Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Bloggish review blog

  • Monster Thursday

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Monster Thursday  (2004)

    When you think of surfing, certain images spring to mind: Huge, bright blue waves, guys in swim trunks and girls in bikinis riding the tide into a sandy beach, stoners sitting back and comparing the day's waves. Now, take all that imagery, and transport it to a village in Norway, and you get Monster Thursday, a Scandinavian movie as pretty and inconsistent as the tide itself.

    The movie starts with a young man, Even, attending the wedding of his friend Tord to the pregnant Karen, whom Even has always loved. Briefly after the wedding, Tord takes off on a business trip to Singapore for a couple of weeks, leaving his new wife in Even's care. Even decides to take the opportunity to win Karen over, and enters a local surfing competition, even though he has no knowledge of the sport. With the help of his friend Beckstrom, meterologist Sara and local surfing guru Skipper, Even gradually starts to grow from a frustrated novice to a shaky but capable wave rider. All this while trying to put the moves on the already taken girl of his dreams.

    Director Arild Ostin Ommundsen is to be commended for his attempt to take the usually bright, sunny ideas and archetypes of surfing and transfer it to a landscape that is the polar opposite. In the liner notes of the DVD, Ommundsen states that he wanted to keep the plot and characters usually associated with sports movies like "Rocky" or "The Karate Kid" and make it relevant to Scandanavia, which he manages to do pretty well. Beckstrom, the encouraging best friend character, is a classic second banana: funny, positive and helpful, if somewhat bumbling. Skipper is a typical mentor: driven and encouraging, but with something of a bitter past. Tord, the antagonist of the film, isn't the sneering, cocky expert one might expect to find in movies associated with competition (he's absent for most of the film) but his position provides a good foil for Even, our hero, to work against.

    The movie is also beautifully shot. Ommundsen and crew did the most that they could to squeeze every drop of color out of the drab Norwegian landscape. He takes a countryside that consists of various shades of gray, black and blue and somehow manages to make it look appealing. By the end of the movie, I almost wanted to go there myself.

    Where Monster Thursday fails, however, and fails spectacularly, is in the storytelling. The plot moves at a snail's pace. The first half of the film seems like a collection of random scenes that barely make sense. I wonder if the relevance between the different dialogue, actions and situations were lost in translation, or the cutting room floor, or if they were even there to begin with. It makes the movie very hard to follow, and harder for the audience to get into the characters presented to us. Karen, the pregnant young wife, seems whiny, indecisive and weak. I had to wonder just what it was about her (other than her looks) that Even found so appealing. The end of the film cuts between the present and the past without warning, so it takes a moment to adjust. The film's end is suitably subtle and visually impressive, with Even riding a huge "monster" wave in the middle of a thunderstorm, but it's a long way to the payoff, such a long way as to wonder whether it was worth the trouble in the first place.


  • Human Comedy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Henry Fool  (1997)

    I watched "Henry Fool" after hearing about the release of the movie's sequel, "Fay Grim." I was intrigued, but realized that I should probably watch the original film first. I really didn't know what to expect. I find indie movies can be a bit of a hodgepodge. I think I expected that the movie would be a bit dull.

    Far from it. "Henry Fool" is one of the best movies I've seen in recent months. It's a really charming story about ordinary people thrown into extraordinary circumstances, with plenty of comedy and thoughtful drama along the way.

    The story has to do with Simon Grim (James Urbaniak), a garbageman who lives at home with his depressed mother and somewhat promiscuous sister, Fay (Parker Posey). Into their life walks Henry Fool (Thomas Jay Ryan), a mysterious writer with a past so checkered it could be used as a chess board. Henry brings with him a set of notebooks, which he claims are his "confessions," a set of memoirs he wants to publish one day.

    At Henry's urging, Simon starts writing down thoughts in his own notebook, which eventually becomes a book-length poem. After Henry discovers Simon's work and finds it to be a masterpiece, the meek Simon starts gaining attention both locally and nationally, while events at home grow increasingly tumultuous.

