Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

Karina on SpoutBlog

  • BlogNosh 02/18/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    • *Blush*??????New York Times blogger David Carr has called our Oscar party “the white hot social center” of the Oscar-party landscape. If you’re in New York that night, you simply must stop by. Details here.
    • “If you???ve seen Daniel Day Lewis??? portrayal of a greedy, sinister oilman in There Will Be Blood, it???s just another example of the Hollywood left???s contempt for capitalism.” That’s Tonight Show producer Dave Berg, speaking at a meeting held to try to rally Hollywood’s Republican troops against Barack Obama. Via Wilshire and Washington.
    • David Edelstein is worried that Juno will win Oscars in just about every category it’s nominated due to better choices splitting the vote. “As one of the few critics to dislike Juno, I would be devastated,” he writes in the first of what will apparently be a series of bloggy exchanges with Lynda Obst. “But weirder things have happened in these silly awards.”
    • From The Department Of Questions That Don’t Need To Be Asked: Jeff Wells wonders, “Is there anyone who doesn’t suspect that Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay will somehow play fast and loose, water down or otherwise make light of that deplorable situation?” Commenters to proceed to argue whether or not Gitmo detainees should be transfered to domestic prisons.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » karina

  • 1930s Makeup

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    30smakeup.png

    Cory Doctrow at BoingBoing points to this scanned article from a 1933 issue of Modern Mechanix, which goes inside the Hollywood makeup studio of the era. Much of the story concentrates on how Boris Karloff (as you know, my classic horror movie hearthrob) was made up to look like Frankenstein and The Mummy, but my favorite part is the headline screencapped above.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » karina

  • SXSW Preview: Present Company

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    For Keeps  (1988)

    For today’s SXSW Preview, we’re taking a look at Present Company, the latest film by Frank V. Ross. Frank, who appeared in this episode of Butterknife, had two films in last summer’s New Talkies program at the IFC Center, and like Quietly on By and Hohokam, Company is a lo-fi character study about the everyday traumas survived by young people far removed from urban hipster culture. This time around, Ross takes a look at Christy and Buddy, two young parents who are raising an infant whilst living in Christy’s parents’ suburban basement. Check out the trailer above, and Frank’s answers to the 4 Questions We’re Asking Everybody below.

    Tell us about your movie. Who did you work with, why did you make it? Give us the reductive, 25-word or less, “It’s like [pop culture reference a] meets [pop culture reference b]!” pitch, then explain what the quick and dirty sell leaves out.

    I don???t know why I made it. But I know now why that material kept my attention finally. Originally this movie was the Susan Smith story meets, I dunno, some shitty movie about a band with a horrible title. I wanted to make a picture about an unwed couple with a baby living in parent???s basement. It???s around me, it???s relevant, and with consequence. The deal breaker was wanting to make a movie with Tamara [Fana], once she was part of the deal we were able to see the picture for what it was supposed to be. She said the imagined circumstances were her nightmare???watching how she played it was a joy.

    So now I guess it???s For Keeps meets Scenes From a Marriage sans-all the talking. Which leaves out the passive-aggressive relationship; and the fact that it???s a comedy of sorts. They don???t hate each other, they think they???re funny, they get along every now and then but they just don???t love one another despite having a baby???that was an accident. Bound by the obligation. Characters not having a strong enough personality to be themselves around different groups or individuals and almost never doing the right thing in circumstances.

    “This meets that” always leaves out way more then can be measured and takes away from how hard we work at trying to make something new. I hate you for asking me to do that. But love that you asked.

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » karina

  • There’s indie, and then there’s indie.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    At his new Salon blog, Andrew O’Hehir asks:

    Are the Indiewood movies gradually sucking money and life out of the genuine independents, meaning smaller distributors without a big studio’s marketing muscle behind them?

    Answer: Yes.

    Glad we could sort that out.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » karina

  • The People vs. George Lucas

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Sci-Fi Scanner points to The People vs. George Lucas, a documentary-in-progress about “the unique, ambivalent and sometimes conflicted relationship” between Star Wars fanboys and the franchise’s creator. The basic thrust seems to be that even people who really loved the original three films take so much issue with the Special Editions and/or the prequel trilogy, that their love is equally balanced by hate, thus turning each and every Star Wars fanboy into a tortured soul, struggling to reconcile the pleasure with the pain, etc. Which is HILARIOUS, right?

    Anyway. The makers of People are looking for “Star Wars aficionados and/or notorious detractors” who are willing to unload their passion on video tape for possible inclusion in the film. More details here.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » karina

  • Pierrot le Fou: The Criterion Edition

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    week_3_600.jpg

    I watched the new Criterion edition of Pierrot le Fou, a film I’ve seen many times but not once in at least five years, with Glenn Kenny and Nathan Rabin???s wildly divergent reads swirling in my head. I am not in a place in my life where I???m particularly open to romance as either a nostalgic concept or present-day reality, but this recent viewing of a film that I loved long ago left me wondering how it could be received with anything but a swoon. Pierrot le Fou can be distant and opaque, for sure, but necessarily so??????it’s about a couple’s inability to overcome the opaque distance that lies between them. More than that, its blend of cinematic Cubism and stylized hyper-realism is deeply evocative of a love that???s literally out to sea. There’s no question that it works as a romance about the death of a romance. In fact, what may be up for debate, is whether it works as anything else at all.

    I was nudged down this path of questioning by two elements of Criterion???s special edition package, both of which illuminate Pierrot???s relevance as an extremely thinly-veiled autobiographical portrait of the disintegration of Jean-Luc Godard’s marriage to Anna Karina. The first is Richard Brody’s liner notes essay, “Self-Portrait in a Shattered Lens,” which meticulously breaks down how a film ostensibly based on an American crime novel called Obsession, infused with two Balzac works which Godard conflated into one, became, through a necessity of casting, an accident of timing and a desperate need for catharsis, “an angry accusation against Anna Karina, and a self-pitying keen at how she destroyed him and his work.”

    Godard, l’amour, la poesie, a documentary on the package’s second disc, doesn’t fully explicate that”destruction”, but it does offer some clues as to the mindset that transposed it into film. Filmmaker Luc Lagier introduces Anna Karina as “a woman to be filmed and loved,” which is our first indication that said accusations towards Karina’s almost mystical-sounding ability to drive Godard to ruin with her love will be taken at face value.

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » karina

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<February 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728291
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement