Advertisement
Sign in
Username
Password
Remember me
Forgot password?
Wanna join?
Sign up
Find movies you'll love
Home
Movies
People
Groups
Reviews
Podcasts
News
My People
>
jimbell
>
Blog
JimBell Blog
Old Joy
Was this review helpful?
[Be the first to tell us!]
Under discussion:
Old Joy
(2006)
Old Joy
is such a minimalist film--and I liked it--that it raises the question, “How minimalist can a film go?” Maybe more importantly, who will this film appeal to? A late-30s family man (Daniel London) and his old friend (Will Oldham) go on a weekend camping trip. End of story. But the chasm that has grown between the old counter-culture friends is great. While the
London
character has accepted the responsibility of a wife and son and listens to political talk-radio, the
Oldham
character is still doing too much drugs and is subtly dissatisfied beyond help. While this is a minimalist film, someone (in my opinion) had to make it, and this is a superb job of it.
Posted
Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:21 PM
by
JimBell
| with
0 comments
Venus
Was this review helpful?
[Be the first to tell us!]
Under discussion:
Venus
(2006)
Although a lot of people liked
V
enus
, they claimed to like it for what I think are the wrong reasons. This is not a film about December-May sex (there is none!). Nor is it a film about
Peter
O'Toole, at 74 years of age, being able to act like an old man (duh!). So that takes care of the vast majority of criticism. So what is the movie about, anyway? This is a film about dieing. Secondarily, it's about whether young people can lean an iota from the ancient sods who are passing on.
Of course, old age and dieing is a broad subject, and, much to director Michel's credit (an excellent director!), this film is about a particular type of man. A British actor of some renown, he believed above all in giving (and, I suppose, receiving) pleasure. When an obnoxious young lower-class woman comes into his life, he does something amazing--he is, as he says, "nice." She blossoms--sort of, realistically, slowly, in fits and starts.
As the O'Toole character dies, he does a lot of things. He dances with his best friend (presumably gay), he fights with his best friend over a misunderstanding, he undergoes medical examinations, he revisits theatres of his powerful maturity, and he longs for the beauty of a woman. While he says he is interested in pleasure, his secondary and unexpressed motive is education. For how can an ignorant, uncultured, boorish woman appeal to him? I love the way he exposes her to culture, and she blossoms. (She exposes him somewhat to the opposite, and it is interesting but a mixed blessing.) But in a heart-breaking and realistic way, she doesn't blossom ideally.
My favourite shot in this sad and hopeful movie is when the O'Toole character goes to his ex-wife's place for a "last" dinner. We see them eating a gourmet meal
sans
lush candle light. It is shot through the banister with a black cat in the foreground, capturing perfectly the way in which things get in the road of unfettered human happiness. This is a precursor to the climactic scene when the old fellow dies on the beach: His last and ironic words to the young lady are (as I remember) "Now we can really talk." He dies.
Posted
Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:15 PM
by
JimBell
| with
1 comments
Sophie Scholl
Was this review helpful?
[Be the first to tell us!]
Under discussion:
Sophie Scholl: The Final Days
(2006)
Sophie Scholl is a simple story simply told. When people write that it is an excellent movie, do they mean the story is powerful, the simple filming is tremendous, or the synergy of the two is compelling?
The simple story is that in 1943, Sophie and her brother, Hans, were caught distributing anti-Nazi leaflets, were interrogated, tried, and executed. If you did not know the fatal ending from history, you could pick it up from movie reviews etc. The film makers use almost no modern filming techniques: no stream-of-consciousness, no hand-held camera, no special grainy film processing, no split screen, no flash backs, and so on, even though there are clearly opportunities to use all of these.
The classical, straight-forward telling is appropriate to the time. 1943 had not seen the atomic bomb, space travel,
HIV
, the internet, or MTV. Things were slower then, less fragmented, more linear. Just as the settings, the language, and the restrained acting create the atmosphere of 1943 daily life, so the screenplay and cinematography reinforce the sense of time.
Posted
Wednesday, July 11, 2007 8:39 AM
by
JimBell
| with
0 comments
Like what you're reading?
Subscribe
RSS 2.0
Search
Go
Browse previous
<
July 2007
>
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
Dig through the archives
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (3)
September 2009 (1)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (7)
May 2009 (1)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (6)
January 2009 (6)
December 2008 (15)
November 2008 (6)
October 2008 (5)
September 2008 (7)
August 2008 (7)
July 2008 (7)
June 2008 (9)
May 2008 (3)
April 2008 (6)
March 2008 (6)
February 2008 (10)
January 2008 (1)
December 2007 (8)
November 2007 (4)
October 2007 (10)
September 2007 (6)
August 2007 (7)
July 2007 (10)
June 2007 (9)
May 2007 (144)
April 2007 (56)
March 2007 (86)
February 2007 (30)
Categories
Reviews (106)
Advertisement
© 2009 Spout LLC. Portions of content provided by All Movie Guide.