    A big part of what makes this movie so great is the title character. Henry is basically Simon's mentor, teaching him proper spelling and grammar, and inspiring him to write. However, unlike many movie mentors, who seem pretty much infallible, or on some kind of moral high ground, Henry is a deeply flawed individual. An alcoholic, womanizer and foul-mouthed literary snob, he's almost an anti-mentor. Yet, somehow, like the characters in the movie, we really like him. Possibly the sweetest moment in the film comes when Mr. Deng, the owner of the convenience store where Henry and Simon hang out, recognizes Henry's alcohol problem and refuses to sell him any more beer. He opts instead to give him espressos. This turns out not to be such a good idea, but really it's the thought that counts.

    Every character in this movie, even the morally questionable ones, are all terribly likeable. Simon's awkward introversion and hidden intelligence, Fay's pride in her brother and even Henry's utter fallibility made the main characters feel kind of like old friends. Even the supporting characters, like Mr. Deng and his daughter, and the priest who wants to save Henry from himself were totally endearing. These were all people I enjoyed watching, and I'm sure I'd still enjoy watching them after a hundred viewings.

  • Where's the beef?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hollywoodland  (2006)

    "Hollywoodland" is a movie with a good atmosphere, based on an interesting premise: did "Superman" star George Reeves really commit suicide? Or, as circumstances seem to suggest, was there more going on behind the scenes than we thought?

    The movie sets out to be a kind of hollywood-noir in the style of movies like "L.A. Confidential," and it works, up to a point. We are presented with a likeable, if somewhat troubled hero (Adrien Brody), suitable bad guys, led by Bob Hoskins as a bullying studio chief. But, unfortunately, "Hollywoodland" is a movie that should have stopped about 45 minutes before the actual, wholly unsatisfying ending. There is a point in the movie, and by a strange coincidence, I think it was also at the point where I lost feeling in my hindquarters, that I stopped feeling sympathetic towards Brody's private detective, Louis Simo. Three-quarters of the way through the film, Simo becomes obsessed with the Reeves case, which seems to be going nowhere. Simo gets so into the circumstances surrounding Reeves' death that his character stops caring about the people around him, and it's at this point that he gets really hard to like.

    My other beef with this movie was the ending. I waited two hours (maybe more) for a conclusion that was not really a conclusion, but a cop-out. As Robert W. Butler, one of my favorite film critics, likes to say: If I'm going to be forced to stay in the seat until my butt goes numb, I'd better get some payoff. When I left the theater, I couldn't help but think "So what was the point of all that?" 

  • Totally Beautiful

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Miss Potter  (2006)

    Watching movies is often a luck-of-the-draw process. If you're just picking movies at random that you think look good, but have no real knowledge of, you never know what you're going to end up with. This is usually how I do my Friday-night movie picking. I just look around for something I think will interest me, watch it, and see what happens. The quality of the movies vary. Some are awful. Some are pretty good. Some are really good. Once in a rare while, however, I'll stumble on a movie that is truly great, a cinematic gem that illuminates the viewer from the inside out, and just makes me feel wonderful for the rest of the day. I'm delighted to say that "Miss Potter" is one of those movies.

    The movie is a biopic of children's author Beatrix Potter (played by Renee Zellweger), who at 32 was living in late Victorian London, still residing with her disapproving parents. The film follows the publishing of Potter's first book, "The Tale of Peter Rabbit" through her move to the Lake District and the purchase of Hilltop Farm, the farm that now serves as a tourist attraction and museum of Potter's life.

    This movie is darling, probably one of the most beautiful films I've seen this year. Beatrix Potter's relationships with her fictional characters, and with her real-life friends and family, are lovingly drawn. In fact, some of the drawings even come to life briefly, providing magical interactions between the author and her creations. The film's romance between Potter and her publisher, Norman Warne (Ewan McGregor) is equally sweet and heartbreaking. Characters like Warne, his feminist sister Millie (Emily Watson) and Potter's mother (Barbara Flynn) are all quite realistic and great fun to watch.

    Even more amazing is the scenery, especially in the Lake District, where the Potter family spent their summers, and where Beatrix eventually settled down. It's a great example of how amazingly green, hilly and pretty the English countryside is. This movie made me want to pack up, catch the next plane across the Atlantic, and move there.

    "Miss Potter" will probably not recieve the attention it deserves, seeing as it
    only came out in limited release, and has not recieved much fanfare on DVD. This is a shame. This heartwarming, inspiring movie belongs among the pantheon of great underrated films set in England, next to "the Secret Garden" and "Fairy Tale." If you want a movie that will make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside, "Miss Potter" is just what the doctor ordered.

  • Jeunet c'est mon amor!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Delicatessen  (1991)

    Holy cow (pun not intended)! What a great movie "Delicatessen" is. I would watch this movie over and over if I had the chance. I picked this up from the local Hastings foreign film section after seeing it was directed by Jean-Pierre Jeunet, who directed the wonderful "Amelie," a movie you'd only dislike if you had no soul. Even people who hate foreign films love Amelie.

    But I digress. I wasn't sure what to expect. After all, "Amelie" may have been wonderful, but "A Very Long Engagement" turned out to be exactly what the title said it was: very long and, sadly, not very captivating.

    Not so with "Delicatessen." The movie starts out a little strangely, in a postl-apocalyptic world in which folks live by cannibalism. The events of the story unfold in a deli and its attached apartment building, where the butcher/landlord hires maintenance men through a newspaper ad, and then quickly dispatches them to provide meat for his customers. The latest fellow to answer the ad is Louison, a former clown. The charming young man quickly catches the eye of the butcher's daughter, who will do everything she can to save Louison from the cleaver.

    The movie unfolds something like a French "Brazil," complete with a goofy underground resistence squad who provide most of the humor in the second half of the film. Jeunet's visual style even seems to reflect that of British auteur Terry Gilliam, but with more of an eye for specific details and antique decoration. Jeunet's world is appropriately grim and also appropriately French, with its inhabitants looking from head-to-toe like they just stepped out of World War II, and with their apartments tastefully decorated, even if they are somewhat shabby.

    Some of "Delicatessen's" sideplots are unnecessary (one man sits in a flooded room breeding and eating frogs and snails) and don't really add much other than the occasional weird visual. But for the most part, the movie is darkly funny, clever and, in some strange way, really kind of cute. It's perfect for people who love a good romantic comedy, but who also have a taste for darker fare. "Delicatessen," like bar of gourmet dark chocolate, will satisfy urges for both the bitter and the sweet.

  • Just Good Fun

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Night Watch  (2005)

    I realize "Night Watch" didn't garner a whole lot of critical acclaim when it came out stateside. I couldn't care less. Part of this might be due to the fact that I have something of a special connection with this movie, having watched it in Russia before it came out over here. But even then I knew the movie wasn't structurally sound. It is, I will admit, a convoluted, multi-layered, poorly explained piece of work. The edits in the American release don't help much either, with a good fifteen minutes trimmed off of Timur Bekambetov's original Russian film.

    So, if the movie's got all these problems, why bother watching it? For the same reason people watch the "Die Hard" movies or campy eighties b-movie horror flicks: It's damn good fun. The visuals are breathtaking, the characters and concepts are like a cross-breeding between "Constantine," "Lord of the Rings" and a warped version of the "Harry Potter" films. People turn into animals. The main baddie has a sword that comes out of his spine. One woman escapes years of bondage in the form of a stuffed owl. And, of course, there are your traditional vampires and practitioners of Black Magic. It's all kind of silly and highly improbable, but, like I said, if you're looking for a good time and a couple hours of eye candy, this is the movie for you.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement