Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Karina on SpoutBlog

  • BECAUSE WE WERE BORN Review, True/False 2009

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    BECAUSE WE WERE BORN Review, True/False 2009

    Because We Were Born’s co-director Jean-Pierre Duret began his career in the mid-80s as a boom operator and sound assistant on the films of Louis Malle and Jacques Doillon, and more recently, he’s led the sound department on the films of Francois Ozon, Agnes Jaoui and the Dardennes Brothers. This pedigree surely helped Born, Duret and Andrea Santana’s thrid nonfiction film set in Northeast Brazil, land a premiere slot last fall at the Viennale, a placement that even the Variety review admitted “may have minimized the attention it garnered as it may have gotten lost among the large number of films showing there.”

    No such risk at True/False, where shortly after its first “secret screening” on Saturday night, Born emerged as a solid standout at a festival which takes as the bulk of its program films that premiered and/or won awards and acclaim at other festivals. In the company of a picture as richly nuanced, technically accomplished and visually exciting as Because We Were Born, Sundance winners like Rough Aunties and We Live in Public (the latter, in particular, has taken a real beating from the True/False chattering classes) simply fall out of the conversation, even amongst those viewers not particularly offended by their aesthetics.

    Duret and Santana follow two teenage boys living in fairly extreme poverty in a rural Brazilian village. Nego, 13, is one of ten children born to a still-young but extremely world-weary single mom, whose many baby daddies have either left her a widow or for other reasons left her and her brood behind. He hangs out at a local truckstop/gas station with Cocada, a 14 year-old without a father who’s determined to learn to drive a truck … or become a thief. When we first meet these boys, they’re loitering around the truckstop, watching drivers eat, discussing strategies for staving off hunger (one recommends coffee). We assume that the both of them live on the street, with no easy access to a decent meal.

    But in the next scene, we follow Nego to his home, a spare and somewhat squalid shack where his mom is nonetheless serving up bowls of eggs and meat to each of her many kids, which the children eat huddled around an old TV. This makeshift recreation of a classic nuclear family scene becomes the first of many moments where the directors shame our assumptions of What Exotic Poor People Look Like, revealing the full picture to be infinetly more compicated as the people at its center reveal themselves to be not archetypes, but charismatic characters that most narrative filmmakers couldn’t invent in equal.

    The directors spent six months with Cocada, Nego and their families, shooting fly-on-the-wall style with zero filmmaker intervention. The result is somethng like a Dardennes film without the traditional, melodramatic beats (a sex scene here, a chase scene there) that those Belgian brothers anchor their narratives with. Nego and Cocada’s stories, such as they are, emerge slowly out of layer upon layer of snapshot vignette, and can only end up in ellipsis.

    A tension is set up between the promise of Lula, the Brasilian president who is seen campaigning for a second term in the village by reminder the poor folks that live there that he used to be one of them, and the binds of poverty, the need to work tomorrow just to pay for the debts incurred today. Cocada’s story comes to dramatize this tension when the boy becomes torn between two versions of manhood, one embodied by a truckdriver who takes Cochada under his wing (and thus offers a vision of urban independence), the other by a relative who makes bricks to trade for livestock, and eventually rides his mule-driven cart to the gas station to procure lighter fluid so he can cremate a dead cow (thus bringing a reminder of where Cocada comes from directly to his point of entry for escape).

    In the film’s mot memorable moments, and those where its theses seem most seamlessly fused with its aesthetic aims, the boys sit around the truckstop, staring into the night, talking about their unpleasant present and their not-particularly grandiose but still probably unattainable dreams of the future. “We have to leave here to know ourselves,” one says to the other. Self-knowledge has rarely seemed so tragically unlikely.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

 


Advertisement