Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

jjgittes Blog

  • Casablanca on Reel 13

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Casablanca  (1943)

    I actually didn't bother to take a single note for this film when it aired on Reel 13 on September 13th. I just sat back and enjoyed the movie and after all, what can I say about the film that hasn't already been said? It is pretty much undisputed as one of the greatest American films of all-time is 10 on my personal all-time top ten list of favorites (well ahead of CITIZEN KANE). The film is near perfection in almost every discipline.

    Even though I don't have much to say that is entirely original, I don't want to be lazy and skimp on the blog, so I'll briefly elaborate. At the heart of CASABLANCA is a great story, well-told. It features romance, adventure, betrayal, suspense, patriotism, politics and surprising to many first time viewers – quite a lot of comedy, mostly due to the famously sharp dialogue provided by the Epstein brothers, who represent two of the three credited screenwriters. They, along with structure expert Howard Koch, weave all of those elements into a seamless patchwork – a script so tight that you could bounce a quarter off it. What's most amazing about that is, according to many books I've read on the making of the film, they were still putting the screenplay together as shooting was going on. It's almost as if they stumbled onto the perfect movie.

    This is not to discount the contribution of Michael Curtiz, who was always a good filmmaker, but had never been given this kind of well-written, multi-layered material. He employs a lot of very unobtrusive tracking shots to incorporate all of the multitude of characters that frequent Rick's Café American (Watching it again, I was reminded of all the little subplots throughout CASABLANCA. For example, do you remember Rick's jilted, mildly alcoholic lover Yvonne who struggles with nationalism or the young Bulgarian newlyweds desperate for an exit visa? It's amazing that they were able to include all of these wonderful details…). Most of all, I think it is the pace that Curtiz uses to get through the story that makes it really click. Even long scenes feel fast (though not overly) due to good cutting between shots and the laser speed with which the quippy dialogue is delivered. Additionally, Curtiz never panders to the audience or dwells too long on information that might be important. You are required to pay attention and follow along and if you do, you are rewarded with a highly satisfactory experience. Quite frankly, even if you miss things, the romance is enough to carry the film on its own and you still walk away with an appreciation for the movie.
    Warner Brothers provided Curtiz with its finest talent (though it may not have known it at the time), particularly in the supporting roles. This is not to say that Bogart isn't good. On the contrary, he's pitch-perfect (Bergman, on the other hand, has a few weak moments, particularly in those of heightened emotions, but enough to really derail the movie in any way). However, it is the supporting cast that, in my mind, gives CASABLANCA its life. Character actors like Peter Lorre, Conrad Veidt and Sydney Greenstreet create such wonderful three-dimensioal portraits in their limited screen time. They are key to making the world of CASABLANCA feel real and relevant. Perhaps the finest performance of the film, though, is Claude Rains as Capt. Renault, the Vichy prefect of police. Of course, on several occasions, the plot hinges on Renault's shifting allegiances, but making that balance work in a character is a great challenge which Rains meets with confidence and charm. Technically, he is both a villain and a hero, but he is always likeable and much of that is due to Rains.

    I was thinking that, in a way, it is almost unfair that Reel 13 aired CASABLANCA because when it comes to naming the best Reel 13 films of the year in December or January, there won't be any contest. CASABLANCA is everything that any movie could ever hope to be and much, much more.Casablanca (1942)

    (For more on this or any other Reel 13 film, check out their website at www.reel13.org)


  • August the First on Reel 13

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    August the First  (2008)

    AUGUST THE FIRST, the Reel 13 Indie from September 13th, is problematic right from the get go. It's hard to dig your teeth into early on, particularly because the characters come at you fast and furious, introduced without any real establishing. I appreciate the attempt at efficiency, but without getting some sense of the characters we are dealing with (and their relationship to one another), nothing has any resonance and it's hard to follow what's going on. It's almost as if the first thirty minutes of the film are awash.

    Eventually, the intelligent, careful viewer will start to understand the characters, their desires and motivations. By then, we are knee deep in an immature melodrama, with an accentuation on the "melo". The story revolves around the graduation party for Tunde, fresh off his college degree. For his party, Tunde surprises his family by inviting his estranged father from Africa to the party. The family is not pleased and then, yelling and tears naturally ensue. The way that director Lanre Olabisi piles on the pain causes the film to depart from the world of the real (the mother is a drunk and recovering from breast cancer, the sister is pregnant, the aunt is a slut who had an affair with the father – get my drift?). Olabisi tries to combat that by employing an ultra-shaky handheld technique to add a vitality to the film, but it doesn't remotely mesh with the soap opera leanings of the narrative. If Olabisi wanted to tell this story, I think he needed to embrace the melodrama a la Douglas Sirk and stylize it accordingly.

    Then again, CRY FUNNY HAPPY, a film that I loved, has some melodramatic elements and also uses a handheld camera. The big difference though is the acting. In CRY FUNNY HAPPY, the actors are raw and honest. Here, they seem untrained and are mostly over-the-top and not very believable (Sean Philips and Kerisse Hutchison are the strongest members of the ensemble as the older brother and sister of Tunde).
    The most intriguing thing about the film is the father character, who shows up at the party unexpectedly. In spite of the actor lumbering around in the character's shoes (D. Rubin Green does not seem very comfortable in the role, particularly in terms of movement – though his accent is believable), he manages to come across as somewhat likeable, even though the majority of the family distrusts him greatly. He is a very complex potential villain. His actions are interesting and seem to belie his statements and yet, his manner suggests that his intentions are pure and true. And so there is suspense in trying to determine why the father is really in town and if he really wants to reconnect. There are layers here and this is what the film needed to exploit even further.

    However, as the film starts to build this interesting mystery amidst the schmaltz, it then turns around and betrays its audience by ending abruptly. I've always said that I don't need closure, but I do require an ending, if you are able to see the difference. There is not enough of a climax in AUGUST THE FIRST to earn the right to end when it did, which is just another of many amateur attributes that add up to make the film a great disappointment.

    (For more on this or any other Reel 13 film, check out their website at www.reel13.org)


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<October 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement