Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Karina on SpoutBlog

  • SPRING BREAKDOWN on DVD Today

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Spring Breakdown  (2008)

    (Spring Breakdown, a very strange film [at least, as far as studio-financed comedies go] that premiered at Sundance earlier this year, comes out on DVD today. This is a slightly edited version of a piece I published during that festival.)

    Variety’s Todd McCarthy received mixed reviews for his Sundance 2009 wrap-up piece, in which he lumped together the festival’s two biggest narrative hits, Push and An Education, as part of a trend of films espousing values “emblematic” of “the start of the Obama age.” I’m not sure our recently elected president has much to do with the themes of films that no doubt were conceived years before he clinched the nomination (especially these two films, both of which were based on long pre-existing texts), but I did notice that this year’s crop of Sundance titles seemed more interested in reflecting the times than some of their solipsistic Amerindie ancestors. I saw more films at this festival that tried, earnestly or satirically, to grapple with the state of the union’s troubled-but-hopeful psyche, than I’ve seen in any single ten day stretch in my professional life.

    Even better, I saw this concern with The State of Things seep into films as disparate as the tacky, raunchy Rachel Dratch/Amy Poehler comedy Spring Breakdown, and Deborah Stratman’s extremely classy, short feature-length experimental documentary feature O’er the Land –– two films which, on paper, couldn’t be more different, and yet are both heavily invested in notions of fin de siècle Americana and the peculiar ways in which Americans take advantage of our bottomless freedom. Dense, sometimes silent, always visually complex, and presented with neither binding narration nor immediately evident narrative, Land is probably the purest cinema experience I had at Sundance this year. Bizarrely, while Stratman’s film has continued to play the festival circuit, Spring Breakdown’s Sundance screenings may be the the only theatrical exposure that the studio-produced comedy is going to see.

    Spring Breakdown, co-written by Rachel Dratch and starring Dratch, Parker Posey, Amy Poehler, Amber Tamblyn and a number of SNL and Arrested Development regulars in supporting roles, had been on the shelf for awhile before news broke that Warners planned to release it straight to DVD. It was a surprise, then, to see the film pop up on the Sundance Midnight line-up, and after the press screening, there were grumblings that Breakdown didn’t belong at Sundance at all. It’s always amusing when anyone tries to claim Sundance as a refuge from populist, lowbrow fare — this, the festival that launched both Saw and Super Troopers –– but it’s an especially wrong-headed way to look at this film, which rides a very fine line between total trash and intelligent provocation, mall multiplex dreck and Troma-esque satire via the grotesque.

    Dratch, Posey, and Poehler play three 40-ish women who have been friends since bonding as uber-nerds in college. These are not inner beauty-full flowers who just need a Cher Horowitz to come along and give them contact lenses and a pair of Spanx; full-on social rejects, they repel everyone but each other. Nor can they be saved by men, who will never condescend to wanting them as long as there’s a single 20 year-old hardbody left on Earth. This is not the 40 Year-Old Virgin, where laughing at the loser at the center of the piece gives way to sympathizing with him, and cheering for his triumph. Unless our culture heads into a serious recalibration of values and quick, says Spring Breakdown, ladies like this will never truly triumph.

    At the start of the action, Dratch catches her obviously beard-needy fiancee (Seth Meyers) getting handsy with the young Latino gardener, Poehler is rejected by a blind guy (Will Arnett — who, I’ve noticed, elicits laughs from the Sundance press corps just by showing up on screen), and Posey’s cat dies, which is bad, because she’s basically treated it like a boyfriend. Posey’s meek office girl is then bullied by her senator boss (Jane Lynch) into secretly trailing the politician’s daughter (Tamblyn) down to spring break in Texas. The three amigas go down together, and Dratch and Poehler’s characters soon find their staid lives upended by this new world of binge drinking and unabashed sluttiness. Posey tries to hold down the line for earnest appreciation of board games and ankle-length skirts, but is eventually sucked into the debauchery when the plot’s final machination demands it.

    Is Spring Breakdown a “good” film? It’s debatable, but in the end what’s good about it may be, as it often is with lower budget cult films, the scope of its intended provocation, and not necessarily the package it’s wrapped in. With the production values of a Mad TV sketch and a similar tendency to telegraph every beat with shouting and wild gestures the way an insensitive person tries to communicate with a foreigner, it’s often both horrible to look at and hell to listen to. You could say that Breakdown is, like Humpday, a comedy of uncomfortability, but unlike Humpday, it can’t work as audience catharsis because no viewer would want to admit to being as socially awkward as the film’s three heroines. With one film, you squirm because you can relate; with the other, you squirm because you hope you’ll never be able to relate.

    That said, I was consistently entertained, sometimes laughing (anything that gives Poehler’s hood rat persona a feature-length narrative context is fine by me), sometimes just gaping at how far the film was willing to go in order to make it clear that its heroines were total no-hopers, far exceeding the point where one imagines an audience of actual coeds actually continuing to get the joke.

    I suppose it’s possible to laugh at/with Spring Breakdown as gross out comedy without taking it too seriously, but throughout I could sense there was also some really interesting stuff roiling underneath the top level, without being quite able to put my finger on it until near the end. And then I realized: Spring Breakdown is a parody of Sex and the City-style media, which depict 40-something women as image and sex-obsessed to the point where they might as well be adolescents, but the film enacts that parody by aping the Fight Club model. Having hit bottom by being “themselves,” with nothing left to lose, these three ladies embrace the fact that, in a time and place where there are no constraints, to be “normal” in America is to go to extremes, even if that means being extremely self-destructive. They dive deep into a nihilistic subculture of masochistic thrill seeking. Eventually, they realize that this is not the answer to their woes. But not until it’s too late to stop everything from exploding.

    The women in Spring Breakdown look at these very American traditions, including a number of rituals (from keg stands to female salsa wrestling to “talent contests” in which 95% of the participants are there to shake barely-clad assets in synchronicity) entered into with the express purpose of excusing female objectification (if not date rape) and/or inciting promiscuity, as curious outsiders, who are torn between this new world’s obvious attractions and their nagging beliefs and morality. That it even attempts to talk about that ambiguity while occasionally being riotously funny puts it ahead of a great deal of Hollywood comedies that have no problem making it to theaters.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • THE HANGOVER Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    THE HANGOVER Review

    The Hangover, Todd Phillips’ return to fratastic form after the disappointing School for Scoundrels, marks itself as an aesthetic step up for the Old School director right from the get go. With moody, pensive music playing on the soundtrack, the opening credits play out over a montage of Las Vegas By Day — giant cranes breaking the skyline of dull towers, Godzila-size advertisements for “talent” like Marie Osmond baking in the sun — fading into the more palatable, glittery, and familiar images of Vegas By Night. This tells us right away that The Hangover means to say something about the contradictions of the city in which its set, and particularly the contrast between the Vegas myth of endless nights of full-on debauchery, and days spent nursing head-splitting regret at all-you-can-eat buffets. But Sin City presents Donnie and Marie is only the half of it: more importantly for The Hangover’s purposes, Vegas is a city constantly in construction, creating and erasing its own totally manufactured history,  a vacation spot paradoxically designed to provide inspiration for amateur photographers, which simultaneously boasts of its ability to send the same tourists home without memories that they could relate in mixed company.

    In other words: the whole goal of the contemporary trip to Vegas is to come home with a digital camera full of evidence that you had a bunch of fun that you can’t recollect and certainly are not going to talk about. So when Phil (Bradley Cooper) Stu (Ed Helms) and Alan (Zack Galifinakis) wake up in their suite at Ceasars the morning after Doug’s (Justin Bartha) bachelor party to find that their room is trashed and they’ve been left to care for a wandering chicken, a live tiger and a mysterious baby, the initial assumption is that this detritus is Vegas business as usual. Why can’t they remember anything that happened the night before? As Phil puts it, “Because we obviously had a great fucking time.” So great that the groom has gone missing.

    So begins a detective noir in the unforgiving desert sun, as the three boys follow a trail of clues in the hopes of piecing together the details of their mystery evening, and getting the groom to the wedding in one piece. As the film moves from one setpiece to the next and the boys suffer at the hands of one hybrid stereotype after another (A townie drug dealer! An effeminate Asian gangster!), the film’s aesthetic foreshadowing begins to sync up with its “some guys just can’t handle Vegas” tagline. The Hangover reveals itself as a revenge fantasy, with Mike Tyson delivering a literal punchline, in which the “real” Vegas rises up against the entitled weekend warriors who come to town talking like they’re looking for trouble, but who really just want to get drunk, get a lap dance, and get home before incurring the wrath of their wives. Sadly, even this class-based revolution lacks imagination. Beyond a certain glee produced by the punishment of douchebags, what happens and what’s revealed on this lengthy fact-finding mission is disappointingly tame when it’s not borderline cliche. Nebbishy dentists Stu wake up married to stripper/hooker/single mom Jade? Crazy!

    That Jade is played by Heather Graham, however, is of some interest: Cooper and Helms seem to be playing extreme versions of the now-archtypical Vegas tourists created twelve years go by Vince Vaughn and Jon Favreau in Swingers, a film in which Graham embodied a sweet rescue in contrast to the sleaze of Vegas itself and the dating scene in general. That she’s essentially performing the same function here — ie: her undemanding ammenability is a salve to an emasculated man’s pain ––  but from within a character that also fucks guys for money, surely says … something. At the very least, it’s indicative of The Hangover’s towards the restorative power of debauchery: the boys travel,  Inferno-style, through hell to become better people. Vegas saves.

    Which is interesting and all, but this is still ostensibly a comedy. The best joke in The Hangover might be its most inside one: as the crew drives into Vegas, Kanye West’s “Can’t Tell Me Nothing” plays on the sound track; it’s surely a nod to the video for the song, which features Galifinakis inexplicably lipsyncing in a field with Will Oldman. The discordance that makes that clip so phenomenally entertaining that it borders on profound seems to be a Galifinakis speciality, and that it follows him into the Hangover is a godsend; he’s the film’s only source of genuine surprise.

    Maybe more importantly, he’s the only actor working hard enough to transcend  type. As written, the character is a pretty standard issue weirdo hanger on who proves himself as a worthy member of the crew by saving the day doing something only he can do. But long before he’s put to work in a triumphant montage, Galifinakis proves himself as the story’s real protagonist, the audience surrogate who, no matter how bad the on-screen predicament gets, is unendingly grateful just to be along for the ride. If The Hangover were just a movie about how Las Vegas enacts its revenge on the douchebag tourists who seek to conquer it, it would be as watchable as it is. It’s only thanks to Galifinakis that we don’t root for the house to win.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • DOGTOOTH Trailer

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I was super surprised when Giorgos Lanthimos’s Dogtooth, one of my favorite movies in Cannes, was selected as the winner of the Un Certain Regard sidebar. Before the prize was announced, very few members of the press had seen it, no one was talking about it, and it was competing against much higher profile films, including the Romanian favorites Police, Adjective and Tales of the Golden Age. The NSFW teaser trailer below the jump (from Twitch, via Living in Cinema) reinforces some of why the film is an unlikely prize winner — mainly, its sense of humor is brattily crude, its aesthetics are ugly-pretty, and though it’s no more bloody than main Competition entry Inglourious Basterds, its commanding melding of genre film and art film is much weirder and more unnerving.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Bruno. Eminem. Yawn.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I refuse to believe that Sacha Baron Cohen’s stunt at last night’s MTV Movie Awards — in which he, as Bruno from the upcoming Bruno, flew through the air in an assless winged costume and landed with his legs wrapped around Eminem’s neck, was in any way unscripted — Completely lacking in genuine (and genuinely dangerous) spontaneity — and completely ripped off from a Howard Stern gag from 17 years ago — the incident feels of a piece with the carefully managed anarchy on display in the Bruno clips shown in March at SXSW. See it for yourself after the jump. I’ll look forward to your comments telling me to “lighten up.”


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

 


Advertisement