Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

jjgittes Blog

  • Witness for the Prosecution on Reel 13

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Billy Wilder has his fourth film featured on Reel 13 this year and it is one that I had, surprisingly enough, never seen before. WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION, based on a play by Agatha Christie, turned out to be a very effective and tense courtroom drama, proving once again that Wilder is not just a great comedy director – he is simply a great director.

    While the plot is all Christie, the dialogue is all Wilder. Snappy sarcasm and this time, with a Brit twist. The mystery itself has some formulaic elements – almost like an episode of THE PRACTICE – but is consistently interesting due to the way Wilder doles out the information. I think the attribute that most makes the movie work is the editing. The film has a brisk pace without being overly fast – it's a steady advancing of the narrative that keeps the viewer involved without stopping long enough for you to solve the crime or going too fast that you miss the bread crumb trail that is left for you. It's the perfect way to approach this kind of story.

    The only real complaint I have about WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION is a small one and it relates to the ending. Granted, I was sufficiently surprised, but there was something that didn't sit well with me about it (it almost seemed as if the Charles Laughton character felt the same way). Firstly, the way the villains all explain themselves at the end is a staple of the genre, but remains problematic. Secondly, it was almost too perfect of a crime/scheme that it didn't seem natural. Only superbraniac villains the likes of Lex Luthor would be able to come up with a plan that air tight. They were able to perfectly predict and anticipate the actions of everyone involved, without even slightly knowing the players in advance. I know Christie's job was to consistently stump and bewilder her readers. She constantly had to be coming up with new ways to trick her increasingly savvy fan base. In this case, the trade off of achieving a truly surprising ending is that it didn't really ring true. While all the facts added up and made sense from a mathematical point of view, it still didn't feel right. And that's a shame, particularly because the first 100 minutes made for a truly great movie.

    (For more information on this or any other Reel 13 film, check out their website at www.reel13.org)


  • Moby Dick on Reel 13

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Moby Dick  (1998)

    A month or so ago, in my blog of LUST FOR LIFE on Reel 13, I mentioned how I did a study on fifties films for an essay I was working on. I also mentioned that I listed LUST FOR LIFE as 10 on my top ten list for 1956. Well, this week's Reel 13 Classic – MOBY DICK – actually was my 9 film of that year.

    In many ways, it's the perfect story for director John Huston. It's a very masculine story and also manages to deal with some of Huston's favorite themes – greed, revenge and obsession (as the story goes, Huston himself, became fascinated with hunting elephants in Africa during the shooting of THE AFRICAN QUEEN five years earlier). So, it's no wonder that MOBY DICK is as successful as it is on screen.

    Really, in my mind, it's the details that make the movie work. Huston does a great job of using cutaways to show the smaller aspects of whaling and the whaling community. He shows you how it was done (its accuracy is debatable, but I certainly don't know any better, so I'll take the film at it's word) and what it was like, which gives the film a vitality and sense of realism that you wouldn't expect from such a period piece. Additionally, Huston smartly employs a quick pace and strong, stark angles of the camera to add to both the tension and the excitement.

    Sadly, Gregory Peck is not very convincing as the infamous and complicated Captain Ahab. His body language is forced and not very believable, which can also be said of his verbal language. He, and many of the other actors, struggle with the old nature of the dialogue. They just can't manage to make it sound natural. Similarly, the mystical elements in the film are also a bit awkward (Several soothsayers and St. Elmo's fire are very weird moments), but seem to be in keeping with the period. Perhaps, here, it is Huston who struggles to translate a dated element of the narrative. Along the same lines, Richard Basehart's voiceover as Ishmael is cinematically tiresome, but I suppose it's there to celebrate the prose of Melville (honestly, I think all that we needed was "Call me Ishmael" to open the film and then he could have shut up for the rest of the movie).

    None of these flaws, however, manage to sink the film altogether. At the heart of the film is a great adventure story by Melville that manages to also underscore many elements of human nature including our innate desire to achieve – to reach higher, go farther and accomplish more than the generation before. It also displays the arrogance of humans to consistently assume that we are always the most intelligent and dominant species on the planet. Huston uses his vast knowledge of film form to cover all this ground as well as to make this world as palpable as he can and the results are very worthwhile.

    (For more information on this or any other Reel 13 film, check out www.reel13.org)


  • Ocean's Eleven on Reel 13

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ocean's Eleven  (1960)

    Though I had never seen the "original" OCEAN'S ELEVEN, I was well aware of it. Word on the street was that it was a bit of a lark and had the feeling of being a film that was made for fun by a bunch of big movie stars who wanted to hang out in Vegas. Watching it a couple weeks ago on Reel 13, I had no idea that it would be as sloppy or unsophisticated as it turned out to be.

    I knew I was in trouble from the very beginning with the obnoxiously slow and annoying title sequence. Animated title sequences, particularly for comedies, were in vogue in the sixties, so that wasn't the issue as much as it was that there was nothing interesting or imaginative about the sequence. Counting up to 11 took forever and the music chosen wasn't engaging enough to make it worthwhile.

    After that, the film is all over the place. It seems to me there were more inside jokes than there were actual jokes, which is pretty infuriating. The result is several scenes seem to ramble (Why do Sammy Davis Jr., Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin take ten minutes to discuss what they would do if they were president? What does that have to do with the price of tea in Vegas?), which interrupts the momentum of the narrative. After all, this is supposed to be a crime caper - the first meeting of the eleven doesn't even happen until fifty minutes into the film. And the caper itself isn't clever enough to make the waiting worthwhile. As a group, they face very little obstacles in pulling off their heist (as opposed to the far superior, exciting and fun remake by Soderbergh) and then to top it all off, the ending is so anti-climactic, that you want to throw something at the screen for wasting your time.

    Director Lewis Milestone doesn't help the matter either. Floating balloons hiding cuts? Cameos? Really? Additionally, the blocking is pretty lame and wooden. Nearly every joke (what was with the running gags regarding the Russian mastermind guy?) falls flat. The sets look weirdly unrealistic and the swinging music gets to be really irritating after awhile, largely due to the constant repetition of the same chords over and over again without any variation. Overall, in spite of its star power, the film plays like a TV movie. No wonder that Soderbergh wanted to remake it. The plot has potential that Milestone, Sinatra, et al all seem to ignore. It is easily the worst film we have seen so far this year on Reel 13 Classics.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<October 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement