Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement

joem18b Blog

  • For Robert B. Parker lovers

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I started reading Robert B. Parker detective novels in 1973 when his "The Godwulf Manuscript" was published. He writes a new book every six months or so now and I look forward to them and check them out of the library and read them like I used to read Nancy Drew stories. Or listen to them on tape. He's written so many, over such a stretch of time, that I can listen to them more than once without remembering in advance exactly what is going to happen. These days, he's the only author that I treat this way.

    Jesse Stone is one of his ongoing characters and I was delighted to see Stone showing up in a TV movie, with Tom Selleck doing the honors. I like Tom Selleck. He's too old for the part but I'm giving him a pass cause he's Tom Selleck. The movie is true to the character and as light and fluffy as the Parker books. Just something for a Parker fan to sit back and enjoy, especially knowing that there are at least four more after this one.

  • This is mostly not about the heart, but that other place

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    The Heart is Deceitful Above All Things (2004)
    Directed by Asia Argento.
    Starring Asia Argento, Peter Fonda, Cole Sprouse, Dylan Sprouse, Jimmy Bennett.
    98 minutes. Rated R.

    A mother (prostitute, substance-abuser, stripper, so forth) regains custody of her 7-year-old son, wrenching him from the arms of his loving foster parents. (If I were Knoxville, Tenn., I'd protest the representation of Child Protective Services in this movie.) Road trip ensues, with predictable results: boy sleeps in bathtub; boy doesn't eat nourishing meals; boy does drugs; boy sees mom on the pot; on the couch in undignified poses; doing it in bed with various johns; boy is molested; made to dress in girl's clothing and then re-molested; runs away; is brought back; sees low-budget dream visions, as Argento appears to be carrying some heavy Mediterranean Catholic baggage; interacts with name actors in bit parts; shows some acting chops; so forth. Amy Sidaris was born to play this mom in an over-the-top, campy, tasteless indie. "The Heart is Deceitful" could have been that movie - almost is, in fact, though not on purpose. But here we're stuck with Argento instead of Sidaris

    From the first shot of Argento I'm asking myself, is he supposed to be the boy's mother for real and he's going to do the whole movie in drag, or is he the boy's transgendered father, or what? Too much lipstick, ridiculous fifties John Waters outfits, male-style fluffy armpits, shaved shanks, vascular hands. My gender speculations last through the whole movie because even after it becomes clear that Asia is going to go all the way as a woman, there are lots of scenes where lowlife guys tell him how beautiful he is and then show him that they mean it, the guy-on-guy action adding texture to the film.

    When Peter Fonda and Ornella Muti and Jeremy Sisto (Rachel Griffiths' crazy younger brother in Six Feet Under) show up in a flick like this, are they just doing somebody a favor or do they need a little work, or what? Sisto gets to rage and shout for 30 seconds, but then the meth lab blows up. Please tell me that they used a stunt double in burnt-flesh makeup to do the part where he stumbles out of the wreckage, smoldering, and stands in the road with his arms up a la Platoon and then drops to his knees and then keels over onto his face on the pavement. Ouch. Needing a little work is one thing, but dude, this is debasing. (Do meth labs in movies ever not blow up?)

    Warning: We are teased with interior shots of a totally tricked-out, pimped-up 18-wheeler and Asia might have saved the movie right there by pausing the narrative and taking us all on a detailed tour of the rig. But no. Probably saving it for the sequel.

    Checking my notes for the moments where I laughed out loud: guy holding cowboy hat over parts before whipping boy unmercifully; gratutious thumb-sucking by mother and son; red rubber crows; West Virginia House of the Lord; Asia Argento, Rome-born scriptwriter, saying "I'll have another, I reckon"; John Robinson's accent; scrubbing "down there" with a big scrub brush; huge pile of potatoes to be peeled; the market that in a later scene becomes a hospital.

    Things to like: Tennessee locations; a decent rain scene; great tattoos all around; Ornella Muti.

    After watching the movie, I checked IMDB and discovered to my amazement that Asia Argento is actually a woman.

    Regarding the title, "The Heart is Deceitful Above All Things" (Jeremiah 17:9) - better would have been Lamentations 2:11, "Mine eyes do fail with tears, my bowels are troubled, my liver is poured upon the earth, for the destruction of the daughter of my people; because the children and the sucklings swoon in the streets of the city."

    Watch it drunk.

    IMDB 6.3; Rotten Tomatoes 40%.


  • You're Gona Miss Me (2005)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    You're Gonna Miss Me (2005)
    Directed by Keven McAlester. Documentary. Not rated. 94 minutes.

