Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Karina on SpoutBlog

  • MEMORIAL DAY Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Memorial Day  (2008)


    What do you do with Josh Fox’s Memorial Day, a sporadically engaging (but far too simple-minded to be as troubling as it wants to be) hypothetical slice-of-life which exists to use spring break to explain away Abu Ghraib? When I saw the film at CineVegas last summer, Memorial Day certainly seemed to have fewer defenders than detractors, and I found it to be alternately mesmerizing, infuriating, boring and eye-rollingly facile. I think it fails as a narrative film, even as it occasionally stuns as a work of pure cinema. And yet, I don’t think it’s dismissable outright.

    Executive produced by Michael Stipe, Memorial is the brainchild of a New York theater rabblerouser named Josh Fox, and is loosely based on his “traveling, site-specific theatre event” Death of Nations 1: The Comfort and Safety Of Your Own Home. Dressed in all in black with standard-issue hipster-lectual glasses, Fox rocked a frustrating evasiveness at the Q & A following the film’s CineVegas premiere. When asked to elaborate on his intentions, Fox responded, “I don’t really do that.” He did, however, admit to being a tourist in the world of low-rent beach towns and military units that his film depicts. “I’m from New York,” the first-time filmmaker said more than once, ultimately invoking an old Spaulding Gray line about living “off the coast of America.”

    The entire performance was off-putting: Fox seemed to set new standards for the indignant, coastal dweller seeking to condemn cultural experiences he hasn’t lived, one minute expressing condescending horror at the kind of youthful debauchery that would be frat-like if those participating in it weren’t several social classes away from being able to go to the kind of college that even has frats, the next minute crediting his military adviser for helping him to understand that “war is fun.”

    Still, the filmmaker’s annoyingly reductive sensibility (embodied by a punchline from the film’s synopsis: “war is a party and partying is a war”) can’t invalidate the power of some of what he’s put on screen. The film begins with a stunningly hypnotic 20-minute montage, which takes us, through fragments in constant motion, into a Memorial Day weekend blow out in Ocean City, a military shore town in Maryland that doubles as a locus for bargain basement tourism. We follow a gang of young women, outnumbered by their slightly older-seeming male companions, as they drink themselves into oblivion, spew casual racism, cry, fight, rape––and capture it all via handheld consumer video. The gaze of the film, at this point, is firmly within the crowd: with the exception of one act of violence recorded from across the street through the magic of digital zoom, all the behavior seen seems to be a Girls Gone Wild-style performance for the camera, and the footage is too intimate and invasive to be shot as though by an dispassionate observer. Shot on location amidst a real holiday weekend party not un-similar to the apocalyptic Venice Beach perma-kegger that runs through Richard Kelly’s supposed fantasy Southland Tales, it’s choreographed amazingly well and acted (by members of Fox’s theater company and extras found on Craigslist) sufficiently convincingly.

    For its first half, Memorial Day plays like an art film about the depravity that poor, uneducated, mostly white kids lapse into under the guise of merely having a good time, a digital verite indictment of the generational nihilism bred by The Real World, amateur porn, and popular culture’s general evasion of moral consequence. But after a transitional scene, in which the location seems unchanged but characters suddenly appear dressed in fatigues, Memorial Day abruptly moves from the world of weekend warriors to an actual war zone. Our drunken racists and rapists––and their victims––are now charged with capturing and guarding anonymous Muslims, their unquenchable but blasé appetites unchanged.

    The rest of the film is given over to narrative reenactments of the imagery made famous by the Abu Ghraib scandal. Fox and his actors imagine the infamous leash incident as stemming from one soldier’s failed seduction of another. Actual memos outlining the rules of interrogation are read out loud and laughed at by kids who we’ve already seen obey nothing but their own unexamined ids. Human pyramids are built to scale. A repeated tableau features these uninterested prison guards discussing their personal exploits in front of a cage of hooded figures; in the most effective moment of this second half, the victim of a sexual assault from the first part of the film confides to a friend how the previous incident made her feel while a prisoner whose hood has come loose stares out from the background. She movingly describes combating the bad behavior of others with further bad behavior. She’s talking about her personal life, but Fox’s political metaphor is loud and clear.

    And that’s it. Virtually non-narrative, Memorial Day sets up the party zone as a moral equivalent to the war zone, hammers that connection home and then stops, content with offering an equation in lieu of an argument. But for all its faults, there’s an implicit and surprisingly conservative critique wedded to that equation. Nowhere do we see commanding officers condoning or interfering: the Iraqi prison is the same authority-free zone as the impromptu motel orgy. There’s an element of metaphoric fantasy here, for sure, but ironically, Fox’s chosen binaries feel slightly more wedded to a real critique than the works of the A-list filmmakers. If Errol Morris tells us that Abu Ghraib was documented by conflicted, innocent bystanders and perpetrated by good soldiers following the orders of our evil empirical leaders, and Brian DePalma tells us that said good soldiers are mostly being corrupted by/driven to commit atrocities by the pressures of the hellish environment into which they’ve selfishly been thrust by our evil empirical leaders, it’s amazing that the militantly anti-war Fox is the filmmaker whose point of view seems to hew most closely to the Rumsfeldian “few bad apples” theory.

    Of course, it’s total bullshit––Fox isn’t actually suggesting that the soldiers responsible for misdeeds at Abu Ghraib take any real personal responsibility. He’s merely reminding us that sexual violence is something they learned not at basic training, but at spring break. Let’s pull out of Iraq and shut down Daytona Beach!

    Memorial Day screens today and tomorrow at the IFC Center in New York. A slightly different version of this review was published originally during the 2008 CineVegas Film Festival.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Christian Bale Typecasting

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I feel terrible for exploiting the Christian Bale Terminator Salvation rant tape for multiple posts in a matter of hours, but these two items just happened to pop up next to each other in my feed reader, and the convergence was just too much too ignore (and anyway — I’m allowed one “What? It’s meta-criticism of the media coverage!” post every now and then, right?)

    First, via FilmDrunk, a jokey video in which “Warner Brother Public Relations Rep Rob Delaney” (previously seen responding to this Harry Potter scandal) condones Bale’s “lesson in professionalism” by tying it to his method: “Christian Bale is a motherfucking tornado of pain and talent. Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, American Psycho. What do these films have in common? They’re all films where Christian Bale plays himself…”

    Then, this very long ABC News story, in which therapists, Bale’s former assistant, and an US Weekly editor all strenuously imply that Bale becomes so one with his characters that he was actually probably yelling at the DP in character as the Terminator. “The art of acting is not paint by numbers, it’s an art form,” reminds T4’s asisstant director. And “anger expert” Richard Driscoll has high marks for the performance:

    Once he started he could very well have gotten into the artistry and the craft of what he was doing…He’s not doing a wussy complaint. He’s doing a full-fledged exemplary headline-news tantrum. He’s reaming this fella out at great length and with extreme passion.

    Let’s recap: the internet video suggesting that Bale cannot divorce himself from the violent characters that he plays was trying to be funny. The reported story from the reputable news agency wasn’t.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Chick Flicks and Economic Stimulus

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Just over two months ago, Pajamas Media blogger Roger Kimball insisted that the economic picture could not possible be as dire as those mainstream liberal media hysterics wanted us to think. Then last week, Pajamas Media announced that their blog network is going out of business. Lesson learned: he who attempts to undercut the current economic pessimism ends up ironically fucked.

    That is, unless “he” is talking about Hollywood. The movie industry is thriving so undeniably in this downturn –– Hollywood just wrapped its best January ever at the box office, with theater attendance up over 16% –– that just yesterday the MPAA’s proposed tax credits were thrown out of the economic stimulus package (California senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, no doubt well aware of the longer-tail consequences of the credit crunch on film financing, voted to keep the tax credits in). With the recent successes of mindless escapist fare like Paul Blart: Mall Cop, and the middling box office performance of “serious” Oscar contenders like Milk and Frost/Nixon, the pervasive meme in entertainment media coverage is that, just like during the first (and still the best!) Great Depression, audiences are flocking to the movies to forget their troubles.

    But the (empty pockets) = (bottomless thirst for cinematic guilty pleasure) equation will really be put to the test by early February’s two high-profile chick-lit-turned-flick releases, Confessions of a Shopaholic (about what happens when a happy-go-lucky credit card abuser gets shamed by love into practicing fiscally responsibility) and He’s Just Not Into You (about what happens when married men allow themselves to be seduced by Scarlett Johansson, whose terrible costuming and hair extensions would suggest the recession has consequences we haven’t yet foreseen — more on that in my review later this week). There seems to be a common wish amongst journalists to make sense of these films (before they’ve even opened, before the audiences have had a chance to embrace or reject what they’re trying to sell) in the context not just of the filmgoing boom of the 1930s, but the substance of Old School depression films themselves.

    Exhibit A: John Anderson’s review of He’s Just Not That Into You in Variety:

    …the pic may also be the first contemporary escapist comedy that feels fully aware of its place in the economic vortex. The lushness, the leisure, the vicarious wealth are all balms to soothe our savaged selves as we look away from the news and onto the screen. Given the state of things, such a movie almost seems like an act of charity toward the public. It’s not screwball comedy, but the underlying sentiments are the same.

    Anderson is not necessarily incorrect, but he fails to mention that the primary tone of the film is fairly grey. There is certainly a fair share of thoughtless lifestyle porn in Into You (there’s one subplot involving a character’s transformation from cheesy real estate loser into even cheesier condo broker to Baltimore’s new-money gays; in another, a couple joke about the “million undocumented workers” who are renovating their fabulous brownstone), but it is not the wacky, high-style romantic comedy that its marketing would suggest. For the most part, it takes the romantic foibles and missteps, angst and agonies of its ensemble almost absurdly seriously. At the risk of giving it too much credit (although I do think it deserves *some* credit), it’s kind of a Husbands and Wives for the US Weekly set, and though the Us Weekly set is certainly a larger, more valuable demo than the Woody Allen set, I wonder what second weekend box office will look like when women start to spread the word that the film’s kind of a bummer.

    I predict Shopaholic will have an easier time of it. In today’s Los Angeles Times, Claudia Eller notes that “Shopaholic’s theme of overindulgence and unmitigated spending comes just as consumers are tapped out on their credit cards and feverishly pinching pennies,” and frets, “some observers worry that those images may not sit well with potential moviegoers who are having a hard time making ends meet.” She then (reluctantly, it seems) acknowledges that “there is some evidence that people want to see escapist fare to take their minds off their troubles. During the Depression, for example, some of the most popular movies were madcap comedies and musicals like Top Hat, with elegant couples such as Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers decked out to the nines.”

    I haven’t seen Shopaholic, but from what I know of it, it’s the prototypical Depression fairy tale: under-funded girl lives beyond her means, only to be saved from the gutter by a well-bred love interest (her boss, no less!) The question is, will the easy out-via-improbable romance racket play to a Mall Cop nation? I don’t have the answers! What say you?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • The September Issue-d to Roadside, and more Sundance Deals

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Screen Daily reports that Roadside Attractions has picked up RJ Cutler’s VOGUE documentary The September Issue, for a planned September release. Here’s our review of the film from Sundance. We’ve added that news, plus info on the sales of Push, Cold Souls and more to our deals chart.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

 


Advertisement