Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Karina on SpoutBlog

  • Bogdanovich and Cuban, The New Odd Couple

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Our friend Kevin Kelly was at that Mark Cuban panel at the TCA featured in the vague WIRED post mentioned earlier, and he sent along some further context––and quotes!

    Apparently, the panel’s essential purpose was to promote Humboldt County, a SXSW vet and now a Magnolia release which will debut on VOD three weeks before hitting theaters in September. Also on the panel was Humboldt co-star Peter Bogdanovich, and talk about an odd pairing. On the one hand, you’ve got mogul Cuban making his cocky techno-evangelist pitch about how business travelers held captive in hotels are dying to charge their corporate cards $12 for the chance to see films like Flawless and Finding Amanda.

    Then there’s old Pete, still an active theatrical patron himself (“Sex in the City was amazing because it was all women. I was the only guy in the theater, and the women loved it, and I loved that the women loved it”), but conscious that it’s an experience that’s diminishing for a reason (in part because trailers are “unbelievably violent, fast, crazy, noisy garbage.”) And he acknowledges that even if, for him,  nothing’s going “to replace the experience of seeing a movie on the big screen with an audience,” alternate philosophies of distribution “seems to be working in terms of getting people to see the films.”

    I wish I had been there. Excerpts from Kevin’s transcription of the even follow after the jump.

    Mark Cuban: Starting with Bubble…initially we started simultaneously on HDNet Movies and in theaters. And you know, as we interviewed people and did some research, it became apparent that, you know, people who weren’t HDNet Movies subscribers, people who weren’t going to go into theaters, still there was demand for the movies.

    So I guess it’s been seven months ago, give or take, we created HDNet Ultra VOD, and that really has been the financial differentiator because consumers just love it. And what it entails, as you can see by the dated up there, you can go to a hotel like this. If you’re staying here at the Hilton and you look at the movie previews, you’ll see Finding Amanda. You’ll see Flawless. Movies that have been playing in this hotel since three weeks before their release, and people are buying them at $11.99, more than they pay in theaters, and they’re buying them in great numbers, great quantities and we actually make more money there. And so we expanded it from just hotels to cable and satellite systems as well.

    Peter Bogdanovich: It’s all new to me. I don’t think there’s anything to replace the experience of seeing a movie on the big screen with an audience. But [the Magnolia plan] seems to be working in terms of getting people to see the films. And if the film works, the word of mouth is what carries it. And word of mouth is what carries any movie anyway really. So I guess it’s working.

    I don’t know. It’s a very odd climate. And I hear nothing but doom and gloom about the independent film. And it seems like the independent films are the only good ones being made because they’re about people. Everything else is about special effects. So I don’t know. It’s kind of a new world and things are changing rapidly, and I think this is part of a new way of approaching the selling of movies. So maybe it works. I don’t know. According to Mark, it’s working.

    Cuban: Right now the independent movies business is broken, and whether or it’s retrievable, I don’t know. Mark Gill was interviewed and gave a very poignant interview that the independent movie business doesn’t have a future. And what we’re trying to do with Magnolia and Landmark and HDNet Movies is really recapture the independent movie business.

    Bogdanovich: There was a… who was it that did that joke? Was it Jon Stewart who said he was watching Lawrence of Arabia on his iPod? I don’t know what to say about it. People can do anything. If they like the picture, okay. We should see it on a TV screen or something a little larger than a stamp. It’s bizarre. All I can say it it’s bizarre.

    Cuban: I’m a technology geek, and so I’ve always tried to say how can we work backwards from people’s needs rather than to work forward from the way things are. And the reality is in this day and age, people want to be able to consume movies how they want them, when they want them, where they want them. And in traditional movies you work really, really hard to build buzz, you spend a lot of money to make people aware. And then you pray to God that people go into theaters. And when they go into theaters, the theaters don’t actually spend any money, so it all comes down to who’s spending all the big money on P&A. And then that Friday you just pray that people show up.

    Bogdanovich: You know, I have a theory that one of the reasons younger people don’t like older films, films made, say, before the ‘60s, is because they’ve never seen them on a big screen, ever. If you don’t see a film on the big screen, you haven’t really seen it. You’ve seen a version of it, but you haven’t really seen it. That’s my feeling, but I’m old-fashioned.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Mark Cuban to Flip Script on Day and Date

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Redacted  (2007)

    Consider this WIRED story more than loosely related to yesterday’s back-and-forth on theatrical distribution, and maybe sort of possibly related to today’s rampant speculation on Che. At the Television Critics Association conference yesterday, vertically integrated movie mogul Mark Cuban announced that he’s going to start selling Magnolia’s theatrical releases on HDNET’s On Demand cable service––BEFORE they debut in theaters.

    I *think* the news nugget here is that this reverse day-and-date roll out wil now apply to ALL Magnolia releases, because otherwise, it’s not really news at all––Cuban’s companies have experimented with this tactic before, and box office grosses would suggest that it didn’t work so well for Redacted. Unless it’s the Cuban-as-cowboy quotes––such as “Landmark is the only national theater chain that will support HDNet’s Ultra Sneak Previews” and “I don’t care what the MPAA does.” But then, that’s not really news, either.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Che: What’s Up With It?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Che  (2008)

    What’s going on with Steven Soderbergh’s Che? Heard anything recently? I haven’t seen any hard news published in any half-way reputable outlet since Cannes (aside from this report from IndianTelevision.com that Che will soon premiere on––wait for it––Indian television, but the film’s international release has never been in doubt). But that hasn’t put an end to the speculation.

    On June 14, Jeff Wells did a post based on a conversation a friend of his had with some other guy who’s “familiar with the comings and goings of” Wild Bunch, the sales agency who funded Che and have been looking for a buyer for it since Berlin. The gist, as Wells passes it along through the various degrees of distance, is that Wild Bunch has given up trying to sell the current cut to a U.S. distributor, and Soderbergh’s too busy shooting his next movie to worry about refining his cut, and everyone’s just sort of shrugging their shoulders and cutting their losses.

    I didn’t come across this story until today, when I finally decided to do some digging on a rumor I heard about the film last month when I was in Las Vegas. It would have been the night after Wells published that post (which, again, I didn’t read until today). En route from one bar to another, a filmmaker pulled out his Blackberry and commented aloud on an email he had just received, claiming that HBO had struck a deal to broadcast Che as a six-hour miniseries. I’m not saying that you should that that story to be any more legit than Wells’ game of telephone (or even IndianTelevision.com’s scoop); personally, I assumed that if there was anything to it, it would have made it to Variety by the end of the week, which it didn’t.

    But it is interesting that Wells’ post extensively discusses the pros and cons of just such a deal, an ultimately concludes that the ” solution, it seems, is that it has to be sold to HBO, but that its value will be diminished if it doesn’t first compete in the [awards] derby. Which means that someone — Mark Cuban? - has to put it out theatrically before 12.31.08.”

    There’s no reason to assume that Cuban would be interested in shouldering the film’s hefty price tag––other than the fact that his production company has an outstanding deal with Soderbergh, and he’s not exactly hurting for cash––which I guess is maybe reason enough to assume that there’s no reason to assume that he *wouldn’t* be interested.

    Regardless: if another crack at the critics is what Che really needs, there’s currently reason to believe that it might get that shot at the New York Film Festival come September. Last night, I was browsing the online version of the July/August issue of Film Comment (like NYFF, a production of the Film Society of Lincoln Center) and on the issue’s index page, there was a preview of the magazine’s September/October issue. For whatever reason, if you go to that page today, the preview no longer exists, but since it’s still in the Google cache, I was able to screencap it:

    Assuming this is still a correct indicator of the content of the issue, there are two things worth pointing out:

    1) It would be virtually unheard of for Film Comment to put a film with no chance of a U.S. exhibition future on the cover of their magazine;

    and

    2) The cover of the September/October issue of Film Comment has not been not given to a film set to play the New York Film Festival since 2004. That issue’s cover was given to I Heart Huckabees, a film which premiered immediately before NYFF at Toronto. Last year and in 2005, in a sensible act of synergy, the Sep/Oct issue was fronted by the film set to open the festival.

    So is some version of Che going to play (or even open) the New York Film Festival? Like I said, if you’ve heard anything, let us know…


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Review: La France

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    La France  (2007)

    Serge Bozon’s La France is generic clusterfuck, but in the best way––a stunningly confident, category-defying, broken-down dream piece about loss and being lost. It’s a film about war in which soldiers are not only never seen actually fighting for their land, but in fact seem to have lost their way in vague and vain pursuit of a lost land to reclaim as their own. It’s a musical with just one song, performed by non-performers in a handful of mutations throughout the film. And it’s a love story, soaked in romantic delusion but ultimately fatalist in regards to the actual odds that love can overcome existential crisis. After a 14 month festival run (including stops at Cannes, New Directors/New Films and LAFF), it opens for a week in New York at Anthology Film Archives on Friday.

    Camille (Sylvie Testud) is living on a rural estate with an invasive sister when she receives a letter from her husband, who has been writing as faithfully as possible from his post in World War I. But in this missive, he tells her to move on, that she’ll never see him again. Convinced that he’s just confused and susceptible to the black magic of nightmares, that the war’s major side effect is simple distance and not total psychological recalibration, Camille sets out to get her man back. She chops off her hair, binds her breasts and heads out into the countryside in search of her love’s brigade. She soon instead finds another band of soldiers, and though she easily convinces them that she’s a desperate, orphaned teenage boy, they’re nonetheless afraid of a look in her eyes, which the lieutenant of the brigade is sure is a sign that this ruffian is “seeking death.” Camille eventually secures the tropps’ trust and earns the right to stay with them, and together they wander the countryside, ostensibly “looking for the front.”

    The journey is long, and less than eventful, and as a lost soul with a dreamily sketched but ill-thought-out goal, Camille fits right in. The band kills time on the road swapping imaginings about the lost city of Atlantis, and singing variants on a French pop theme about a blind girl and her lover(s). Bozon recorded the songs live, capturing the less-than-professional voices organically stretching and cracking as the actors played along on shabby home-made folk instruments.

    At first these musical moments––which unflailingly crop up before night falls and a certain anxious, almost hallucinatory madness creeps on to the screen––play as wonderful non-sequitors. Eventually, they start to tell stories that run parallel to La France’s primary themes. At one point, the feminine protagonist of the song (who is given voice by a variety of legitimately male soldiers, but never Camille) sings a lament to a lost boyfriend: “I promised a lover, a German who’s hard of hearing. The idiot doesn’t know France…who am I to judge?” Later, “she” swoons for a Polack: “I’d like France to be invaded by Poland/I can feel the pleasant vibrations.” If the colonialist fantasy is analogous to rape, this is its inversion: in search of a safe haven away from home, they’re fantasizing that they could submit to another country’s embrace. This longing resolves itself in the saddest of ironies when Camille discovers what’s become of her husband. She may have assumed a new identity in order to find him, but their parallel journeys away from home have transformed both into different people.

    As much as Bozon’s vision has been praised for its startling originality, so has his choice of title come under attack for its “portentousness“, for being merely a “provocation.” Is this France––or was it? An empty space on which the lonely and lost draw their own impossibly romantic fantasies, only to wander towards inevitable disappointments with heads and hearts infected by the deceptively simple beauty of pop? In an interview with Mark Peranson for Cinema Scope, Bozon, a former film critic and active vinyl obsessive, admits to sourcing his “politics” from his pop preferences:

    Just listen to “Going All the Way” by The Squires or “On Tour” by The Chancellors (two garage diamonds found by Tim Warren of Crypt Records) and you’ll understand the political meaning of my movie. I’ll try and explain: “On Tour” is a song (as you could guess) about the life of a group on tour. But, like all the real garage bands, the Chancellors never played once outside their own town. Now think about the “tour” of my soldiers… you see? You begin by expecting some light, uplifting pop, but in the end it’s only imposture, frustration, and anger all over the place.

    Like the music in which the filmmaker finds his unlikely inspiration, La France’s grand, all-encompassing gestures of uplift are underpinned by an eventual awareness of their futilty. That tension, and the odd magic that comes out of it, is irresistible.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • SAG Out of Luck. Trade Roughage 07/09/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    • The members of AFTRA have ratified a proposed deal with the APMTP over a new contract. This wrecks SAG’s hopes that they’ll be able to use the dissatisfaction of the hundred-thousand-plus actors who belong to both unions as leverage against their own stalled negotiations. Another factor to SAG’s woes: after the WGA strike, nobody wants to be out of work again.
    • Variety confirms Nikki Finke’s report that the Weinsteins are looking for a financing partner to help them get Quentin Tarantino’s Inglorious Bastards made in time for premiere at Cannes 2009; the studio has already found a moneybag for Rob Marshall’s Nine in Relativity Media.
    • Palisades Media has picked up the just-shuttered Tartan UK’s 400-film video library, which includes films like Super Size Me, In the Mood For Love, and the works of Bergman and Pasolini.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

 


Advertisement