RockNRolla Giveaway
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

JimBell Blog

  • Definitely, Maybe

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Why is Definitely, Maybe a charming, affecting film? In one sense, it is a stereotypical romantic comedy, including being not funny. In another it is rather preposterous: Why should a father spend so much time telling his daughter the story of who her mother is when she already knows who her mother is!? Yet the movie works.

     

    First, the three women in Will Hayes’ life (Ryan Reynolds) do an excellent job of acting. (I have long asked myself this deep philosophical question: What gorgeous, seductive Hollywood starlet does not have the experience to play a romantic role!?) Also, all three women are complex and interesting characters: sometimes we like them, and sometimes we don’t—how realistic! So the high school sweetheart is so loving and tender (Elizabeth Banks) that she has an affair with Will’s roommate as soon as Will goes to New York to work on the Bill Clinton campaign (1992). Her motivation, as we discover late in the movie in my favourite-scene with her, is that she is scared of all Will’s big plans to be President etc. In the same scene, I also love it when she admits how awkward and difficult she has found romance since that break up—no matter the academic qualifications and the career success and the good looks. And the photocopy girl in the campaign headquarters, April (Isla Fisher), is superficial, but then profound, deeply attracted to Will and then standoffish. I particularly liked the way the movie made is seem logical that an overachieving, ambitious, political person like Will and a slacker like her were incompatible when you could sense that there was a deep attraction and kindness in their relationship. And Summer (Rachael Weicz) is too independent, but then seemly deeply in love with Will. Again, my favourite scene is near the end of the movie when Will attends her trendy party and she starts to kindle old flames with him. He calls her “game,” says he wants to skip it and the heartbreak, and just be friends. This brief exchange is refreshingly different and a manifestation of how Will has, slowly and not so surely, grown.

     

    Of course, if Ryan Edwards as Will could not hold up to these accomplished actresses, the movie would collapse. He does, but in a subtlety profound way. He is not Hollywood star material, and is, as James Berardinelli notes, “adequate.” Whereas Berardinelli means this as a criticism, I mean it as a strength. I think Will represents a lot of idealistic, highly intelligent, well-educated males today: he is a failure. Ryan Edwards’ basic insecurity as an actor and as a Canadian serve him well in portraying a guy whose dreams have evapourated.

     

    Definitely, Maybe also holds your attention with suspense. It is presented as “who is your mother?” but, of course, she already knows who mother was/is. The deeper question is “who did Will really love”? Although Will loved all three wonderful women, one love was of a somewhat (carefully chosen word) deeper love.

     

    The stories are told in flash back—please rescue us from this ill-conceived technique—but here is works powerfully. The story is, in essence, of a guy and three women making lots of juvenile mistakes in their twenties. The profundity comes when you realize that these romantic liaisons affected and still affect a child (Abigail Breslin).

     

    This is largely a tale of 20’s romances, and I am long past that ephemeral stuff. But here is gains resonance because a young girl is trying to prevent her parents’ divorce and find her dad happiness.


  • The Dark Knight

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

  • Top Ten Movies I've Seen This Year (Half-way)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Italian  (2005)

    Mother of Mine  (2005)

    51 Birch Street  (2005)

    Elizabeth I  (2006)

    Gone Baby Gone  (2007)

    Get Smart  (2008)

    Sharkwater  (2006)

    Longford  (2007)

    These are the top ten films I’ve seen at the mid-point of the year. I think it is a good idea to post a semi-annual list because instead of complaining about mundane theatre offerings the list confirms that there are enough excellent films out there to watch. In no particular order:

    Mother of Mine (2005; Finland/Sweden)—A young Finish boy is torn from his family by WWII and later in life comes to terms with both of his mothers and how they treated him.

    Gone Baby Gone (2007)-- Dennis Lehane, the author of the novel on which the movie is based, says that we as a society have not figured out how to protect our children. The search for a missing little girl dramatizes his concern.

    51 Birch Street (2005; documentary)—Doug thought that in his parents’ marriage, his mother was the loving and approachable one and his father was remote and cold, but when Doug’s mother died and his father quickly married his former secretary, everything Doug thought he know about his family started to change.

    The Italian (2005; Russia) follows a young, plucky Russian boy’s attempt to escape adoption to Italy and instead find his birth mother.

    Starting Out in the Evening (2007) develops two complex relationships among New York’s intelligentsia. The course of any kind of love never did run smooth.

     

    Sharkwater (2006; documentary) examines sharks’ behaviour, their importance to the planet, and our complex rush to exterminate them.

     

    Charlie Wilson’s War (2007) is a high-spirited look at how US politics works, and our tour leader is the extremely complex and always interesting Senator Wilson.

    Longford (2006) portrays the public struggle and the personal growth of Lord Longford as he visits in prison a woman involved in the murder of several children.

    Get Smart (2008) may be the funniest movie in theatres this year, and it improves on the original series by creating more well-rounded characters and more serious action.

    Elizabeth I (2005) transports you to London in the late 1500s and embroils you in Queen Elizabeth’s loves and politics.


  • Elizabeth I

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Elizabeth I  (2006)

    Elizabeth I (2005/2006) transports you to London in the late 1500s and embroils you in Queen Elizabeth’s loves and politics. In the first half of this four-hour, two-part mini-series, the Virgin Queen (Helen Mirren) is enmeshed with Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester (Jeremy Irons). In the second half, hot and hot-headed Robert Devereaux, Earl of Essex (Hugh Dancy), arouses the Queen, but winds up o’er stepping his bounds. Although I am not certain if the historical details are accurate, I know a reasonable amount about Essex and his attempted revolt, and the movie seemed to stick to what happened. The acting is excellent, the costumes and sets convincing, and the passions of so long ago very real. No wonder this film swept so many awards.


  • Sharkwater

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sharkwater  (2006)

    Sharkwater (2006) is an excellent documentary. Ultimately, what I want from a documentary is to learn, in a reliable fashion, something important that I did not know before. Although I have seen white-tip reef sharks and bronze whalers while scuba diving, I learned that I actually know little about sharks and what humans were doing to kill one of the oldest and most magnificent creatures on earth.


  • 8mm

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    8MM  (1999)

    8mm (1999) is a disgusting decent into the evil world of hard-core pornography and “snuff films.” It makes you wonder about the people who would revel working month after month on a film that makes you feel soiled just watching it. I watched it because I heard it was a classic neo-noir, and there is some justification for that description. But the film also makes you wonder if all the sordidness is developing some worthwhile theme. The theme is developed carefully and stated boldly: Some people are unbelievably evil because they like it. Whether that message is worthwhile learning by wading through two hours of degradation is very much a personal thing. I found it the theme simplistic and the film not worth recommending.


 


Advertisement