    "You're Gonna Miss Me" is a well-made documentary about Roger (Roky) Erickson, a '60s lead singer from Austin whose career arc spiked early and then descended steadily, taking him on a long slide from modest stardom to incarceration to abject and lengthy mental illness. The film sketches his history and offers a little rock and roll on the side.

    A brief scene from a courtroom intervention opens the film, with one of Roky's brothers petitioning the court to have Roky removed from the care of his mother and placed with his brother instead. This scene signals to us that Erickson won't be dead at the end of the movie, that there is family conflict in the offing, and that we can now go back in time to Erickson's roots with the judge's decision and its consequences awaiting us when we make it back to the present.

    The movie then proceeds, interleaving scenes of a beautiful, full-voiced, youthful Roky with scenes of the wreck that he has become by the time he reaches his 50s. Interviews with Patti Smith, ZZ Top's Billy Gibbons, and others suggest that Erickson's performance style and voice had considerable influence on rock and rock in the late 60s. Janis Joplin considered joining one of the bands that he co-founded, the 13th Floor Elevators. (She went to San Francisco instead.) Meanwhile, the Elevators released an album titled "The Psychedelic Sounds of the 13th Floor Elevators." For this, and because of the LSD and grass that they used heavily, the group was credited with coining the term "psychedelic rock." A quick check of my shelf of 60s wax reveals The Electric Prunes, Ultimate Spinach, and Canned Heat, but no Elevators.

    There followed success, the hit "You're Gonna Miss Me," San Francisco, drugs and alcohol and women, and then it was all downhill from there. Hepititis. Back to Austin. Lockup in a mental hospital for the criminally insane. Two broken marriages. Back into his mother's arms. As the story unfolds, we jump back to the present periodically, where Roky's behavior onscreen convinces us of his mental illness.

    Halfway through the movie, in the course of interviews with family members, musicians, the police, and others, there suddenly appears onscreen a 24-year-old young man, talking about his father Roky. His father? This is Roky's son? Where did he come from? This is a reminder that the filmmaker is compressing 58 years of a man's life into 94 minutes. If I took an hour's worth of video from your life, threw in 30 minutes of interviews with your family and friends, and then sat you down to observe the results, would you notice anything missing? Could I capture your essence in that time? However successful McAlester is at doing so, this movie can't turn me into an expert on Erickson in an hour and a half.

    [mild spoilers]

    As the past and present converge, we see Roky's youngest brother decide to petition the court for the right to become Roky's legal guardian. This means removing him from his mother's care and a lot more work than the brother realizes. Like when you decide to paint your house.

    The core message of the movie now emerges: If you are unfortunate enough to need help in this life, mental or physical, and you don't happen to be rich or famous, your fate will depend upon the kindness and good works of your family, friends, and possibly of strangers. In Roky's case, any such kindness was insufficiently strong or committed or lasting or widespread among those who knew and cared for him to overcome his resistance to it. He walked away from one wife; another wife walked away from him. His brothers looked on from a distance. He dropped friends and they let him drop them. The only, unlucky, exception to this lack of commitment to help came from his mother. Year after year, Roky lived as his mother wanted him to live, remaining dependent upon her. No medication. No music. No dental care. This from a mother who comes across onscreen almost as damaged as Roky himself. If I were to tweak the movie in any way, it would be to add footage that somehow helps us understand and visualize the long, long stretch of time between Roky's youth and late middle age - a lifetime, his life - wasted, frittered away, consumed by an illness that could have been managed by treatment and the involvement of a single person willing and able to make the effort to help him, but instead kept him tied to a mother satisfied to have him near her and broken rather than out in the world and functional.

    But, finally, the younger brother does step up and provide the financial and emotional effort to make a difference in Roky's life. A demonstration of the results, after a long period of treatment, rehabiliatation, and support, is provided quietly by Roky with his guitar in a chair outside his brother's home in Pittsburg. 

    The screener disk contained no extras. I'm sure that commentary tracks will increase the value of an already excellent documentary.  Rotten Tomatoes rates the movie at 81; the IMDB rating is 8.4. For more on the film, listen to FilmCouch podcast #26. For the latest on Roky Erikson, check out his Wikipedia entry at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roky_Erickson.


  • Be With Me (2005)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Be With Me  (2005)

    Be With Me (2005)
    Directed by Eric Khoo.
    Starring Theresa Chan, Ng Sway Ah, Seet King Yew, Exann Lee
    93 minutes. Unrated.

    In English, Cantonese, Hakkim, and Mandarin, with English subtitles.

    "Be With Me" weaves three fictional romances around the true story of Theresa Chan, a deaf and blind woman living in Singapore.

    Sometime during the first half of this film, I decided that director Eric Khoo must be a talented novice, in need of guidance but possessed of real film-making skill. I reined in some of my negative critical reactions because of this. However, I have since learned that Khoo was credited with reviving the Singapore movie industry ten years ago with "Mee Pok Man" (1995), and that after a silence of 7 years, he has recently directed three new films, one of them "Be With Me." Which means that everything I saw onscreen, Khoo put there on purpose. What market and/or financial pressures and/or cultural perspectives caused him to make the peculiar choices he made, I can't say, so I'll simply report my viewing experience without feathers.

    In the film, an old man loses his wife and learns to live without her; a social misfit stalks a beautiful woman and writes her a love letter; a teenager falls in love with a girl she meets on the internet, and then is jilted by her. Khoo cuts between these stories quickly, taking time out periodically to insert documentary-style film and exposition about Theresa Chan, who lost her hearing and then her sight when she was fourteen, to diseases that remain nameless in the film (meningitis, in fact).

    The stalking and teen-love stories, although beautifully shot, are dramatically appropriate for no more than after-school TV; they don't belong anywhere near Theresa Chan. There is a place for schoolgirls in bed together, don't get me wrong, with urgent soapy music welling up in the background, and a place as well for failed suicide, and for death via getting hit on the noggin by a falling body, but these matters do not comport well with footage of an energetic sixty-year-old deaf and blind woman teaching eight-year-olds to knit. At least, not where I come from.

    The third fictional segment of the movie is another matter. In long, composed, static shots with an an ambient soundtrack and subdued colors, an old man (Ng Sway Ah) is followed by the camera and studied as he closes his small shop in the city, shops for food, cooks at home, and lies in bed alone. The years of his long life are etched into his face and we're given plenty of time to contemplate the rhythms of his day and the ravages of time on his body, and to compare him and his daily life with ourselves, with all the attendant intimations of mortality that this kind of mediation triggers in us. Rare opportunity, and a blessing.

    In the film, the old man's wife appears in many scenes with him, sitting or standing wordlessly by. I thought that she had some plot-driven, Alzheimer-like malady that caused her to behave this way. Turns out that she was a ghost. Don't know why I didn't get that, but in the end, as she faded away, it didn't make any difference one way or the other. Similarly, I had trouble keeping track of which teenage girl was which, and whether either was related to the stalker, so forth. Again, in the end it didn't matter.

    And speaking of ambient sound, by muting the movie I could differentiate the cricket chirps in my backyard from those on the sound track. Counting chirps per minute, dividing by 4, and adding 40, I deduced that I was watching the movie at 75F, while in Singapore it was 88F while the night scenes were being shot.

    Which brings us to Theresa Chan. Director/writer Khoo would have done well to toss out all of the film I've described so far, regardless of any poetry contained in it, and replace the lot with more footage of Chan. After a period of complete isolation within herself, sight and hearing gone, by a series of lucky chances Chan found herself enrolled in the Perkins School in Boston. She lived in the U.S. for ten years, learning to knit, ride horses, understand and speak English, and otherwise engage life and the world directly. We watch her type, cook, teach, and talk while we read her written words, expository and philosophical, in subtitles.

    But how did she learn, starting alone, with only her sense of touch? Not to lower the tenor of this review, but I'm reminded of a recent podcast by Kevin Smith and Scott Mosier. These two knuckleheads spent thirty minutes debating the proposition that the Helen Keller story was an elaborate hoax, since in Smith's estimation it would have been impossible for her to learn 90% of what she claimed to know, given her condition. ("SMODCAST" is available on Itunes. IT IS NOT FOR EVERYONE.) Smith and Mosier had seen both versions of "The Miracle Worker," but perhaps because they make movies themselves, they didn't believe anything in either movie, Anne Bancroft or no Anne Bancroft. Anyway, the point is, Khoo would have been well advised to skip the three fictional tales and invest his production money in a ticket to Boston, for a visit and some interviews at Perkins.

    Again, how was Theresa Chan able to maintain the lively spirit she exhibits? We want to learn more. It isn't all good news. She lost her one true love and we read parts of her letters to him. She isn't interviewed because the conceit of the movie is that hers is the fourth story, and that the old man's eventual connection to her helps him to overcome his own loss and move on.

    In the event, "Be With Me" is the film that got made. It's message - and it definitely has one - is... well, Theresa Chan's written words in the subtitles are about the importance of love. The three fictional stories are all about the rough edges of love. So perhaps the message is that love is important. (Theresa's one true love died of cancer on Christmas Day, just before their wedding.) Love...is...important...

    On the other hand, there is virtually no dialog in the film - ironic since four languages, plus braille, plus a sort of sign language on the hand, plus cell phone texting and internet email, are all employed - so maybe there is a message here about communication. As in, a deaf and blind woman can communicate better than all these other folks, and maybe better than YOU, so... communication...is...important...

    Khoo's artistic enterprise, then, is to cause me to cogitate on love and the importance thereof, or find inspiration in love, or just learn to communicate better with those I do love, or, wait, perhaps just to keep hope alive. There was something in there about how there is always hope. Never give up. So forth.

    So, put aside for now my questions about how a person can learn when deaf and blind. Put aside my resonance with the everyday rhythms of an old man's life.

    Come to think of it, I did learn one thing from this movie: Teresa Chan is not a cynic, and neither is Eric Khoo. There is no cynicism or irony in this quiet, graceful movie. After watching it, I was, in fact, briefly, not cynical myself.

    This film won five international film festival awards and was nominated for three others.

    The DVD was provided by Film Movement (www.filmmovement.com) - "Early access to award-winning independent and foreign film."

    IMDB rating - 7.4. Rotten Tomatoes rating = 90.


  • Barton Fink

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Barton Fink  (1991)

    Watched Barton Fink again after 15 years. That's 15 years of additional exposure to John Goodman, Steve Buscemi, John Turturro, and Judy Davis. Make a difference? Once the movie was rolling, I don't think so. They all have the chops to make me forget everything that I know about them and accept what I'm seeing on the screen.

    Which reminds me of recent discussions about whether Angelina Jolie can star in a movie without distracting the viewer with thoughts of her offscreen celebrity; the consensus on "A Mighty Heart" seems to be that she can.

    Barton Fink holds up for me. Could have been made yesterday. Every shot evokes the 40s. Bright colors

    but with that dark gold light that sybolizes L.A. and Hollywood back at the end of the Deco days. All right, I have no idea what the hell I'm talking about, but the color and lighting in Barton Fink are as important as any of the actors. A pleasure to just sit and enjoy the look of the film. Is there a word for nostalgia for a time you never actually knew?

    My spouse suprised me at the end of the movie by asking me what I thought it all meant - did he die and go to heaven, or hell, or what? Questions of symbolism never occured to me; I took the story as straight narrative.


  • The Lost Room (2006)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Lost Room  (2006)

    The Lost Room (2006) (TV Mini)

    Directed by Craig R. Baxley, Michael W. Watkins.
    Starring Dennis Christopher, Julianna Margulies, Kevin Pollak, Peter Krause, Roger Bart, Elle Fanning.

    Lions Gate Films; aired on the SciFi Channel. 4 episodes.

    Self and spouse sat down to check on Peter Krause post-Six Feet Under. Summary: he's still Nate. Back now with Julianna Margulies instead of Rachael Griffiths and Lili Taylor. What a life.

    Please write in and explain Julianna Margulies' eyes to me. What is going on with those eyes? They're semi-opaque or...? The greatest eyes currently on the big screen.

    The Lost Room is presented in 4 episodes. We watched a complete episode and when I checked the box, I discovered that it was Episode 3. So we dropped into the movie at midpoint without noticing. I mean, when you start watching a movie, you expect some things to be explained as you go along, and they were explained, elliptically. So at the end of the episode, the question for us was, go on to 4 or go back to the beginning? Spouse wanted to go back to 1, but I thought the whole thing was a little thin in the first place, even without having to sit through the first half. So instead of returning to Blockbuster and picking up 1 & 2, I brought home Barton Fink and we watched that again.

    The Lost Room takes a big risk by assembling a collection of everyday objects and assigning each a super power. (And of course, the powers turn out to be just what is needed at each crisis point in order to advance the plot. E.g., the little travel clock "sublimates copper," turning copper from solid metal directly to gas, all without heat or light; so that when the protagonists find themselves in a locked room, the hinges of the door are made of, yes, copper.) The risk is that when each object is employed, a certain silliness can infuse the scene: the little clock is set down on the floor; a pause; the locked door falls over. A woman points her scissors at Nate; violence insues. And then we've got the nailclippers and the shoe and the... I can just hear Baxley: "Ladies, check your purses. We need tweezers!"


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement