Advertisement
Join Spout
Sign in
you
You
Take a tour of spout.com
Join Spout!
Sign in
Learn more about us
Downloads
movies
Browse movies
Now in theaters
Coming soon to theaters
New on DVD
Coming soon to DVD
Trailers
Genres
Newsletters
Recent Spoutblog posts
FilmCouch
Film festival coverage
Community movie buzz
Community activity just now
Recent community reviews
Community tags
Recent lists
Get recommendation with SpoutMind
Browse store
mavens
Browse Movie Mavens
Recent maven reviews
View all mavens
Top bloggers
Top listers
Busy people
Search people
What's a maven?
communities
Browse Communities
Recent discussions
Recent list activity
Popular groups
Most movies
Most talkative
My People
>
jimbell
>
Blog
JimBell Blog
Fracture
Under discussion:
Fracture
(2007)
Fracture
has a major flaw. Often critics will say coyly that there are holes in the plot big enough to drive a truck through, and I never know what they are talking about and they never say. Same with
Fracture
. Critics have claimed it has “plot holes” and that the movie does not withstand scrutiny, but they never explain. They must be incredibly smart. The flaw in
Fracture
occurs right at the beginning. The brilliant Ted Crawford (Anthony Hopkins) finds his wife (Embeth Davidtz) cheating with some guy, and when she arrives home, he shoots her in the head. But the police can find no murder weapon. The guy having the affair is a police detective, Crawford steals his gun and shots Mrs. Crawford, and then, when the detective is distraught over his lover laying in a pool of blood, Crawford slips the gun back in the detective’s clothing, and the detective walks the gun out of the crime scene. The problem with this strategy, upon which the entire movie rests, is that Crawford could not have known that the detective would show up at the crime scene. Maybe he was off duty? Maybe more than one detective covered the area and chance had another policeman show up? Maybe the detective was simply in a meeting? Similarly, Crawford could not have known exactly how the detective and the other cops at the scene would behave. What if the detective showed up late and the cops arrested Crawford with the gun in his hand? Such questions are important because for a brilliant and careful man like Crawford, one slip means he is guilty of first degree murder. He wouldn’t take the risk. But given that the movie says he does, this legal thriller is pretty good. Besides the gun twist, there is another twist at the end of the movie which is rather clever. Of course the movie is unnecessary in that we don’t need another formulaic legal thriller like this, but everyone does a competent job to create a movie that holds your interest but probably does not stay in your memory.
posted on Saturday, December 01, 2007 11:55 PM by
JimBell
Was this review helpful?
Comment
Email me new comments.
Like what you're reading?
Subscribe
RSS 2.0
Search
Go
Browse previous
<
December 2007
>
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
5
Dig through the archives
July 2008 (5)
June 2008 (9)
May 2008 (3)
April 2008 (6)
March 2008 (6)
February 2008 (10)
January 2008 (1)
December 2007 (8)
November 2007 (4)
October 2007 (10)
September 2007 (6)
August 2007 (7)
July 2007 (10)
June 2007 (9)
May 2007 (144)
April 2007 (56)
March 2007 (86)
February 2007 (30)
Categories
Reviews (37)
Advertisement
Privacy
Safety
Legal
Report bad behavior
© 2008 Spout LLC. Portions of content provided by All Movie Guide.