Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

JimBell Blog

Wall-E

Under discussion:

Wall-E  (2008)

Movie awards season is silly season. Tunnel vision is the common perspective—people talk about fewer and fewer movies until the awards seem a foregone conclusion. We all believe that Wall.E is the only animated feature worth considering. We believe it is so good that discussion about the film centers on whether it should also be entered in the Best Picture categories. So with this much tunnel vision behind Wall.E, I’m probably wasting my breath to argue that the movie is not particularly good.

 

Both major themes in Wall.E are hackneyed. Humans so abused Earth that they left it a sterile junk yard and had to live in space. Have you heard anything like that before? But then the trite theme gets worse. Space-dwelling humans, who are obese, ignorant, and lack the bone structure to function in gravity, can find a green plant and re-establish life on earth. One plant does not sustain a population. OK, there’s a few other plants popping up among the garbage. Could they be contaminated? Inedible? And, come to think of it, is that all you need for life on earth? What will these people do for shelter? Clean water? Clean air? It gets ridiculous trying to talk about it.

 

The second element of Wall.E is the hackneyed love story between Wall.E and Eva. Boy sees girl—love at first sight. Girl is not interested, but she is slowly won over by good deeds. But, no, she rejects him, then quickly sees the error of her ways and acknowledges her love. But then the trite theme runs into more trouble. Wall.E, the mobile garbage compactor, is unable to show much romantic emotion. His replaceable metal and glass eyes are not expressive. Emotion is often shown by what is reflected in his glass plates. Not touching. Eva, the sleek white pod of a robot, has eyes which are blue dots on her screen face. She is unable to show romantic emotion, except in the last half of the film, her eyes take on various shapes that indicate emotions somewhat like emoticons on your computer. The film-makers try to counteract this serious shortcoming by building up the hand-holding motif. From a Hollywood musical on a salvaged television derives the idea that hand holding is love, and Wall.E and Eva do their best to interlock metal fingers. This might work for some people, but it seemed awkward to me.

 

Wall-E might be worth watching, but it is not in the league of Finding Nemo or The Incredibles. Actually, it is not as good as the other animation I’ve seen recently: Bolt—a movie with a great theme, wonderful characters, and heart-grabbing scenes.

 

 

posted on Sunday, January 11, 2009 9:19 PM by JimBell


Was this review helpful?
Yeah Yeah Nope Nope



Comment    Email me new comments.


JimBell
Posted Monday, January 12, 2009 11:29 PM

Thanks Pippin for the detailed response. You say that Wall.E is outstanding for its "presentation," for new heights in animation technique. I don't know enough about animation to comment on this. But I do believe that a hackneyed and simplistic story told with ground-breaking animation does not make a great film. Peace, JIMBELL
pippin06
Posted Monday, January 12, 2009 12:00 AM

Wow, Jim. I think it's my turn to suggest that you might have missed the boat on this particular film. While I haven't seen Bolt yet and can't compare, I saw Wall-E when it was first released, pre-awards show hype. I think I saw a different version of the film than you did. I wonder if you're condemning the film based on its awards season hype, since that's how you started your blog. For the sake of the benefit of the doubt, it's easy to concede that the storylines are new iterations of themes used before in other films, television, books...but it's the presentation of them that make Wall-E a standout. Pixar has achieved new heights in animation, in dimension, color, texture, motion...not to mention executing a story in the first half hour or so that plays like a silent film, complete with warmth, depth, and visual artistry not seen in many animated vehicles before it. Wall-E himself is quite expressive, actually, as is Eve (less so but still), and while his expressions may be awkward, he is, after all, a robot. And whlie one could argue that the latter half of the film is didactic and possibly contrived, I don't think the one plant popping up through the ground was deux ex machina territory; I think it was symbolic of survival and the fact that the planet had enough possible clean air for the human race to return and start anew, as they had done in the past. Granted, this story might not have sat as well with you as previous Pixar creations (and, for the record, Finding Nemo is still my favorite), but to say it's not in league with them or other comparable nominees is not taking into account the film as a whole. Also, for the record, it is a foregone conclusion - Wall-E's going to win, but I don't think that means the public as a whole considers only the one. I've heard praise for Kung Fu Panda and Bolt too, but Wall-E is one of the rare films that actually deserve its merits, even if the other two deserve some too.


Advertisement