Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

JimBell Blog

  • Up the Yangtze

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Up the Yangtze  (2008)

    Up the Yangtze (2007) is a tricky documentary. It has a slow, gentle pace that makes it seem at first glance to be as far removed from a dramatic, opinionated Michael Moore documentary as possible. As the Canadian director and his China-born father (we never see them) cruise up the Yangtze on a “farewell tour” before it is flooded for the world’s biggest hydro-electric project, we follow the lives of two young people working on the boat, a brash young man who is the product or victim of China’s one-child policy, and, primarily, a 16-year old girl from a poor, illiterate family who live in a shack on the riverbank and grow their own vegetables. The triumph of the film is to gain intimate access to the girl’s family—washing the cat, picking corn, discussing the family’s survival, and moving by carrying it up the banks on their backs.

     

    The easy-going, respectful, and gracious look belies the fact that the director advocates a position on the Three Gorges Dam every bit as insistently as Michael Moore advocates a position in his polemical documentaries. This becomes clear if you ask what Up the Yangtze does not tell you. It documents meticulously what is being lost by China’s modernization, but what does it show about what is being gained? We see only urban concrete jungles with slender women sporting Western fashions, and we see is some detail a luxury cruise boat where the gap between the Chinese staff and the rich Western tourists is clear and awkward. Is there nothing else? The film shows the negative effects of the Three Gorges Dam, as we see the farmer’s house and land flood in time-lapse photography, but never once do we hear why the dam was build or what benefits it might bring.

     

    While Up the Yangtze failed as a documentary on the Three Gorges Dam or the wider issue of modernization in China, it succeeded in giving a behind-the-scenes look into a poor Chinese farming family and a modernizing cruise boat staffed by a complex mix of young Chinese people. I feel privileged to have met the family, and I will never look at a tourist operation such as the cruise ship the same way again.


  • TransSiberian

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Transsiberian  (2008)

    TransSiberian (2008) is a good thriller, but be careful who you watch it with.

    Partner (10 minutes into the film): I’m not seeing much in the way of scenery. Maybe it’s lucky we decided not to take the TransSiberian like these two (Roy—Woody Harrelson, and Jessie, Emily Mortimer) because we might have seen nothing but trees.

    Partner: This is so slow. I mean nothing is happening except the movie is creating this vague sense of fear, just like so much nowadays! Just anxiety and dread free-floating.

    Me: I think they’re creating mystery. What exactly is that other couple bunking with Roy and Jessie up to. Roy and Jessie are such good, church-going, trusting Americans, and the other couple is up to something. The characters are developing. The girl looks punky but might be ok. The Spanish guy is sleazy and suspicious at one moment and then charming and jovial at another.

    Partner: Now Jessie is kissing that Spanish guy. Ok, she’s lost all my sympathy. How dumb! Whatever happens to her, she deserves. How can she be so stupid?

    Me: I think her somewhat troubled “perfect” marriage and her old, wild days showed through there for a second. She’s a complex women, and not a happy camper.

    Me: How dumb! She left that Spanish guy alone in her room with her suitcase there, with her passport and everything in it.

    Partner: She is not very bright for a woman who used to be worldly and street smart.

    Me: Yeah.

    Partner: Why doesn’t she just tell the Russian police the truth about what happened!?

    Me: Right from the start we’ve seen you cannot trust the police. The story about them holding a guy for a month because his name was spelled wrong on a travel document, then cutting off a couple of toes to make him pay the bribe.

    Partner: Turn down the volume! That torture scene is . . . oh, no!

     

    Although I did not enjoy watching the movie, it is well-crafted, featuring excellent acting all around and a strong sense of place which enhances the foreboding. If there is anything that keeps this from being an excellent film, it is the denouement, the very end. A strength of the movie is the depth of serious questions it raises: Can an all-American boy and a bad ole girl make a marriage work? What’s the best way to approach another culture, with open arms or with great care? And there’s the age-old question beloved by Henry James in the late 1800s about how “innocent” Americans could fit in “sophisticated” Europe. These questions understandably take a back seat to the frantic action of the climax. But in the denouement, none of these questions are developed or taken to the next level. Rather Roy and Jessie seem stunned, which is perfectly understandable but is also the easy way out for a screen writer.


 


Advertisement