Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

JJ79 Blog

  • For One More Day (2007)

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]

    Released: December 9,2007
    Director: Lloyd Kramer
    *****
    For One More Day comes to us from the Mitch Albom factory and as such, contains enough schmaltz and sap for a dozen Christmas-themed movies.  Ostensibly, the story wants to be about a former baseball player trying to commit suicide after one too many real life disasters and is visited by his dead mother for, you guessed it, one more day.  Albom is a sportswriter turned novelist with Tuesdays with Morrie and The Five People You Meet in Heaven, both of which are fine novels lacking a certain something in the television adaptation.  Is this a bad production? Certainly not.  Ellen Burstyn and Michael Imperioli make sure of that.  But it tends to be a trite story with too pat an ending designed to make everyone happy.

    We're introduced to Charles (Imperioli) as he is drunk as a skunk and ready to put a gun to his head.  When his dead mother shows up, he relives important parts of his life (a wife and daughter are suspiciously left out).  We see what makes him the depressed man he is today: an overbearing father and, to a lesser extent, a mother who tried too hard.  We're also thrown for a loop when a supposed sports reporter begins to talk to him, with the final reveal at the end being this woman is his grown up daughter, writing the story her father has told her.

    Broadcast on ABC late last year, For One More Day contains more than a fair share of commercials in the second hour, breaking up any kind of momentum the story can manage to generate.  It's also trite in a way movies tend not to be in our current day and age.  As if everything can be made better when one party has so egregiously harmed another.  Sometimes it works in the real world, but more often than not, no matter how good the performances, the entire endeavor veers toward a cliched movie of the week.  (Which is exactly what this is in the end.)

    Scenes involving Burstyn and Imperioli work because there seems to be a genuine chemistry between the two.  But Albom can't resist adding sugar to the top, making everything okay by the end credits.  Relationships and lives are fixed within a 90 minute time frame without being witness to any of the work, cheating the audience out building any sense of sympathy for Charlie.  It takes far too long to get to the eventual ending since the screenplay wastes time with small scenes between Charlie and Maria, recounting the story.  Without them, there would be a chance to see how the two reconnected in the first place or some semblance of a rift between Charlie and his wife.  But the story can't be without its schmaltz.


  • Organizm (2008)

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Organizm  (2008)

    All you really need to know going into "Organizm" is the movie was produced for the Sci Fi Channel. Concerning the fight against an unstoppable biological growth, high school biology teacher Frank Sears (Johnathon Schaech) and AWOL military germ researcher Carrie Freeborn (Erica Leerhsen) piece together a puzzle going back forty years as a small town is targeted for destruction not only by the enemy, but also the Army.

    As far as cheap cable movies go, this one (also known as "Living Hell") isn´t too bad. Sure, it borrows heavily from the likes of "Tremors" and "Aliens." Some of the acting is circumspect and internal logic is all but forgotten. But it turns out to be a fun, quick ride, so I can forgive just about any story concerns. Writer/director/producer Richard Jefferies does as effective a job as he can in bringing both Sears and Freeborn to life as three dimensional people. In fact, the first half hour or so is devoted to Carrie´s relationship with her husband Glenn (Jason Wiles), as well as backstory for Frank, contrived as it might be, to make the leads something more than plot pawns. To a limited extent, it works, though with a short running time and prime scheduling spot on Sci Fi, relationship and character isn´t really a priority for anyone.

    Because it runs only 92 minutes with end credits, there isn´t time for unnecessary detours or subplots. In essence, there is only an "A" plot. There is no time to create a romance between Carrie and Frank, leading Jefferies to create a scene which can be construed as a sex scene, yet is simply about protection. It is a gratuitous sequence, with Carrier becoming lubed up with blood in preparation for the final battle.

    Why blood, you might ask? In short (and, yes, this is a spoiler), the only way to stop the infestation is with Frank´s blood. He has a natural immunity going back to his father, a Russian scientist who worked with his mother on the military base back in the late 1950s. Because the create was designed to be the ultimate weapon, nothing can stop it. No nuclear attack, no rifles, missiles, guns…nothing. It´s a lesson the Colonel Eric Maitland (James McDaniel) learns as his troops retreat to town, yet his higher ups-who take over later down the line-don´t seem to take any mind to it.

    That´s the greatest downfall of the script, the intent of showing the military as little more than gun-toting, violence happy brutes to whom science is a four letter word. Jefferies even mentions it in the commentary track; it´s almost as if he has an ulterior motive in writing the script. Despite "Organizm" being a monster movie, this is a moment of social consciousness…or perhaps even social tweaking.

    In creating the setting and mood, Jefferies paints each character broadly in generalities and stereotypes, for ease more than anything. There´s the hard headed commander (admittedly, he doesn´t enter the picture until late), the subordinate with a change of heart, the obligatory "stunning" death, the child, the female heroine and the unlikely hero. In using this shorthand we can identify without too much work, Jefferies is able to leave most of the exposition behind, creating a leaner and meaner screenplay.

    When Jefferies just goes with trying to scare the bejesus out of us, he does a fairly good job, even if the proceedings bear more than a few resemblances to the "Alien" franchise. It´s no more obvious than in the finale, as Sears and Freeborn throw themselves into a dark corridor littered with slimy tentacles on every side. I guess if you´re going to pay homage (or steal, depending on the viewpoint) to another film, you might as well go with the best. Not that "Organizm" can hold a candle to the Ridley Scott or James Cameron films.

    It can be argued there isn´t time to create a comprehensive narrative with any more than two characters for us to care about or an elaborate rationale for the monster. Our antagonist isn´t allowed to have a mind of its own, feelings or backstory. Just an unstoppable killing machine with no hope of gaining audience sympathy. In a way, this approach works the best since every cinematic monster has been given human qualities. Even the "Jaws" shark is defending a family. Nothing here. The tentacles were created as the last option for the United States to use against an enemy. In that respect, it is Frank´s father who is the villain and not the creepy crawlies. Yet he is never given anything more than a cameo to explain what´s going on.

    Even if the narrative gets us to the eventual explanation too soon, leaving the action for the second half of the film, at least it gets there in a decent enough manner. For this type of production, of course. It´s specious reasoning based on glances and gut instinct, but, honestly, does anyone care? This moment of exposition is nothing more than a mere formality. No one tunes into Sci Fi Channel films for the narrative or the acting, only for the visual effects.

    About those visual effects…they look cheap in some shots and decent enough in others. Aside from the titular organism, many other shots were created in a computer, according to Jefferies. It caught me by surprise every time he mentions a skyline or innocuous shot being digitally composited. For a movie shot in 20 days on a relatively small budget ($4.5 million, according to reports), a great deal was done without the benefit of practical effects.

    VIDEO:
    One major problem here which has little to do with the actual look of the film. Along the top edge of the screen is a broken white line of distortion throughout the film. It fades in and out in certain sections, yet remains there for the duration of the movie. Otherwise, the 2.35:1 anamorphic transfer is good enough for a film of this kind, considering the look Jefferies was going for. Most of the outdoor day scenes contain a considerable amount of mosquito noise while the night shots appear considerably better. Almost everything has a washed out look to it, by design, while several types of film were used to capture various scenes, lending to different looks. (And thereby harder to accurately judge.)

    AUDIO:
    Both the English 5.1 and 2.0 tracks are serviceable enough, neither of which blow the doors off of anything we´ve heard before. The tracks sound eerily alike, with the 2.0 coming across slightly louder than its counterpart. There isn´t any noticeable distortion in either track and the sound is generally contained to the center channel.

    EXTRAS:
    A group of trailers begin the disc, including "Taxi to the Dark Side" (2:28), "Love and Other Disasters" (1:46), "Careless" (2:09) and "Banshee" (1:49). This film´s trailer (1:57) is also included in the Special Features section. The only other feature is the aforementioned commentary with Jefferies, Schaech and Leerhsen. The three rarely allow a moment of dead space and have the knowledge to share stories ranging from working without visual effects to the inspiration for the film and general snafus on set. They´re an amiable bunch, content to laugh it up in one moment and then becoming serious in the next.

    PARTING THOUGHTS:
    A decent enough way to spend 92 minutes, "Organizm" isn´t going to win any awards or be critically lauded. Then again, it was never designed to.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345


Categories
 


Advertisement