Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

JakeStevens Blog

  • Don't Listen To The Critics

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    RV  (2006)

    Personally, I think Barry Sonnenfeld's films are the damned funniest things out there today, and this one is no exception. I don't know why his films are critically reviled, but they make me laugh out loud...and often. Most certainly, there is the infamous "shit shower" scene that could most definitely be categorized as purile (which normally I despise), but here...I don't know why, but it's funny. Perhaps it's Robin Williams, whose work at the turn of the millennium turned less manic and more acerbic, and here he's spouting a few rapid fire one-liners and zingers. The only thing I didn't care for was the song and dance number at the end...it's bad. REAL bad. But anytime I watch this film, I'll just turn it off before that part...and voila! Jeff Daniels has a few good lines in here, and (to me, at least) Cheryl Hines and Will Arnett are some newcomers who prove to have very malleable faces. If you've seen "The Addams Family", "Addams Family Values" or "For Love Or Money", "Get Shorty" or the "Men In Black" series, you know what to expect from Barry Sonnenfeld. In my opinion, that equates to "A Good Time".


  • Beautifully Shot, But Tonally Uneven

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I'm EXTREMELY torn about this film. On the one hand, they stay MOSTLY true to the text of Shakespeare, and the locales are decidedly gorgeous. Kudos. But the 20th Century Fox DVD I watched on my Plasma TV is non-anamorphic, so it was very grainy, leaving much to be desired considering the lush 19th century Italian backdrop. I'd LOVE to see this film on Blu Ray as I'm sure the colors would jump off the screen the way they were meant to. On the other hand, the wealth of talent that makes up this cast is extrordinary, and it's obvious most of the actors have a grasp on The Bard's tongue-twisting double entendres, but as I've said in other reviews, it's the absence of a proper accent that began to take me out of the film. For instance, Kevin Kline (a Shakespearean veteran) has the acting chops down pat and he's a joy to watch, but ARG! Why the mid-western American accent? The same for David Strathairn, Stanley Tucci, Calista Flockhart and Michelle Pfeiffer - all put in fantastic performances...and they all sound like they live next door to me. Hmfph. All that being said, it's one of Shakespeare's more difficult productions to adapt, and director Michael Hoffman gave it a pretty good shot, even if the final product is flawed. I hope to see a Blu Ray version soon...perhaps it's raise the rating a notch.


  • Yikes

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Hard Candy  (2006)

    I found myself squirming through the majority of this film, and that's a GOOD thing, considering the suject matter at hand. Number one reason this film is worth watching - THE ACTING. Ellen Page and Patrick Wilson are FANTASTIC actors, and with the cinematography consisting of nearly all close ups of the two actor's faces, it's crucial that they both hit the right notes with the dialogue, and indeed, they do not disappoint. There are moments of EXTREME discomfort for the viewer, so anyone who can't handle psychological tension might want to skip this film. For those of you who can, and those of you who appreciate two actors doing what they do best, check this film out.


  • The First (And The Best)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Police Academy  (1984)

    Oh, man. I grew up with these characters. As a child, I even went so far as to attempt to "novelize" the film (ala Bantam) and narrate it with verbatim dialogue from the film itself. Those transcripts have long been lost to the ravages of time, but this pricelessly tasteless film survives. I STILL quote from this film (and some of its sequels) to this day, and who doesn't love the cast assembled here? It's a completely brain-dead comedy, but at least we can emphasize the "comedy" part of that equation with certainty. On this 986th (or so) viewing, I watched it with the 20th Anniversary Cast Commentary, and the actors had me laughing AGAIN! What chemistry that had, and STILL have! I must admit, though, that the whisperings of yet another sequel leave me feeling cold, Even though some of the other films had great moments, THIS is where it all started, and you've got to appreciate it for what it is - a runaway comedic hit that resonated with audiences back then and still holds up now.


  • No Better Or Worse Than "Temple Of Doom"

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]

    OK. I went into this film KNOWING what impossibilities the Indiana Jones creators are capable of cooking up (see "Temple of Doom" for the series' lowpoint), and this film completely lived up to those expectations. The action sequences nearly ruined the film for me, and even the company I viewed the film with, who are HUGE Indie fans, were "tsking" through the "Tarzan" sequence (you'll know what I mean...). I had already forgiven the "refridgerator" scene, but the "climbing ants" were almost too much to bear, followed immediately by the "dipping tree" scene - I had almost given up hope. I'm being vague here as to not give away too much. The script is shoddy and plods along, but for some reason, all is forgiven, because truth be told, it's nice to see Indie up on the big screen again, regardless of the many, many flaws inherent in this outing. Definitely for Indie fans, and those who go in hoping it'll elevate the series to a new level will be disappointed.


  • A Fantastic Debut Film

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ratcatcher  (1998)

    I can't believe that Lynne Ramsay had never made a feature length film before this - its subject matter is handled with such care and the cinematography so carefully framed that she seems like a seasoned pro (or, at least, better than some actual seasoned pros). It's gritty yet beautiful, slightly surreal, passionate yet not nostalgic or sentimental. I will definitely be watching this again.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement