Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Karina on SpoutBlog

  • Luke And Brie Are On a First Date, Hamptons 2008

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Quiet City  (2007)

    Luke and Brie Are On a First Date, which world premiered in the Hamptons last weekend, is the debut feature by Chad Hartigan, a frequent collaborator of Aaron Katz, and there are definitely some superficial similarities between the two filmmakers’ work. Like Katz’s Quiet City, Luke and Brie follows two attractive young people (George Ducker and Meghan Webster) around a city as they break through awkward uncertainty to forge a tentative romantic connection, and with their dreamy, super-intimate videography, both films have a way of enveloping a viewer in the action (or what passes for action), ultimately serving as delivery vehicles for the kind of heightened realism that marks an unexpectedly life-changing night out.  But Luke and Brie plays its drama much closer to the surface, and through a little bit of self-reflexivity, a film that’s virtually wall-to-wall conversation manages to avoid feeling too talky.

    Hartigan, who is a Los Angeles-based box office analyst by day, said after the Hamptons screening that Luke and Brie, based structurally on his own first date with his current girlfriend, was shot in 5 days on a budget of $3000. The small scale of the project opens it up to an obvious criticism: surely, all of us could come up with a single night in our romantic lives that seems worthy of dramatization, and many of us could round up some friends and scrape together a few dollars and take a week off work to tell it. So what makes Luke and Brie special? Maybe nothing, and maybe that’s it — maybe it’s not interesting because it’s entering into unchartered territory, but because it takes us through universal, well-worn feelings and makes them feel new. With his camera often seeming to float over faces in extreme close-up, Hartigan’s micro-focus on the nerves, uncertainties, and ambiguities, the posturing and reflex self-medication and unexpected moments of honesty that fuel the night so nails the harrowing aspect of navigating modern romance — in which it’s always easier to do nothing than to do what one really wants — that he’s able to turn the film’s ultimate surrender to traditional romantic closure into something of a surprise.

    I had a bit more to say about Luke and Brie on this week’s episode of FilmCouch. The trailer is above, and future screening information is here. The film is still on the festival circuit and does not have distribution.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Let the Right One In Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    A version of this review previously appeared during Fantastic Fest. There is a new addendum at the bottom of the post. Let the Right One In opens in select cities today, as the first release in Magnet’s Six Shooter Series.

    After months and months of anticipation, encompassing countless breathless reviews, surprise festival accolades, and angry warnings from supporters of the Swedish vampire film that I’d better stop dismissing it as “The Swedish Vampire Film”, there was probably no way in frozen-over Scandinavian hell that Let the Right One In could have lived up to the hype. So — sorry — but I don’t think it’s a masterpiece, nor do I see it breaking significant new ground. In transmuting universal real-world fears of the other and of mortality into the tropes of the supernatural, it’s simply doing what good horror movies have always done, and always should do. That said, it’s hard not to find its widespread popularity to be extremely encouraging. Aside from its lovely cinematography and sensitive child-actor performances, Right One’s real selling point is the humanist gild it lays on its genre lily. Maybe this is why I’m less than blown away — it’s hardly the first film I’ve seen recently which uses basic genre elements to delve deeper into everyday human horrors — but if there seems to be more of an appetite for this kind of horror than the Saw V kind of horror, that has to be a good thing.

    Oskar (Kare Hedebrant) is a scrawny 12 year-old child of divorce who spends most of his time alone, updating a scrapbook devoted to a number of local murders/bloodlettings, and solitarily practicing the revenge against the school’s gang of bullies which he can’t get up the balls to actually enact. One night in the courtyard of the depressingly nondescript apartment where he lives with his mom, Oskar meets a bedraggled girl named Eli (Lina Leandersson), who also claims to be “12…more or less.” Eli catches Oskar making his imaginary bully threats and seems intrigued, but the mysterious girl insists that she and her neighbor cannot be friends. “I want to be alone,” says the teenage Garbo. “So do I,” counters Oskar. And yet soon they’re meeting up every night, and trading brief romantic messages via Morse code through their apartment walls. It’s not until after Eli has agreed to go steady that Oskar puts the pieces together, and realizes that the female salve to his soul-sucking loneliness is actually a blood-sucking killer. But is that really any scarier than the barely-pubescent nihilists in his class who try on more than one occasion to drown him?

    Right One’s basic point is that human status is not a guarantor of humanity. There are humans who prey on other humans because they’re cruel and unfeeling and genuinely like to be the cause of pain, and there are former humans who have supernatural disease which requires them to prey on current humans so they can drink their blood, but these former humans may be more capable of love and kindness than the non-undead. Set in deep winter (all the better climes for teen romance to thaw frozen fingers and distract from runny-noses), and bathed in a shiny, ice-blue glow (all the better to highlight the pools of blood, which are inserted relatively judiciously), it’s hard to imaging Right One looking better or more successfully conveying the coldness of the everyday human world. This is nice.

    And yet, Right one is hardly above critique. Its construction is problematically loose, with a script full of throwaway narrative turns and straight out plot holes. And it’s not that subversive. What seems like the natural place to end the film –– on a realistically sad echo of a heart-tugging early image –– is counteracted by a last-minute victory of sorts, leading to a getaway happy ending which feels tacked on and improbably sunny. Right One is certainly well-made and miles more thoughtful than you might expect a teenage vampire film to be, but if I’ve learned one thing this week at Fantastic Fest, it’s that we shouldn’t necessarily have to keep our expectations of international genre films all that low. Let the Right One In is good enough, but it’s okay to ask for more.

    Addendum: I’ve been criticized, since publishing this review initially, for “not getting” the ending, which I won’t spoil here. I do “get” that there is a vicious cycle at work;the “improbably sunny” part, is that the film seems to be saying that Oskar’s participation in this vicious cycle is preferable to his alternative. I maintaint that the film is never more subversive than an average episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (and I say that as a Buffy fan, although in terms of genre transcendence, I far prefer Angel.)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

  • Soderbergh Loses It. Trade Roughage 10/24/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Doubt  (2008)

    • According to Variety, Steven Soderbergh “is plotting a 3-D live-action rock ’n’ roll musical about Cleopatra,” for which he “is courting Catherine Zeta-Jones” for the title role. We’re sure this will never actually happen., because obviously, S.S. is just pulling a fast one on the trades by convincing them that he’s moving on to Cleo immediately after Che. Right? He must have either lost it, or have lost the ability to make a convincing joke… right?
    • John Patrick Shanley’s Doubt will replace The Soloist as the opening night film at AFI. A better win-win couldn’t have been planned.
    • The Academy is parcelling out almost half a million dollars in grants to various film fesitvals, including Sarasota, Seattle, and Ebert Fest.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth

 


Advertisement