Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Karina on SpoutBlog

  • LA MISSION. Sundance 2009 Preview With Director Peter Bratt

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    La MISSION, an American Spectrum film starring Benjamin Bratt and directed by his brother Peter, takes place in the Mission District of San Francisco, and tracks the relationship between an ex-con bus driver named Che (played by the former Mr. Julia Roberts), his son and a sexy neighbor lady who “challenges Che to reconcile the life he thought he had.” We asked Peter Bratt the 4 Questions We Ask Everyone, and his answers touched on everything from American Graffiti to Marvin Gaye to Ki-duk Kim. More after the jump.

    Tell us about your movie: who did you work with, what did you shoot on, why did you make it? Give us the reductive, 25-word or less, “It’s like [pop culture reference a] meets [pop culture reference b]!” pitch, then explain what the quick and dirty sell leaves out.

    We shot La MISSION on HD entirely on location in 26 short days. The core team was made up of myself, brother Benjamin Bratt (who was doing double time as lead actor and producer), and force of nature/producing partner Alpita Patel.

    The “dirty sell”: Imagine the old cars and music from American Graffiti (but with a bit more funk), the working class, ethnic flavor of Saturday Night Fever, and the soul searching of Peter Weir’s Fearless, and you have La MISSION.

    The real skinny: The story takes place in an urban Latino community, and centers on a violent patriarch (“Che”) who discovers that his only son (“Jess”) is homosexual.

    In the San Francisco Neighborhood that bears the film’s name, Che is a reformed bad boy of the street, who at middle age, finds beauty building classic lowrider cars. His son, and the friends he’s had since childhood, are at the center of his world. In many ways, Che personifies the dominant patriarchal culture that surrounds him, and like that culture, is at the threshold of great change. He is faced with a choice: maintain old habits and attitudes, OR adapt, grow and mature. In order to make this choice, Che is forced to stretch beyond his comfort zone; and it’s only from this place that he discovers what might be at stake if he doesn’t chose wisely. As a filmmaker living in an increasingly violent and dangerous world, I was drawn to the idea of transformation and the pain that often goes with it. I also wanted to fulfill a life’s dream, and make a movie with a Marvin Gaye jam in it!

    If you funded your film through a “day job” or through working on projects that were not your own, tell us about that. If not, tell us a story from your past work life, before you became a professional filmmaker.

    I worked as a carpenter before and after I made my first film. Before that, I had applied and was admitted to NYU film school. Weeks before I packed up and headed East, I sold my truck and all my tools, confidently thinking I would never need them again. It took me less than a semester to learn that film school wasn’t for me, and I dropped out and returned home to San Francisco with my chin on my chest. Carpentry was the only way I knew how to make a living, so I started all over again from scratch, buying and collecting tools as more jobs came in. After I saved enough to live on for a year, I held up in a work-for-rent, sub-basement apartment, read every “how to write a screenplay”  book  under the sun, and then sat down and  wrote the screenplay I would eventually make into my first feature. But the moral of the story is: “never say never…and most definitely never sell your tools!”

    Have you been to Park City before? If so, tell us your best moment (or worst, which ever is funnier).

    I’d been there once before, in the pre-internet days, with my film Follow Me Home. We got the film in the can for a little over a $200,000, but had to raise more for post. Needless to say, it was a long process that kept us busy almost up to the day we premiered at the Holiday One theater. I was very naïve and didn’t have an agent, a lawyer, a publicist, or any other veteran consultant, and my editor and I simply showed up with a 35mm print and NO promotional material. When we walked through town, we saw that nearly every other film team had postcards, one sheets, flyers, etc. Later that night, in a panic, we high-tailed it to Salt Lake and found an all night Kinko’s. We stayed up half the night making flyers and posting them throughout the streets and store fronts of Park City. Every morning we would rise at the crack of dawn, before the crowds filled the streets, and plastered any empty space we could find. This time around the team is a bit more seasoned, so I’m hoping to slow the pace down enough to enjoy my morning coffee.

    Let’s get hypothetical: You’re on death row. The night of your execution, you’re allowed to watch any two films of your choice. What would you pick for your last-night-on-Earth double feature?

    Good hypothetical. Rather than going with a couple films about family, friendship, or how sweet life is, I would be focused on meeting death and preparing myself for the ultimate journey. For that I’d want a road map to navigate the “hell worlds” I would surely encounter due to my evil ways. I would go with Jacob’s Ladder (based on “Tibetan Book of the Dead”) and the South Korean film that examines each stage of a person’s life, Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter … and Spring. Then get on my knees and pray.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Cinema Eye Honors 2009 Shortlist

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The shortlist has been announced for the 2009 Cinema Eye Honors. The list includes a number of titles that many felt were unjustifiably snubbed from the Oscars shortlist, some based on qualification quibbles, including Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired, My Winnipeg, The Order of Myths, Stranded: I’ve Come From A Plane That Crashed Into The Mountain, and Waltz With Bashir. Omitted: Dear Zachary, a number of Oscar shortlisted titles including I.O.U.S.A., and each of the top five highest grossing non-fiction films of 2008, including Religulous.

    I’ve pasted the full shortlist after the jump with links back to previous coverage of the films on SpoutBlog. Though I haven’t personally seen all of these, between everyone on the Spout team we’ve previously covered all but two.

    AMERICAN TEEN - Nanette Burstein, dir
    THE BETRAYAL (NERAKHOON) - Ellen Kuras & Thavisouk Phrasavath, dir
    ENCOUNTERS AT THE END OF THE WORLD – Werner Herzog, dir
    THE ENGLISH SURGEON – Geoffrey Smith, dir
    FORBIDDEN LIES – Anna Broinowski, dir
    IN A DREAM – Jeremiah Zagar, dir
    MAN ON WIRE – James Marsh, dir
    MY WINNIPEG – Guy Maddin, dir
    THE ORDER OF MYTHS – Margaret Brown, dir
    ROMAN POLANSKI: WANTED AND DESIRED – Marina Zenovich, dir
    STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE – Errol Morris, dir
    STRANDED, I COME FROM A PLANE THAT CRASHED ON THE MOUNTAINS – Gonzalo Arijon, dir
    TROUBLE THE WATER – Carl Deal & Tia Lessin, dir
    UP THE YANGTZE – Yung Chang, dir
    WALTZ WITH BASHIR – Ari Folman, dir


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • DGA Nominations. Yawn.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Boyle. Fincher. Howard. Nolan. Van Sant. No alarms, no surprises. indieWIRE has the historical analysis that reminds us that last year, the DGA nominated Sean Penn for Into the Wild and the Academy swapped him out for Jason Reitman, but, you know … unless whatshername who was fired from Twilight makes a big surge super quick, it seems unlikely that anyone’s going to get an Oscar nomination this year for nabbing $100 million+ of teenage girl allowance. I’m gonna go out on a limb and say the Best Director Oscar nominations will probably look a lot like this.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Anti-war Films ARE Successful!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Cory Doctorow at BoingBoing is calling it “a masterful takedown” of “the right-wing myth that Hollywood keeps making anti-war movies that flop, proving how out of touch the Liberal Elite are with the will of the peeepul.” This post from Leverage creator John Rogers may be that, but it also points to something I’ve brought up many times before: the whole “Liberal Hollywood will spend untold sums of money to make sure we lose the war in Iraq and turn your children into godless eco-communists!” hysteria only floats when buoyed by willful ignorance of the stratification of the film industry. Different kinds of films are made, distributed and marketed in different kinds of ways, thus lending their ultimate market performance different kinds of expectations. I know when infidel propaganda like Taxi to the Dark Side doesn’t quite do the same business as good ol’ entertainment like Hannah Montana Topless With the Jonas Brothers in 3D, it’s tempting to say that America hates Alex Gibney. Except that America doesn’t know who Alex Gibney is.

    Rogers, who wrote the post in response to a conversation at Big Hollywood, the new Breitbart offshoot edited by John “Dirty Harry” Nolte, first uses budget vs box office breakdowns to demonstrate that films like In The Valley of Elah and Lions For Lambs, oft cited as proof that Americans aren’t buying what Liberal Hollywood is selling, actually made a profit. He then argues that many of the anti-war films that *didn’t* turn a profit are hardly either proof of a Hollywood conspiracy against the will of the people, or evidence that all of America has voted with their wallets against this kind of cinema, because they were neither produced by Hollywood nor released wide enough for most Americans to even get a vote. To excerpt liberally from Rogers on Redacted:

    FIFTEEN THEATERS for Redacted, for chrissake. Here’s a quick clue — when Hollywood wants to sell something, we make it as widely available as possible for purchase. Crazy, I know. What sort of marketing mumbo-jumbo is this?

    …an experimental film by DePalma costing, last I heard, about $5 million, this one pops up all the time in angry screeds, but … we’re really down in the weeds here. Fifteen theaters. Grace is Gone, released in 7 theaters? No End in Sight released in 2 theaters (made a nice bit of coin in DVD)?

    I’m going to assume Nolte isn’t arguing that because no one went to see a movie playing in two theaters in the entire country this is somehow proof nobody wants to see those kinds of movies. It’s like arguing that because all of America doesn’t eat at Mama Luigi’s in Brockton, Mass., America hates Italian food. He isn’t that stupid.

    “Stupid” isn’t the right word. Most arguments that “prove” American theatergoers have no interest in the propaganda that evil “Liberal Hollywood” is trying to shove down our throats purposefully ignore the fact that most movies with any sort of real, balls-out political agenda are either produced independently of the Hollywood studio system, and/or are made for so little money that they can break even fairly easily. And this goes for liberal or conservative films — as Rogers points out, we could talk about Stop-Loss and An American Carol in the same breath as evidence that overtly political films on either side are a simple waste of resources … if we were “the sort of fuckwit who tries to derive patterns off two lousy data points.”

    Rogers accuses Nolte and Big Hollywood of displaying a “childrens understanding of how Hollywood runs.” I say they actually do know better, they must understand basic concepts like relative gross well enough, but deliberately pretend they don’t in order make sure their rhetoric floats. Whatever gets you through the blog, right?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Sex Scenes: Sex and Drugs and My Way

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Pretty in Pink  (1986)

    Sid and Nancy  (1986)

    Valley Girl  (1983)

    I’ll never forget the first time I heard the Sinatra standard “My Way”, while sitting in the balcony of an art house in Denver, chain-smoking Benson & Hedges ultra-light menthols, staring nearly hypnotized by the sight of sexy Gary Oldman transforming himself into the swaggering embodiment of punk rock, tearing through both cover song and screen. Sid and Nancy (along with Howard Deutch’s Pretty In Pink which also came out in 1986, and Martha Coolidge’s 1983 Valley Girl) was nothing less than a revelation to this teenager with Aqua-netted hair, Doc Martins and ripped fishnets, because it actually portrayed “my people,” spoke to me in my own musical language.

    And my feeling of identification probably was not unlike that experienced by a certain segment of the movie-going public 31 years before Alex Cox paid tribute to the junkie romance of Sid Vicious and Nancy Spungen, who witnessed another tale of fucked-up love, possible homicide, and enduring heroin chic. Heartthrob Frank Sinatra would not sing “My Way” in Otto Preminger’s groundbreaking 1955 The Man With The Golden Arm, but he would play the fictional Frankie Machine, another lean and hungry musician of dubious talent weighed down by both a needy blonde and a monkey on his back.

    With a sizzling jazz score by Elmer Bernstein as perfectly wedded to image as Joe Strummer’s powerful sound is in Cox’s film, and with production design every bit as hyper-real as the addict’s hallucination style of Sid and Nancy, Preminger’s movie, like Cox’s, uses its sleek, feline, magnetic lead to shed light on a hapless guy unwittingly the helpless victim of his own charm, a plaything to both ruthless women and greedy men who take advantage of his naïve nature. Sinatra’s Frankie is a kindhearted, charismatic card dealer just out of rehab, trying to follow his dream of being a drummer, but he’s stuck with a scheming wife in a wheelchair (Eleanor Parker, who seems to be doing a camp version of a Tennessee Williams heroine) and a sometime employer/drug dealer (the appropriately slimy Darren McGavin) who uses heroin as an ace in the hole to control the fragile Frankie. Sid likewise was just a young, working class punk who suddenly found himself stuck with a scheming groupie/junkie/drug dealer (played by Chloe Webb who manages to make Nancy both annoying and endearing), a bass he could barely play, and a Machiavellian manager in the form of Malcolm McLaren who used all the Sex Pistols band members as his own personal puppets. Sid never wanted to be a nihilist icon any more than Frankie wants to deal cards; they’re just so damn alluring, so good at what they do, that others demand it!

    And pretty soon the lifestyle – including heroin – they’ve nodded into becomes all they know. Tellingly, the most sexually fraught scenes in The Man With The Golden Arm occur not between Frankie and his mistress Molly, played by va-va-voom Kim Novak, but between Frankie and his dealer Louie. It’s Louie who is forever massaging Frankie’s back when he’s tired, intimately cooing in his ear like a lover, taking him arm in arm back to his flat as Frankie swivels his head like a two-timing spouse, for he’s more nervous being seen alone with Louie than with Molly. In one scene a tired Louie begins to relax and get undressed, even takes off his shirt before shooting up that golden arm. Neither Molly nor Frankie’s wife Zosch ever show that much skin in front of Frankie!

    Indeed, towards the end of Sid and Nancy the bond between the couple isn’t sex, isn’t love, so much as a shared insatiable lust for the drug, the third party in their fatal ménage a trois. For the pursuit of the fix is sexual in itself. And yet the most painful truth in Sid and Nancy is laid bare in that one scene in which Sid destroys everything around him, slaughters that old Sinatra standard in a big ironic “**** you.” For in a world where outside forces like sex, drugs and rock and roll can determine an individual’s fate there is no such thing as “My Way.”

    SEX SCENES is a weekly column in which Lauren Wissot watches old films, new films, indies and blockbusters, and tells us what turns her on. If you’ve got a film, a star, a genre or an issue that you’d like Lauren to tackle, let us know in the comments.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

 


Advertisement