Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

JakeStevens Blog

  • The Poor Man's Charlie Chaplain

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Pool Sharks  (1915)

    In W.C. Field's film debut, he pretty much is just aping what Chaplain and Keaton do in their films (and much better, I might add). Field's misanthropic persona would go on to do much better than this early effort, and I believe his near-decade long sabbatical was a godsend, whether planned or not.

  • ???

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    What is it? What did I just watch? Is it a narrative? Is it surrealist? Is it allegorical? Is it absurdist? Is Jean Cocteau attempting to explain his feelings about his personal past in an obscure and unintelligible way? He completely dismisses any thought process into the making of this film! How is that even possible? Is he bullshitting us? Was it supposed to be this confusing? Does it mean anything at all? I can't answer any of these questions...but the weird thing is...I want to watch it again!

  • Nice Try, But A Bit Too Sloppy In Parts

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Stardust  (2007)

    I wanted to like this movie - I really did. And it starts off great; you've got Ian McKellen narrating, cool camera effects and a princess held prisoner by a witch with a magical chain. And then the movie takes a serious nosedive. Much of the acting is subpar, there are plotholes aplenty, and the influences aren't so much referred to as ripped off from their sources (King Lear, MacBeth, The Princess Bride, etc.). There are some interesting moments, most notably Robert De Niro's entire performance (which nearly falls into the "subpar" acting I mentioned early, but he's so over-the-top it kind of works), Michelle Pfeiffer's comedic timing, and most of all, Mark William's Billy the Innkeeper character...what a great, fun, and funny role! Towards the end of the movie, I started to get extremely bored with the film and actually ended up playing Solitaire on my phone...not a good sign. Definitely made with children in mind. I don't know - chalk it up to a bad screenplay and bad directing, I guess.

  • One Of My Favorite Woody Allen Films

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    How Woody Allen consistently (and almost annually, I might add) writes such well written, well rounded and yet personal screenplays is beyond me. This one definitely has his touch and yet seems the most honest and realistic of his films that I've seen to date (I'd say a close second is Another Woman, and I haven't seen Interiors or Manhattan yet). How he manages to jump between all of the lead character's lives so effortlessly and have the audience keep up with all of the various story lines is beyond me. Hidden inside this screenplay are some of Woody Allen's best gems, both dramatic and comedic. Pure genius.

  • A Fun, Carefree Film

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    10 Items or Less  (2006)

    What a charming little independent film! Director Brad Silberling and Morgan Freeman take some very fun jabs at the business they both thrive in, and I found myself honestly laughing at most of the jokes in this film. Freeman and the relatively unknown Paz Vega have fantastic chemistry together, and even though some of the dialogue could have easily fell into the world of cliche, they play it with just enough wink-wink-nudge-nudge to let us know how much fun they're having together. It doesn't surprise me that this didn't get a wider release (very low-fi looking, lots of dialogue, almost a documentary feel to a lot of the scenes), but what a loss for the general public. The cameos in the film are like little breaths of fresh air just when you need them. Go rent it!

  • Almost Reaches "Great" Status, But Not Quite

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    First off, let me say that this film could possibly contain Kevin Bacon's finest acting hour. You honestly find yourself forgetting that it's Kevin Bacon on the screen, and believe he is Henri Young, tortured and victimized by Alcatraz's cruel warden, played by the also impressive Gary Oldman. Also, the cinematography is absolutely breathtaking, with the smokey aura of the prison just oozing menace and the long, swirling takes of the courtroom scenes pulling you into the story like you were a fly buzzing around the room. But that's where my kudos end. Christian Slater, bless his heart, is trying so hard to keep up with the likes of his much more talented co-stars, and ends up coming off as flat and lifeless (although his ending speech in the courtroom is pretty convincing). The film takes a major blow to the gut, though, when one finds out that, even though the beginning of the film will lead you to believe that this is "based on a true story", most of this never happened the way it's being portrayed. Henri Young didn't die on Alcatraz, didn't steal $5.00 for his sister, was actually a bank robber and a murderer, and eventually got transferred to another prison and released on parole in 1972. But holy crap, it sure makes for an entertaining film.


 


Advertisement