Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

Jaybriel Blog

  • Making Reccomendations at the Video Store

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Do you ever make reccomendations, unsolicited, to total strangers at the video store?  I have this feeling that doing so makes me the world's biggest a**hole, but occasionally I can not help it.  Yesterday at my neighborhood store I saw someone eyeing "Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus" on the shelf and making "looks interesting" eyes to his girlfriend.  Before I could stop, I blurted out something like "That movie is excellent.  One of my favorites in recent memory."

     What I'm wondering is, is this sort of reccomendation totally emotionally manipulative, or is it just one person trying to do something nice for another?  I mean, it's akward if someone tells you how great a movie is if you then say, "yeah, I'm not into it" and put it down.  On the other hand, how great must a movie be for some random stranger to tell you they dug it?

    I don't have the best social filters in the world, so I'll probably continue to do it, but I'd be interested to see what others think. 


  • Dreamland

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dreamland  (2005)

    I enjoyed this movie.  I didn't think it was great, but did think it was worth watching.  It is a coming of age movie like many, many others out there, but is a fair example of the genre.  I particularly enjoyed the sultry, anemic quality that is carried through in the script, soundtrack, washed-out pallette, and cinematography.

  • Horror and a want for time

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    KT and JB were over for a drink and a chat the other evening and we spoke about horror films.  I had posted about Suspiria (by Argento) here just a bit before, and K wanted to know what I thought of the movie (more on that in a comment to that post).  In any case, I've been thinking a lot about horror films since then.  I almost never watch them now, but I did watch them a lot for a brief time in the 80s (nowadays I think war films fill that slot, but I'm not sure).  I find myself wanting to re-watch Hellraiser and its sequels, more than probably any others.  I'm not so interested in revisiting the teen slasher flicks that I hardly watched anyway, but the brief spate of demonic-themed films from Wes Craven and his imitators hold my thoughts right now.  I mostly wonder, if I saw them now would they still scare me and would I still like them?  I really liked them then, and they fully terrified me.

    Perhaps I'll take a moment to watch Hellraiser I soon and see.  But, like everyone else, I guess, I seem to have a lot less time than pretty much anything else.  Sigh.


  • Suspiria

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Suspiria  (1977)

    Man, I watched this dog of a film over and over with a small group of friends for about a year in high school.  And we weren't even chemically altered at the time.  For some reason I just thought about it again a few days ago and couldn't remember the title.  For some reason it came back to me tonight and there it was on Spout.  Thanks!

  • SLACKER

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Slacker  (1991)

    Man, Salon just posted a piece on the movie Slacker (http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2006/07/05/slacker/), and it really hit me a little hard.  I was in college at the Wisconsin when I saw Slacker, and I think I enjoyed it more than any film I had ever seen at that point, and possibly more than any I've seen since.  That is not to say I think it's the best film ever made (though I think it's in the running), but more that it was the exact right film for me at the time.  I was living in a co-op with 30 other people, all working a little this and that (I worked at a record store, and as a courier for the art department of Wisconsin public radio), consuming various chemicals, going to school, contemplating art, and, well, slacking off.  My life was never as easy or purely dedicated to slacking as the movie, but then movies aren't actually real, they just seem that way, right?  And in this case the movie absolutely felt like the best parts of my real life.

    I was a little sad to read in the letters section of Salon that someone's reaction to the article was to say that Austin isn't cool any more.  Maybe not, or maybe we slackers have moved on to other things, but really, does it matter?  Madison's probably not that cool anymore, nor Berkeley, and Seattle's certainly no longer the cheap groovy haven it was in the early 90s.  But what has really changed is my/our view of the world.  Watching Slacker is still fun, though now it makes me a little melancholy.  I must be getting old, that I'm so ready to think about my college days and it's so clear that I can't go back.


  • How Shallow Am I?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    This week E. and I watched Match Point and Melinda, Melinda, W. Allen's two most recent movies (as far as I know).  I thought neither was a great film, but I enjoyed both enough, I suppose.  I thought MP was, indeed, as Ktincu said in her blog, surprisingly un-Allenish, which was nice.  I like Johansson--what man my age doesn't--but didn't think she smouldered particularly well in the movie.  I couldn't bring myself to care at all about any of the characters, which made the whole thing a bit of an unsatisfying experience.  But the worst of it is I liked M,M a whole lot more.  I seem to like all the WA movies everyone in the critical press derides--M,M, Shadows and Fog (which I totally enjoyed), Bullets over B'way.  Am I just the shallowest movie watcher ever????  Perhaps.  I did like M,M, though.  It wasn't a great film at all, but it had a couple of things that I just adored.  I really liked Wallace Shawn (I know, a tiny bit part, but I'd watch him do commercials; I just love to see him, hear him, think about his strange, frog-like persona); I thought Will Farrell as WA was creepy, wierd, and absolutely perfect; and I liked the happy ending in the comic version--sure, I identified with Farrell more than anyone else in the film.  Sigh.


  • Sin City

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sin City  (2005)

    I don't quite know what to think about this film.  I liked a lot of things about it, and I'm not particularly squeamish, but I did find it all a bit disturbing.

    As a comic book adaptation this ranks up there with Spiderman.  It totally captures the unidimensionality, look, dialogue, and so on of the original.

    I think I liked the B&W w/slight coloration best about the movie.


  • Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Wow, this is one of the most interesting films I've seen in a good long while.  It is, I suppose, a documentary, but only inasmuch as there's not another word for non-fiction film that I can think of.  It doesn't follow the narrative/cinematic conventions of documentary film in any sense.  It is probably better conceived as film performance art, or perhaps really good travel memoir in film instead of writing.

    The musical performances are remarkable--not generally particularly polished or technically adroit, but there is some beautiful, intense music-making nonetheless.  Jim White, the principal figure is not the most interesting musician here.  Banjoists Lee Sexton and David Eugene Edwards are pretty impressive, and three sisters singing a traditional murder-ballad in a restaurant in some small town are high points.  The Handsome Family are more impressive on CD than in the film, but the man's wierd low voice, and the image of the two of them singing perched on a shack over the water somewhere in North Florida is pretty arresting.

    Ultimately the song "Poor Wayfaring Stranger," as sung by Edwards seems to sum up the movie--a meditation on the dark, creepy world of southern small towns and countryside so well described by Flannery O'Connor.  Or perhaps the lyric "Every casts a shadow under the sun's golden fingers" is it.  There may be light and beauty, but it is the darkness that captures our eyes here.

    The movement from Sin to Church, from prisoners and bikers and Saturday night drinkers to pentacostal worshippers, and preachers is cliche, I suppose, but works nicely to give shape to this film.  In the end I suppose this is as essentializing as "Deliverance," but as an act of self-representation it seems to have so much more depth, so much more power.  Like "The Dancing Outlaw," this film challenges us to look and listen closely at something that is not simple to understand.  To see and see past a century or more worth of stereotype.

    Highly reccomended.


  • Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Wait, I don't understand.  Who added such nasty tags to this movie without even seeing it???  What's up with a "No one can talk me into seeing this movie, no matter what" position?  Sure, there are plenty of movies I'm not interested in, but it seems a little silly to act as if that's anything other than blinders.  It's like saying "I hate honeycomb tripe.  I've never eaten it, but I know I hate it."  Fine, I suppose, but not worth much as a critical position.

    In any case, I'm clearly in the minority here, but I have to say, I think DB:MG is great.  Even the title makes me crack up.  What other kind of Gigolo is there, besides a Male one.  Hell, the rhyme scheme cracks me up: "We need a name that will rhyme with 'Gigolo'...Bigalow!"  That's fantastic.  The movie itself was remarkably enjoyable.  The humor is purile, but that's true of _LOTS_ of great films.  Eddie Griffin is excellent.  the image of him sitting in a hot tub eating ice cream is indelible!  It's so wrong on so many levels.  Rob Schneider is not generally a good actor, and I don't generally like SNL-Alum movies (though there are some..."Tommy Boy", for instance), but here he's perfect.  In the end I think it's also pretty touching.  Maybe not in a 'great film' kind of way, but in more than a Hallmark card kind of way.  If you're open to the possibility that broad, cartoonish characters can be effective in film (and lord knows if you're not, that cuts out a good 80% of all movies), the Deuce character is genuinely appealing.

    I have a sinking feeling about the sequel, but I may end up watching it.


  • Funny Ha Ha: sort-of loved it

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Funny Ha Ha  (2003)

    I sorta loved this film, but sorta thought it was awful.  Which is probably the exact right response for a film that is all about indecision, paralysis, and the inability to deal.  It's a far cry from Slacker, the granddaddy of all slacker-made, slacker-themed films, though.

  • Forrest Gump: I don't get it

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Forrest Gump  (1994)

    This was _the_ film of its time, as far as I can tell--I remember everyone I knew went to it, people kept saying quotes from the movie in their best Forrest Gump voice, critics talked aobut how it summed up something (I can't remember what, though probably an era, I suppose).  I didn't see it at the time; too much else going on, I suppose.  It was on television the other night, and I watched a bit of it and was totally mystified.  What did anyone see in this film?  Hanks is intolerable, the image of America it evokes is at best irrelevant and at worst dangerous nostalgia.  Maybe I'm just too disaffected.  Maybe I'm missing something.  Is there some ironic undertone that I was just utterly tone-deaf to?

  • Bruno Ganz in Downfall

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Downfall  (2004)

    I find it difficult to deal critically with the Holocaust, Germany, Germans in general, and films about the Nazi era, but I thought I'd post briefly about this movie.  It is touching, terrifying, and a little gut-wrenching, and a topic that could have been killed easily by bad writing, bad acting, an attempt to draw political lines between the '40s and today too broadly; but I thought on all counts it was great.

    Mostly, though, I wanted to say this about Bruno Ganz: is he the German Gerard Depardieu?  Why is he so little known here in the U. S.?  Is it because German films are so much less broadly popular than French films?  Is it that Americans besides myself find it impossible to fully disassociate Germany even now with the Nazi regime?  Ganz's portrayal of Hitler in his last days in Downfall is remarkable.  He brings an intensity to the performance, swinging between gentle, soft tones and rage in a way that is totally believeable and belies an underlying madness without making the character seem like a cartoon.

    I hesitate to make too much of this, because comparisons with Hitler are really the end of all political conversation, but: it is hard, watching Ganz-as-Hitler in the bunker clearly unhinged and out of touch with reality above ground, being told he is right by his advisors, not to think about George W.  The strength of the movie, I suppose, is that this is almost certainly unintended.

    Incidentally, this movie made me realize why I don't like German Shepherds--the image of Eva Braun walking hers on a leash is unforgettable.

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789


Categories
 


Advertisement