Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

jjgittes Blog

  • Dial M for Murder on Reel 13

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I only wrote down two notes during my watching of DIAL M FOR MURDER last month on Reel 13: "They cut right to the chase" and "Why does Hitchcock love tennis players?" The former is a reference to the efficiency with which the film begins (efficiency is one of many Hitchcock trademark qualities) – the film opens with Grace Kelly kissing her American lover. They talk briefly, Ray Milland (a retired tennis player in this film) enters and the murder plot begins. No time wasted. The second note refers to the random abundance of tennis players in Hitchcock's milieu (STRANGERS ON A TRAIN, which aired on Reel 13 in May, is another notable example). It's not really that relevant, but it struck me as interesting.

    It's not these notes, in particular, that strike me as much as the infinitesimal amount of them. I usually fill a whole page worth of notes when watching any Reel 13 film, Classic or Indie. I think there are three reasons why DIAL M FOR MURDER didn't motivate me to put pen to paper as much: 1) It's a film I've seen a million times, including recently enough at the 2006 Bryant Park Summer Film Festival, 2) it's a good film – very solid and well made (do you expect anything less from Hitch?) and therefore, I was left with very little to complain about and 3) it's a pretty simple film. It's based on a stage play and Hitchcock doesn't try to make it anymore ambitious than that. Almost all the action takes place in the Milland/Kelly living room and the majority of the film is discussion. The built-in tension, plus Hitchcock's adept camerawork and pacing help to prevent the talkiness of the script from ever getting overly dull.

    With all that said, the simplicity of DIAL M FOR MURDER (and Hitchcock would probably agree with me) prevents it from being a great movie. In all likelihood, it was a small project that he could work on while he prepared some of his other triumphs of the 50's like REAR WINDOW (1957), VERTIGO (1958), NORTH BY NORTHWEST (1959). It's not emotionally complex like VERTIGO or an epic cross-country adventure like NORTH BY NORTHWEST. It's not even a whodunit, since we know the perp from the outset. It's more of a howdunit and that is and always has been its appeal. Despite its lack of ambition, DIAL M FOR MURDER achieves its goals and as a result, provides for a pleasant and interesting 105 minutes of entertainment.


  • A Simple Curve on Reel 13

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    A Simple Curve  (2005)

    As much as I complain about the vast majority of Reel 13 Indies, what I love about it is that once and a while, a film comes along that takes me by surprise and captures my heart and mind, like CRY FUNNY HAPPY or THE RAGE IN PLACID LAKE. A SIMPLE CURVE is the latest film to accomplish just that. It is a prime example of what makes Reel 13 Indies worthwhile.

    Early on in the film, I realized that it was another one of those Canadian films that the folks at Reel 13 seem to love. My expectations immediately dipped greatly, given how lame the rest of the Canadian films have been so far this year (I wish I could have back the hours I spent watching WILBY WONDERFUL, A PROBLEM WITH FEAR or LONG LIFE, HAPPINESS AND PROSPERITY). However, slowly but surely, A Simple Curve started to creep on me. It dawned on me how charismatic all of the actors were (Michael Hogan, who plays the hippie father Jim, has a unique performance style that I wasn't sure what to make of at first, but I became accustomed to it and realized how important it is in the characterization Hogan was crafting in what wound up being an outstanding performance). Then, it occurred to me how confident and textured the cinematography was – not a trait of most of the other Canadian films (with the exception of maybe A PROBLEM WITH FEAR, which was otherwise vapid). As the film went on and solidified the relationships between the characters, I became enraptured in the story of twenty-something Caleb, a notably strong protagonist, because while he is frequently emotionally lost, he also clearly has a good head on his shoulders and a solid moral compass (though he sometimes ignores it). This makes him very appealing as a character, which is aided by the subtle choices by actor Kris Lemche, channeling a younger Christian Slater, with slightly less edge and significantly more charm.

    A SIMPLE CURVE is hardly groundbreaking. Both the narrative and style are very familiar, variations on a tried and true story and formula. However, as usual, it's the execution that makes all the difference. Director Aubrey Nealon handles moments of melodrama with an astonishing amount of honesty, clarity and maturity. Occasionally, she will even surprise us with a scene of absolute beauty and power (Caleb and Lee kissing on a bench outside a party, Caleb explains his family situation to Buck and Ericka while they work on the septic tank). These scenes add up to make for a totally enriching and satisfying movie experience. This was accentuated by the fact that A SIMPLE CURVE was a something of a discovery because after all, isn't it those films that take us by surprise that are the most gratifying of all?


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<September 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011


Categories
 


Advertisement