pillage and rape. The most poignant remainders of humanity are found in the touching relationship of this boy and his dog.

               The biggest problem with the movie is that it introduces several interesting ideas and does not explore them. For example, there's a threatening glowing green force called the screamers that are apparently very harmful. One reference suggests that is they so much as touch you- you'll die. Even the toughest of men run like children at the mention of screamers. Vic temporarily suppresses his male urges when the woman he intends to rape escapes in the pit of the screamers. Only when Blood tells Vic to stop quivering like a baby does Vic deny his fear and follow his instinct. This lust, however, almost gets them killed. A group of 20+ men come to rape the woman. A stubborn Vic at this point cares more about sex than his life. As a result, Blood, Vic and the woman are almost killed and must hide out in the screamers pit. To the wise Blood's dismay, the two continually disrupt his peaceful sleep with their animal sex.

                       Manipulated by the sexual prowess of the woman, Vic abandons Blood to follow her to the underworld. The remainder of civilization is preserved underground. It is an eerie, Lynch-like Pleasantville ruled by a committee. It turns out that the power-driven woman submitted herself to Vic in order to lure him down there and earn her place on the committee. It should be noted that her drive for power is the only non-misogynistic element in the movie. It turns out that the committee has selected Vic to provide the sperm for their women. This sounds like a dream come true until Vic is hooked up to a sperm-extracting machine. Again, this Brave New World, 1984 dystopian idea of population control is left unexplored. Through a turn of events, Vic escapes with the woman back to the barren, desolate ruins of the surface world. The movie avoids the clichés and does a good job showing that the surface land has as many problems as the underworld.

               Blood waited for Vic, but as a result he is on the brink of death. Vic must make a crucial decision. This ending is incredibly funny, and well realized as it bring the movie round full circle in an evolutionary, survival of the fittest way. The movie is best for it’s oddly telling male relationship.

    ~Kristen Gorlitz


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement