Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Karina on SpoutBlog

  • Defending Boll: BlogNosh 05/28/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    • “I refused to sign the absurd online petition that was drafted to stop Uwe Boll from making more movies,” writes Alex Ross Perry at Tisch Film Review. “Not because I do not believe in the power of online petitioning to accomplish social change, but because of my genuine appreciation for the films of Uwe Boll.”
    • The IndiePix Blog brings word of Rooftop Panorama, a three-day series of panels, screenings and parties hosted Rooftop Films and co-sponsored by IndiePix and Shooting People. It runs from June 12-14; Rooftop Films kicks off their summer screening series this Saturday with a free screening of At the Death House Door in Fort Greene, Brooklyn.
    • Speaking of the devil: At the Death House Door co-director Steve James has published an essay called “The Decline of the Longitudinal Doc” at IFC.com. “For me, longitudinal docs are the most deeply satisfying form. Spending years following a story is the ultimate act of filmmaking discovery, because you don’t know where the journey is leading, no matter how perceptive you think you are,” he writes. “If you spend years filming people, they will grow to be something more than just a ’subject.’”

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • War, Inc’s Big Weekend

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    War, Inc.  (2008)

    According to indieWIRE, the John Cusack satire War, Inc made an impressive $45,714 on two screens in its opening weekend. Not exactly Iron Man numbers, but a much higher per-screen average than any other film in limited release. For the sake of perspective: Indiana Jones and I’m Vaguely Certain Shia La Beouf’s IMDb Profile Exaggerates His Height made less than a thousand dollars more per screen in its by all accounts sufficiently massive opening weekend; Cusack’s last film, the also war-themed Grace is Gone, made just $50,899 in its entire theatrical run.

    So this a victory for indie film, right? Yay! Except, of course, that the movie’s abysmally bad.

    Don’t just take my word for it––check out War, Inc’s page on Rotten Tomatoes, where its rating of 25% Fresh seems to have been inflated by the cherry-red plaudits of a couple of known blurb whores.

    Still, there’s something going on here, and I can’t quite put my finger on what it is. This can’t be a Peter Bart “the audience doesn’t care about critics” thing––and if it is, it’s the exception to the rule in a summer season in which the most critically acclaimed Hollywood product is also the highest grosser. Is there a segment of audience that’s finally ready to laugh at the idea of America as bumbling conquerors? As AJ Schnack points out, Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden? is experience a sudden up-tick in box office love, so maybe that’s part of it.

    Another theory: people love John Cusack. Especially girls. Well, okay––women, but Cusack has a way of making women revert back to girlhood. Girls especially love a specific brand of Cusack: this guy just has to put on a suit and drop his chin slightly and open his eyes wide and start convincing a reluctant woman (on screen) that she should abandon all previous life plans in order to do something foolish with him, and millions of women (off screen), who would probably otherwise have perfect control of their faculties, start to feel like their insides are melting and complain that they can’t quite think straight. That segment of the audience was probably so doped up on the pheromones bouncing off the screen that they could barely even notice War, Inc’s basic incompetency as a satire, a comedy, a romance or a political statement. And don’t cry for their poor husbands and boyfriends, who surely reaped the rewards of The Cusack Factor that night at home. It’s a win-win!


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Sarah Jessica Parker stars in “Taliban recruitment film”?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    If my Twitter stream is to be believed, I was the only female, 20-something writer in New York City who was NOT invited to the Sex and the City premiere last night. (Could it have been because of this? Or this? Or this? Hmmm.) Certainly, each picture Julia Allison staged at the event offers up at least 1,000 word on the matter, but who has time to do all that reading? Jeff Wells‘ take is much more succinct:

    The film is another Taliban recruitment film — a grotesque and putrid valentine to the insipid “me, my lifestyle, my accessories and I” chick culture of the early 21st Century. Guys everywhere — if you’re in a brand-new relationship, take her to see this thing. If she even half-likes it, dump her and walk away cold. Save yourself!

    Funny side note: I remember the moment when, as a senior in college, I decided that I could no longer in good conscience watch Sex and the City. It was, I think, the premiere of the first season to air after 9/11, and there was a scene where Carrie announced that she was going to help rebuild downtown by going shopping. It was such a direct aping of George W. Bush’s commerce-as-opiate for the troubled masses prescriptive of the time that it seemed like the ultimate sign that the show had cut loose the thread of critique that once seemed to be woven into its pornographic depiction of excessive consumption.

    We obviously couldn’t have hoped that the movie would have transcended the worst aspects of the show––at least, not after having heard Fergie’s theme song––but I honestly didn’t think it was going to go as far as this, to become the embodiment of not just what *I* hate, but Why They Hate Us.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Mommie Dearest Author Says Celebs Shouldn’t Adopt

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mommie Dearest  (1981)

    Christina Crawford––adopted daughter of Joan Crawford, and author of Mommie Dearest, the woe-is-me memoir on which the Faye Dunaway camp classic was based––has always had a bizarre/brilliant way of promoting herself. This week, the woman who is only famous for having been adopted by a celebrity is promoting a 30th anniversary edition of her memoir about being adopted by a celebrity by saying that celebrities shouldn’t adopt. From The Guardian:

    “I have tremendous concerns about celebrity adoptions by people like Madonna and Angelina Jolie,” she said in an exclusive interview to mark the publication of a 30th anniversary edition of her memoir. “From the adoptee’s point of view, it is vitally important to know who they are, where they came from, or it can have profound medical and psychological effects.”

    Crawford alleges that her mother, who was one of the biggest film stars of Hollywood’s Golden Age, adopted her four children for publicity purposes…When asked if today’s celebrities are driven by the same motivation, she replied: “What do you think? Why are they so keen on getting the maximum newspaper and magazine coverage?”

    Of course, taking advantage of one’s relationship to a celebrity to attract media attention, and then using that opportunity to rail against how celebrities shouldn’t do things to attract media attention, is completely different. And none of this has anything to do with that new book about Joan Crawford, recently excerpted in Vanity Fair, which basically contends that Mommie Dearest was pure fiction manufactured by Christina in a desperate ploy for attention. Why can’t you give her the respect that she’s entitled to?!?!


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Sex and the Men Would Rather Be Shot. Trade Roughage 05/28/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sex and the City  (2008)

    • For all the Sex and the City promotional madness and media hype, says Diane Garrett at Variety, “there’s no escaping the fact that the movie is a chick flick with strong appeal among an older femme demo but questionable interest among others. All the magazine coverage in the world — 63 pages in the May 23 edition of Entertainment Weekly alone — and Sex and the City TV marathons haven’t really moved the needle among men, many of whom suggest they’d rather be shot than sit through the movie.”
    • Seemingly determined to try to recreate the relationship of Roger Vadim and Jane Fonda whether or not the Barbarella remake works out, Robert Rodriguez is apparently “shopping around Women in Chains!, a violent drama set at a woman’s prison starring his fiancee, Rose McGowan.” Oh, right––it’s camp, so it’s neither misogynist nor creepy
    • IFC continues their Cannes buying spree days after the end of the festival, picking up Grand Prix winner Gomorrah. The Italian mafia flick has done solid business in its homeland since opening last week.
    • The CineVegas film festival will honor Anjelica Huston. Don Cheadle, Rosario Dawson, Viggo Mortensen and Sam Rockwell with their Half Life award, while James Caan will be declared a Vegas Icon.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

 


Advertisement